The Order kills Quantum Break before UC4 does

The game is currently $20 digitally, is it worth the $20?

@unrealgunner: "All 3 are crap third person shooter games that's why all you talk about is graphics"

Uncharted 4 is an Action Adventure not TPS.

Every game relies on some sort of technique to look good, nothing wrong with that.

@Pedro: Honestly 20 it's still a stretch. At least the story can keep you engaged and it's short enough. And there's so much wrong with the game that it alone makes it entertaining. You can buy it used for less money.

The order was boring as hell and had crap writing, the only good aspect was graphics. Quantum Break will be much more than just graphics.

Wow, you actually managed to post in-game screenshots, good job man.

@gpuking said:

Now that we know QB is 720p with dips on XBone, there's absolutely no hope for it to compete with The Order, here's some directfeed of QB from DigitalFoundry for comparison.

VS

And now, we eagerly await the vastly superior PC version.

God no.

@Blazed: I played UC2 and UC3 it's a third person game that forces me to shoot a lot of things that's a TPS

Let's wait for the proper version of QB to come out before you start declaring The Odour victorious, especially when it's not reached the levels of the best looking multi-platform games

All in game screenshots, not photomode or cutscenes and The Order doesn't come close any of those. Uncharted 4 has it's work cut out to come close as well. We know you'll spam the forums with UC4 graphic king threads anyway, that much is expected.

@GarGx1 said:

Let's wait for the proper version of QB to come out before you start declaring The Odour victorious, especially when it's not reached the levels of the best looking multi-platform games

All in game screenshots, not photomode or cutscenes and The Order doesn't come close any of those. Uncharted 4 has it's work cut out to come close as well. We know you'll spam the forums with UC4 graphic king threads anyway, that much is expected.

You're right about The Order and UC4 not coming close, because they're FAR better than those games graphically;). But let's not derail this thread with your trolling, it's about QB vs The Order so stick to it or gtfo.

@gpuking: Please, The Order is a blurry mess, as shown by your very own screenshots (if you can call edited images screenshots), even in the photomode and cut scene shots everything, apart from the central character, is blurred out, the game doesn't even allow you to focus on an NPC you're shooting at, it's truly atrocious and not worth a single accolade. When it can't come close to existing games what chance does it have against new games?

Honestly, this is your idea of the best in game graphics of any game to date? and you have the audacity to say I'm trolling! Get a new prescription your glasses aren't working

We are all well aware of why you never post in game screenshots, the only person you're fooling is yourself. Now please stop it.

You know your screenshots aren't helping you at all yet only building my case even more lol. You honestly have no idea what you're talking about so I aint even wasting my time on you.

Open in new tab and go fullscreen.

Blur, blur and more blur, you can't even see the enemies in the third pic properly...truly graphics king...

That's blatantly false. Come on.

@GarGx1:

LOL. The Order is graphically way better than the Ryse.

quantum break looks more realistic

.

@gpuking: Carry on with the denial, you already know there's nothing left in the tank.

@imt558: Show me something then to prove that because there is nothing in this thread.

All in-game screenshots I took. The Order looks good and the character models and animations are likely top 3 but everything else is average. The environment just doesn't match the sheer quality and dynamism of the characters. There is a large disparity between them and their surroundings. Ryse is far more consistent and I'd say The Order 1886 characters look every bit as good as Ryse if not better but when it comes down to the environment and the characters? Ryse takes it by a good bit.

the order in game

Ryse in game

./

@fantasygamer:

Dude, why i noticed 1680x1050 resolution in of one those shots.

And looks like GarGar also put some Ryse PC shots.

@Juub1990:

Why not more darker shots from The Order.

I thought we were talking about the PC version of Ryse?

I took the shots using the share function of the PS4.

@GarGx1:

No need to. You already have better The Order shots in page before.

@Juub1990:

I see. Anyway, i played Ryse on PC at much higher settings than Xbone version. The Order looks better to me

With your complete lack of technological understanding and even the most simple of things, I have a very hard time believing you own a PC capable of even launching Ryse, let alone one that can play the game at higher settings than the Xbox One..

@dynamitecop:

Quote :

With your complete lack of technological understanding and even the most simple of things

...

Look who's talking. NYadc, shut up.

Of course I used PC screenshots, all my screenshots are from PC. I game on PC and PS4 not Xbox. The thread is about The Odour being graphically better than a game being released on PC, who cares about how the 720p version on Xbox One compares? That's not the definitive version of the game. Why on earth would I use Xbox One images in any graphics discussion? Yuk! You don't use a 9mm pistol when you can use a tank.

Ryse is just one game that I used to demonstrate how The Order is not the graphics king silly delusional Sony fans think it is.

@Juub1990 said:

@imt558 said:

@GarGx1:

LOL. The Order is graphically way better than the Ryse.

All in-game screenshots I took. The Order looks good and the character models and animations are likely top 3 but everything else is average. The environment just doesn't match the sheer quality and dynamism of the characters. There is a large disparity between them and their surroundings. Ryse is far more consistent and I'd say The Order 1886 characters look every bit as good as Ryse if not better but when it comes down to the environment and the characters? Ryse takes it by a good bit.

In before gpu-king cutscene pictures.

@fantasygamer said:

@imt558 said:

@GarGx1:

LOL. The Order is graphically way better than the Ryse.

the order in game

Ryse in game

./

PC versions of Ryse, Tomb Raider, Witcher 3 (overall), and Battle Front 4 (overall) all look better than The Order when comparing pure gameplay. We've seen the screenshots in dozens of threads. All come to this conclusion. Unreal and Star Citizen probably as well once fully released (so that they "count").

@gpuking: Same bullshots, same slightly better than average looking game with poor texture filtering, incredibly low draw distance, and horrible vasoline inspired DoF. Not to mention the fake "cinematic lighting".

The Order is far above anything I've played on my PC.... people who say otherwise need to actually play the damn game.

@scatteh316: I disagree and i've played The Order extensively. It's great looking, but suffers from a pretty low draw-distance, and some horrendous blurring.

Funny because I've played many games on PC that look better. Are you perhaps only talking about cutscenes? Or have you just not tried those games on Ultra?

@unrealgunner: Nah, at it's core Uncharted a an action/adventure game.

So people are cherry picking the darkest shots of The Order and comparing to bright ones from other games? How pathetic. Also the game has probably the best looking environment of any game bar UC4.

No chance in hell TR or Ryse can touch this.

Not sure if this was settled later on, but no @imt558 this is not correct.

Resolution (regarding displays') is the measure of the number x & y pixels. You are muddling the SI units.

Resolution is # of x & y pixels only.

Aspect ratio is the ratio of the number of x pixels : number of y pixels.

Pixel Density is the number of pixels in a unit area.

To say something is 1080p in a 2.4:1 ratio, is saying that the display is showing 2.4 * 1080 pixels in it's x-axis and 1080 in it's y-axis. Or 2592 (x-axis) : 1080 (y-axis). Multiply those numbers together and divide by the unit area of the display and you now have pixel density (or image quality as some of you are incorrectly using the term in substitution of).

If the game is rendering only 800 y-axis pixels, then it is 2560 x 800 on a display that is capable of rendering 2560 x 1080. But that does not make it 1080p, that makes it 2560 x 800 and gives it an aspect ratio of 2560/800 : 1 or 3.2:1 in game on a display that is capable of running 1080p in a 2.4:1 aspect ratio.

Remember the display itself is capable of rendering in 1080p, but that does not make the game 1080p. After all I can make doom 2 to run in 800 x 600 on a 1920x1080 display, but that does not make the game 1920x1080.

How can we play when there's is no game to play?

@gpuking: It's not really cherry picking, people are posting screens of actual in game footage, which you also happened to do as well, however I can see that that was short lived after your most recent post. If the game carries the same details from gameplay to photomode, then you shouldn't have to worry about posting screens with a hud or from a third person perspective.

I'm not worried at all, just correcting misinformation conceived by some idiots here for thinking The Order is all blur and less quality than the cutscene. Now obviously I can't replicate the cutscene capture using gameplay since I don't have the exact script for all the lighting set up, camera angle and etc, but the point is gameplay model is exactly the same, same textures, same shaders, just different set up or angle. Using Photomode actually helps me to get close to prove my point since I can zoom in and change angles, so if you want me to prove the quality then using photomode shot is more than reasonable.

Thats great for you graphics whores. The game sucked elephant cock. 5/10

Well, these are some of my screenshots from The Order. These are not in photomode or hand picked by me, just some random captures the game makes when a Trophy is earned. So there was no bias on my side to choose the moment when the capture was made. Specially on more "busy" areas, I think it's pretty clear how far the game goes to mask it's flaws.

As a I've said before, the game looks good, and it has an excellent art direction. But to consider it a landmark in graphics it' just insane, IMO. The developers made very good job working with the limitations of the PS4,and they deserve all the crdit for it, but this is not teh best thing eva!

@phbz:

What you think of the gameplay?

@PSP107: Honestly, as a 3rd person shooter, it's very basic made even worse by the poor AI. It has a pseudo bullet-time mode that's absolutely hilarious (seriously wtf is that?). Stealth sections are oversimplified and quick-time events frequently break the gameplay flow. Sadly in all its gameplay elements the game is at best mediocre by today's standards.

The Order is a trash game with excellent looking character models and that's it. I've played it and it's just not very impressive, with so much blur it actually made me feel sick. Infamous looks better if we're talking console games and there are a good 4-5 PC titles that are more impressive.

ryse kills the order

/

Actually, that is where you are wrong again. Most of the things you say are flat out wrong. I prefer to use facts. So the trolling is on you.

That system War jelly. Everyone has Quantum break on their minds. Gotta love it.

@kvally: You have poor understanding of what facts are.

@gpuking said:

So people are cherry picking the darkest shots of The Order and comparing to bright ones from other games? How pathetic. Also the game has probably the best looking environment of any game bar UC4.

No chance in hell TR or Ryse can touch this.

@phbz said:

Well, these are some of my screenshots from The Order. These are not in photomode or hand picked by me, just some random captures the game makes when a Trophy is earned. So there was no bias on my side to choose the moment when the capture was made. Specially on more "busy" areas, I think it's pretty clear how far the game goes to mask it's flaws.

As a I've said before, the game looks good, and it has an excellent art direction. But to consider it a landmark in graphics it' just insane, IMO. The developers made very good job working with the limitations of the PS4,and they deserve all the crdit for it, but this is not teh best thing eva!

Hmm, which to believe. The clipped edited photo-mode shots or the unedited in game screen shots? Oh the dilemma!

Gpuking, stop the sharade, you're only making yourself look more and more idiotic.