why can't it be boston for once*sigh*anyways heres the trailer
www.kotaku.com
This topic is locked from further discussion.
this was a big reveal for the 360...why can't it be boston for once*sigh*anyways heres the trailer
www.kotaku.com
TheShadowLord07
Why choose Boston when there is New York and LA? Much better cities.why can't it be boston for once*sigh*anyways heres the trailer
www.kotaku.com
TheShadowLord07
[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]Why choose Boston when there is New York and LA? Much better cities.why can't it be boston for once*sigh*anyways heres the trailer
www.kotaku.com
i5750at4Ghz
cuase I'm im from boston. of course I want to see my my city feature in game :P
going from over 30 buttons to 0?
how can they possibly pull this off :?
Dead-Memories
On screen displays and voice commands.
going from over 30 buttons to 0?
how can they possibly pull this off :?
I'm guessing the controller will be on screen now. This game is a Kenect plus controller game guys. Put you torches away. Thats the second person that has said this. Can I get a source? I would be kind of disappointed if it did use a controller.[QUOTE="dreman999"][QUOTE="iammason"] I'm guessing the controller will be on screen now.iammasonThis game is a Kenect plus controller game guys. Put you torches away. Thats the second person that has said this. Can I get a source? I would be kind of disappointed if it did use a controller.
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/09/15/steel-battalion-heavy-armor-goes-button-free-on-kinect/
Well, this is ... unexpected. The "Steel Battalion" franchise, perhaps best remembered for its 1,980-button controller, is coming to a platform that requires none. Microsoft has just announced that From Software will bring Steel Battalion: Heavy Armor to the 360 via Kinect. Well, technically, Microsoft just said the game will have "Kinect Enablement," so we guess there's still a chance you'll be able to play with a standard controller, we can't say for sure.
Meaning both kinect and controller used.
Thats the second person that has said this. Can I get a source? I would be kind of disappointed if it did use a controller.[QUOTE="iammason"][QUOTE="dreman999"] This game is a Kenect plus controller game guys. Put you torches away.dreman999
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/09/15/steel-battalion-heavy-armor-goes-button-free-on-kinect/
Well, this is ... unexpected. The "Steel Battalion" franchise, perhaps best remembered for its 1,980-button controller, is coming to a platform that requires none. Microsoft has just announced that From Software will bring Steel Battalion: Heavy Armor to the 360 via Kinect. Well, technically, Microsoft just said the game will have "Kinect Enablement," so we guess there's still a chance you'll be able to play with a standard controller, we can't say for sure.
Meaning both kinect and controller used.
That doesn't mean anything. Kinect Enablement isn't the same as saying "it will use a controller". That is just joystiq's assumption. I'll wait until actual details are revealed. Until then, I'm hoping it is controller free.Why choose Boston when there is New York and LA? Much better cities.i5750at4Ghz
I am not from the US, but I love Boston. It is the most beautiful of the US cities I visited.
Why not seattle? the only time it ever gets in games is when russians decide to invade west cost, like world in conflictwhy can't it be boston for once*sigh*anyways heres the trailer
www.kotaku.com
TheShadowLord07
they didnt drop it the devs makign it were getting sued. or atleast thats what I heard.mleh.
MS dropped the MechWarrior IP for this >.>
HavocV3
they didnt drop it the devs makign it were getting sued. or atleast thats what I heard.[QUOTE="HavocV3"]
mleh.
MS dropped the MechWarrior IP for this >.>
TheShadowLord07
whaaa no way, the new MechWarrior looked like it would be sooo good...really felt a sense of size, glad they didnt have them tower over citys
they didnt drop it the devs makign it were getting sued. or atleast thats what I heard.What? MS Sold the MechWarrior IP back to its original owners, alongside Crimson Skies. No one is being sued for all the information I have heard, the only mess was a Mech appearing in the teaser trailer that was not supposed to be legally shown under the MW IP - it was ripped off a Japanese tabletop games maker by Battletech makers from what I recall. Which is great. Microsoft pushed MW into the mud after MW4 Mercenaries.[QUOTE="HavocV3"]
mleh.
MS dropped the MechWarrior IP for this >.>
TheShadowLord07
[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]they didnt drop it the devs makign it were getting sued. or atleast thats what I heard.What? MS Sold the MechWarrior IP back to its original owners, alongside Crimson Skies. No one is being sued for all the information I have heard, the only mess was a Mech appearing in the teaser trailer that was not supposed to be legally shown under the MW IP - it was ripped off a Japanese tabletop games maker by Battletech makers from what I recall. Which is great. Microsoft pushed MW into the mud after MW4 Mercenaries.[QUOTE="HavocV3"]
mleh.
MS dropped the MechWarrior IP for this >.>
skrat_01
once sec getting the link:
The future of Mechwarrior 5 is a little up in the air today, with Harmony Gold – the media company that holds the rights to the Robotech universe in the US – commencing legal action against the upcoming mech title. Legal threats are being sent out to gaming websites as you read this, Harmony Gold demanding that they pull down the trailer for Mechwarrior 5. Why? It's a long story. See, Mechwarrior (and its daddy, BattleTech) haven't always used original designs for their mech. They sometimes straight up stole them from existing series, particularly Japan's Macross, which in the US forms the first part of the Robotech trilogy. So BattleTech and Harmony Gold – who hold the Robotech rights in the West – went to court in 1996. End result? BattleTech (and by extension Mechwarrior) ceased using mech designs lifted from Macross, and instead employed only mechs they had themselves designed. Harmony Gold's complaint in this instance is that the Mechwarrior 5 trailer uses designs that they own the trademark to. Now, they may have a point – the red mech in the image above looks a little like the Tomahawk Destroid from Macross (pictured below). But only a little. Surely not enough to warrant legal action. Anyway, at the moment, the only legal threats we know about are those made to IGN. There's no comment yet from Piranha Games, the team working on Mechwarrior 5, or from Harmony Gold, explaining just what their beef is, and whether they'd be happy with edits to the game or are out for blood. We'll update when we hear more. MechWarrior 5 Trouble Brewin
this what I meant when the devs(did not know who are the names of the dev trying to make MW5) being sued.
What? MS Sold the MechWarrior IP back to its original owners, alongside Crimson Skies. No one is being sued for all the information I have heard, the only mess was a Mech appearing in the teaser trailer that was not supposed to be legally shown under the MW IP - it was ripped off a Japanese tabletop games maker by Battletech makers from what I recall. Which is great. Microsoft pushed MW into the mud after MW4 Mercenaries.[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]they didnt drop it the devs makign it were getting sued. or atleast thats what I heard.
TheShadowLord07
once sec getting the link:
The future of Mechwarrior 5 is a little up in the air today, with Harmony Gold – the media company that holds the rights to the Robotech universe in the US – commencing legal action against the upcoming mech title. Legal threats are being sent out to gaming websites as you read this, Harmony Gold demanding that they pull down the trailer for Mechwarrior 5. Why? It's a long story. See, Mechwarrior (and its daddy, BattleTech) haven't always used original designs for their mech. They sometimes straight up stole them from existing series, particularly Japan's Macross, which in the US forms the first part of the Robotech trilogy. So BattleTech and Harmony Gold – who hold the Robotech rights in the West – went to court in 1996. End result? BattleTech (and by extension Mechwarrior) ceased using mech designs lifted from Macross, and instead employed only mechs they had themselves designed. Harmony Gold's complaint in this instance is that the Mechwarrior 5 trailer uses designs that they own the trademark to. Now, they may have a point – the red mech in the image above looks a little like the Tomahawk Destroid from Macross (pictured below). But only a little. Surely not enough to warrant legal action. Anyway, at the moment, the only legal threats we know about are those made to IGN. There's no comment yet from Piranha Games, the team working on Mechwarrior 5, or from Harmony Gold, explaining just what their beef is, and whether they'd be happy with edits to the game or are out for blood. We'll update when we hear more. MechWarrior 5 Trouble Brewin
this what I meant when the devs(did not know who are the names of the dev trying to make MW5) being sued.
Yeah that's what I meant, in regard to the "Mech appearing in the teaser trailer that was not supposed to be legally shown under the MW IP - it was ripped off a Japanese tabletop games maker by Battletech makers from what I recall"; the article is a year odd old.I don't think anyone was eventually sued, I'm pretty sure the game is well into development.
Hopefully it turns out well, either way MW Living Legends is a great substitute.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment