Splinter Cell vs MGS4(poll)

Well since the new Splinter Cell will be Xbox 360 exclusive.. Which game do you guys think will be the best tactical shooter?
Both have been high AA-AAA


Huxley_00

tactical shooters? do you even know those games?
oh and SC5 is also on PC

Take a look at my avatar & guess.
Kook18

Metal Gear Solid > Splinter Cell. Splinter Cell does look better than MGS, but MGS has the better story and is much funner. majadamus

funner isn't a word last time i checked

[QUOTE="Kook18"]Take a look at my avatar & guess.
-DarthVader-

Take a look at my avatar & guess.
Kook18

MGS is too average. And Splinter cell beats it anyways.---

fix'd

[QUOTE="Kook18"]Take a look at my avatar & guess.
-DarthVader-

Take a look at my avatar & guess.
Kook18

[QUOTE="---"]MGS is too average. And Splinter cell beats it anyways.ImagineGamer

fix'd

As a pure stealth game Splinter Cell has always had MGS beat IMO. I don't think either of them are "stealth shooters" though... Puckhog04

The MGS boss battles alone destroy Splinter Cell (which is a pretty cool series).



Nike_Air

[QUOTE="Puckhog04"]As a pure stealth game Splinter Cell has always had MGS beat IMO. I don't think either of them are "stealth shooters" though... tegovoltio

The MGS boss battles alone destroy Splinter Cell (which is a pretty cool series).



Nike_Air

Uh, ok. In your opinion, sure, MGS is the better game. I've been playing MGS since the NES Metal Gear games and I love Splinter Cell.

Like i said, as a pure stealth game (stealth mechanics), Splinter Cell has it beaten hands down IMO. You have issues with that?

[QUOTE="ImagineGamer"]

[QUOTE="---"]MGS is too average. And Splinter cell beats it anyways.majadamus

fix'd

you're right. fix'd isn't a word, but ppl use that on teh internet. the ' replaces the "e"
like killed-kill'd

[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"]As a pure stealth game Splinter Cell has always had MGS beat IMO. I don't think either of them are "stealth shooters" though... Puckhog04

The MGS boss battles alone destroy Splinter Cell (which is a pretty cool series).



Nike_Air

Uh, ok. In your opinion, sure, MGS is the better game. I've been playing MGS since the NES Metal Gear games and I love Splinter Cell.

Like i said, as a pure stealth game (stealth mechanics), Splinter Cell has it beaten hands down IMO. You have issues with that?

[QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="ImagineGamer"]

[QUOTE="---"]MGS is too average. And Splinter cell beats it anyways.ImagineGamer

fix'd

you're right. fix'd isn't a word, but ppl use that on teh internet. the ' replaces the "e"
like killed-kill'd

[QUOTE="Puckhog04"]

[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"]As a pure stealth game Splinter Cell has always had MGS beat IMO. I don't think either of them are "stealth shooters" though... tegovoltio

The MGS boss battles alone destroy Splinter Cell (which is a pretty cool series).



Nike_Air

Uh, ok. In your opinion, sure, MGS is the better game. I've been playing MGS since the NES Metal Gear games and I love Splinter Cell.

Like i said, as a pure stealth game (stealth mechanics), Splinter Cell has it beaten hands down IMO. You have issues with that?

I've played all Metal Gear games...not just Metal Gear Solid. :wink:

His question was essentially which is the better "Stealth Shooter"? Which isn't really a genre...in fact, it's a contradiction. I didn't find anything wrong with the animation on any of the SC games. Yeah, there are surreal moves on SC. But you don't think that taking on a fully armed mech on foot is surreal? Both have surreal aspects...they are, afterall, videogames. As a pure stealth game, Splinter Cell wins IMO. If you're looking for a deep story to the game but with less advanced stealth gameplay then i believe MGS is the series for you. That's essentially my thoughts on the two games.

Splinter Cell destroys MGS in quality of controls, realism, gameplay, story. MGS is like a bad anime. None of it makes a lick of sense. Let's not forget SC also has an awesome multiplayer mode. PS: they haven't shut that server down yet. ;)JiveT

MGS has something Splinter Cell doesn't have

Philosophy
TriangleHard

I've played all Metal Gear games...not just Metal Gear Solid. :wink:

His question was essentially which is the better "Stealth Shooter"? Which isn't really a genre...in fact, it's a contradiction. I didn't find anything wrong with the animation on any of the SC games. Yeah, there are surreal moves on SC. But you don't think that taking on a fully armed mech on foot is surreal? Both have surreal aspects...they are, afterall, videogames. As a pure stealth game, Splinter Cell wins IMO. If you're looking for a deep story to the game but with less advanced stealth gameplay then i believe MGS is the series for you. That's essentially my thoughts on the two games.

Puckhog04

[QUOTE="Puckhog04"]

I've played all Metal Gear games...not just Metal Gear Solid. :wink:

His question was essentially which is the better "Stealth Shooter"? Which isn't really a genre...in fact, it's a contradiction. I didn't find anything wrong with the animation on any of the SC games. Yeah, there are surreal moves on SC. But you don't think that taking on a fully armed mech on foot is surreal? Both have surreal aspects...they are, afterall, videogames. As a pure stealth game, Splinter Cell wins IMO. If you're looking for a deep story to the game but with less advanced stealth gameplay then i believe MGS is the series for you. That's essentially my thoughts on the two games.

tegovoltio

The one that was specifically for Europe and Japan? Yea, briefly. I don't recall ever beating the game to be honest but i did play it briefly. It's tough to remember most of the details.

[QUOTE="---"]MGS is too average. And Splinter cell beats it anyways.ImagineGamer

fix'd

Well since the new Splinter Cell will be Xbox 360 exclusive.. Which game do you guys think will be the best stealth shooter?
Both have been high AA-AAA


Huxley_00