The future is digital, Microsoft just fluffed Xbox One message

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess ? Kinda refreshing in this game biz if ya ask me. :P

Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind. :twisted:

I dunno, many think it's the future and we'll just need to move slower towards full on DD.

Any thoughts?

The Story.

---

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-07-01-desilets-the-future-is-digital-microsoft-just-fluffed-xbox-one-message

Désilets: the future is digital, Microsoft just fluffed Xbox One message

"Some people still buy CDs and vinyl, but nobody's yelling at Apple because of iTunes."

Ex-Ubisoft developer and Assassin's Creed creator Patrice Désilets has said that Microsoft was right to focus on a digital-based future for Xbox One games, but the company failed to deliver its message correctly.

Désilets, whose own blockbuster game 1666: Amsterdam is on hold after he quit Ubisoft, gave his thoughts on the lifespan of physical media, as well as Microsoft's recent U-turn on Xbox One game ownership, to Eurogamer sister site GamesIndustry International.

1

Ezio for you to say.

"I just think, 'come on, guys, the future is going to be digital,'" Désilets explained. "Maybe right now we don't fully understand it, so we don't know how to communicate what digital is and how it will actually work.

"I was a bit like, 'Really?' It's all going to be digital, and we're already halfway through it. I know some people still buy CDs and vinyl, but nobody's yelling at Apple because of iTunes. I just find that a bit hypocritical. Just a little bit."

Microsoft's initial vision of how Xbox One game ownership would operate was loudly rejected by the gaming community. The company's plans would have seen game discs largely redundant after a game had been installed, while the Xbox One itself would need a 24-hour online check-in to function.

"Microsoft was trying to do something [different], and yes the message wasn't the best one, and it wasn't delivered the best way," Désilets continued, "but in the end I think people will buy most games on PSN on PlayStation 4 and Xbox Live on Xbox One.

"The problem is the message, and how to deliver the message. They focused on the wrong stuff. They didn't have to mention that you needed an internet connection every 24 hours. They didn't have to do that.

"I can't be the only one seeing all of these music and game stores closing. What's the reason? People aren't going to them anymore."

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#2 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

Recognizing what future patterns are going to be suddenly doesn't change people's opinions on preferring cases and manuals, borrowing games, selling used games, etc., nor does it suddenly give internet to those with poor internet or those without it.

That was the issue. I still see a mix being the future for the next decade

Avatar image for OctaBech
OctaBech

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 OctaBech
Member since 2008 • 276 Posts
MS tried to force DRM down our throats, the 24h online check and mandatory camera isn't needed for digital purchases.
Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#4 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

MS tried to force DRM down our throats, the 24h online check and mandatory camera isn't needed for digital purchases.OctaBech

and kinect.

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts
Can't say i give a flying fvck what diselets thinks about...well, anything. He's wrong on this, we still are not at the point where we need to rely on only digital and there's still a shit-ton of room for disk games. I still would prefer a disk if it means I don't have to check in every damn day on a fricking console. It's just not necessary at all right now.

If it means that I can't just hand my game over to a friend or just sell it at a whim anywhere and everywhere then I guess I just don't need that console the game is on.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

Sure the future is digital. Even I, a game collector ackowledge this. What desillets doesnt get though is that we can still lend/borrow those cds and vynils to our friends cause physical format should not have limitations. MS was imposing those limitations on physical format even though they already have them on their DD games

Avatar image for tdkmillsy
tdkmillsy

6617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 tdkmillsy
Member since 2003 • 6617 Posts
MS tried to force DRM down our throats, the 24h online check and mandatory camera isn't needed for digital purchases.OctaBech
The Kinect had nothing to do with DRM so why bother bringing it up. The 24 hour checkin wasn't needed for DRM, but was needed to allow the other features they tried to introduce such as not needing the disc once its installed, selling you game and playing your games on other consoles to name a few. They where very honest but fluffed the message and should have made much more of deal about the benefits it gave right at the beginning. I hope they re-introduce what they where trying to do but just for digital downloads at a later date.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

Recognizing what future patterns are going to be suddenly doesn't change people's opinions on preferring cases and manuals, borrowing games, selling used games, etc., nor does it suddenly give internet to those with poor internet or those without it.

That was the issue. I still see a mix being the future for the next decade

Blabadon

Pretty much especially the last line.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

"Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind."

As always. No joke, the PS4 is literally a beefed up 360.

:cool:

 

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts
MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess?
Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#11 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts
[QUOTE="OctaBech"]MS tried to force DRM down our throats, the 24h online check and mandatory camera isn't needed for digital purchases.tdkmillsy
The Kinect had nothing to do with DRM so why bother bringing it up. The 24 hour checkin wasn't needed for DRM, but was needed to allow the other features they tried to introduce such as not needing the disc once its installed, selling you game and playing your games on other consoles to name a few. They where very honest but fluffed the message and should have made much more of deal about the benefits it gave right at the beginning. I hope they re-introduce what they where trying to do but just for digital downloads at a later date.

And bricking your $500 video game console's main feature, playing video games, if you didn't pass the check-in. If I know I'm going to do one of those features, I'll connect online by myself and check-in on my own terms, on my own time. Otherwise, it was bullshit DRM at its worst.
Avatar image for OctaBech
OctaBech

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 OctaBech
Member since 2008 • 276 Posts
[QUOTE="OctaBech"]MS tried to force DRM down our throats, the 24h online check and mandatory camera isn't needed for digital purchases.tdkmillsy
The Kinect had nothing to do with DRM so why bother bringing it up. The 24 hour checkin wasn't needed for DRM, but was needed to allow the other features they tried to introduce such as not needing the disc once its installed, selling you game and playing your games on other consoles to name a few. They where very honest but fluffed the message and should have made much more of deal about the benefits it gave right at the beginning. I hope they re-introduce what they where trying to do but just for digital downloads at a later date.

There's no hope for you. No the 24h was not for the installs, the installs was an excuse just like the magic cloud, the installs could have been made optional or have had an "insert disc after a week" check instead. And please do not say the Kinect had nothing to do with DRM, not when MS made those silly DRM patents for it.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess? Heil68
Yup, MS was there doing the heavy lifting whilst as usual, Sony sat back let MS take all the arrows but was prepared to take full advantage of that just like how now, PS4's online is now behind a pay wall like XBL but again as usual, you have no problem with that b/c it's Sony, the one and phony. Why you such a Sony shill? Money, Swag, other? Inquiring SP's want to know. :P

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Up front and honest?  They fed us TV, Sports and Call of Duty on stage while slipping their DRM via press release.  Then, they try to have a field day at their E3 press conference while the letters DRM are never mentioned to hold on to your wallets but it backfires.

 

MS Was anything but up front about their DRM policies and it made the gamers understandably suspicious.  Then, they followed it up with dropping the ball when trying to give an explanation as to why they were doing it.  Then, they got caught up in an NSA scandal.  Then they got caught putting stupidly overspec'd PCs at their game demoes at E3.  Then, after it was all said and done, they told everyone to go buy a 360..

 

What was even the point of making this thread?  The reality of the situation is that MS has not a soul to blame but themselves for their fiascos.

Avatar image for GravityX
GravityX

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 GravityX
Member since 2013 • 865 Posts
Microsoft's only problem, is that of being Microsoft. If any other company would have tried this digital approach, I guarantee you that the outrage would not have been as great. Personally I would have welcomed this new vision for gaming. My 360 is always connected via wifi and buying games online via marketplace is great. People blew this whole 24 hour check in stuff out of proportion too. If you are like me and have your console always connected to the internet anyway this"check" was going to be seamless ping. Plus it would have allowed for background downloads and updates. DRM was a necessary evil for digital distribution. Steam does it. Now I think the issue also comes from out previous history with the consoles and what the word console means. Everyone was stuck on the word "console". Xbox One was built for digital distribution and should not have classified/branded as a console. Now, of course this sucks for people without internet or the means of buying games at full price. However we must remember that gaming is not a right, it is a privilege. Like cable TV or having a smart phone. Bottom line MS did not outline their vision well at all. They dropped the ball, Unfortunately for them, they did not have a Steve Jobs as a spokesman. Because if they did we getting the future sooner than later. And everyone would have been fine with the that.
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

"Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind."

As always. No joke, the PS4 is literally a beefed up 360.

:cool:

 

RR360DD
Still buttmad I see
Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

When your Twitter account, head of PR and your executives all sing a different story when people ask questions about your system..

 

Up front, you were not.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"]MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess? SecretPolice

Yup, MS was there doing the heavy lifting whilst as usual, Sony sat back let MS take all the arrows but was prepared to take full advantage of that just like how now, PS4's online is now behind a pay wall like XBL but again as usual, you have no problem with that b/c it's Sony, the one and phony. Why you such a Sony shill? Money, Swag, other? Inquiring SP's want to know. :P

Well, given who the dominated last gen with a perfect 10/10 game and unprecedented 3 GTOYS' and 2 games in the top 5 of all video game history, it's easy to see why. I've payed for Live for 7 years, now I cant pay for PSN? Why couldn't MS follow through with their plans? :( I can hear you laughing all the way over here and thus SDC. Thank you Sony. :cool:
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

Up front and honest? They fed us TV, Sports and Call of Duty on stage while slipping their DRM via press release. Then, they try to have a field day at their E3 press conference while the letters DRM are never mentioned to hold on to your wallets but it backfires.

MS Was anything but up front about their DRM policies and it made the gamers understandably suspicious. Then, they followed it up with dropping the ball when trying to give an explanation as to why they were doing it. Then, they got caught up in an NSA scandal. Then they got caught putting stupidly overspec'd PCs at their game demoes at E3. Then, after it was all said and done, they told everyone to go buy a 360..

What was even the point of making this thread? The reality of the situation is that MS has not a soul to blame but themselves for their fiascos.

Shewgenja

Seems to me you just made the case that MS did speak more about what they had planned which then spurred other questions which then they sought to rectify and ease consumers concerns by capitulating doing the 180. Where as again, Sony was vague and said nothing concrete what there future plans on the subject were.

Anyway, ya know what, I'm a bit sorry I brought all this up as I dodn't feel like arguing it and kinda happy it's now going the way it's going but it just seemed like good SW material is all. :P

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

"Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind."

As always. No joke, the PS4 is literally a beefed up 360.

:cool:

 

stereointegrity

Still buttmad I see

Nah I love the 360. Will be great playing the PS4 for nostalgia reasons.

Then I'll go back to the XOne for the true next gen innovations

:cool:

Life is good when you can afford more than one console

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess? Heil68

Yup, MS was there doing the heavy lifting whilst as usual, Sony sat back let MS take all the arrows but was prepared to take full advantage of that just like how now, PS4's online is now behind a pay wall like XBL but again as usual, you have no problem with that b/c it's Sony, the one and phony. Why you such a Sony shill? Money, Swag, other? Inquiring SP's want to know. :P

Well, given who the dominated last gen with a perfect 10/10 game and unprecedented 3 GTOYS' and 2 games in the top 5 of all video game history, it's easy to see why. I've payed for Live for 7 years, now I cant pay for PSN? Why couldn't MS follow through with their plans? :( I can hear you laughing all the way over here and thus SDC. Thank you Sony. :cool:

Eh, just messin dude and having some SW fun but alas, it all gets moooaaar serious then I want it to.

Avatar image for LordOfPoms
LordOfPoms

1138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 LordOfPoms
Member since 2013 • 1138 Posts

MS was just being too upfront and honest about it I guess ? Kinda refreshing in this game biz if ya ask me. :P

Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind. :twisted:

I dunno, many think it's the future and we'll just need to move slower towards full on DD.

Any thoughts?

The Story.

---

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-07-01-desilets-the-future-is-digital-microsoft-just-fluffed-xbox-one-message

Désilets: the future is digital, Microsoft just fluffed Xbox One message

"Some people still buy CDs and vinyl, but nobody's yelling at Apple because of iTunes."

Ex-Ubisoft developer and Assassin's Creed creator Patrice Désilets has said that Microsoft was right to focus on a digital-based future for Xbox One games, but the company failed to deliver its message correctly.

Désilets, whose own blockbuster game 1666: Amsterdam is on hold after he quit Ubisoft, gave his thoughts on the lifespan of physical media, as well as Microsoft's recent U-turn on Xbox One game ownership, to Eurogamer sister site GamesIndustry International.

1

Ezio for you to say.

"I just think, 'come on, guys, the future is going to be digital,'" Désilets explained. "Maybe right now we don't fully understand it, so we don't know how to communicate what digital is and how it will actually work.

"I was a bit like, 'Really?' It's all going to be digital, and we're already halfway through it. I know some people still buy CDs and vinyl, but nobody's yelling at Apple because of iTunes. I just find that a bit hypocritical. Just a little bit."

Microsoft's initial vision of how Xbox One game ownership would operate was loudly rejected by the gaming community. The company's plans would have seen game discs largely redundant after a game had been installed, while the Xbox One itself would need a 24-hour online check-in to function.

"Microsoft was trying to do something [different], and yes the message wasn't the best one, and it wasn't delivered the best way," Désilets continued, "but in the end I think people will buy most games on PSN on PlayStation 4 and Xbox Live on Xbox One.

"The problem is the message, and how to deliver the message. They focused on the wrong stuff. They didn't have to mention that you needed an internet connection every 24 hours. They didn't have to do that.

"I can't be the only one seeing all of these music and game stores closing. What's the reason? People aren't going to them anymore."

SecretPolice
Of course the future is digital, but the difference between what Microsoft did and Sony/Nintendo have done is that MS made DRM a incentive for publishers, not consumers. Not a single policy that MS announced benefitted consumers in anyway whatsoever. Sony is going to push digital as well, but they didn't take away any consumer's freedoms to do it. What will most likely happen is what Nintendo has done -- give you a reason to go digital. Fire Emblem: Awakening shipped in limited quantities, pushing people to purchase on the digital front. Then look at Super Luigi U, 20 dollars cheaper if you buy it digitally and two months earlier than its retail release. Give people a reason to go digital and they will. Force them too and you will have what happened to Valve at the start of Steam and what happened to Microsoft. Remember that? When Steam was universally hated for forcing itself on people? When Valve finally made Steam a service that benefited consumers, it blew up.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Yup, MS was there doing the heavy lifting whilst as usual, Sony sat back let MS take all the arrows but was prepared to take full advantage of that just like how now, PS4's online is now behind a pay wall like XBL but again as usual, you have no problem with that b/c it's Sony, the one and phony. Why you such a Sony shill? Money, Swag, other? Inquiring SP's want to know. :P

SecretPolice

Well, given who the dominated last gen with a perfect 10/10 game and unprecedented 3 GTOYS' and 2 games in the top 5 of all video game history, it's easy to see why. I've payed for Live for 7 years, now I cant pay for PSN? Why couldn't MS follow through with their plans? :( I can hear you laughing all the way over here and thus SDC. Thank you Sony. :cool:

Eh, just messin dude and having some SW fun but alas, it all gets moooaaar serious then I want it to.

It's all good SP, when you practice the Live, Learn and Love philosophy. Why you so serious? :P
Avatar image for Supes_24
Supes_24

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Supes_24
Member since 2013 • 87 Posts
Can't say i give a flying fvck what diselets thinks about...well, anything. He's wrong on this, we still are not at the point where we need to rely on only digital and there's still a shit-ton of room for disk games. I still would prefer a disk if it means I don't have to check in every damn day on a fricking console. It's just not necessary at all right now.

If it means that I can't just hand my game over to a friend or just sell it at a whim anywhere and everywhere then I guess I just don't need that console the game is on. jer_1
I feel the same way. Screw digital only, I hate it. I prefer to have a disc and let the console read it for me to play. With digital you have to buy the game, $60 and rarely do you get deals with digital. Not only that, with all the damn installs you eventually have to get a bigger HD and spend more money to play the same games if I must had physical media. It's ridiculous and I can't stand when people don't understand how more expensive digital will be down the road. I don't want to "save" HD space by deleting a game and if I want to play it again I have to download it again. That's just stupid. If its digital only they need to install at leat 1 TB HDs.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45737 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"] Well, given who the dominated last gen with a perfect 10/10 game and unprecedented 3 GTOYS' and 2 games in the top 5 of all video game history, it's easy to see why. I've payed for Live for 7 years, now I cant pay for PSN? Why couldn't MS follow through with their plans? :( I can hear you laughing all the way over here and thus SDC. Thank you Sony. :cool: Heil68

Eh, just messin dude and having some SW fun but alas, it all gets moooaaar serious then I want it to.

It's all good SP, when you practice the Live, Learn and Love philosophy. Why you so serious? :P

:lol: K, that's more like it.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Up front and honest? They fed us TV, Sports and Call of Duty on stage while slipping their DRM via press release. Then, they try to have a field day at their E3 press conference while the letters DRM are never mentioned to hold on to your wallets but it backfires.

MS Was anything but up front about their DRM policies and it made the gamers understandably suspicious. Then, they followed it up with dropping the ball when trying to give an explanation as to why they were doing it. Then, they got caught up in an NSA scandal. Then they got caught putting stupidly overspec'd PCs at their game demoes at E3. Then, after it was all said and done, they told everyone to go buy a 360..

What was even the point of making this thread? The reality of the situation is that MS has not a soul to blame but themselves for their fiascos.

SecretPolice

Seems to me you just made the case that MS did speak more about what they had planned which then spurred other questions which then they sought to rectify and ease consumers concerns by capitulating doing the 180. Where as again, Sony was vague and said nothing concrete what there future plans on the subject were.

Anyway, ya know what, I'm a bit sorry I brought all this up as I dodn't feel like arguing it and kinda happy it's now going the way it's going but it just seemed like good SW material is all. :P

No worries. I think the DRM policy couldn't be implemented because it was simply too much stick and not enough carrot in the end. Their delivery of the message did nothing to smooth things over with the gamers. It's probably a good thing they mishandled the situation as poorly as they did. Having an international fiasco over NSA spying while all this was happening was just icing on the cake.
Avatar image for nyzma23
nyzma23

1003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 nyzma23
Member since 2013 • 1003 Posts

i stopped buy physical games years ago i don't give a crap about used games and online thing

Avatar image for dreman999
dreman999

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dreman999
Member since 2004 • 11514 Posts

We don't need always online to have this furture.

Avatar image for AD216
AD216

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 AD216
Member since 2008 • 1719 Posts

i think what they did wrong was change the disc policy. they couldve introduced a who different set of rules for people who buy dd and people who buy physical copies. eventually the dd would have won out

Avatar image for Zuzuvela
Zuzuvela

1993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Zuzuvela
Member since 2013 • 1993 Posts
Its gonna happen....MS got its troubles as a result of trying to force the issue and bad PR Sony got away with it by accepting it and getting themselves prepared without making its commitment yet
Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

"Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind."

As always. No joke, the PS4 is literally a beefed up 360.

:cool:

 

RR360DD

Still buttmad I see

Nah I love the 360. Will be great playing the PS4 for nostalgia reasons.

Then I'll go back to the XOne for the true next gen innovations

:cool:

Life is good when you can afford more than one console

Life's good when you have money to do things out of your mom's basement, regardless , xONE hardware is a joke compared to ps4s , kinect is a joke ,i'm not sure which true next gen innovations you're talking about but whatever floats your boat i guess.

Avatar image for Armoured_Mage
Armoured_Mage

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Armoured_Mage
Member since 2005 • 766 Posts

"Some people still buy CDs and vinyl, but nobody's yelling at Apple because of iTunes."

SecretPolice

The difference is CDs can be <100MBs and games can be >20GBs

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"] Still buttmad I see RoOodriGowW

Nah I love the 360. Will be great playing the PS4 for nostalgia reasons.

Then I'll go back to the XOne for the true next gen innovations

:cool:

Life is good when you can afford more than one console

Life's good when you have money to do things out of your mom's basement, regardless , xONE hardware is a joke compared to ps4s, kinect is a joke ,i'm not sure which true next gen innovations you're talking about but whatever floats your boat i guess.

the hardware is almost the same with the Xone having a slightly less powerful GPU. You think the PS4 is going to be leaps and bounds above the Xone in any game? Don't delude yourself, the PS4 is a gimped mid range PC. You want hardware, then go PC only. It's the only TRUE next gen system.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
Philosophies are going to have to change greatly if the future of console gaming is ever going to be digital. Right now there are absolutely no advantages of buying a console game digitally. You pay a higher price for a game with no resale value that in many instances you have to store on expensive proprietary hardware. With movies and music, you can play your tunes and watch your shows on multiple devices, from your tv to your tablet to your smart phone. It makes a whole lot of sense to buy the digital version. Music usually doesn't even come with DRM. With PC games, digital games are sold on multiple store fronts and are on sale for next to nothing all the time. Retailers cannot compete, and the product at retail doesn't have any resale value, anyway. Digital games on consoles are consistently $20-$30 more than they are at retail. They never get marked down until the MSRP changes. They almost never go on sale. You can't play your game on anything but 1 specific brand of video game console. If you want to play the game on your friend's console, you have to download the game, which takes a few hours. The alternative is buying the disk, which you can just take to your friend's house and play instantly. Why would the consumer ever choose to make the future of console games digital under this setup?
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

There was nothing wrong with the wording of the message that Microsoft was pushing, people understood it perfectly. There is no obvious benefit for gamers to abandon the status quo. The only way that gamers would accept a digital based console would be if that resulted in cheaper games. The industry absolutely refuses to lower the price of games even if the costs of manufacturing the disks are reduced by buying games digitally. People simply saw through all of the bullcrap and realized that Microsoft was simply trying to curtail the used game market.  The entire concept was rightfully scrapped. If video game publishers aren't willing to lower the price of games bought digitally then there is no reason to expect gamers to give up used games as an alternative.

Avatar image for comptonst88
comptonst88

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 comptonst88
Member since 2012 • 348 Posts

I pray that we never go completely digital with games because I like buying a game from the store on disc and feeling like I own the game.  DD just feels like im renting it and it takes up HDD space which I hate.  Not to mention, it takes forever to download full games these days even, at least until everyone can get fiber optic internet.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

everything is getting digital and in the cloud, there is a difference between digital and not having rights over our things and having to ask permission to play our things.

If they went full digital go ahead, steam does it, but they do it right, why do they use the digital excuse for having to ask them permission every 24h? why i cant do w/e i want with thing i already own and paid for?

there is digital and there is them having every right over us because our things are in their servers. BIG DIFFERENCE.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#39 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Problem with Microsoft's stance is they want to have their cake and eat it too. They shouldn't expect consumers to embrace their all digital future if they don't plan to offer any the benefits that Valve gives with Steam.

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

"Ya might say Sony took the wimpy approach of leading from behind."

As always. No joke, the PS4 is literally a beefed up 360.

:cool:

 

getyeryayasout
You say that like it's a bad thing.

i was going to ask that my self
Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

[QUOTE="RoOodriGowW"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Nah I love the 360. Will be great playing the PS4 for nostalgia reasons.

Then I'll go back to the XOne for the true next gen innovations

:cool:

Life is good when you can afford more than one console

kingtito

Life's good when you have money to do things out of your mom's basement, regardless , xONE hardware is a joke compared to ps4s, kinect is a joke ,i'm not sure which true next gen innovations you're talking about but whatever floats your boat i guess.

the hardware is almost the same with the Xone having a slightly less powerful GPU. You think the PS4 is going to be leaps and bounds above the Xone in any game? Don't delude yourself, the PS4 is a gimped mid range PC. You want hardware, then go PC only. It's the only TRUE next gen system.

I'm not only talking about graphical differences between the consoles , the difference will be there to feed this beloved forum but for the average gamer it won't matter , enthusiats with money will get a pc like you said , i'm also talking about the faster and bigger ram which will alow for faster multitasking and interfaces , m$ OS occupies almost half of thos 8 gigs of ram , while ps4's just an eighth.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

The funny thing is that thing the Cows love called Playstation Plus is all digital. :lol:

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#43 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

The funny thing is that thing the Cows love called Playstation Plus is all digital. :lol:

xhawk27

Sony didn't attempt to do mandatory check in for games.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

The funny thing is that thing the Cows love called Playstation Plus is all digital. :lol:

Lionheart08

Sony didn't attempt to do mandatory check in for games.

Yeah but it does check to see if your a Playstation Plus subscriber. Also MS did the check in for the sharing feature. How many times does this have to be addressed.

Avatar image for ShadowHawk676
ShadowHawk676

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ShadowHawk676
Member since 2012 • 111 Posts

Digital might be the future hell there is barely any point of putting a disk drive in PC's anymore. The being said 24 hour chekcs were not the way to go. Plus if digital is the future what is the point of getting a console in the future. A couple of exclusives and a cheaper upfront cost for the hardware. Then you have more expensive games and games that don't look as good. 

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

Still the only feature on the Xbox One that had me interested is the no putting the disc in the drive to play the game. Also the family sharing if it was only the whole game and not an hour timed demo. That story about the demos didn't make sense. Why do the 24 hour check-in if it's only for demos? The future is Digital, how long before it goes 100%? I don't know.Â