The Power... of The Cell O.O

wow is this true? look at the downgrade!

(found this picture somewhere)

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

Here is a PS3 Year end title.

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

Wil4hire

And yes, 1st party devs may get good graphics on the ps3 after spending months and months on it.But guess what, most 3rd parties just wont bother, specially considering the horrible sales of software on the ps3.

[QUOTE="Wil4hire"]

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

whocares4peace

And yes, 1st party devs may get good graphics on the ps3 after spending months and months on it.But guess what, most 3rd parties just wont bother, specially considering the horrible sales of software on the ps3.

Maybe one day when you have a job in the game/visual effects industry you will know that all projects go through phases. Be it PORTS or not. Only 360 fans could be daft enough to think that those are A. Real Images from a Final Product. B. The "POWER" OF the Cell.

[QUOTE="whocares4peace"][QUOTE="Wil4hire"]

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

Wil4hire

And yes, 1st party devs may get good graphics on the ps3 after spending months and months on it.But guess what, most 3rd parties just wont bother, specially considering the horrible sales of software on the ps3.

Maybe one day when you have a job in the game/visual effects industry you will know that all projects go through phases. Be it PORTS or not.

One can only hope.

What a horrible thread.

The Cell isn't a graphics processor.

Lost Planet is going to be a port.

I don't understand how these devs act like that is all they could possibly get out of the PS3, when Resistance, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, and Haze all look significantly better.

Either these devs kick the asses off the devs that port all of these games, or they really haven't taken the time how to learn to program for the PS3.

What explanation is there for that? Is Capcom saying Insomniac and Naughty Dog are much, much better developers than them? That's what it seems like.

Insomniac put out R:FOM for launch and they're already finished their second title. Both look and play fantastic. What's stopping Crapcom, Electronic Advertising, etc to put out games of the same calibre.

I can understand the console companies wanting less competition, but publishers and devs should want the PS3's userbase to grow so they can sell more games. Do they think if they abandon it, people will just switch over to 360? Nuh uh. You'd lose a lot more people than if you have both platforms running strong. It's in their best interests to make good games and push sales of all three consoles. Why do they seem to miss this point?

What a horrible thread.

The Cell isn't a graphics processor.

Lost Planet is going to be a port.

I don't understand how these devs act like that is all they could possibly get out of the PS3, when Resistance, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, and Haze all look significantly better.

Either these devs kick the asses off the devs that port all of these games, or they really haven't taken the time how to learn to program for the PS3.

What explanation is there for that? Is Capcom saying Insomniac and Naughty Dog are much, much better developers than them? That's what it seems like.

Insomniac put out R:FOM for launch and they're already finished their second title. Both look and play fantastic. What's stopping Crapcom, Electronic Advertising, etc to put out games of the same calibre.

I can understand the console companies wanting less competition, but publishers and devs should want the PS3's userbase to grow so they can sell more games. Do they think if they abandon it, people will just switch over to 360? Nuh uh. You'd lose a lot more people than if you have both platforms running strong. It's in their best interests to make good games and push sales of all three consoles. Why do they seem to miss this point?

excelR83

Resistance does not look better than Lost Planet. Lair would look better, but it has performance issues. All the other games you listed look on-par or better though.

[QUOTE="excelR83"]

What a horrible thread.

The Cell isn't a graphics processor.

Lost Planet is going to be a port.

I don't understand how these devs act like that is all they could possibly get out of the PS3, when Resistance, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, and Haze all look significantly better.

Either these devs kick the asses off the devs that port all of these games, or they really haven't taken the time how to learn to program for the PS3.

What explanation is there for that? Is Capcom saying Insomniac and Naughty Dog are much, much better developers than them? That's what it seems like.

Insomniac put out R:FOM for launch and they're already finished their second title. Both look and play fantastic. What's stopping Crapcom, Electronic Advertising, etc to put out games of the same calibre.

I can understand the console companies wanting less competition, but publishers and devs should want the PS3's userbase to grow so they can sell more games. Do they think if they abandon it, people will just switch over to 360? Nuh uh. You'd lose a lot more people than if you have both platforms running strong. It's in their best interests to make good games and push sales of all three consoles. Why do they seem to miss this point?

BioShockOwnz

Resistance does not look better than Lost Planet. Lair would look better, but it has performance issues. All the other games you listed look on-par or better though.

Bioshock once again illustrates how blind bots can be.

"Resistance does not look better than Lost Planet" I am almost convinced that 360 emits severe radiation levels.

[QUOTE="excelR83"]

What a horrible thread.

The Cell isn't a graphics processor.

Lost Planet is going to be a port.

I don't understand how these devs act like that is all they could possibly get out of the PS3, when Resistance, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, and Haze all look significantly better.

Either these devs kick the asses off the devs that port all of these games, or they really haven't taken the time how to learn to program for the PS3.

What explanation is there for that? Is Capcom saying Insomniac and Naughty Dog are much, much better developers than them? That's what it seems like.

Insomniac put out R:FOM for launch and they're already finished their second title. Both look and play fantastic. What's stopping Crapcom, Electronic Advertising, etc to put out games of the same calibre.

I can understand the console companies wanting less competition, but publishers and devs should want the PS3's userbase to grow so they can sell more games. Do they think if they abandon it, people will just switch over to 360? Nuh uh. You'd lose a lot more people than if you have both platforms running strong. It's in their best interests to make good games and push sales of all three consoles. Why do they seem to miss this point?

BioShockOwnz

Resistance does not look better than Lost Planet. Lair would look better, but it has performance issues. All the other games you listed look on-par or better though.

Yeah, Resistance does look better. I definitely think so. Gamespot gave R:FOM a 9 and Lost Planet an 8, and since GS scores are all that matter here, I guess I can say this:

FACT: R:FOM looks better than Lost Planet :P

I don't get why people hate on R:FOM's graphics, it is an awesome looking game with a good HDTV. The atmosphere (fog, rain, snow) is great, and the further into the game you get the better the graphics look.

hmmmm im kind of skeptical because somebody could have made that from a pc in game pic the ps3 picsolidgamer

Same here, because it isn't on Capcoms site.

Oh, and when I said "significantly better", I wasn't talking about the 360 versions of games, I'm talking about the watered-down garbage they give us. I'll restate it to clarify: R:FOM, Uncharted, Haze, R&C, Motorstorm and Heavenly Sword look significantly better than any of the crap ports EA, Ubisoft, and now Capcom are sending our way. excelR83

[QUOTE="excelR83"]Oh, and when I said "significantly better", I wasn't talking about the 360 versions of games, I'm talking about the watered-down garbage they give us. I'll restate it to clarify: R:FOM, Uncharted, Haze, R&C, Motorstorm and Heavenly Sword look significantly better than any of the crap ports EA, Ubisoft, and now Capcom are sending our way. Wil4hire

Truth. Lems pounce on the ugliest port they can find as "evidence" that it is all the PS3 is capable of, completely ignoring all of the titles that look 10x better.

When are people on these boards ever going learn?....

The Cell is a CPU not a GPU it does not really affect the look of the games graphics, that is down to Xenos on the 360 and RSX on the PS3. Now Xenos was an ATI prototype of the R500/600 technology which was very next-gen when it was released, however the PS3's RSX comes from the Nvidia GeForce 7 series which is very outdated and has been outdated since before the PS3 was launched.

So the 360 has a far better GPU, this is why you see alot of games looking better and running at higher frame rates than on the PS3. The Cell CPU is superior to the 360's Xenon but all it allows developers to do is have more things on screen (characters for example) at once.

So all the Cow's constantly saying things like "Deveolpers ha en't harnessed the power of the cell", "Once dev's figure out how to work with the PS3 it's games will look better than the 360's" are just talking complete crap. For the graphics it's all down to your GPU and the 360 has the best of any console out.

Another useless thread.kelkimble2k4

I call B.S on the comparison.

Looks like both are from the PC version. First one set to high. Second set to low.

I call B.S on the comparison.

Looks like both are from the PC version. First one set to high. Second set to low.

x_boyfriend

First one might be the PC version, you could check the screen section at GS if you want to know for sure.

Funny how TC fled from his own thread. I am guessing he is the creator of that picture as well?

The PS3 screenshot is so obviously a screenshot of the PC version with graphical settings at minimum.

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

Here is a PS3 Year end title.

Wil4hire

:lol: looks like Stranglehold, Mission 2

What a horrible thread.

The Cell isn't a graphics processor.

Lost Planet is going to be a port.

I don't understand how these devs act like that is all they could possibly get out of the PS3, when Resistance, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, and Haze all look significantly better.

Either these devs kick the asses off the devs that port all of these games, or they really haven't taken the time how to learn to program for the PS3.

What explanation is there for that? Is Capcom saying Insomniac and Naughty Dog are much, much better developers than them? That's what it seems like.

Insomniac put out R:FOM for launch and they're already finished their second title. Both look and play fantastic. What's stopping Crapcom, Electronic Advertising, etc to put out games of the same calibre.

I can understand the console companies wanting less competition, but publishers and devs should want the PS3's userbase to grow so they can sell more games. Do they think if they abandon it, people will just switch over to 360? Nuh uh. You'd lose a lot more people than if you have both platforms running strong. It's in their best interests to make good games and push sales of all three consoles. Why do they seem to miss this point?

excelR83

So you expect Capcom, to waste its time trying to figure out how to program for that nightmare, when there are no guarentees that its even going to sell?

I just wish people weren't so blind and distracted by the name Sony and Playstation 3. Its not going to be anywhere near as good as the PS2, and it'll look like the 3DO compared to the PS1.

I do applaud how you guys can have such high hopes despite nearly every game flopping in terms of sales. It's always "just wait until this comes out" then when it comes out it still flops..at this rate who knows if MGS4 will even reach 1 milllion. The games just aren't selling, and I don't see why some devs still have Sony's balls in their mouth and put so much faith into it.

When are people on these boards ever going learn?....

The Cell is a CPU not a GPU it does not really affect the look of the games graphics, that is down to Xenos on the 360 and RSX on the PS3. Now Xenos was an ATI prototype of the R500/600 technology which was very next-gen when it was released, however the PS3's RSX comes from the Nvidia GeForce 7 series which is very outdated and has been outdated since before the PS3 was launched.

So the 360 has a far better GPU, this is why you see alot of games looking better and running at higher frame rates than on the PS3. The Cell CPU is superior to the 360's Xenon but all it allows developers to do is have more things on screen (characters for example) at once.

So all the Cow's constantly saying things like "Deveolpers ha en't harnessed the power of the cell", "Once dev's figure out how to work with the PS3 it's games will look better than the 360's" are just talking complete crap. For the graphics it's all down to your GPU and the 360 has the best of any console out.

hargZer0

Well if that's true then why does Halo 3 look so last gen?

Funny how TC fled from his own thread. I am guessing he is the creator of that picture as well?

Sollet

what? no I kinda forgot about the thread till now..

[QUOTE="hargZer0"]

When are people on these boards ever going learn?....

The Cell is a CPU not a GPU it does not really affect the look of the games graphics, that is down to Xenos on the 360 and RSX on the PS3. Now Xenos was an ATI prototype of the R500/600 technology which was very next-gen when it was released, however the PS3's RSX comes from the Nvidia GeForce 7 series which is very outdated and has been outdated since before the PS3 was launched.

So the 360 has a far better GPU, this is why you see alot of games looking better and running at higher frame rates than on the PS3. The Cell CPU is superior to the 360's Xenon but all it allows developers to do is have more things on screen (characters for example) at once.

So all the Cow's constantly saying things like "Deveolpers ha en't harnessed the power of the cell", "Once dev's figure out how to work with the PS3 it's games will look better than the 360's" are just talking complete crap. For the graphics it's all down to your GPU and the 360 has the best of any console out.

sakura_Ex

Well if that's true then why does Halo 3 look so last gen?

Only Bungie can answer that but my best guess would be that they wanted to focus more on the gameplay than the graphics. They probably cut the development time by a considerable amount using those graphics.

However it is fact that the 360 has the better GPU while the PS3 has the better CPU. With the focus of many developers and publishers being multi-platform at the moment, i can't see mnay titles comming out on either consoles that will have a massive graphical difference. It will all come down to the exclusives, and there will always be games on the 360 that look bettre than games on the PS3 and games on the PS3 that look better than games on the 360.

There are much better looking games on the PS3 than Lost Planet. Who cares what it looks like between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions? That game was still very mediocre. I would never buy it, for any platform.

There are much better looking games on the PS3 than Lost Planet. Who cares what it looks like between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions? That game was still very mediocre. I would never buy it, for any platform.

thinicer

Capcom developers = the Cell?

since when??

[QUOTE="Wil4hire"][QUOTE="whocares4peace"][QUOTE="Wil4hire"]

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

whocares4peace

And yes, 1st party devs may get good graphics on the ps3 after spending months and months on it.But guess what, most 3rd parties just wont bother, specially considering the horrible sales of software on the ps3.

Maybe one day when you have a job in the game/visual effects industry you will know that all projects go through phases. Be it PORTS or not.

One can only hope.

You are being the fanboy here... what you think a port is magically just added over? >>

Real Screenshot comparison. LINK

A game pre alpha is your best flamebait?

Wil4hire

You cant say its pre alpha when they are porting it. The game is complete just getting ported.

Real Screenshot comparison. LINK

xooco

Real Screenshot comparison. LINK

xooco

Only difference is that 360 has more colour

2nd screen is definitely taken from a PS3 version :roll:rogerjak

http://kotaku.com/gaming/jaggies/lost-planet-ps3-burns-my-eyes-their-blood-soothes-313525.php

sure is

poor cows, always get the watered down ports