Texture hungry games always better looking on 360. period.

Yeah, because we all know how important jaggies are when playing UT3 online

:roll:

I like to examine the jaggies while I casually take bullets to my chest..........

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Shad0ki11

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Everybody that surf the internet and checks gaming websites should know by now that most or the majority of multiplats are superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason and people who doesn't know about that should be told asap. Pass the word around, be a friend and tell a friend to tell a friend, that most if not all multiplats are better on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason.

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Shad0ki11

[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

stika

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look better then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

The problem with saying that the 360 is better than PS3 at something is that we still don't know what the PS3's full capabilities are. For all we know the 360 still has some headroom itself.

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Rikusaki

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

buh buh buh teh jaggies is what fuels teh warses tiger35010

i want to put that in my sig! plz, that is like the post of the year!!! :D :D

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Shad0ki11

...lol, yeah...oh and how do u know thats the limit? the devs even said they wish they put more time into it. cliffy b on an GT interview on the XBL marketplace said that gears can advance alot, he figured he didn't use about 80% of its power.

Everybody that surf the internet and checks gaming websites should know by now that most or the majority of multiplats are superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason and people who doesn't know about that should be told asap. Pass the word around, be a friend and tell a friend to tell a friend, that most if not all multiplats are better on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason.

ReverseCycology

That is changing! CoD4 are equal on each platform. Burnout Paradise looks much nicer on the PS3 along with Oblivion. Plus to tell you the truth other than the freezing issues the PS3 has with Assassin's Creed, I couldn't tell the two apart!

[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

akuma303x

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look better then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

Rikusaki

I was thinking the reason Mass Effect is considered X360's graphical ceiling is because the X360 clearly isn't powerful enough to run the engine successfully.

:|

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Everybody that surf the internet and checks gaming websites should know by now that most or the majority of multiplats are superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason and people who doesn't know about that should be told asap. Pass the word around, be a friend and tell a friend to tell a friend, that most if not all multiplats are better on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason.

gdp72

That is changing! CoD4 are equal on each platform. Burnout Paradise looks much nicer on the PS3 along with Oblivion. Plus to tell you the truth other than the freezing issues the PS3 has with Assassin's Creed, I couldn't tell the two apart!

Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Rikusaki

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look better then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

O.o what, Mass effect is new like uncharted....it gets better just like the ps3...after the first year all platforms make graphics jump, like with gears on the 360. uncharted is the gears on the ps3, visually, it ups the bar for that console.

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Shad0ki11

According to your reasonning Call of duty3 is the ps3's limit... Optimization anyone?

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

stika

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

thank you :D

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look better then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

CelineDion

I was thinking the reason Mass Effect is considered X360's graphical ceiling is because the X360 clearly isn't powerful enough to run the engine successfully.

:|

lol i hope thats sarcasm because even epic said the ue3 engine runs better on the 360 and the ue3.5 makes it about equal on both.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Everybody that surf the internet and checks gaming websites should know by now that most or the majority of multiplats are superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason and people who doesn't know about that should be told asap. Pass the word around, be a friend and tell a friend to tell a friend, that most if not all multiplats are better on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason.

gdp72

That is changing! CoD4 are equal on each platform. Burnout Paradise looks much nicer on the PS3 along with Oblivion. Plus to tell you the truth other than the freezing issues the PS3 has with Assassin's Creed, I couldn't tell the two apart!

See thats the funny thing, people mostly cows think the PS3 is more powerful. If that was the truth these games would be leaps and bounds superior in everyway on the PS3 over the 360, but its not, most of them are identical. So sure Sony games might look nice but the bottom line most if not all multiplats will be the same or superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason. A console cheaper can produce the same quality and even better than a console that still have the highest starting price.

Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...

stika

You would think since the PS3 came out a full year after the 360! Wasn't that game out within the first 6 months of launch for the 360?

Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...stika

Better is better. Period.

[QUOTE="stika"]Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...unasyn

Better is better. Period.

not when there is a one year diference, by the way, that was a very poor damage controll, a real reply would be this:

[QUOTE="stika"]

Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...

gdp72

You would think since the PS3 came out a full year after the 360! Wasn't that game out within the first 6 months of launch for the 360?

to which he has a strong point

BTW unasyn, i just hope you remeber those words when UT comes out on the 360 about six months later then the PS3 version. its a prooven fact that the longer a console is out the better its games look

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

stika

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

lol at tc and those that agree w/ him. It has been affirmed by systemwars majority that uncharted is,bar nothing, THE BEST LOOKING console game on the market. Why? Because it has superior textures to any other game on consoles. And the pres of Epic stated explicitly that UT3 is more grpx intensive than Gears. Proof in the pudding? Indeed.BobHipJames

to that ut 3 statment, yes because it uses a new verison on the engine not the ue3.5 but newer then just ue3. The statment doesn't say it looks better on the ps3, heck they could be saying pc ut 3 ver pc gears!

and with the uncharted is bar and has the best textures is majorty, majority doesn't mean truth....u know how cows say there are more lemmings then cows...why is that there are so many cows that used to say that? ...hmmm seems we have some "stealthy" cows out there...lol and no uncharted does not have the best textures, it in the fortress and anything that isn't in the jungle and the jungle rocks. looks like half life 2 dated graphics. Is that bad? no, is tha the best? no. ppl just like there rocks....rocks don't make a game look good overall. oh but yes, uncharted does have nice water and a good looking boat...everything else is average....cows just like the game too much because its the first game too look good on their console so they praise it so much.

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

BobHipJames

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

did Bioware say they used 100% of the 360´s capabilities? same thing

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

Rikusaki

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look better then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

[QUOTE="stika"]

Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...

gdp72

You would think since the PS3 came out a full year after the 360! Wasn't that game out within the first 6 months of launch for the 360?

extra dev time=better use of the engine....they later adpat the ps3 visuals to the 360 and they really do look exactly the same...but cows don't wanna think that because they ignore that 360 games get updates and lemmings don't go out all wild when something looks better from an update...

See thats the funny thing, people mostly cows think the PS3 is more powerful. If that was the truth these games would be leaps and bounds superior in everyway on the PS3 over the 360, but its not, most of them are identical. So sure Sony games might look nice but the bottom line most if not all multiplats will be the same or superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason. A console cheaper can produce the same quality and even better than a console that still have the highest starting price.

ReverseCycology

Well since most developers seem to be switching to the PS3 as the platform to develop on, that is going to change. Example being Burnout Paradise. You will never see a huge gap though like some cows would hope because the two systems are pretty much on par with one another. Well, except in realiablity!:P

[QUOTE="stika"]Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...unasyn

Better is better. Period.

not really....if u really want to say that, then look at turok on ps3 verses the 360...the ps3 verison is like a xbox 1 game....

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

stika

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Sure, but we already know what the 360's graphical limit is as of now, which is Mass effect. We still have to see the Playstation 3's graphics pushed to the limit.

-_-;;

BobHipJames

why do you say mass effect is the 360´s limit?

Maybe because we haven't seen anything look beter then Mass Effect on the 360. The PS3 continues to improve its graphics with newer games while the 360 stays pretty much the same. Thats why some multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3. And it will only get better.

well i have yet to see anything better on the PS3 then uncharted, are you telling me that the PS3 has also reached its limit?

he was just making a point about consoles and devloping, ppl say the 360 reached it limit. which it hasn't either. Devs say the same thing with the 360...so yeah :)

[QUOTE="unasyn"]

[QUOTE="stika"]Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...stika

Better is better. Period.

not when there is a one year diference

Still better. Thanks for playing.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

See thats the funny thing, people mostly cows think the PS3 is more powerful. If that was the truth these games would be leaps and bounds superior in everyway on the PS3 over the 360, but its not, most of them are identical. So sure Sony games might look nice but the bottom line most if not all multiplats will be the same or superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason. A console cheaper can produce the same quality and even better than a console that still have the highest starting price.

gdp72

Well since most developers seem to be switching to the PS3 as the platform to develop on, that is going to change. Example being Burnout Paradise. You will never see a huge gap though like some cows would hope because the two systems are pretty much on par with one another. Well, except in realiablity!:P

developers seem to be switching? out of all the high profile developers Burnout is the only game i can remember that has the PS3 as the lead platform (i could be wrong though)

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="unasyn"]

[QUOTE="stika"]Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...unasyn

Better is better. Period.

not when there is a one year diference

Still better. Thanks for playing.

remember those words when UT comes out for the 360 is all i have to say ;)

The PS3 is hard to develop for,

so it will take some time for the PS3 to equal the 360

To tell the truth i can't even tell the difference when playing a multi plat, there the same to me.

to which he has a strong point

BTW unasyn, i just hope you remeber those words when UT comes out on the 360 about six months later then the PS3 version. its a prooven fact that the longer a console is out the better its games look

stika

Possibly but I wouldn't doubt that they port that game over and you will notice very little differance between the two.

No one can tell who is going to have the Best graphics right now... BUT, all of you saying that one or the other has games WAY better just need their eyes checked... There are only slight differences and they both look great... Way better is like this gen VS the ps2 or xbox1...

And by the way, never heard of Bottleneck??? The ps3 and even the 360 for that matter(but less) have more processing power that they need for their GPU's... Don't know if you are pc gamers too, but imagine you have a quad core, but you are using a 1900xtx or little worth for sony with these kind of cpu??? No matter how much processing power you have, it will ALLWAYS be limited by your gpu capabilities... that's it... Having said that, we'll still have bett er looking games in the future because of devellopers optimization, so just enjoy and don't expect anything revolutionary till next gen of consoles or getting a pc...

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

See thats the funny thing, people mostly cows think the PS3 is more powerful. If that was the truth these games would be leaps and bounds superior in everyway on the PS3 over the 360, but its not, most of them are identical. So sure Sony games might look nice but the bottom line most if not all multiplats will be the same or superior on the 360 over the PS3 for whatever reason. A console cheaper can produce the same quality and even better than a console that still have the highest starting price.

gdp72

Well since most developers seem to be switching to the PS3 as the platform to develop on, that is going to change. Example being Burnout Paradise. You will never see a huge gap though like some cows would hope because the two systems are pretty much on par with one another. Well, except in realiablity!:P

click the link in my sig, the burnout paradise devs take consoles. u know why they used the ps3 as the lead sku? to figure it out and not make a mush 360 port. they didn't have it as the lead sku just because its powerful'er...which it isn't! they rather are equal with their strengths and weaknesses, 360=graphics ps3=physics.

the devs actually said the ps3 in reality wasn't the lead sku, the ps3 just had the most programmers working on it..thus more money going into it! hehe....click the link in my sig to their podcast.

[QUOTE="stika"]

to which he has a strong point

BTW unasyn, i just hope you remeber those words when UT comes out on the 360 about six months later then the PS3 version. its a prooven fact that the longer a console is out the better its games look

gdp72

Possibly but I wouldn't doubt that they port that game over and you will notice very little differance between the two.

i have little thoughts of that, but to quote unsyn

Better is better. Period.

unasyn

dont worry (this jab is aimed at unasyn not you, i actually agree with you)

[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="unasyn"]

[QUOTE="stika"]Oblivion on the PS3 was launched one year later...unasyn

Better is better. Period.

not when there is a one year diference

Still better. Thanks for playing.

lol sorry u fail, do u'r research. look at shivering isle on the 360...it has the updated graphics in it...lol and if u don't buy that, there is still an update u download for oblvion to make it better....the goty edition in stores has the update already on the disc.

developers seem to be switching? out of all the high profile developers Burnout is the only game i can remember that has the PS3 as the lead platform (i could be wrong though)

stika

I'm sure not all will but a small trend seems to be developing.