It is not the first time such discussion arises. I lived something extremely similar about 15 years ago. We were living in the untouchable reign of Nintendo, and, unexpectedly, a new console was born. The Sony Play Station. I remember quite well the reaction of most Nintendo fans (undenyable hardcore):
"The PS is not for true gamers"
"These new gamers are ruining the industry"
"Only Nintendo makes games for the true gamers"
"The PS has no games for true gamers, Lara Croft is just a sexual atraction and Tekken is not Street Fighter"
Sounds familiar? Just that the words "true" and "new" have evolved in "core" and "casual", but the essence is the same. Gamers have always been afraid of changes, and innecessary elitist, must I add.
Back to 1995. Did the PS brand ruin the industry? Were those "new gamers" really a bad thing? Was expanding the market to new levels that awful? No, no and hell no. Expanding the market was the best thing to happen to this industry, and the Play Station brand evolved to be that monster that the PS2 was.
Yes, you can argue what you want, that the Wii is that or that, that the Wii is "for teh kiddyz", "soccer moms" (what is an extremely riddiculous argument) etc etc, or that it will never do what the PS did, but, at this point, no one knows. Yes, the Wii is not, by no means, the PS2, but the situation seems similar to the one of the original PS, to me at least..
But, after what happened 15 years ago, I'm more than glad to give Nintendo the benefit of the doubt.
Besides, Mario Galaxy rocks.
Log in to comment