the system that sells the most will eventually get the most and best games

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zam_basic
Zam_basic

5246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Zam_basic
Member since 2002 • 5246 Posts

all third party develoopers will flock to the wii and they will all compete hard making the best games.

sorry lemmings but your "claim to best games" wont last long

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts
that's the theory but i don't think many people (even the ones who use that argument) really trust it.
Avatar image for M8ingSeezun
M8ingSeezun

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 M8ingSeezun
Member since 2007 • 2313 Posts

Keep dreaming sheep.

If you have GTA4 or Doom 4 (hypothetically) on all platforms....a majority will only pay attention to the 360, PS3 and PC versions. In this situation, Graphics are simply the deciding factor, with gameplay coming close second. Most gamers will likely be WOWED by the eye-candy abilities of powerful platforms. Sorry to break it to you.

Sorry, sheep, but that desperate 3rd party flocking to Wii theory just won't and will never work.

Avatar image for Russell_Burrows
Russell_Burrows

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Russell_Burrows
Member since 2005 • 143 Posts

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

Avatar image for Panzer_Zwei
Panzer_Zwei

15498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Panzer_Zwei
Member since 2006 • 15498 Posts
The most? yes. The best? I think that's very subjective.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
I think that there's not enough historical precedence to support such a statement, nor do I think it makes much sense as an absolute statement.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

that's the theory but i don't think many people (even the ones who use that argument) really trust it. CaseyWegner

Yeah, this might be the first gen that this might be false. Although the 3rd party is picking up for the Wii, it still is low compared to the PS3 and 360.

Avatar image for jackvegas21
jackvegas21

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jackvegas21
Member since 2007 • 3157 Posts
That is only your opinion.
Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

all third party develoopers will flock to the wii and they will all compete hard making the best games.

sorry lemmings but your "claim to best games" wont last long

Zam_basic

why not just keep making games for ps2? plus ps2 graphics = to wii.

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts

Well.. In gens where all platforms are rather similar this is definitly true...

But.. the wii is quite different.. Although when(if) the WIi sells twice as much as the xbox360 this might come true..

Avatar image for V_Isle
V_Isle

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 V_Isle
Member since 2006 • 1785 Posts
Anyone who has to say "sorry, _____" knows their argument does not work at all. You'll see pretty much nothing but casual shallow crap on the Wii, because that's what's selling. So you're not gonna see awesome titles like Mass Effect or Bioshock ending up on there, just more crap like Cooking Mama. It's also been stated, that devs use profits from their crappy Wii titles to fund actual games being developed for 360/PS3. So no, 360 will not be beaten in the games category by the Wii, ever.
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts
"Best" is entirely subjective.

But the system that sells the most does generally get the most games.
Avatar image for Unholy_Smite
Unholy_Smite

796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Unholy_Smite
Member since 2007 • 796 Posts
Not gonna happen! The Wii is the most casual system ever made, so devs won't be in any rush to release hardcores games to it.. Just use it as a breaking even point, put a bad casual game on the Wii while the 360 and PS3 get all the hardcore games. Breaking even point.
Avatar image for V_Isle
V_Isle

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 V_Isle
Member since 2006 • 1785 Posts
Subjective? This is System Wars, we go by Gamespot reviews. And so far, 360 wins. I don't care if it had a year head start either, do we blame the PS2 for having one? Devs made actual good hardcore titles for the PS2 after it sold well, but now devs see you can make lame crap like Cooking Mama and get good sales, so now the ratio of quality games to good sales is totally changed. Good sales, and crappy games, and more crappy games later on for more sales, that's more like it, for the Wii.
Avatar image for GrlGmr
GrlGmr

4179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 GrlGmr
Member since 2003 • 4179 Posts

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

RussellBurrows

I'm sorry, but I call BS on the whole 'Nintendo Loyalist' argument. It's just ludicrous.

"HEY! Here's this great game that got awesome reviews and looks really fun to play! Oops, it's not by Nintendo... Back on the shelf it goes."

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
[QUOTE="RussellBurrows"]

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

GrlGmr

I'm sorry, but I call BS on the whole 'Nintendo Loyalist' argument. It's just ludicrous.

"HEY! Here's this great game that got awesome reviews and looks really fun to play! Oops, it's not by Nintendo... Back on the shelf it goes."



Regardless you can't argue that Nintendo first-party isn't dominating Wii game sales.
Avatar image for GrlGmr
GrlGmr

4179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#17 GrlGmr
Member since 2003 • 4179 Posts
[QUOTE="GrlGmr"][QUOTE="RussellBurrows"]

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

Teufelhuhn

I'm sorry, but I call BS on the whole 'Nintendo Loyalist' argument. It's just ludicrous.

"HEY! Here's this great game that got awesome reviews and looks really fun to play! Oops, it's not by Nintendo... Back on the shelf it goes."



Regardless you can't argue that Nintendo first-party isn't dominating Wii game sales.

Nintendo is the developer with the most games out for the system at the moment, and they tend to make high quality games. That is the reason why 1st party games are dominating, not because of some imagined sense of loyalty to the company.

Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts

See, there's a problem there.

While more sales does theoretically equal more games, saying "wait 'till they shift focus" doesn't hold much cred here.

So right now it's 360>Wii~PS3 (true that it's opinion with all 3, but according to GS 360>PS3~Wii), not Wii>360>PS3 because of sales.

Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts

I think that there's not enough historical precedence to support such a statement, nor do I think it makes much sense as an absolute statement.Teufelhuhn

how so? every single system that has won since snes vs genesis has had the biggest variety of the best games..

Avatar image for chadwardennn
chadwardennn

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chadwardennn
Member since 2007 • 883 Posts

that's the theory but i don't think many people (even the ones who use that argument) really trust it. CaseyWegner

Because the hardware of the Wii isnt comparable to the 360/ps3.

And yes sheep, hardware matters. Id rather have metroid, galaxy and brawl with nextgen graphics/physics etc. etc. than swinging around with my wiimote.

Avatar image for Xeratule
Xeratule

4472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Xeratule
Member since 2003 • 4472 Posts

all third party develoopers will flock to the wii and they will all compete hard making the best games.

sorry lemmings but your "claim to best games" wont last long

Zam_basic

PC+X360+PS3 still has a larger userbase than the Wii alone; thus the multiplats will remain on the other systems. (The Wii's hardware is too weak to handle multiplats.)

Avatar image for Xeratule
Xeratule

4472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Xeratule
Member since 2003 • 4472 Posts

Well.. In gens where all platforms are rather similar this is definitly true...

But.. the wii is quite different.. Although when(if) the WIi sells twice as much as the xbox360 this might come true..

omgimba

That actually holds some weight. When the Wii has more sales than the combined competition, we'll start to see a big shift towards the Wii's development.

Avatar image for funnymario
funnymario

9122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 funnymario
Member since 2005 • 9122 Posts
The Wii is just too different. That logic is usually the case, but this time around, things have changed.
Avatar image for Russell_Burrows
Russell_Burrows

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Russell_Burrows
Member since 2005 • 143 Posts

What killed the Game Cube?

Lack of Third Party game sales in equal numbers to Nintendo game sales so developers seeing poor game sales started jumping ship from the GC to the PS2 and the then nascent X-Box.

How are third party game sales on the Wii?

Avatar image for SgtWhiskeyjack
SgtWhiskeyjack

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 SgtWhiskeyjack
Member since 2004 • 16364 Posts

IMO the Xbox had the best games last Gen over the PS2.

Avatar image for ShmenonPie
ShmenonPie

1117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 ShmenonPie
Member since 2007 • 1117 Posts
Not if the Wii stops selling soon, which I think it will. Surely all the misled casuals have finished buying them by now?
Avatar image for ShmenonPie
ShmenonPie

1117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 ShmenonPie
Member since 2007 • 1117 Posts

IMO the Xbox had the best games last Gen over the PS2.

SgtWhiskeyjack

LOL I don't think I just read your post right... How can you think that?!?!?!?!?

Avatar image for Xeratule
Xeratule

4472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Xeratule
Member since 2003 • 4472 Posts

What killed the Game Cube?

Lack of Third Party game sales in equal numbers to Nintendo game sales so developers seeing poor game sales started jumping ship from the GC to the PS2 and the then nascent X-Box.

How are third party game sales on the Wii?

RussellBurrows

3rd party games didn't come to the gamecube mostly because of disc capacity issues. PS2 and Xbox were both on DVDs.

Avatar image for rowzzr
rowzzr

2375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#29 rowzzr
Member since 2005 • 2375 Posts

all third party develoopers will flock to the wii and they will all compete hard making the best games.

sorry lemmings but your "claim to best games" wont last long

Zam_basic

that's actually very much true. however, anyone could plainly see that the wii's hardware isn't capable of handling games such as bioshock - unless they make some major league downgrade.

the wii has a weak fanbase - the casuals - a fanbase that could leave nintendo at anytime they wish. the hardcores however, there aren't much "sheep" to support the wii. so saying the wii is the best option for hardcore and "best" games isn't really looking at it logically so NO.

Avatar image for SgtWhiskeyjack
SgtWhiskeyjack

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 SgtWhiskeyjack
Member since 2004 • 16364 Posts
[QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

IMO the Xbox had the best games last Gen over the PS2.

ShmenonPie

LOL I don't think I just read your post right... How can you think that?!?!?!?!?

My favourite games were PGR2, Forza, Ninja Gaiden Black, Rallisport Challenge2, Dead or Alive online and Rainbow six 3 BA, the PS2 had nothing that touched them in my opinion.

Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
Developers only go to the Wii to make money.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#32 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
i dont know about that theory considering that most companies that make consoles do not make money of the actual console itself, but the games that are played on them
Avatar image for dispator
dispator

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 dispator
Member since 2005 • 570 Posts

Dont think so.

Wii wont be getting the best games,IMO couse i dont see some high profile developers that like using up to date hardware in their games going and releasing games on the wii!

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#34 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts
[QUOTE="ShmenonPie"][QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

IMO the Xbox had the best games last Gen over the PS2.

SgtWhiskeyjack

LOL I don't think I just read your post right... How can you think that?!?!?!?!?

My favourite games were PGR2, Forza, Ninja Gaiden Black, Rallisport Challenge2, Dead or Alive online and Rainbow six 3 BA, the PS2 had nothing that touched them in my opinion.

You also forgot to add that almost every multiplat title was better for the xbox also.

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

sony have the most studios so i would go with the ps3 over time...

wii games would cost the least to make but they would probably churn them out two to the dozen and i dont think there would be much quality amongst them..

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

all third party develoopers will flock to the wii and they will all compete hard making the best games.

sorry lemmings but your "claim to best games" wont last long

Zam_basic

Great logic.:roll:

Avatar image for _koolgirl_
_koolgirl_

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 _koolgirl_
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

3rd parties are trying to cash in on the Wii (Boogie), but the attempts are poor and have poor game sales as a result.

This logic holds true when all competitors are half azz similar, however Wii's hardware is very last gen with the only new gen feature being the controls. Games like Manhunt 2 are goingto Wii and Ps2. Not PS3, not 360, not the PC, PS2. In fact, I would say the continued success of PS2 has helped the Wii more than anything, publishers can make a game for the biggest fan base of last gen and the new up and coming of this gen at the same time.

However the hardcore (the guys who spend alot of money on games) buy games on the other platforms because they want something actually next gen. The Nintendo fanboys and fans of Nintendo in general buy Nintendo games. The non gamers are still playing Wii sports.

Lets look at this slightly different. At the end of last gen, Xbox and GC were about tied with worldwide sales, however (in the US anyway), all the 3rd party support had moved to Xbox and PS2. Not because those systems were better but because 3rd parties realised where they made money. Many people owned a GC as a secondary console, only for exclusives, many own a Wii for the same reason. Wii has great software sales for 1st party or a 3rd party exclusive (if it's good), but if you look at big money makers like Madden, Wii has by far the worst sales.

Avatar image for choasgod
choasgod

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 choasgod
Member since 2005 • 5710 Posts
Unfortunatly for Nintendo the majority of Wii owners prefer to buy either Nintendo games or kiddy brand stuff ...

This is why 3rd party devs. didn't support Wii from the get-go ... third party games historically sell better on SONY or Microsoft or SEGA platforms ... i mean casuals want the next Mario game, the next Metriod, the next Yoshi game ... Nintendo makes the game people want ... so unless a third party game reaches those high standards its ignored ...
Avatar image for Heatly
Heatly

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Heatly
Member since 2003 • 1110 Posts
As of right now the 360 is where its at for selling software. It has by far the most million plus sellers as well as almost a guarantee that if your game is good it well sell period. Also you guys have been saying this for a year now to wait and see all of these third party developers flocking to the Wii and the only thing I see is developers claiming they are making Wii games just to support there financingfor their true next gen apps.
Avatar image for blizzvalve
blizzvalve

14052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#40 blizzvalve
Member since 2007 • 14052 Posts

that's the theory but i don't think many people (even the ones who use that argument) really trust it. CaseyWegner

Well that theory worked with everyother gen

Atari-Had most games and most sales

NES-had most games and most sales

SNES-had most games and most sales

PS-had most games and most sales

PS2-Had most games and most sales.

I don't know why the theory won't work for this gen. I don't think we can have two winners in SW.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

RussellBurrows
Wasn't Goldeneye third party? I think it was, sorry if I'm wrong, I have never played that game (gasps all around).
Avatar image for ProductNumber49
ProductNumber49

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 ProductNumber49
Member since 2006 • 3840 Posts

Ubisoft said the Wii makes them lots of money, even if they release casual party games,they can still make a fortune. So after, they can finance games for 360/ps3 and pc.

Srry.

Sales does not always equal better games. :|

The Wii should be considered as a toy,not a console.

Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="RussellBurrows"]

The Wii sold plenty of consoles that were purchased for the most part by the Nintendo Loyalists and the main problem for Third Party Developers is that Nintendo Loyalists for the most part purchase only Nintendo software.

This bodes badly for the future library on the Wii as when gamers consider multiplat. games its always lower quality on the Wii if you consider game features other than the controller.

Grodus5

Wasn't Goldeneye third party? I think it was, sorry if I'm wrong, I have never played that game (gasps all around).

No, it was produced by Rare, which was second party at the time and published by Nintendo.

Anyway, about the theory....I think we can all agree that this generation is radically different than previous generations, yes? Then while that theory held true in previous generations (though a Genesis vs SNES debate could go either way), the results could be radically different as well.

Avatar image for JocktheMotie
JocktheMotie

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 JocktheMotie
Member since 2007 • 660 Posts
PC has the best games. And nobodyreally knows how many gaming PC's there are. I guess you could track the sale of graphics card sales in a year, but it doesn't give you a great estimate, because most PCplayers upgrade every two years or so and may skip a generation of cards.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60819 Posts
Unless its the Wii..Sorry but thats the cold hard truth.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

Ubisoft said the Wii makes them lots of money, even if they release casual party games,they can still make a fortune. So after, they can finance games for 360/ps3 and pc.

Srry.

Sales does not always equal better games. :|

The Wii should be considered as a toy,not a console.

ProductNumber49

Indeed, sales do not a better game make. The Wii's user base is in love with so much casual crap thats what many dev's will play to, because s*** sells if you spinkle it with magic dust and make it trendy.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
That was true for past gens but may not be for this one. Past gens, if you made a game for the best selling console, you could easily make a port for it's competitors and have your game sell much more. This gen it's different. 360 and PS3 are so different than the wii that you can't just make a wii port for 360 or PS3 and vice versa. On the other hand, you can make a game for the 360 and easily have a port for the PS3. That's why you see all those 360+PS3 multiplats that are missing from the wii. Unless the wii surpasses the combined sales of both consoles, that trend will continue.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]I think that there's not enough historical precedence to support such a statement, nor do I think it makes much sense as an absolute statement.-Renegade

how so? every single system that has won since snes vs genesis has had the biggest variety of the best games..

then shouldn't you be fine with using games to determine the winner?

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
no they won't. its easier and makes more business sense to make a multiplat for 360 and ps3 than a wii game.