thats what i get for being a graphic **** (RE5)

i get ripped off for 8$ for a month of XBL

i saw the comparason screenshots of RE5 and 360 had slightly better textures so yes i got it for 360.... o but wait u need to be a gold member for online :roll:

never again. lesson learned. next time mutiplats will always be on PS3. free online FTW

Wow.

erm.. How didn't you see this coming. Everybody knows you have to pay for gold. Plus it's cheap so who cares?

erm.. How didn't you see this coming. Everybody knows you have to pay for gold. Plus it's cheap so who cares?

lundy86_4

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

erm.. How didn't you see this coming. Everybody knows you have to pay for gold. Plus it's cheap so who cares?

Jade_Monkey

Realistically though it is expensive to run that kind of service. I would like free Gold membership, but Microsoft likes their money.

this smells like flamebait

you didn't know you had to pay for xbox live gold??

where have you been living under..? a rock?

you didn't know that playing online requires XBL gold?

i feel sorry for you TC :?

wow... surprised?

$8 a month?

so sick of people complaining about 50$ a year for xbl. Honestly, I gladly pay for it. Its leaps and bounds better the PSN. Its less than 5$ a month. If you cant afford that, then you shouldnt spend 300$ on a gaming machine and 60$ on games. Bottom line.

Don't think you own an xbox, or you hate the xbox, or hell, both.

the time of 360 is over

PS3 is winning in game exclusives/better games

sillaris

That was your post from another thread, and i think it just supports my theory.

isn't XBL like $4.25 a month?

so sick of people complaining about 50$ a year for xbl. Honestly, I gladly pay for it. Its leaps and bounds better the PSN. Its less than 5$ a month. If you cant afford that, then you shouldnt spend 300$ on a gaming machine and 60$ on games. Bottom line.

h575309

don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

do some reserch, google the screenshots. it does have sharper textures

Just the fact that you have to pay for online annoys me. PS3 & PC >

so sick of people complaining about 50$ a year for xbl. Honestly, I gladly pay for it. Its leaps and bounds better the PSN. Its less than 5$ a month. If you cant afford that, then you shouldnt spend 300$ on a gaming machine and 60$ on games. Bottom line.

h575309

so sick of people complaining about 50$ a year for xbl. Honestly, I gladly pay for it. Its leaps and bounds better the PSN. Its less than 5$ a month. If you cant afford that, then you shouldnt spend 300$ on a gaming machine and 60$ on games. Bottom line.

h575309

don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolsillaris

do some reserch, google the screenshots. it does have sharper textures

isn't XBL like $4.25 a month?

GTR_FX

60 Euro per year sounds expansive for me :roll:

isn't XBL like $4.25 a month?

GTR_FX

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolGTR_FX

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

[QUOTE="GTR_FX"]

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

The textures are sharper because they are higher resolution textures, you silly goose.

[QUOTE="GTR_FX"]

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"][QUOTE="GTR_FX"]

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

swazidoughman

The textures are sharper because they are higher resolution textures, you silly goose.

[QUOTE="h575309"]

so sick of people complaining about 50$ a year for xbl. Honestly, I gladly pay for it. Its leaps and bounds better the PSN. Its less than 5$ a month. If you cant afford that, then you shouldnt spend 300$ on a gaming machine and 60$ on games. Bottom line.

Sully28

don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

The PS3 can't do reflections. :lol:

[QUOTE="GTR_FX"]

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

nope try again

[QUOTE="GTR_FX"]

[QUOTE="S-Slambo"]don't forget the bad screen tearing the 360 version has. both versions look identical with some color differences and extra jags...360 does NOT have better textures. lolS-Slambo

no your wrong, the 360 version has better textures, shaders, sharper shadows, more AA, better particle effects, and less framerate issues

ign and giant bomb both said the 360 looks better

also:

PS3 TOP 360 BOTTOM

youre really going to say you dont see better textures on 360?

The differences are so miniscule... :|
Why don't You have a monster PC if it matters that much? :|

[QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

erm.. How didn't you see this coming. Everybody knows you have to pay for gold. Plus it's cheap so who cares?

lundy86_4

Realistically though it is expensive to run that kind of service. I would like free Gold membership, but Microsoft likes their money.

Actually no it isn't expensive. MS is charging you because they can. PSN has dedicated servers and it's free why can't MS do the same.

ur supriced that u had to pay to play on live? from the pictures people posted i think the 360 version look better.iam2green

Well a stiff picture doeisnt comapare to motion. ALso TC where have uv been. Of course you gatta pay to play online on 360. Thats why I mainly get all my games on PS3.

I can afford to pay the small fee for the superior online service. I only pay $29.99/year.

And this comes as a surprise...how? What games on Live don't require Gold (honest question)?SteezyZ

R U Osama Bin Laden or something...you must be because only a person living in a cave wouldn't know Live costs $40/year.

*every* 360 game requires a gold membership to play online. :|