S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat (PC exclusive) system requirements + screens

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58674

Minimum System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 Ghz / AMD XP 2200+
512 MB RAM
128 MB DirectX 8.0 compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 5700 / ATI Radeon 9600

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 / AMD 64 X2 5600+
2 GB RAM
512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX / ATI Radeon HD 4850

---

Its nice to see they've had some retail success and are making another part. Hopefully they can afford some debuggers/testers this time : )

Wow I can run it. Good news.

one kinda realistic element i noticed is you can run forward faster than running backwards on stalker

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

I have a ATI Radeon HD 4850, 3GB(technically 4 if it weren't for Vista 32 bit)and 2.3 GHZ Quad-Core, I could run it.:o

map design is alright in the multiplayer, but it's all one settings though that's what makes it boring.

it feels like same theme over and over just different placement of stuff.

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

videogameblow

I have a ATI Radeon HD 4850, 3GB(technically 4 if it weren't for Vista 32 bit)and 2.3 GHZ Quad-Core, I could run it.:o

mitu123

i can max out stalker first one on my 8600 GTS 256 mb, im running xp currently, but for some reason i cant play 2 multiplayer maps dark valley and another the game wont let me select them made these maps are only playable in dx10? i dunno

[QUOTE="videogameblow"]

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

JangoWuzHere

it's the same theme over and over boring.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

I have a ATI Radeon HD 4850, 3GB(technically 4 if it weren't for Vista 32 bit)and 2.3 GHZ Quad-Core, I could run it.:o

i can max out stalker first one on my 8600 GTS 256 mb, im running xp currently, but for some reason i cant play 2 multiplayer maps dark valley and another the game wont let me select them made these maps are only playable in dx10? i dunno

[QUOTE="videogameblow"]

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

JangoWuzHere

I don't blame him, Single Player Campaigns are becoming very insignificant in FPS.

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="videogameblow"]

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

RedFactionFan

I don't blame him, Single Player Campaigns are becoming very insignificant in FPS.

[QUOTE="videogameblow"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

I have a ATI Radeon HD 4850, 3GB(technically 4 if it weren't for Vista 32 bit)and 2.3 GHZ Quad-Core, I could run it.:o

mitu123

i can max out stalker first one on my 8600 GTS 256 mb, im running xp currently, but for some reason i cant play 2 multiplayer maps dark valley and another the game wont let me select them made these maps are only playable in dx10? i dunno

i downloaded the trial off gametap supposed to be whole game.

look though in pic the deathmatch maps pool and dark valley i cant select them

http://i41.tinypic.com/swsso0.jpg

Ahh this gamedoes suck though pretty much.

im sure those 2 maps arent any greater than the other average maps.

i mean they alright, but it's basically just a piece of land some buildings lol the maps arent very vertical or multileveled though.

same goes for crysis about highest spot on map is getting on top of a roof which isnt even very tall.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="videogameblow"]

i can max out stalker first one on my 8600 GTS 256 mb, im running xp currently, but for some reason i cant play 2 multiplayer maps dark valley and another the game wont let me select them made these maps are only playable in dx10? i dunno

i downloaded the trial off gametap supposed to be whole game.

look though in pic the deathmatch maps pool and dark valley i cant select them

http://i41.tinypic.com/swsso0.jpg

I'm very interested in this. I've never played a Stalker game. Will my PC run it well?

Core 2 quad (Q6600 2.4ghz)

3 GB ram

Nvidia 8800 ultra

*Sigh*

I hate my weak Laptop.

I'm very interested in this. I've never played a Stalker game. Will my PC run it well?

Core 2 quad (Q6600 2.4gz)

3 GB ram

Nvideo 8800 ultra

tubbyc

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="videogameblow"]

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

videogameblow

it's the same theme over and over boring.

[QUOTE="videogameblow"]

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] My god stop complaing about STALKERS multyplayer. HAve you ever even touched the single-player?Verge_6

it's the same theme over and over boring.

the fps i grew up with had decent multiplayer and single player

why cant people have both anymore?

multiplayer maps in fps now really arent great anymore.

there's a big tower in this one crysis multiplayer map, but you can only climb hallway up it, you cant even go all the way to the top that's stupid

This is what i mean by vertical

the fps i grew up with had decent multiplayer and single player

why cant people have both anymore?

videogameblow

Why do you have to have multiplayer to begin with? Woe unto the shooter games that want to focus on unforgettable settings, atmosphere, and story, for the twitchy MP gamer only wants to get his daily kick of pwning n00bs in teh face.

^^^ that screenshot there's a platform for people to fight on up there, but you can jump off into the water if ur about to die lol.

i remember back in the day people trying to jump off to get away from me and i kill em in midair falling LOL.

the maps now just feel like a box piece of land with some buildings tossed on it, not vert vertical or multiroomed i dunno hard to explain

but that was fun jumping from that high into the water.

see this giant tower on this crysis deathmatch map named steel mill?

you can only go as high as my crosshair is pointing you cant go all way to the top

why cant you go all the way to the top? stupid the maps arent vertical enough these days

and this crysis map actually is just a box with some buildings thrown around it

Gotta give crytek alittle props for this deathmatch map peak though, not really as vertical as id like to, has alot better design than most of their maps.

if they kept pumping out quality maps like that'd be a ok dev.

Just curious as to why this topic is in System Wars instead of the PC & Mac Games forum?

This hasn't exactly opened up a System Wars related debate :|

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58674

Minimum System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 Ghz / AMD XP 2200+
512 MB RAM
128 MB DirectX 8.0 compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 5700 / ATI Radeon 9600

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 / AMD 64 X2 5600+
2 GB RAM
512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX / ATI Radeon HD 4850

---

Its nice to see they've had some retail success and are making another part. Hopefully they can afford some debuggers/testers this time : )

RedFactionFan

Well, with THOSE system requirements, it's no wonder PC gaming is already dead.

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="videogameblow"]

they need some damn physics in the multiplayer though.

RedFactionFan

I don't blame him, Single Player Campaigns are becoming very insignificant in FPS.

[QUOTE="RedFactionFan"]

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] My god stop complaing about STALKERS multyplayer. HAve you ever even touched the single-player?DragonfireXZ95

I don't blame him, Single Player Campaigns are becoming very insignificant in FPS.

Wow, those minimum requirements are low...

512 Mb ram? lol.

yay! I can run it :D

Just curious as to why this topic is in System Wars instead of the PC & Mac Games forum?

This hasn't exactly opened up a System Wars related debate :|

raynimrod

Greatness :D

[QUOTE="RedFactionFan"]

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58674

Minimum System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 Ghz / AMD XP 2200+
512 MB RAM
128 MB DirectX 8.0 compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 5700 / ATI Radeon 9600

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 / AMD 64 X2 5600+
2 GB RAM
512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX / ATI Radeon HD 4850

---

Its nice to see they've had some retail success and are making another part. Hopefully they can afford some debuggers/testers this time : )

IgGy621985

Well, with THOSE system requirements, it's no wonder PC gaming is already dead.

Low requirements are killing PC gaming????

bump

Low requirements are killing PC gaming????

DeckardLee

Everything is killing PC gaming according to system wars rules.

bump

RedFactionFan

[QUOTE="RedFactionFan"]

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58674

Minimum System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 Ghz / AMD XP 2200+
512 MB RAM
128 MB DirectX 8.0 compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 5700 / ATI Radeon 9600

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 / AMD 64 X2 5600+
2 GB RAM
512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX / ATI Radeon HD 4850

---

Its nice to see they've had some retail success and are making another part. Hopefully they can afford some debuggers/testers this time : )

IgGy621985

Well, with THOSE system requirements, it's no wonder PC gaming is already dead.

[QUOTE="RedFactionFan"]

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58674

Minimum System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 Ghz / AMD XP 2200+
512 MB RAM
128 MB DirectX 8.0 compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 5700 / ATI Radeon 9600

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 / AMD 64 X2 5600+
2 GB RAM
512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card / nVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX / ATI Radeon HD 4850

---

Its nice to see they've had some retail success and are making another part. Hopefully they can afford some debuggers/testers this time : )

IgGy621985

Well, with THOSE system requirements, it's no wonder PC gaming is already dead.

Wait what...? Are you suggesting that these requirements are very high? These are for the most part very standard requirements, none of those parts would be expensive.