the buggiest game developer.......

bethesta [however you spell it] i love they;re games and all.....but every game i played from them is mad buggy and needs to be patched. opinions?

Bethesda no contest

Definitely Obsidian in my experience.Xaero_Gravity

[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"]Definitely Obsidian in my experience.clyde46

Bethesda or DICE

Bethesda, not even close.

Without Bethesda's bug it won't be a Bethesda game. Plus you got to admit, some of the bugs are hilarious. :P

I love Osidian to death, but they've definitely got more against them on the bug side than Bethesda has..='(

Valve, Rockstar or Naughty Dog. Badosh

Valve, Rockstar or Naughty Dog. Badosh

[QUOTE="Badosh"]Valve, Rockstar or Naughty Dog. Xaero_Gravity

[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"][QUOTE="Badosh"]Valve, Rockstar or Naughty Dog. Badosh

Stfu.Xaero_Gravity

Bethesda or DICE

seanmcloughlin

You missed me when DMC4 went multiplatform. And learn2stfu.Xaero_Gravity

Xaero, Xaero, Xaero.

stfu

Valve, Rockstar or Naughty Dog. Badosh

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Bethesda or DICE

BrunoBRS

Big name company? Obsidian, hands down.

Actual developer who releases the buggiest games? That title goes to a company none of us probably know the name for, or the name of the game for that matter. Do you know how many games have been made, like, ever lol? Realistically speaking of course, we won't know, hehe.

Out of the better known ones, Bethesda or Obsidian. Their bugs are usually the result of too much ambition... when you have a game like Skyrim with so many characters and places, bug testing must be pretty damn hard.

To be fair, Bethesda's games are much more complex than other games. With the amount of things that you can do in the game, it's understandable that the game would have a few bugs that they didn't find until millions of people were playing the game...superclocked

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Bethesda or DICE

BrunoBRS

Eh, their BF3 stuff was pretty buggy at launch. Even after the beta I would fall through the map and see the occasional long necked soldier. But from a dev who primarily deals with online I think poor net code can be counted as being buggy. Like bad hit detection and getting hit behind walls etc. It's not entirely in their control but DICE are notorious for slapping shit into their BF games and then hoping it works, then have to completely change or fix it with patches later on

Obsidian are 100 times worse than bethesdaRR360DD

Yeah but they usually have a much better base game than Bethesda. 

Ubisoft

bethesta [however you spell it] i love they;re games and all.....but every game i played from them is mad buggy and needs to be patched. opinions?

youngmurk911

Bethesda is also one of the most ambitious. It's easy to be bug free when you go through the easy way and make 5 hour linear campaigns. When games are open world, have dozens of quests, hundreds of NPCs you can interact with, thousands of objects with their own physics, etc, on the other hand, bugs happen.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Obsidian are 100 times worse than bethesdaStringerboy

At least Obsidian knows how to write.

Without a doubt, it has to be Codemasters. Their F1 series is an annual bug-fest.

It's a toss up between Obsidian and Bethesda

Stellar Stone. Idk if its just Big Rigs but that entire game was just one big bug.

Bethesda and obsidion are pretty much tied.

Cd Projekt: They release their games too early and with too many bugs. The combat and the menus were both broken when Witcher 2 came out. 

I know people go on about how they support their games etc. I preordered that and played it when it came out. It shouldn't have been released in that state.