The Wii is changing gaming -and we all know it.

  • 174 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Popadophalis
Popadophalis

1587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Popadophalis
Member since 2007 • 1587 Posts

A while ago I asked myself why do the hardcore hate the Wii? There are two other consoles all catering exclusively to the hardcore crowd so why should they care so much about the little old Wii targeting an expanded audience?

Then it struck me, they hate it because it's changing gaming as we know it. When Low budget games like Wii Fit Carnival games and Wii play can still be selling phenominally well months after it's initial release we know the landscape of gaming is changing dramatically.

A generation of cinematic gaming is closing fast and the Hi-def consoles are going down with the ship. Are you prepared for what's coming next?

Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts
The industry would collapse in on itself if all devs were to start only making casual shovelware.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

The real question should be, is the Wii changing gaming to the better or worse?

I still hope MS & Sony wont follow the steps taken by Nintendo this generation....

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#4 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts

The industry would collapse in on itself if all devs were to start only making casual shovelware.-DrRobotnik-

This will never happen as even if it did then it would be like, all shovelware on wii and the good games on PS360 and then next gen the PS4/720 would follow but there are still many developers making great games on the wii so I doubt this would ever happen

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#5 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts

The real question should be, is the Wii changing gaming to the better or worse?

I still hope MS & Sony wont follow the steps taken by Nintendo this generation....

Malta_1980

MS kind of has with the 360 arcade

And what if they do follow nintendo next gen?

The main problems with the wii are not enough good 3rd party games, not powerful enough, no storage device etc, but if the Sony/Microsoft made a console then these problems would probably be fixed

Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

How much did Carnival sell exactly? I honestly dont know.

I think Nintendo is catering to both their core audience and the casual. I dont think casual is taking over, just selling as well.

Wii play would NOT sell if it didn't come with a controller, and wii fit is a great workout device that totally taps a different market.

MS is following the steps of N by the casual games of LIPZ, your in the movies, and avatars. And it sounds like motion controllers are on the way. I think all this is just including more to the gaming base, not taking away from the 'hardcore'.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I've often wondered if the ultimate goal of all game companies is to sell out the audiences that helped build them.

Broader audience, simpler, easier and more accessible.

This sells more games at the expense of the 'hardcore' audience, if game developers truly are 100% money driven then this is the case. However I've noticed several instances were developers actively worked against the profitability of a title to maintain their artistic vision, so perhaps there is a little hope for the 'hardcore' audiences.

Avatar image for legol1
legol1

1998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 legol1
Member since 2005 • 1998 Posts
what the tc fail to understand is hi def gaming is selling very well but on three platform instead of one this is why pc ps3 and 360 share alot of multiplat games ,and the wii have its own game and some multiplat with the ps2.
Avatar image for qewrewq
qewrewq

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 qewrewq
Member since 2004 • 1274 Posts

How much did Carnival sell exactly? I honestly dont know.

I think Nintendo is catering to both their core audience and the casual. I dont think casual is taking over, just selling as well.

Wii play would NOT sell if it didn't come with a controller, and wii fit is a great workout device that totally taps a different market.

MS is following the steps of N by the casual games of LIPZ, your in the movies, and avatars. And it sounds like motion controllers are on the way. I think all this is just including more to the gaming base, not taking away from the 'hardcore'.

flazzle

I think Carnival did about 2m worldwide, but I lost the link with the info. anyway, the casuals make the most of the Wii's userbase, take a look at Wiisports, it doesn't come with the controller, and it's selling like mad, I think that the hardcore gamers who bought only a Wii this gen, are the same people who only owned a gamecube last gen.

Do you think people buy Wiifit to workout, no, they buy it for the same reason they bought Carnival games and Wiisports, it taps the exact same market, casuals.

Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts
The wii adds variety, it's diffrent from the other main consoles. I like it.
Avatar image for rgame1
rgame1

2526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 rgame1
Member since 2008 • 2526 Posts
i dont think wii fit is lopw budget at all. hence TC fails me thinks.
Avatar image for Popadophalis
Popadophalis

1587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Popadophalis
Member since 2007 • 1587 Posts

what the tc fail to understand is hi def gaming is selling very well but on three platform instead of one this is why pc ps3 and 360 share alot of multiplat games ,and the wii have its own game and some multiplat with the ps2.legol1

I haven't failed to understand anything. Hi Def gaming is struggling at best. You know there's a problem when massive games like GTA4 and MGS4 -the cream of the conematic gaming crop-fail at moving any extra consoles. The gap between the Wii and the hi-def consoles is dramatically increasing and every month the NPD serves to highlight just how myopic Sony and microsoft's business strategies are.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
Gamers hate change, it's the truth, that's why they hate the Wii. Look at any game series that changes and people will always bash the change, RE for example when 4 came out, all the RE fans hated it for changing things up, Fallout 3, everyone hates on it for changing the series. Gamers just seem to hate change but I seriously don't know why, it's like they just want gaming to stagnate and die, do they not realise that unless gaming changes then new people won't be gaming in 10 years time, and I doubt they'll be playing in 10 years time, why do you think so many people who started gaming with like the NES still play today? Because of the changes games have gone through, if we were still playing with 2d sprites and playing loads of platformers and beat em ups, none of those people would still be gaming.
Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

I think Carnival did about 2m worldwide, but I lost the link with the info. anyway, the casuals make the most of the Wii's userbase, take a look at Wiisports, it doesn't come with the controller, and it's selling like mad, I think that the hardcore gamers who bought only a Wii this gen, are the same people who only owned a gamecube last gen.

Do you think people buy Wiifit to workout, no, they buy it for the same reason they bought Carnival games and Wiisports, it taps the exact same market, casuals.

qewrewq

I bought Wii fit to workout and its killer. I dont think people bought Carnival games or wii sports to workout. Not every casual game sells like wii fit, or carnvial or wii sports. You logic fails. its quite so simple to say 'its casual.it will sell..

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#15 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
With the way developers treat the Wii this revolution is quite weaksauce
Avatar image for plod2
plod2

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 plod2
Member since 2007 • 289 Posts
I bet half the people who bought wiis were just fooled by the advertising and went along with it saying it was "fun". I don't think the Wii is changing gaming, if you advertise anything crap well you can still sell it. I bet next gen the wii 2 won't sell as many, after playing with the wii people will releasise its a gimmic and a joke and won't fall for the same thing again.
Avatar image for qewrewq
qewrewq

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 qewrewq
Member since 2004 • 1274 Posts
[QUOTE="qewrewq"]

I think Carnival did about 2m worldwide, but I lost the link with the info. anyway, the casuals make the most of the Wii's userbase, take a look at Wiisports, it doesn't come with the controller, and it's selling like mad, I think that the hardcore gamers who bought only a Wii this gen, are the same people who only owned a gamecube last gen.

Do you think people buy Wiifit to workout, no, they buy it for the same reason they bought Carnival games and Wiisports, it taps the exact same market, casuals.

flazzle

I bought Wii fit to workout and its killer. I dont think people bought Carnival games or wii sports to workout. Not every casual game sells like wii fit, or carnvial or wii sports. You logic fails. its quite so simple to say 'its casual.it will sell..

You bought wii fit to workout...wow, ok. that doesn't prove that most people bought it to workout, my logic doesn't fail, they bought it because it looked "fun" and "unique". Or maybe..just maybe, you're right, I guess we'll never know.

Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

I haven't failed to understand anything. Hi Def gaming is struggling at best. You know there's a problem when massive games like GTA4 and MGS4 -the cream of the conematic gaming crop-fail at moving any extra consoles. The gap between the Wii and the hi-def consoles is dramatically increasing and every month the NPD serves to highlight just how myopic Sony and microsoft's business strategies are.

Popadophalis

Well, GTA on the 360 sold more than any other GTA game that was on the XBOX i believe.

I think the problem for systems not moving is that the systems are priced too high for most consumers. Im not saying that price alone moves systems (if that were the case GC would have won last gen), but I think they are high enough to be a deterret. There is also a lot of life left in PS2 so i bet most don't feel compelled to upgrade is my guess

Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

You bought wii fit to workout...wow, ok. that doesn't prove that most people bought it to workout, my logic doesn't fail, they bought it because it looked "fun" and "unique". Or maybe..just maybe, you're right, I guess we'll never know.

qewrewq

My point is there are a lot of casual games that fail. Deca Sports isn't exactly tearing up the charts. Neither is Brunswick bowling. Wii Fit actually has an excellent Yoga setup, as well as strength building. You wouldn't know it, because people immediately mock it.

And I think wii sports is a great game. Especially for launch.

You are. We'll never know.

Avatar image for ps3wizard45
ps3wizard45

12907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 ps3wizard45
Member since 2007 • 12907 Posts

The real question should be, is the Wii changing gaming to the better or worse?

I still hope MS & Sony wont follow the steps taken by Nintendo this generation....

Malta_1980

but what if they did ? :? *Shivers*

what if sony and MS gave up on serious gaming for some fancy gimmick ? i would not like that

Avatar image for mr_mozilla
mr_mozilla

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mr_mozilla
Member since 2006 • 2381 Posts

[QUOTE="Malta_1980"]

The real question should be, is the Wii changing gaming to the better or worse?

I still hope MS & Sony wont follow the steps taken by Nintendo this generation....

ps3wizard45

but what if they did ? :? *Shivers*

what if sony and MS gave up on serious gaming for some fancy gimmick ? i would not like that

Would that really change anything in the end? Sure, instead of only WiiFit we would have PSFit and XboxFit as well, but that doesn't mean there wouldn't be Halo4 or MGS5 too.

The reason Wii lacks in that area is because the core audience is on the 360/PS3, so devs choose to make "hardcore" games for them instead. If all consoles were like Wii the core games would split evenly between them all, they wouldn't just disappear.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#22 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
"Change" doesnt always mean for the better, ya know.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

[QUOTE="ps3wizard45"][QUOTE="Malta_1980"]

The real question should be, is the Wii changing gaming to the better or worse?

I still hope MS & Sony wont follow the steps taken by Nintendo this generation....

mr_mozilla

but what if they did ? :? *Shivers*

what if sony and MS gave up on serious gaming for some fancy gimmick ? i would not like that

Would that really change anything in the end? Sure, instead of only WiiFit we would have PSFit and XboxFit as well, but that doesn't mean there wouldn't be Halo4 or MGS5 too.

The reason Wii lacks in that area is because the core audience is on the 360/PS3, so devs choose to make "hardcore" games for them instead. If all consoles were like Wii the core games would split evenly between them all, they wouldn't just disappear.

yes i understand your points.... i dont think Sony and MS would make consoles which are inferior technically to the current ones... also they will probably better the online services they currently have, so most probably their next-gen consoles would have more variety and have the same 'hardcore' games + new IP's and more 'casual' games to attract a larger audience...

if that would be the case then we would have the perfect mix... in the end its always up to devs to produce quality titles since you may have the most powerful console in the market but if devs are lazy and want to produce mediocre titles which are cheaper (cost-wise) to produce but still sell, that's what they'll do... its all about making profit in the end...

Avatar image for -hells-
-hells-

1027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 -hells-
Member since 2008 • 1027 Posts
Driving it into the ground more like
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
Or they just hate it because of the last gen graphics, rubbish online and crap line-up of games comopared to other consoles (imo)
Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts

I've often wondered if the ultimate goal of all game companies is to sell out the audiences that helped build them.

Broader audience, simpler, easier and more accessible.

This sells more games at the expense of the 'hardcore' audience, if game developers truly are 100% money driven then this is the case. However I've noticed several instances were developers actively worked against the profitability of a title to maintain their artistic vision, so perhaps there is a little hope for the 'hardcore' audiences.

AnnoyedDragon

It all depends on what the big 3 make next gen, this gen the 'hardcore' are pretty much safe BUT we will see the changes the wii has made to the market next gen, if you think about it the wii has even made a big impact even in this early stage of this gen, Sony and MS both had their buissness plans fimly set on Cinematic gaming but we have seen changes in this 2 year period of the wii supremecy

the 360 has tried to do 'casual' games and so has the PS3, we shall see how they all structure their buissneses for the next gen of consoles, will they sell out? will they just try and emulate the nintendo casual sucess, the truth is the real damage to the gaming industry is yet to be seen

Avatar image for Popadophalis
Popadophalis

1587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Popadophalis
Member since 2007 • 1587 Posts

It all depends on what the big 3 make next gen, this gen the 'hardcore' are pretty much safe BUT we will see the changes the wii has made to the market next gen, if you think about it the wii has even made a big impact even in this early stage of this gen, Sony and MS both had their buissness plans fimly set on Cinematic gaming but we have seen changes in this 2 year period of the wii supremecy

the 360 has tried to do 'casual' games and so has the PS3, we shall see how they all structure their buissneses for the next gen of consoles, will they sell out? will they just try and emulate the nintendo casual sucess, the truth is the real damage to the gaming industry is yet to be seen

BoloTheGreat

I imagine if Sony and microsoft don't change they will face some serious financial problems. The amount of money the two companies have lost on their consoles thus far is staggering.

Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts
[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

It all depends on what the big 3 make next gen, this gen the 'hardcore' are pretty much safe BUT we will see the changes the wii has made to the market next gen, if you think about it the wii has even made a big impact even in this early stage of this gen, Sony and MS both had their buissness plans fimly set on Cinematic gaming but we have seen changes in this 2 year period of the wii supremecy

the 360 has tried to do 'casual' games and so has the PS3, we shall see how they all structure their buissneses for the next gen of consoles, will they sell out? will they just try and emulate the nintendo casual sucess, the truth is the real damage to the gaming industry is yet to be seen

Popadophalis

I imagine if Sony and microsoft don't change they will face some serious financial problems. The amount of money the two companies have lost on their consoles thus far is staggering.

actually overall MS gaming devision has made a profit (i think, its kinda hazey), sony has also made a profit with the PS2 but lost alot with the PSP, the PS3 numbers are embarassing too. hopefully they won't but money speaks louder than screaming gamers as Ninty as no doubt proved be refusing to even throw a bone to its loyal audience this year.

MS ans Sony will probably piss all over us gamers clambering for the casual market, then again if that market gets to crowded and the Wii ans nintendo are already so will known/established we could see massive losses if they go in the deep end expecting Wii sales, also the market coult turn sour and the fickle public could lose intrest in gaming alltogether so i guess we are at least a stable audience to milk...

i guess i just hope they see that casual/crappy =/= sucess and the wii has had a combination of luck and timing to get where it is.

Avatar image for DireToad
DireToad

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DireToad
Member since 2006 • 3948 Posts
Gamers hate change, it's the truth, that's why they hate the Wii. Look at any game series that changes and people will always bash the change, RE for example when 4 came out, all the RE fans hated it for changing things up, Fallout 3, everyone hates on it for changing the series. Gamers just seem to hate change but I seriously don't know why, it's like they just want gaming to stagnate and die, do they not realise that unless gaming changes then new people won't be gaming in 10 years time, and I doubt they'll be playing in 10 years time, why do you think so many people who started gaming with like the NES still play today? Because of the changes games have gone through, if we were still playing with 2d sprites and playing loads of platformers and beat em ups, none of those people would still be gaming.bobbetybob



lol sheep and their high horses
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

Hardcore gamers don't hate the Wii, shallow gamers hate the Wii.

There is more shovelware on the PC, PS2 and PS1 individually.

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point. I can maybe understand that if you can't afford a PC that you might have a 360, but the games on that system are so watered down compared to PC that its sad. So you guys go QQ somewhere else.

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point.

DaBrainz
Wow... just.. wow.
Avatar image for Pinkyimp
Pinkyimp

3623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#33 Pinkyimp
Member since 2006 • 3623 Posts
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point.

angelkimne

Wow... just.. wow.

almost...almost sig worthy...

Avatar image for TheGrat1
TheGrat1

4330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TheGrat1
Member since 2008 • 4330 Posts
Sony has been making casual games since last gen (Singstar, Buzz, and Eye Toy). Singstar and Buzz sold very well but you didnt see them running to push aside all development for games similar to them. Eye Pet, Afrika, and the Eye of Judgment are what could be considered casual games but I dont care because Sony doesnt focus too much on games like that, they dont build their gaming press confrences around them. And people critisize wii's casual games so much because most of them are so cheap looking. People will rarely critisize games like Afrika because they look so sophisticated.
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
[QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point.

Pinkyimp

Wow... just.. wow.

almost...almost sig worthy...

Oh man, the truth hurts donnit? Let's say you have a PC, why would you have an xbox or PS3? MGS4? One exclusive game that I wouldn't be able to play on my PC that would be worth my time. You only mock me because you cannot argue my point.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

I've often wondered if the ultimate goal of all game companies is to sell out the audiences that helped build them.

Broader audience, simpler, easier and more accessible.

This sells more games at the expense of the 'hardcore' audience, if game developers truly are 100% money driven then this is the case. However I've noticed several instances were developers actively worked against the profitability of a title to maintain their artistic vision, so perhaps there is a little hope for the 'hardcore' audiences.

AnnoyedDragon

Can you name these examples? I'd like to hear them... because my major denies that this happens...

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

A generation of cinematic gaming is closing fast and the Hi-def consoles are going down with the ship. Are you prepared for what's coming next?

Popadophalis

HD consoles with motion sensing so that "cinematic games" also incorporate them? because you know that all next gen consoles will be HD right? or do you really think the next gen will go back to SD?

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

The "hardcore" dislike the Wii because it could encourage M$ and Sony to produce more "non-hardcore" games to compete with it.

Uvavooh

What's wrong with making games for everyone? Only the hardcore audience should be allowed to play games?

I think some of you have forgotten that Nintendo still makes hardcore games. In fact, they've released more hardcore than casual software this gen.

Avatar image for TheGrat1
TheGrat1

4330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 TheGrat1
Member since 2008 • 4330 Posts

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point.

DaBrainz

Nintendo has warped your mind young padawan.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

Sony has been making casual games since last gen (Singstar, Buzz, and Eye Toy). Singstar and Buzz sold very well but you didnt see them running to push aside all development for games similar to them. Eye Pet, Afrika, and the Eye of Judgment are what could be considered casual games but I dont care because Sony doesnt focus too much on games like that, they dont build their gaming press confrences around them. And people critisize wii's casual games so much because most of them are so cheap looking. People will rarely critisize games like Afrika because they look so sophisticated.TheGrat1

1) Nintendo didn't push aside all development for casual games.

2)Sony should build their gaming press confrence around those games if they want to sell consoles and games... They don't need to tell you or me about MGS4, or R&CQFB... we will find out anyway, via the internet... they need to tell non-gamers and casual gamers who don't spend their time reading gaming news...

3)Wii causal games do look cheap... Afrika doesn't look sophisticated...

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

I think some of you have forgotten that Nintendo still makes hardcore games. In fact, they've released more hardcore than casual software this gen.

Rocky32189

I do belive they released more Core First party games in a year then either Sony or MS.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

True gamers recognize that the Wii is the only console worth owning at this point.

TheGrat1

Nintendo has warped your mind young padawan.

Actually I've been gaming since the early 80's, can I be a Nintendo Jedi?!

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

It is not the first time such discussion arises. I lived something extremely similar about 15 years ago. We were living in the untouchable reign of Nintendo, and, unexpectedly, a new console was born. The Sony Play Station. I remember quite well the reaction of most Nintendo fans (undenyable hardcore):

"The PS is not for true gamers"

"These new gamers are ruining the industry"

"Only Nintendo makes games for the true gamers"

"The PS has no games for true gamers, Lara Croft is just a sexual atraction and Tekken is not Street Fighter"

Sounds familiar? Just that the words "true" and "new" have evolved in "core" and "casual", but the essence is the same. Gamers have always been afraid of changes, and innecessary elitist, must I add.

Back to 1995. Did the PS brand ruin the industry? Were those "new gamers" really a bad thing? Was expanding the market to new levels that awful? No, no and hell no. Expanding the market was the best thing to happen to this industry, and the Play Station brand evolved to be that monster that the PS2 was.

Yes, you can argue what you want, that the Wii is that or that, that the Wii is "for teh kiddyz", "soccer moms" (what is an extremely riddiculous argument) etc etc, or that it will never do what the PS did, but, at this point, no one knows. Yes, the Wii is not, by no means, the PS2, but the situation seems similar to the one of the original PS, to me at least..

But, after what happened 15 years ago, I'm more than glad to give Nintendo the benefit of the doubt.

Besides, Mario Galaxy rocks.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGrat1"]Sony has been making casual games since last gen (Singstar, Buzz, and Eye Toy). Singstar and Buzz sold very well but you didnt see them running to push aside all development for games similar to them. Eye Pet, Afrika, and the Eye of Judgment are what could be considered casual games but I dont care because Sony doesnt focus too much on games like that, they dont build their gaming press confrences around them. And people critisize wii's casual games so much because most of them are so cheap looking. People will rarely critisize games like Afrika because they look so sophisticated.GundamGuy0

1) Nintendo didn't push aside all development for casual games.

2)Sony should build their gaming press confrence around those games if they want to sell consoles and games... They don't need to tell you or me about MGS4, or R&CQFB... we will find out anyway, via the internet... they need to tell non-gamers and casual gamers who don't spend their time reading gaming news...

3)Wii causal games do look cheap... Afrika doesn't look sophisticated...

I agree with points 1 and 2.

on point 3 i would say that Afrika is just Endless Ocean on land. That game did not feel cheap. of course Afrika looks better but that's more about hardware than the software.

Avatar image for TheGrat1
TheGrat1

4330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 TheGrat1
Member since 2008 • 4330 Posts
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

I've often wondered if the ultimate goal of all game companies is to sell out the audiences that helped build them.

Broader audience, simpler, easier and more accessible.

This sells more games at the expense of the 'hardcore' audience, if game developers truly are 100% money driven then this is the case. However I've noticed several instances were developers actively worked against the profitability of a title to maintain their artistic vision, so perhaps there is a little hope for the 'hardcore' audiences.

GundamGuy0

Can you name these examples? I'd like to hear them... because my major denies that this happens...

Kojima-sama with MGS4. He didnt want to sacrafice what made MGS4, MGS4 just to make some more yen by porting to 360. Understand? I know it looks wierd to read.

Avatar image for DireToad
DireToad

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 DireToad
Member since 2006 • 3948 Posts

It is not the first time such discussion arises. I lived something extremely similar about 15 years ago. We were living in the untouchable reign of Nintendo, and, unexpectedly, a new console was born. The Sony Play Station. I remember quite well the reaction of most Nintendo fans (undenyable hardcore):

"The PS is not for true gamers"

"These new gamers are ruining the industry"

"Only Nintendo makes games for the true gamers"

"The PS has no games for true gamers, Lara Croft is just a sexual atraction and Tekken is not Street Fighter"

Sounds familiar? Just that the words "true" and "new" have evolved in "core" and "casual", but the essence is the same. Gamers have always been afraid of changes, and innecessary elitist, must I add.

Back to 1995. Did the PS brand ruin the industry? Were those "new gamers" really a bad thing? Was expanding the market to new levels that awful? No, no and hell no. Expanding the market was the best thing to happen to this industry, and the Play Station brand evolved to be that monster that the PS2 was.

Yes, you can argue what you want, that the Wii is that or that, that the Wii is "for teh kiddyz", etc etc, or that it will never do what the PS did, but, at this point, no one knows. Yes, the Wii is not, by no means, the PS2, but the situation seems similar to the one of the original PS, to me at least..

But, after what happened 15 years ago, I'm more than glad to give Nintendo the benefit of the doubt.

Besides, Mario Galaxy rocks.

IronBass



But the point is that the PS1 rocked. The Wii, does not.

It's not about market expansion and elitism and whatever. It all comes down to the games. And the Wii lacks in that department compared to the other systems.
Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#47 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

There real question is...

Are you happy with your Wii as a standalone console?

Do you actually own more than Wii?

If yes, is Wii your primary console over (x360-ps3-PC or whatever you got)??

Answer for yourself and youll see that.... simply CANT live this gen only with Wii... You lose TOOOOO much to mention.. Now youll say me about sales... I dont play sales so sorry dont get what you mean... Because Wii is way more appealing to kids,casuals and selling like crazy , has also the best games around? Dont think so.. And actually thats a fact...

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"]

It is not the first time such discussion arises. I lived something extremely similar about 15 years ago. We were living in the untouchable reign of Nintendo, and, unexpectedly, a new console was born. The Sony Play Station. I remember quite well the reaction of most Nintendo fans (undenyable hardcore):

"The PS is not for true gamers"

"These new gamers are ruining the industry"

"Only Nintendo makes games for the true gamers"

"The PS has no games for true gamers, Lara Croft is just a sexual atraction and Tekken is not Street Fighter"

Sounds familiar? Just that the words "true" and "new" have evolved in "core" and "casual", but the essence is the same. Gamers have always been afraid of changes, and innecessary elitist, must I add.

Back to 1995. Did the PS brand ruin the industry? Were those "new gamers" really a bad thing? Was expanding the market to new levels that awful? No, no and hell no. Expanding the market was the best thing to happen to this industry, and the Play Station brand evolved to be that monster that the PS2 was.

Yes, you can argue what you want, that the Wii is that or that, that the Wii is "for teh kiddyz", etc etc, or that it will never do what the PS did, but, at this point, no one knows. Yes, the Wii is not, by no means, the PS2, but the situation seems similar to the one of the original PS, to me at least..

But, after what happened 15 years ago, I'm more than glad to give Nintendo the benefit of the doubt.

Besides, Mario Galaxy rocks.

DireToad




But the point is that the PS1 rocked. The Wii, does not.

That's argueable. I never liked the PS1. The N64 was a lot better, Imo.

It's not about market expansion and elitism and whatever. It all comes down to the games. And the Wii lacks in that department compared to the other systems.

That 's also argueable. Don't forget that reviews has never meant anything for the people out there. Yup, you can call the "casual", or "uninformed" or whatever, but true is, that overall the people is happy with their Wiis, and every time that auddience gets bigger. So, it can be said the Wii also rocks.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

There real question is...

Are you happy with your Wii as a standalone console?

Do you actually own more than Wii?

If yes, is Wii your primary console over (x360-ps3-PC or whatever you got)??

Answer for yourself and youll see that.... simply CANT live this gen only with Wii... You lose TOOOOO much to mention.. Now youll say me about sales... I dont play sales so sorry dont get what you mean... Because Wii is way more appealing to kids,casuals and selling like crazy , has also the best games around? Dont think so.. And actually thats a fact...

AzatiS

You can say that about every console. If you pick only one console, whatever it is, you'll be missing a lot.

And that argument also works in the other way, not having a Wii also means missing a lot of true masterpieces.

And the quality of game will never be a "fact". It is something absolutely subjective.

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

But the point is that the PS1 rocked. The Wii, does not.

DireToad

That's your opinion.