[QUOTE="SUD123456"][QUOTE="Shewgenja"]
The only down-sides I see to this is that we have no idea how close Ballmer's relationships are to the gaming community and it also shows a distinct lack of faith in the team that Mattrick had working under him.
Shewgenja
It's the exact opposite of what you said.
He isn't naming a replacement immediately because he has confidence that the whole division won't fall apart, thus he can take the time to think it through especially in light of his plans to restructure the overall executive team. That's a good thing.
It is also good that he will get a chance to hear unfiltered reports.
Au contrair. He has been planning to do this for a few months at least and had his own cabal carrying out the Q/A. So, yeah, he wasn't able to find a suitable person to take Mattrick's role before he was donesville. http://allthingsd.com/20130623/update-microsoft-restructuring-nears-as-execs-top-fret-over-their-fate/[/QUOTE]I am well aware of his ongoing restructure plans...seeing as I mentioned it in my post :)
You have to think as a senior executive. If things are messed up and you don't trust the people 2 levels down, you will automatically put someone in between, even if it is an interim measure. ie. the division will report temporarily report to another of your direct reports. If you don't, you automatically inherit all the problems of two levels down which means you will be ineffective in your position because you will be fire fighting. That is pretty much unacceptable, especially if you are the CEO.
When you don't immediately replace, it says that you think the division can carry on for a while because management 2 levels down is capable of running the day to day.
Just because you don't immediately promote doesn't mean that you don't have good people 2 levels down. There may simply not be someone ready quite yet. Or you may feel it prudent to do an extended search. This is very common at the executive level.
Log in to comment