I usually post pics when I make these threads but this time I'll just post this.
I think its sufficient
Nuff said
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I usually post pics when I make these threads but this time I'll just post this.
I think its sufficient
Nuff said
[QUOTE="Impress3"]YOU AGAIN?! You think people forgot that you basically already made this topic before haha.....but i gotta admit that video you got there does look very cool!I usually post pics when I make these threads but this time I'll just post this.
I think its sufficient
Nuff said
ms555
NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
YOU AGAIN?! You think people forgot that you basically already made this topic before haha.....but i gotta admit that video you got there does look very cool![QUOTE="ms555"][QUOTE="Impress3"]
I usually post pics when I make these threads but this time I'll just post this.
I think its sufficient
Nuff said
Impress3
NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
No, it's generic and extremely over rated.[QUOTE="Impress3"][QUOTE="ms555"] YOU AGAIN?! You think people forgot that you basically already made this topic before haha.....but i gotta admit that video you got there does look very cool!SAGE_OF_FIRE
NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
No, it's generic and extremely over rated. i think so too. it took me hours to get used to the control in KZ2, and KZ3 isnt any better.YOU AGAIN?! You think people forgot that you basically already made this topic before haha.....but i gotta admit that video you got there does look very cool!ms555
NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
No, it's generic and extremely over rated. i wouldnt go as far as to say that.... i think this TC guy over rates it, but overall the game is still very good and very good looking.... my only problem is that the TC guy literally, and i mean literally, thinks this game is like taken from Jesus' Bible! But seriously the game is still very good, i just think there are plenty of better games to. What killzone does right that alot of other scifi games dont is the feel it has, it has a very epic, all out war feel that alot of games only use background images and cutscenes to create. In that regard, Killzone is one of a kind. I will give it that[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="Impress3"]No, it's generic and extremely over rated. i think so too. it took me hours to get used to the control in KZ2, and KZ3 isnt any better.NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
taterfrickintot
Same, not impressed with the campaign and the multiplayer is over shadowed by other games *cod 4 ahem ahem*
i think so too. it took me hours to get used to the control in KZ2, and KZ3 isnt any better.[QUOTE="taterfrickintot"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] No, it's generic and extremely over rated. HailedJohnDman
Same, not impressed with the campaign and the multiplayer is over shadowed by other games *cod 4 ahem ahem*
It's single player is bad and it's multiplayer is too similar to cod (which is a bad thing).I cannot deny, that gif is sick!! But that whole "OMG this game is an religious experience" **** you seem to be on is for the birds.
Teh motion blurz :D Also, someone please explain how that last support to the left collapsed?rpgs_shall_rule
unusually strong winds? lol
Yeah thats pre made destruction....not impressed good sirwalkingdreamsame. BFBC2, you can collapse almost any building by yourself, without the scripted crap. and looks about just as cool.
[QUOTE="walkingdream"]Yeah thats pre made destruction....not impressed good sirtaterfrickintotsame. BFBC2, you can collapse almost any building by yourself, without the scripted crap. and looks about just as cool.destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.
same. BFBC2, you can collapse almost any building by yourself, without the scripted crap. and looks about just as cool.destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:|[QUOTE="taterfrickintot"][QUOTE="walkingdream"]Yeah thats pre made destruction....not impressed good sirZaibach
destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:|so is move functionality, I'm a level 30 in bfbc 2 not all buildings are destructable and in the campaign destruction 2.0 doesnt play that much of a role :| so dont look so bemused. its 3 m where I am, so off to bed I go[QUOTE="Zaibach"]
[QUOTE="taterfrickintot"] same. BFBC2, you can collapse almost any building by yourself, without the scripted crap. and looks about just as cool.walkingdream
It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:|so is move functionality, I'm a level 30 in bfbc 2 not all buildings are destructable and in the campaign destruction 2.0 doesnt play that much of a role :| so dont look so bemused. its 3 m where I am, so off to bed I go destruction 2.0 is the best gameplay mechanic of 2010...[QUOTE="walkingdream"]
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.
Zaibach
I always see you say that but ya never really back it up, you just exit the thread. What is up with that.[QUOTE="FIipMode"]
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] No, it's generic and extremely over rated. FIipMode
Aw I was hoping today would be different lol.
Fine (KZ2 btw). The story is practically non existent, the characters are horrible, the game is short with no replay value, terrible ending, lame final battle, uninspiring weapons, average/poor gunplay, poor set pieces, very very linear, input lag, very low field of view, inconsistent graphics with bad textures, no variety in gameplay, and there is more but whatever..... Oh wait! and Rico.[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="FIipMode"] I always see you say that but ya never really back it up, you just exit the thread. What is up with that.
SAGE_OF_FIRE
Aw I was hoping today would be different lol.
Fine (KZ2 btw). The story is practically non existent,the characters are horrible, the game is short with no replay value, terrible ending, lame final battle, uninspiring weapons, average/poor gunplay, poor set pieces, very very linear, input lag, very low field of view, inconsistent graphics with bad textures, no variety in gameplay, and there are more but whatever.Well I'm thrown a little bit, because I thought we were talking about Killzone 3 but I can go back in time.
The game has an insane amount of replay value in the multiplayer, did you play it because all of your complaints seem to be about the singleplayer.
Anyway I agree on these.
The others I can't say I agree on, the game had great gunplay and it helped even more that the animations are top notch which makes combat even more satisfying. And the singleplayer picked up ni the second half, the Thesaris train, sniping in the desert and the Exo were all very fun sections, the meat of the game is still the multi though that's where Killzone shines.
Still not getting how it's generic though.
Fine (KZ2 btw). The story is practically non existent,the characters are horrible, the game is short with no replay value, terrible ending, lame final battle, uninspiring weapons, average/poor gunplay, poor set pieces, very very linear, input lag, very low field of view, inconsistent graphics with bad textures, no variety in gameplay, and there are more but whatever.[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="FIipMode"]
Aw I was hoping today would be different lol.
FIipMode
Well I'm thrown a little bit, because I thought we were talking about Killzone 3 but I can go back in time.
The game has an insane amount of replay value in the multiplayer, did you play it because all of your complaints seem to be about the singleplayer.
Anyway I agree on these.
The others I can't say I agree on, the game had great gunplay and it helped even more that the animations are top notch which makes combat even more satisfying. And the singleplayer picked up ni the second half, the Thesaris train, sniping in the desert and the Exo were all very fun sections, the meat of the game is still the multi though that's where Killzone shines.
Still not getting how it's generic though.
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="Impress3"]No, it's generic and extremely over rated. i think so too. it took me hours to get used to the control in KZ2, and KZ3 isnt any better. R u kidding? I had some issues with KZ2's controls but still loved the game. KZ3 has vastly improved the control scheme!NO You again? are you going to report me for just replying back to you.
I simply make these threads to capture the images I have in my mind from playing this game. Most games don't leave an imprint on me like that.
I know my threads are hyperbole but the name of this forum is 'System Wars' so I just play it up a little.
The fact remains though that this game is very much a BEAST & is constantly getting slighted by the media & folks of that ilk for some reason. It clearly isn't just 'another pretty shooter'. Its game play is just as awesome as the graphics.
taterfrickintot
It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:|so is move functionality, I'm a level 30 in bfbc 2 not all buildings are destructable and in the campaign destruction 2.0 doesnt play that much of a role :| so dont look so bemused. its 3 m where I am, so off to bed I go I'm a level 50 in bfbc 2 and destroying buildings can stop campers and destroy m-coms in them, they are not a gimmick, plus putting holes through them help and parts of terrain can be destroyed and filled with holes too.[QUOTE="walkingdream"]
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.
Zaibach
One time I shot a rocket into a house, destroyed part of the roof and killed a guy from across the f***ing map. That was so badass.
[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]whuuuuuuuuuuu In what way? Perks and killstreaks. Mmkay. I played the beta and... Really? Killstreaks, you only get stuff like increased accuracy and reload faster, not shinanegans like attack dogs and AC130 or whatever it is. Perks... You only get one of them, but ok I'll give that to you. Whatever, I don't see it as a bad thing. Perks aren't the reason COD multiplayer sucks. But it's not even the same genre of multiplayer, it's class based. Besides perks, I can't make any comparisons to COD while keeping a straight face. Even though I HATE most of the changes in multiplayer from 2, Killzone 3 multiplayer is simply on a whole nother level of fun than Black Ops.[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] it's multiplayer is too similar to cod mitu123
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]
same. BFBC2, you can collapse almost any building by yourself, without the scripted crap. and looks about just as cool.taterfrickintotdestructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:| yep makes it so no one sets charges just rushes forward with tanks and blows the buildings walls out...falling building instantly destroys the objective point.
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.
It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:| This only happens what, in one map? Most maps, you can't make the building collapse because's its too strong or too low. And at the OP. YAY scripted destruction, I notice that everything else is bolted down. yep makes it so no one sets charges just rushes forward with tanks and blows the buildings walls out...falling building instantly destroys the objective point.Fine (KZ2 btw). The story is practically non existent, the characters are horrible, the game is short with no replay value, terrible ending, lame final battle, uninspiring weapons, average/poor gunplay, poor set pieces, very very linear, input lag, very low field of view, inconsistent graphics with bad textures, no variety in gameplay, and there is more but whatever..... Oh wait! and Rico. [QUOTE="taterfrickintot"] i think so too. it took me hours to get used to the control in KZ2, and KZ3 isnt any better. These two comments.... wow.., lol.... I don't have time to dissect you both said, but I really don't get you guys at all. I do agree with some things that you said sage, but most of it just seems like you're FINDING things to hate about KZ2. You must hate most single player FPS's then too right? It would have been easier for you to just say something like "I'm not into the majority of FPS's on consoles these days." I'm interested to hear what your reply is.[QUOTE="FIipMode"]
[QUOTE="FIipMode"]
Aw I was hoping today would be different lol.
SAGE_OF_FIRE
killzone3 looks so amazing and imho deserve to be shooter of the year
_SWAG_
Every post I have seen from you is just kissing the PS3's a**. Have you posted anything else?
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]destructibility is party of if not solely the main gimmick of BFBC.
It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:| yep makes it so no one sets charges just rushes forward with tanks and blows the buildings walls out...falling building instantly destroys the objective point. Not every m-com is in buildings.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="walkingdream"]It's hardly a gimmick it completely changes the way the game is played:|yep makes it so no one sets charges just rushes forward with tanks and blows the buildings walls out...falling building instantly destroys the objective point. Not every m-com is in buildings.because its a gimmick doesnt mean its a bad gimmick, I've destroyed buildings and stuff its greatmitu123
Not every m-com is in buildings.because its a gimmick doesnt mean its a bad gimmick, I've destroyed buildings and stuff its great It's not a gimmick regardless, if anything, it's extremely helpful. On Port Valdez on the 1st set you can destroy A from across the map easily without getting into much danger.[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] yep makes it so no one sets charges just rushes forward with tanks and blows the buildings walls out...falling building instantly destroys the objective point.Zaibach
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]because its a gimmick doesnt mean its a bad gimmick, I've destroyed buildings and stuff its great It's not a gimmick regardless, if anything, it's extremely helpful. On Port Valdez on the 1st set you can destroy A from across the map easily without getting into much danger.I hate port valdez:evil: the defenders have the sdvsntsge st every turn except msybe the second stage[QUOTE="mitu123"] Not every m-com is in buildings.mitu123
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment