The Switch isn't hardcore

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheMisterManGuy
TheMisterManGuy

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheMisterManGuy
Member since 2011 • 264 Posts

We can all agree that the Nintendo Switch live conference was a less than stellar presentation. Awkward translations, sluggish pacing, weak third party presence and hefty price tags bogged it down quite a bit. That being said, I think people are complaining for the wrong reasons.

When the Switch was first unveiled, many people were hoping it would return Nintendo to being a hardcore gamer company that focused on hardcore, mature games with no gimmick or filthy casual garbage. Just a controller, handheld, and classic Nintendo franchises and AAA 3rd party games. Then Nintendo comes out in January and basically says "LOL, I don't think so!" and proceeds to double down on their Wii/DS era mindset. Unsurprisingly, gamers were salty. After all, this was supposed to be Nintendo's return to the glory days of the **GameCube** where they were hardcore and for "gamerz!".

What people fail to realize, is that this is how Nintendo ALWAYS was. Anyone with any amount of common sense and knowledge of how Nintendo approaches video games really should've seen this coming. Yes, with Nintendo Switch, Nintendo is going back to it's roots. However, it's not the Hardcore, mature gaming, nostalgia filed, adult male Nintendo that people seem to fantasize about. It's the pick-up-and-play, fun for everyone, local multiplayer, mobile first Nintendo that defined their success with the Famicom and GameBoy, and strengthened it with the Wii and DS. And that's what the Switch is, Nintendo is doubling down on their strengths, not conforming to their weaknesses.

That isn't to say the company hasn't learned a thing or two. The launch line up may be barren, but if you look at the Switch's first year as a whole, it looks a lot rosier. Nintendo seems to be avoiding front loading the Switch launch with too many titles to avoid Wii U esque software droughts, and instead prepping a major first-party release for nearly each month, with more potentially on the way at E3. As much as I hate pay-walled online play with a passion, the fact that Nintendo's service is subscription based might mean it's a lot more feature packed and modern that it probably won't matter in the long run. That NES rental nonsense is complete BS though.

The Switch as a whole, also looks to have a lot more thought put into it's design and gimmicks than the Wii U ever did. The IR motion capture thingy on the Right Joy-Con may look silly, but it at least has a functional gameplay purpose, unlike the camera and TV remote nonsense on the Wii U Gamepad. And the fact that each Joy-Con can be used as a separate controller is the kind of smart ingenuity that hasn't been seen from the company since the Wii and DS era.

Going back to the reveal trailer for Nintendo Switch in October, it's easy to see this was never going to be the Hardcore gamer box that fans were clamoring for. No amount of hip 20-somethings, Skyrim, or Red branding, was ever going to change that. Nintendo might be done with the Wii and DS brands, but the philosophy and technology they introduced will always remain within the company, and if you think they're going away anytime soon just to gain some street cred, think again.

Avatar image for sHaDyCuBe321
sHaDyCuBe321

5769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sHaDyCuBe321
Member since 2003 • 5769 Posts

TLDR

Thread title is false though.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

We had hardcore with Wii U. I feel would be a mistake to do that again. Its time to appeal to everyone. Good read though, Nintendo is back baby. First Nintendo console ive ever preordered.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23837 Posts

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#5 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts

If it isn't, then that's for the better.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

I don't understand why something needs to only cater to an exclusive base of 60-90 million people. It doesn't have to be hardcore as long as it gets games that the hardcore can enjoy. Apart from that, if the thing also happens to appeal to a larger audience? Good for it, and good for that other audience

Avatar image for applefan1991
applefan1991

3397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By applefan1991  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 3397 Posts

A) We don't need another "we can all agree" thread.

B) This is a blog post. You aren't really providing anything to discuss other than your lengthy opinion.