the most advanced game ever created (will surprise everyone)

.kkrieger, the game is entirely done through procedural generation of all textures and game assets...which means the game actually takes up an amazingly small size of 78 kb....

if done in standard ways, it was estimated that the game would take up over 2500 times that amount of data.

here is a pic.

you can download it for free and try it out also.

http://www.theprodukkt.com/kkrieger

*plz note, this is only a tech demo...dont compare about poor gameplay in a tech demo....gameplay wise, its probably more basic than doom...but thats really not the point.

Played it like two years ago, yep the graphics might not be that bad but the game itself sucks ass.

You can't procedurally generate a story or complicated levels with no clipping issues.

Procedural synthesis is great indeed, but it's too CPU demanding and require quite complex programming. Most games only use to cache the generated textures instande of really generating them as you play.

And Cell is specialy great with procedural synthesis techniques. link

Played it like two years ago, yep the graphics might not be that bad but the game itself sucks ass.

You can't procedurally generate a story or complicated levels with no clipping issues.

Frunku

read before you post....all of this is designed as a tech demo...its not ment to be enjoyed...but to show off what procedural generation can actually do.

The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. LordXelNaga

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. cobrax75

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. LordXelNaga

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

you want an example? spore on the PC is entirely based off this technology t...why is this benificial you ask? because if done normaly, all the user created material that the game is based off of will take up several harddrives worth of space over time because everything in the game comes from other users....so rather than a creature that you make taking up 100MB and transfering to another persons PC very slowly (which kinda defeats the purpose of the game) these creatures can take up only around 1kb, and be transfered very very fast.

many games are already using limited amounts of this technology for a lot of more natrual things...a lot of games use it for trees (Oblibion) and a Crysis does a lot of its foilage procedurally.

It might seem like it might take up more time....but when you want to create 500 different models of trees...having them be procedurally made is a far far easier and faster alternative.

im clueless to whatever this isTombom159

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. cobrax75

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

you want an example? spore on the PC is entirely based off this technology t...why is this benificial you ask? because if done normaly, all the user created material that the game is based off of will take up several harddrives worth of space over time because everything in the game comes from other users....so rather than a creature that you make taking up 100MB and transfering to another persons PC very slowly (which kinda defeats the purpose of the game) these creatures can take up only around 1kb, and be transfered very very fast.

many games are already using limited amounts of this technology for a lot of more natrual things...a lot of games use it for trees (Oblibion) and a Crysis does a lot of its foilage procedurally.

It might seem like it might take up more time....but when you want to create 500 different models of trees...having them be procedurally made is a far far easier and faster alternative.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. LordXelNaga

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

you want an example? spore on the PC is entirely based off this technology t...why is this benificial you ask? because if done normaly, all the user created material that the game is based off of will take up several harddrives worth of space over time because everything in the game comes from other users....so rather than a creature that you make taking up 100MB and transfering to another persons PC very slowly (which kinda defeats the purpose of the game) these creatures can take up only around 1kb, and be transfered very very fast.

many games are already using limited amounts of this technology for a lot of more natrual things...a lot of games use it for trees (Oblibion) and a Crysis does a lot of its foilage procedurally.

It might seem like it might take up more time....but when you want to create 500 different models of trees...having them be procedurally made is a far far easier and faster alternative.

well, this tech demo was only created for a competition...

of course this cant replace everything like they are trying to do in the game.....well it can, but it would be far to hard to do....

but for games like Spore, its an excellent thing for which the game can simply not function without.

and for anything that has to be randomly generated, at least to a certain degree....this is simply a far easier way to do everything.

Played it like two years ago, yep the graphics might not be that bad but the game itself sucks ass.

You can't procedurally generate a story or complicated levels with no clipping issues.

Frunku

Eh, it's good for what it is. They were trying to compress the game as much as possible, and considering the graphics in that, that's amazingly well done. It's meant to show that, well, you don't need 2gb of graphics in order to have good ones.

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. cobrax75

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

you want an example? spore on the PC is entirely based off this technology t...why is this benificial you ask? because if done normaly, all the user created material that the game is based off of will take up several harddrives worth of space over time because everything in the game comes from other users....so rather than a creature that you make taking up 100MB and transfering to another persons PC very slowly (which kinda defeats the purpose of the game) these creatures can take up only around 1kb, and be transfered very very fast.

many games are already using limited amounts of this technology for a lot of more natrual things...a lot of games use it for trees (Oblibion) and a Crysis does a lot of its foilage procedurally.

It might seem like it might take up more time....but when you want to create 500 different models of trees...having them be procedurally made is a far far easier and faster alternative.

well, this tech demo was only created for a competition...

of course this cant replace everything like they are trying to do in the game.....well it can, but it would be far to hard to do....

but for games like Spore, its an excellent thing for which the game can simply not function without.

and for anything that has to be randomly generated, at least to a certain degree....this is simply a far easier way to do everything.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LordXelNaga"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="LordXelNaga"]The problem with this is that it is insanely hard to pull off in an actual game. Plus Lair used procedurally generated landscapes and that did nothing to make it more impressive rather it caused numerous issues in itself. Holding textures in RAM is financially and hardware more economical for developers. LordXelNaga

that was a landscape...this is an entire level....

its deffinetly very benificial...if you can cut down on the size a game takes up by 2500 times.

you want an example? spore on the PC is entirely based off this technology t...why is this benificial you ask? because if done normaly, all the user created material that the game is based off of will take up several harddrives worth of space over time because everything in the game comes from other users....so rather than a creature that you make taking up 100MB and transfering to another persons PC very slowly (which kinda defeats the purpose of the game) these creatures can take up only around 1kb, and be transfered very very fast.

many games are already using limited amounts of this technology for a lot of more natrual things...a lot of games use it for trees (Oblibion) and a Crysis does a lot of its foilage procedurally.

It might seem like it might take up more time....but when you want to create 500 different models of trees...having them be procedurally made is a far far easier and faster alternative.

well, this tech demo was only created for a competition...

of course this cant replace everything like they are trying to do in the game.....well it can, but it would be far to hard to do....

but for games like Spore, its an excellent thing for which the game can simply not function without.

and for anything that has to be randomly generated, at least to a certain degree....this is simply a far easier way to do everything.

The technology that ID has is not new, it has been used in RTS's for years....it also doesnt work that good....its in use for Quake Wars...and really doesnt look that good.

[QUOTE="Tombom159"]im clueless to whatever this isBlue-Sphere

It's witchcraft and pagan rituals