This topic is locked from further discussion.
Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.akuma303x
those games are being mado for the 360, and ported to the PS3, don't expect the PS3 version to look better...
[QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.farrell2k
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
[QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.Lazy_Boy88
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
Lair ?
That nothing that can't be done on the 360.
Its looks rather average as well with its downgraded self.
[QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.Lazy_Boy88
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
no the 360s gpu is stronger but the ps3 has a better cpu but its hard to develope for and there are lots of sites that say that. so in the end no console will blow another away this gen in terms of graphics.
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.-Ninja_Dog-
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
Lair ?
That nothing that can't be done on the 360.
Its looks rather average as well with its downgraded self.
1080p@30FPS, 32x32km maps measuring 4 gigs+ each, 25 gigabyte on the Blu Ray disc, 25,000 soldiers on a single map, hundreds of dragons, progressive mesh, fluid dynamics.
You lose.
Plus, Julian said that the map size, number of soldiers, animations, AI, progressive mesh, and fluid dynamics are only possible on the Playstation 3. For more failure, that is.
Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.akuma303x
Call of Duty 4 DOES NOT HAVE RAGDOLL PHYSICS. It has the same canned death animations as Call of Duty 2, and you're trying to tell me that it's some kind of milestone and beats out anything on the PS3?
First of all, GT5, MGS4, Little Big Planet, Heavenly Sword, Lair, and Uncharted: Drake's Fortune (which I know for absolute fact looks better than RE5 in it's current build) should have already convinced you that's absolutely not true.
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.Redfingers
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
Lair ?
That nothing that can't be done on the 360.
Its looks rather average as well with its downgraded self.
1080p@30FPS, 32x32km maps measuring 4 gigs+ each, 25 gigabyte on the Blu Ray disc, 25,000 soldiers on a single map, hundreds of dragons, progressive mesh, fluid dynamics.
You lose.
QFT!!! You have my permission to claim ownage! ;)[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.Redfingers
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
It's just different architechture. It all depends on how much the developer is willing to do with the Cell to get games to look good. We've already seen PS3 is plenty capable of things 360 isn't with Lair.
Lair ?
That nothing that can't be done on the 360.
Its looks rather average as well with its downgraded self.
1080p@30FPS, 32x32km maps measuring 4 gigs+ each, 25 gigabyte on the Blu Ray disc, 25,000 soldiers on a single map, hundreds of dragons, progressive mesh, fluid dynamics.
You lose.
progressive mesh? ok, wow. everyone is missing the point. The point is simple, look at gow for the PS2. Those graphics on that system was once thought impossible. And yet it was pulled off. The idea that the PS3 can do something like progressive mesh and you think the 360 cant is ignorant. Not you, the idea. Everything the PS3 can do ( aside fromthe number ofparticle effects and such) The 360 can do. Not to mention several 360 games have texture depth that embarrisses the PS3's texture capabilities. But I guaruntee if an engine is made fully for the 360 or PS3, The graphics we see now will double in quality. And no I'm not ignorant, I just know that the efficiency of a GPU is the leading factor in what can be created with it. I know that both have great GPU's. I know the 360's is a bit more efficient, but cell helps the RSX in that department. ( although reguardless the 360's GPU is more efficient.) Look the game engine is what I mean. Not graphical effects. All game engines have those.[QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.farrell2k
However, The RSX isn't the only part to the GPU. The Cell makes the PS3 capable of greater graphics. So, The PS3 version SHOULD have better graphics.
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
[QUOTE="farrell2k"][QUOTE="akuma303x"]Is the game engine used to create the game is the biggeest advantage this gen. "I see RE5 and COD4, both wich were on 360 hardware and real 360's running them." I realize they look better than any game on PS3. I know they will be on the PS3. I knowthe PS3 should have better graphics. I wold have to say it's clear the game's engine is the biggest factor with graphics.Vaizard34
However, The RSX isn't the only part to the GPU. The Cell makes the PS3 capable of greater graphics. So, The PS3 version SHOULD have better graphics.
The ATI's GPU is superior to the PS3's modified Geforce 7900. The 360 SHOULD have better graphics.
However, The RSX isn't the only part to the GPU. The Cell makes the PS3 capable of greater graphics. So, The PS3 version SHOULD have better graphics.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment