The reasons why Modern warfare 3 will demolish BF3

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

In my opinion, Modern warfare 3 will be a far better game than Battlefield 3. In my opinion, Modern warfare 3 is like a massive tank compared to battlefield 3. I have many reasons why and I am guranteed sure it will. Here I go with the reasons.

1. Modern warfare 3 hands-down will have better sales, many people will buy it. Battlefield 3 seems to be a only target for the PC gamers. It seems console gamers are not interested in battlefield 3. IMO, Modern warfare 3 will wreck battlefield 3 in sales.

2. Better Graphics, I think Battlefield 3 will suck in graphics. It seems that the console version of battlefield 3 will be equilavent to PS2 graphics. PC Graphics of BF3 may be good but IMO MW3 Console graphics will beat BF3 PC graphics by far.

3. Best Frame Rate, MW3 will always run at 60fps where battlefield 3 will run at 40-50fps.

4. Killstreaks, In Battlefield 3, it is total luck, a tank, humvee, or even a helicopter can spawn in front of you and tadaa! In MW3, you have to work for helicopters and such.

5. MW3 is easy to get to.

6. More realistic, yes mw3 is more realistic than battlefield 3. Can someone explain anyone can just spawn on top of their teamates? Thats not realistic. In MW3, you get spawned in places that you would think you should get spawned. (Mostly bases) Also MW3 has real life places like London's big ben, India, France's Eiffel Tower. Battlefield has none of that. No one wants to play imaginary virtual maps.

7. Spec ops, since when did battlefield 3 had special ops and good addicting modes? Thats right, Never!

8. better leveling up in MW3 by far.

9. better customization than battlefield 3. You cant customize your camo of you gun, face paints in bf3. Also you can add title and emblems which are fun to collect all.

10. Last but not least is the theater mode. Went really good in a match, dominated a match in battlefield, want it on youtube? Tough luck. In MW3, you can just like Black Ops.

Now comment if you think I am right or not.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

BF3 will crushMW3 in the graphics department on all systems it releases on Tc. One game has an all new campaign mode with no repetitve plot structures taken from previous games from what I seen and the other gamehas repetitve plot structure taken from previous games like the underwater sections and the vehical type sections.

Avatar image for ImSwordMan
ImSwordMan

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ImSwordMan
Member since 2004 • 2273 Posts
  1. Better sales by all the casuals and 12 year old kids
  2. You really think an engine that has been used since COD4:MW will be able to have better graphics than a PC game with a whole new engine? and you are comparing console graphics to PC graphics on a NEW ENGINE of all things, really?
  3. Does it online?
  4. More like camp for your killstreaks, you dont have to put much effort for killstreaks.
  5. Ill give you this one
  6. :| realism in a video game? come on really video games arent meant to be real and you are saying MW3 will be more realistic?
  7. hmm
  8. We dont know MW3 multiplayer yet so we cant judge it
  9. same as 8
  10. I dont rememer being able to post on youtube...
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
COMPLETELY WRONG. I'm sorry but tanks don't spawn anywhere but at your base, you have to drive it up to the confrontation area. BF3 has cutting edge graphics, MW3 has a 6 year old engine and graphics, FACT. The PC will run it at 100 fps. You spawn in random corners in a tiny 200 square metre map, how is that more realistic than spawning on your squad leader? You will also visit Paris and such in BF3 too. So much ignorance, do some research and then come back! Sales don't mean anything about gameplay quality Call of Duty - 55 million Tom Clancy - 55 million Dragon Quest - 57 million Ape Escape - 58.9 million The Legend of Zelda - 59 million Gran Turismo - 63.15 million Winning Eleven/Pro Evolution Soccer - 69 million Sonic the Hedgehog - 80 million Madden NFL - 85 million Need For Speed - 100 million Grand Theft Auto - 100 million Final Fantasy - 100 million FIFA - 100 million The Sims - 125 million Tetris - 125 million Pokemon - 215 million Mario - 262 million By that logic I'm guessing even Sonic is better than MW right?
Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
ShoTTyMcNaDeS

2784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Member since 2011 • 2784 Posts
I think you are off base on alot of your points. First and foremost, besides both games being based around modern military tactics and gameplay, they are really quite different experiences. Imo, BF3 will be the better looking of the two even on console. CoD games really haven't changed visually since CoD 4. MW3 will again bring the same fast paced perk/killstreak driven gameplay to the online component. While on the other side of the coin, BF3 will have the classic BF class driven online mechanic where you have a role and in order for your team to succeed, you must play within that role. I do agree that once again, particularily on console, MW3 will outsell BF3 by a large margin. As far as the extras like gun camos, medals and attachments, DICE has already said that BF3 will have 10 times the unlocks available than BFBC2 had. Imo, the CoD games have gone a little overboard with this kind of stuff. I also feel that the CoD games have gone crazy with the Perk/Killstreak system. Personally speaking, I would much prefer they go back to the 3,5,7 Killstreak days of CoD 4 and get rid of game ruining Killstreaks like the Huey, Tactical Nuke and things of that nature. I think it would eliminate alot of the camping that everyone complains about in CoD games. I think both games will be awesome to play and will both sell well. In the end however, the CoD franchise is simply more popular and will once again win out in the sales catagory.
Avatar image for Kevz0
Kevz0

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Kevz0
Member since 2010 • 550 Posts

MW3 has a 6 year old engine and graphics, FACT.ocstew
Quake 3 is from ´99.

Avatar image for shalashaska88
shalashaska88

3198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 shalashaska88
Member since 2005 • 3198 Posts
So um the idea of spawning is realistic huh? Wow.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

I'm just going to go ahead and assume this is a joke thread.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

SMH... no just no. I won't even entertain this topic as to why when it's already apparent.

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"] MW3 has a 6 year old engine and graphics, FACT.Kevz0

Quake 3 is from ´99.

Urgh, I was trying to be conservative with all the updates to the engine and all. If Quake 3 was from 99 then the engine is probably even older.
Avatar image for LustForSoul
LustForSoul

6404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LustForSoul
Member since 2011 • 6404 Posts

I stopped at 2 when you said it will be equilavent to PS2 graphics. Your arguments are a joke. BF3 will crush MW3's graphics on any platform.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25264 Posts
  1. Modern Warfare 3 will have higher sales, but I am pretty certain Battlefield 3 will be popular for a longer time, since MW3 will be mostly forgotten once the next big shooter pops up.
  2. No it wont. BF3 is using a new engine, FrostBite 2.0. I am pretty sure MW3 will use the same engine the other CoDs did. BF3 is much more likely to look better because of a better engine, not to mention gameplay footage.
  3. Will it have that online as well?
  4. Those vehicles only spawn in bases. So no, it is not total luck.
  5. That is true, but Battlefield isnt relatively accessible as well. Not as accessible as CoD though.
  6. Umm, what? Pretty sure there was a paris level in Battlefield 3.
  7. Conquest Mode. Something even some mmos have copied.
  8. Perhaps, but we dont know yet.
  9. We dont know yet
  10. I cant record footage in Battlefield? Never knew.
Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

uhh, what is this guy talking about? Half the things he says have no factual basis. He's saying that out of two games that haven't been released yet that one will be better at everything.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

this will get locked because its a joke of a thread. no.2 is just.... there are no words

Avatar image for Oil_Rope_Bombs
Oil_Rope_Bombs

2667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Oil_Rope_Bombs
Member since 2010 • 2667 Posts
All of your points were assumptions.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
Far too easy trollbait.
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

only insales and perhaps more users

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

both MW3 and BF3 are up for preorder in most retailers shocking isnt it.

Also lol at the fact killstreaks are a pro.That is just a gimmick to make average joe think he's awesome cause he can shoot a gun and sit in a corner for 10min to get a helicopter.Its nice when you run and gun but a lot of the high killstreaks really force camping, thats why im on barebones when im online much better.

CoD4 had it right black ops was fairly close but killstreaks and some weapons really hindered it.Dunno how it was so hard to improve upon CoD4 its only gotten worse.

Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts

I'm just going to go ahead and assume this is a joke thread.

Vaasman

It obviously is.

but IMO MW3 Console graphics will beat BF3 PC graphics by far.

shahilsyed

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
10/10 I raged.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

I'm just going to go ahead and assume this is a joke thread.

nethernova

It obviously is.

but IMO MW3 Console graphics will beat BF3 PC graphics by far.

shahilsyed

Don't forget he called BF3 graphics like something from PS2 :P

Avatar image for YoungSinatra25
YoungSinatra25

4314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#24 YoungSinatra25
Member since 2009 • 4314 Posts
You cant help but be a COD fanboy can you? Your a casual, its ok. But half of what you posted was uninformed nonsense. I'll address the few you got really really off. 2. Your dumb, just leave it at that if you beleive your statement... 3.Bf on consoles runs at 30FPS and 720p, COD runs 60FPS at 600p. 6. See #2. Bf has real locations but once again see #2. 9.Bf3 actually has just as much customization as COD this time around. It's obvious you don't know **** about the develpoment of these games and just pulling nonsense out your butt. Do research...
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Its my opinion.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Its my opinion.

shahilsyed

Thats exactly what it is so don't try make them out as facts

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
stopped reading at 'battlefield only targeted for pc'
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
Super Mario owns MW. Sheesh SM makes MW look like a turd and SM nailed the FPS element perfectly while MW is just full of noobtubers and spawn camping. Oh wait that's an opinion and it belongs on my blog. I suggest the OP does the same before he gets modded.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Go on hate, its called opinions. Some of the things I listed are facts. You people cant take that mw3 is gonna be better.

Avatar image for Republican11
Republican11

1029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Republican11
Member since 2008 • 1029 Posts

6. More realistic, yes mw3 is more realistic than battlefield 3. Can someone explain anyone can just spawn on top of their teamates? Thats not realistic. In MW3, you get spawned in places that you would think you should get spawned. (Mostly bases) Also MW3 has real life places like London's big ben, India, France's Eiffel Tower. Battlefield has none of that. No one wants to play imaginary virtual maps.

shahilsyed

Can someone explain to me how ANY kind of spawning is realistic? (Except for baby making)

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

Go on hate, its called opinions. Some of the things I listed are facts. You people cant take that mw3 is gonna be better.

shahilsyed
No you stated BF3 looks like a PS2 game even when it clearly does not. How the hell is that constitute an opinion. More like blindness. The same goes for the tank spawning bull****. That does not happen. How about I pretend MW3 has you ride ponies to set up a conspiracy that lets you go back in time to destroy the Twin Towers? Is that opinion?
Avatar image for QQabitmoar
QQabitmoar

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 QQabitmoar
Member since 2011 • 1892 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Go on hate, its called opinions. Some of the things I listed are facts. You people cant take that mw3 is gonna be better.

ocstew

No you stated BF3 looks like a PS2 game even when it clearly does not. How the hell is that constitute an opinion. More like blindness. The same goes for the tank spawning bull****. That does not happen. How about I pretend MW3 has you ride PONIES to set up a conspiracy that lets you go back in time to destroy the Twin Towers? Is that opinion?

OH NO NO NO! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!

Avatar image for bostadskontrakt
bostadskontrakt

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#33 bostadskontrakt
Member since 2008 • 387 Posts

Uuh, MW is shooting the other guy. BF is large scale warefare.

Now I'm off to create a thread about why Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit is way better game thanForza Motorsport or GT5. NFS hasmanymore hot pursuits.

Avatar image for tumle
tumle

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 tumle
Member since 2004 • 1274 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Go on hate, its called opinions. Some of the things I listed are facts. You people cant take that mw3 is gonna be better.

ocstew

No you stated BF3 looks like a PS2 game even when it clearly does not. How the hell is that constitute an opinion. More like blindness. The same goes for the tank spawning bull****. That does not happen. How about I pretend MW3 has you ride ponies to set up a conspiracy that lets you go back in time to destroy the Twin Towers? Is that opinion?

IMO the world is flat .

IMO everybody can fly by flapping there hands.

IMO na na nananaana

you cant just state lies and call them you're opinion. You could but you would have no credibility anywhere

But TC keep on trolling.. actually please stop;)

Avatar image for Khoo1992
Khoo1992

2472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#35 Khoo1992
Member since 2005 • 2472 Posts

BF: BC2 is already much better looking than all the COD games.

Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

lol, this thread is really funny to read. Of how the guy who stated this has no idea and has probably never played a battlefield game in his life. Also battlefield 3 will be popular MUCH longer than modern warfare 3. You know why? Becase MW3 will become old once the next one comes out which means in 1 year. And it's STILL running on the same game engine as it's predicessors. Why is this fourm even here? Oh yea, I smell a CoD fannboy XP

Avatar image for AndersK
AndersK

396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 AndersK
Member since 2005 • 396 Posts

Too obvious OP, too obvious.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

BTW, I own battlefield 1943 and Bad company 2 so I do own a battlefield game.

Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

BTW, I own battlefield 1943 and Bad company 2 so I do own a battlefield game.

shahilsyed

for pc or 360? Because we all know everything is better on pc. And CoD is using an outdated engine compared to battlefield.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I own bf1943 on xbox 360 and bad company 2 on pc. Bad company 2 on PC at its best is OK.

Avatar image for Kiro0
Kiro0

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Kiro0
Member since 2009 • 1176 Posts

May have actually fallen for it if number 2 wasn't so obvious.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
Those are ridiculous reasons.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62010 Posts

Good God, some of your points are terribad. BF3 console version will be on par with PS2 graphics, and the console versions of MW3 will beat the PC version of BF3? At least try and come off as a serious poster.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I own bf1943 on xbox 360 and bad company 2 on pc. Bad company 2 on PC at its best is OK.

shahilsyed
Get BF2 then.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

I don't know if this is supposed to be a joke to make CoD fans look bad or what.

In my opinion, Modern warfare 3 will be a far better game than Battlefield 3. In my opinion, Modern warfare 3 is like a massive tank compared to battlefield 3. I have many reasons why and I am guranteed sure it will. Here I go with the reasons.

1. Modern warfare 3 hands-down will have better sales, many people will buy it. Battlefield 3 seems to be a only target for the PC gamers. It seems console gamers are not interested in battlefield 3. IMO, Modern warfare 3 will wreck battlefield 3 in sales.
Battlefield has a significant PS3 and 360 userbase. Bad Company and Bad Company 2 did really well. BF3 pre-orders were 10 times those of BC2. It seems console gamers are interested.

2. Better Graphics, I think Battlefield 3 will suck in graphics. It seems that the console version of battlefield 3 will be equilavent to PS2 graphics. PC Graphics of BF3 may be good but IMO MW3 Console graphics will beat BF3 PC graphics by far.
This nonsense is primarily what's making me think you're having a laugh.

3. Best Frame Rate, MW3 will always run at 60fps where battlefield 3 will run at 40-50fps.
BF3 will run at 30FPS on consoles and 0-100FPS on PC.

4. Killstreaks, In Battlefield 3, it is total luck, a tank, humvee, or even a helicopter can spawn in front of you and tadaa! In MW3, you have to work for helicopters and such.
Having vehicle access be dependent on killstreaks would be positively stupid in Battlefield. They would have to copy Homefront's battlepoint system. In which case I'd be concerned about the map design. Having big sprawling maps without vehicles during the beginning doesn't sound too great. The maps would have to be tailored more towards infantry combat. Pushes like the one on Arica would be impossible.

5. MW3 is easy to get to.
Don't know what that's supposed to mean.

6. More realistic, yes mw3 is more realistic than battlefield 3. Can someone explain anyone can just spawn on top of their teamates? Thats not realistic. In MW3, you get spawned in places that you would think you should get spawned. (Mostly bases) Also MW3 has real life places like London's big ben, India, France's Eiffel Tower. Battlefield has none of that. No one wants to play imaginary virtual maps.
Spawning by its very nature is unrealistic, regardless of how it works. Complaining about aspects of these games not being realistic is so incredibly daft. Especially when it's something that improves the game. Battlefield has squad spawning to lessen transportation, repetition and to make it easier for squads to stick together and help each other out.

I believe every single installment in the series except possibly for BF2142 has had almost exclusively maps based on real locations. This includes BF3. Operation Metro is set in Paris for instance.

The last sentence there is so flabbergasting and senseless I don't know how to respond to it. Suppose you didn't want to play a lot of the maps in Blops then. Think Havana and Hanoi are the only ones based on real locations.

7. Spec ops, since when did battlefield 3 had special ops and good addicting modes? Thats right, Never!

8. better leveling up in MW3 by far.

9. better customization than battlefield 3. You cant customize your camo of you gun, face paints in bf3. Also you can add title and emblems which are fun to collect all.

10. Last but not least is the theater mode. Went really good in a match, dominated a match in battlefield, want it on youtube? Tough luck. In MW3, you can just like Black Ops.

Now comment if you think I am right or not.

shahilsyed

With all these you are making uninformed and/or baseless assumptions. Some of which can already be proven wrong. It is pretty ill advised to critcize specifics of a game that are yet to be detailed/you don't know **** about.

7. BF3 has had a co-op mode ever since it was announced months and months ago. First details supposed to be revealed at Gamescom.
9. EA is yet to go into detail on the customization, but has made it clear that it is a big focus. So expect a bunch of it.
10. BF3 will have a replay recorder.

Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

Wow some of you bit hard.

Avatar image for Morrdecai
Morrdecai

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Morrdecai
Member since 2011 • 587 Posts
The only thing Mw3 will beat BF3 in is sales.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
I would focus on the good points instead of just trying to go overboard and say ridiculous things like mw3 has better graphics. I mean that makes me doubt your even serious.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Go on hate, its called opinions. Some of the things I listed are facts. You people cant take that mw3 is gonna be better.

shahilsyed

Well, this is one of those rare occasions where an opinion, aside from the sales point, is absolutely, completely and totally wrong.

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
Lol, the MW engine doesn't even account for gravity. In BC2, every projectile from the sniper to the tank is affected by gravity.