The Wii will ALWAYS dominate because it applies the same principals as the DS

The Atari Jaguar Will ALWAYS dominate because it applies the same principles as the Atari.

 :?

As much as I love the Wii, dude, this thread fails.

The world doesnt work that way. A=B doesnt mean a=b. Led___Zeppelin

Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

[QUOTE="palaric8"]Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail Maelkav

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

[QUOTE="Maelkav"]

[QUOTE="palaric8"]Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

Hmmm. Again, there were a lot of games the PS2 couldn't run. Take your Wii flaming elsewhere. "next-gen" is an overused term that people like you enjoy throwing around because it makes you feel superior. Congrats.

[QUOTE="palaric8"][QUOTE="Maelkav"]

[QUOTE="palaric8"]Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail Maelkav

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

Hmmm. Again, there were a lot of games the PS2 couldn't run. Take your Wii flaming elsewhere. "next-gen" is an overused term that people like you enjoy throwing around because it makes you feel superior. Congrats.

The world doesnt work that way. A=B doesnt mean a=b. Led___Zeppelin

You mean A=a and B=b

That's what the topic starter meant.

Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

I don't care if the Wii always dominates. As long as I get strong 1st party games and strong 3rd party games consistantly every year, I'll be satisfied.

Dreamcast dominated no one, and yet it was still fun.

lack of domination =/= lack of fun.

[QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="palaric8"][QUOTE="Maelkav"]

[QUOTE="palaric8"]Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

Hmmm. Again, there were a lot of games the PS2 couldn't run. Take your Wii flaming elsewhere. "next-gen" is an overused term that people like you enjoy throwing around because it makes you feel superior. Congrats.

Wow... even I am getting sick of these "Wii will win" threads.foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="Maelkav"]

[QUOTE="palaric8"]Wii isn't next gen,thats the reason wii will fail palaric8

"The PS2 isn't as advanced at the XBOX, thats the reason why it will fail."

:roll:

Yeah. I remember people who used to say that. It's called an "illogical statement".

PS3 or 360 couldn't run Wario Ware: Smooth Moves.   360 has no motion censing, PS3 doesnt have good motion censing.  They'd have to DOWNGRADE the game to make it adaptable to a normal controller.  Just like Wii would be able to run oblivion if they downagraded the graphics. 

I disagree Natato, because the same franticly fun gameplay was ORIGINALY done on the GBA. GBA has LESS buttons than a 360 or PS3. Motion sensingh isn't neccesary for a fun WarioWare experience.pyoob

Were not talking about the GBA version, we're talking about Wario Ware: SMooth Moves, the exact game, not just any old Wario Ware.  PS3 or 360 couldn't run it without downgrading the game.  It'd be a A game if it came out on PS3 or 360.  Period. 

But what about the fact that the handheld market and the console market are made up of completely different demographics for the most part?

People who buy handhelds and handheld games are mostly different people than who buy consoles and console games. 

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Wow... even I am getting sick of these "Wii will win" threads.Teh_Stevz

[QUOTE="pyoob"]I disagree Natato, because the same franticly fun gameplay was ORIGINALY done on the GBA. GBA has LESS buttons than a 360 or PS3. Motion sensingh isn't neccesary for a fun WarioWare experience.NATATO

Were not talking about the GBA version, we're talking about Wario Ware: SMooth Moves, the exact game, not just any old Wario Ware.  PS3 or 360 couldn't run it without downgrading the game.  It'd be a A game if it came out on PS3 or 360.  Period. 

The gameplay in any WarioWare game has the same principles. Sure, a 360 can't have you make a swinging motion with a sword, but it can make you franticaly try to complete microgames that get fast er as you go. The exact same principles of gameplay can work on any system in the case of WarioWare.

The world doesnt work that way. A=B doesnt mean a=b. Led___Zeppelin

[QUOTE="NATATO"]

[QUOTE="pyoob"]I disagree Natato, because the same franticly fun gameplay was ORIGINALY done on the GBA. GBA has LESS buttons than a 360 or PS3. Motion sensingh isn't neccesary for a fun WarioWare experience.pyoob

Were not talking about the GBA version, we're talking about Wario Ware: SMooth Moves, the exact game, not just any old Wario Ware.  PS3 or 360 couldn't run it without downgrading the game.  It'd be a A game if it came out on PS3 or 360.  Period. 

The gameplay in any WarioWare game has the same principles. Sure, a 360 can't have you make a swinging motion with a sword, but it can make you franticaly try to complete microgames that get fast er as you go. The exact same principles of gameplay can work on any system in the case of WarioWare.

Same pinciples of Oblivion would be the same if they made a downgraded graphics version for the Wii.  You do the exact same things, but with not as good graphics, thus hurting experience.  WWSM would be the same principles, but with no motion censing, thus hurting the experience. 

Face it WWSM will always be better on Wii, Oblivion will always be better on PS3/360. Don't be sore just becasue some games are just plain better on the Wii.

[QUOTE="pyoob"][QUOTE="NATATO"]

[QUOTE="pyoob"]I disagree Natato, because the same franticly fun gameplay was ORIGINALY done on the GBA. GBA has LESS buttons than a 360 or PS3. Motion sensingh isn't neccesary for a fun WarioWare experience.NATATO

Were not talking about the GBA version, we're talking about Wario Ware: SMooth Moves, the exact game, not just any old Wario Ware.  PS3 or 360 couldn't run it without downgrading the game.  It'd be a A game if it came out on PS3 or 360.  Period. 

The gameplay in any WarioWare game has the same principles. Sure, a 360 can't have you make a swinging motion with a sword, but it can make you franticaly try to complete microgames that get fast er as you go. The exact same principles of gameplay can work on any system in the case of WarioWare.

Same pinciples of Oblivion would be the same if they made a downgraded graphics version for the Wii.  You do the exact same things, but with not as good graphics, thus hurting experience.  WWSM would be the same principles, but with no motion censing, thus hurting the experience. 

Face it WWSM will always be better on Wii, Oblivion will always be better on PS3/360. Don't be sore just becasue some games are just plain better on the Wii.

The things people expect from consoles are different from the things they expect from handhelds.

handhelds don't really need to have good graphics, they can be horrible actually and be just fine.

But people expect consoles to have cutting edge technology. They want good visuals, and sound, and they expect that from a new console.

also, handhelds don't really need media features to be succesful.

nowadays, people want a good amount of media features, to add value to thier purchase. 

The things people expect from consoles are different from the things they expect from handhelds.

handhelds don't really need to have good graphics, they can be horrible actually and be just fine.

But people expect consoles to have cutting edge technology. They want good visuals, and sound, and they expect that from a new console.

also, handhelds don't really need media features to be succesful. Trading_Zoner

Could've fooled me. PSP keeps telling us that it is superior to the DS because of this exact reason.

nowadays, people want a good amount of media features, to add value to thier purchase. 

Mmmm, not really. People want a good amount of value to add value to their purchase. "Value" is a fluid term that shifts and changes depending on what the market wants. If that was true, PS3 would be the top seller....