Splinter Cell Screen shots comparison

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jaljogan
jaljogan

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jaljogan
Member since 2006 • 167 Posts

above in every picture are the screens taken from PS3 `s Splinter cell DA , and the lower are from SC DA Xbox 360 . see the difference for ur self and decide .

--

------------

----------

----------------

 

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

yes another version better on th 360.

i think its about 10/0 now isnt it?

edit: sorry 10/1 :)

Avatar image for UKNintendoFreak
UKNintendoFreak

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 UKNintendoFreak
Member since 2006 • 405 Posts
I've seen this thread too many times....
Avatar image for reaperstoll
reaperstoll

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 reaperstoll
Member since 2006 • 918 Posts
Ubi fails ports, i hope they aren't this bad with R6:Vegas, i am really looking forward to picking it up.
Avatar image for Uptown
Uptown

10348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Uptown
Member since 2002 • 10348 Posts
a crappy port.  we all know PS3 can run this game.  Ubisoft is lazy
Avatar image for jaljogan
jaljogan

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jaljogan
Member since 2006 • 167 Posts
I've seen this thread too many times....UKNintendoFreak
and the conclusion u draw is ?
Avatar image for jeffwulf
jeffwulf

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jeffwulf
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts
Ubisoft should give up.  They suck incredibly at porting games.
Avatar image for jaljogan
jaljogan

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jaljogan
Member since 2006 • 167 Posts
Ubi fails ports, i hope they aren't this bad with R6:Vegas, i am really looking forward to picking it up.reaperstoll
Avatar image for jaljogan
jaljogan

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jaljogan
Member since 2006 • 167 Posts
[QUOTE="reaperstoll"]Ubi fails ports, i hope they aren't this bad with R6:Vegas, i am really looking forward to picking it up.jaljogan

Avatar image for justforlotr2004
justforlotr2004

10935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 justforlotr2004
Member since 2004 • 10935 Posts

[QUOTE="jaljogan"][QUOTE="reaperstoll"]Ubi fails ports, i hope they aren't this bad with R6:Vegas, i am really looking forward to picking it up.jaljogan

lol why did you quote yourself.

Avatar image for Freebird8877
Freebird8877

3407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Freebird8877
Member since 2006 • 3407 Posts
The top is the PS2 version. And btw, this game sucks so hard on PS3, the frame rate is HORRIBLE.
Avatar image for Freebird8877
Freebird8877

3407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Freebird8877
Member since 2006 • 3407 Posts

[QUOTE="jaljogan"][QUOTE="jaljogan"][QUOTE="reaperstoll"]Ubi fails ports, i hope they aren't this bad with R6:Vegas, i am really looking forward to picking it up.justforlotr2004

lol why did you quote yourself.

Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
people are still going on about this? Devs are too lazy to make a good port, the PS3 can easily do those graphics.. look at first party games.. if Ubisoft bothered to learn how to actually make good games for that system.. ports wouldnt look that bad
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
people are still going on about this? Devs are too lazy to make a good port, the PS3 can easily do those graphics.. look at first party games.. if Ubisoft bothered to learn how to actually make good games for that system.. ports wouldnt look that badE_x_i_l_e
they failed with resistence.
Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts

[QUOTE="E_x_i_l_e"]people are still going on about this? Devs are too lazy to make a good port, the PS3 can easily do those graphics.. look at first party games.. if Ubisoft bothered to learn how to actually make good games for that system.. ports wouldnt look that baddaveg1
they failed with resistence.

Resistance was a great game, regardless if it had amazing visuals or not. Plus that was Insomniacs FIRST Next gen game, have you seen screens for Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction?

Avatar image for sunscorch
sunscorch

2512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sunscorch
Member since 2004 • 2512 Posts
its always nice to see a 360 vs PS2 comparison being claimed as a 360 vs PS3.:roll:
Avatar image for Mikerules868
Mikerules868

2153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Mikerules868
Member since 2004 • 2153 Posts

I've seen this thread too many times....UKNintendoFreak

me too. 

Avatar image for Dr-Doctor
Dr-Doctor

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Dr-Doctor
Member since 2006 • 707 Posts
i don't see any difference
Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
Ubisoft strikes again!:(
Avatar image for Legzdins
Legzdins

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Legzdins
Member since 2005 • 569 Posts
just look at resident evil4 ubisoft ported it and even 2 years before it looks like 100x times better on a last gen console (GC) which is 100x times weaker than PC now and PC version just looks horrible horrible.... Ubisoft simply sucks at ports.....
Avatar image for fuman3
fuman3

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 fuman3
Member since 2003 • 602 Posts

its always nice to see a 360 vs PS2 comparison being claimed as a 360 vs PS3.:roll:sunscorch

 

LOL so true.

Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts
The top is the PS2 version. And btw, this game sucks so hard on PS3, the frame rate is HORRIBLE.Freebird8877
No. The PS2 version of SC: DA is completely different.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

its always nice to see a 360 vs PS2 comparison being claimed as a 360 vs PS3.:roll:sunscorch
Uh, this is 360 vs. PS3. Go look at the PS2 screens on GameSpot. The PS2 version is completely different.

The very fact that you thought it was the PS2 version illustrates just how bad the PS3 version looks. :haha:

TCHBO 

Avatar image for Perception1
Perception1

1010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Perception1
Member since 2006 • 1010 Posts

yes another version better on th 360.

i think its about 10/0 now isnt it?

edit: sorry 10/1 :)

daveg1

 

1. Your late, really late.

 

2. It's Ubisoft were talking about here.