The Wii's VC is rather pointless...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#1 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

The Wii's VC is rather pointless for gamers who did'nt grow up on those old games. They have no value to younger gamers, the audience that Nintendo is targeting.

I personally don't find many of the VC games fun because the game-play and graphics are way outdated and the games hold know sentimental value to me. How about people younger than me (im 19)? These games don't mean anything to these younger gamers.

Even though Super Mario Bros. is an amazing game, when compared to the 3d platformers of today, it is totally outdated and rather boring. Though Super Mario Bros. has one advantage, it is timeless and even now holds its greatness, but what about the other games? The ones that only gamers who owned those games back on the NES or SNES actually remember? Those games have no appeal to the younger audience today because they hold no sentimental value.

The VC is really pointless when it comes to today's younger crowd. Also who is going to spend $250 just to play way outdated games? Seriously, the VC is not a major selling point for gamers who have not ever played those old games.

I personally am not interested in it at all. Who wants to pay money for these really old games? Also what if you already own these games? You need to pay for it again just to play them on your console now? What is the point!

 

Avatar image for Flipnblack
Flipnblack

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Flipnblack
Member since 2007 • 839 Posts
Actually, quite a few people have bought a Wii for the VC. You may not be interested in it, but you are in the minority...
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

I'd argue the VC is it's strongest point. 

I am getting a Wii largely because of it.  I would love to play many of my old Nintendo games.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts
Uhm yeah uh huh okay...:roll:
Avatar image for web966
web966

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 web966
Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts
2d mario>3d MArio
Avatar image for Kev_Unreal
Kev_Unreal

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Kev_Unreal
Member since 2007 • 2818 Posts
Well, I'm having a blast with Starfox 64.;) That all I need from VC.
Avatar image for Microsoft1234
Microsoft1234

7683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Microsoft1234
Member since 2006 • 7683 Posts
first off it is mad kids talk about mario party being the **** also alot of kids that are casuals who i know personally buy games like soccer and hockey (horrible games) because of that......
Avatar image for obi1232004
obi1232004

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 obi1232004
Member since 2004 • 225 Posts

The Wii's VC is rather pointless for gamers who did'nt grow up on those old games. They have no value to younger gamers, the audience that Nintendo is targeting.

I personally don't find many of the VC games fun because the game-play and graphics are way outdated and the games hold know sentimental value to me. How about people younger than me (im 19)? These games don't mean anything to these younger gamers.

Even though Super Mario Bros. is an amazing game, when compared to the 3d platformers of today, it is totally outdated and rather boring. Though Super Mario Bros. has one advantage, it is timeless and even now holds its greatness, but what about the other games? The ones that only gamers who owned those games back on the NES or SNES actually remember? Those games have no appeal to the younger audience today because they hold no sentimental value.

The VC is really pointless when it comes to today's younger crowd. Also who is going to spend $250 just to play way outdated games? Seriously, the VC is not a major selling point for gamers who have not ever played those old games.

I personally am not interested in it at all. Who wants to pay money for these really old games? Also what if you already own these games? You need to pay for it again just to play them on your console now? What is the point!

 

Wasdie

well i am 16 and i love the VC

 

also if you don't want to spend money then don't buy em and if you already own em don't rebuy em its that simple 

Avatar image for RahnAetas
RahnAetas

1834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RahnAetas
Member since 2003 • 1834 Posts
Seems a lot of people are intrested in it.  Sides, certain games are timeless.  Like Tetris or Solitare.  VC is perhaps the best way for people to get their hands on some good 2D platformers, a genre that is practically non-existant now a days.  Take something like Earthworm Jim, that's something that stays great for a pretty long time.
Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts
I'm younger than you, and I actually remember owning all of Nintendo's systems. I actually enjoy buying from the VC, not only can I enjoy games that I don't have anymore, but the ones that I might have been to young to realize were good. Though I see your point as completely valid, some people may not like it because they've gotten used to the games we play today.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The VC is getting Super Metroid. That is worth it right there. At least, to me it is.
Avatar image for Fortier
Fortier

7728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Fortier
Member since 2004 • 7728 Posts
Whatever you say...but gaming's best era is being heavily represented on the VC...I consider that a strong point.
Avatar image for OceanLeet
OceanLeet

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 OceanLeet
Member since 2007 • 938 Posts
I'm 22 and am loving the VC.  Many of the titles on it cannot be easily found anymore, if at all.  I'll gladly drop $5 for old classics that I played as a young kid.
Avatar image for Fick1122
Fick1122

2135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Fick1122
Member since 2006 • 2135 Posts
Thats not entirely true. I missed out of Super Castlevania IV when I was young so I bought it on the VC, and it is one of my favorite games. Plus I never had a Genesis, so now I can get the classics I've never played.
Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#15 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
its a good way to play classic games weather or not ur at the age
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
this post is rather pointless...
Avatar image for supermanfarr
supermanfarr

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 supermanfarr
Member since 2006 • 888 Posts
I would be great if I didnt own a working nes and snes with all the cool games. I bought it all of ebay before the wii was even thinking about coming out. So for me its pointless.
Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
Anything that allows me to play Gunstar Heroes, Link to the Past, Contra 3, Starfox 64, and Bomberman '93 is not pointless. It is godly.
Avatar image for REVOLUTIONfreak
REVOLUTIONfreak

18418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#19 REVOLUTIONfreak
Member since 2005 • 18418 Posts
Who hasn't played those old school games?  Well, I for one haven't played much of anything on the SNES or NES, so I guess I haven't.  Besides, SNES games aren't at all outdated in visuals or gameplay, in fact those are the games that will hold up the most... and some N64 games like OoT and Starfox 64 still look pretty good, you have a very biased opinion on this.
Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Sorry, personally I love the original Super Mario Brothers...I think it's far better than the ones that are out today, eg. "NEW" Super Mario Brothers DS etc.
Avatar image for Tristam22
Tristam22

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Tristam22
Member since 2006 • 1598 Posts

The Wii's VC is rather pointless for gamers who did'nt grow up on those old games. They have no value to younger gamers, the audience that Nintendo is targeting.

I personally don't find many of the VC games fun because the game-play and graphics are way outdated and the games hold know sentimental value to me. How about people younger than me (im 19)? These games don't mean anything to these younger gamers.

Even though Super Mario Bros. is an amazing game, when compared to the 3d platformers of today, it is totally outdated and rather boring. Though Super Mario Bros. has one advantage, it is timeless and even now holds its greatness, but what about the other games? The ones that only gamers who owned those games back on the NES or SNES actually remember? Those games have no appeal to the younger audience today because they hold no sentimental value.

The VC is really pointless when it comes to today's younger crowd. Also who is going to spend $250 just to play way outdated games? Seriously, the VC is not a major selling point for gamers who have not ever played those old games.

I personally am not interested in it at all. Who wants to pay money for these really old games? Also what if you already own these games? You need to pay for it again just to play them on your console now? What is the point!

Wasdie
Oh really? Why are some people still playing their SNES, their Saturn, their Turbo Duo, or their N64? Is it because those games aren't valuable anymore? Are games inherently "better" now?
Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Anything that allows me to play Gunstar Heroes, Link to the Past, Contra 3, Starfox 64, and Bomberman '93 is not pointless. It is godly.Hoffgod
Bomberman 93' Never came out in Australia, that really is sad...:(
Avatar image for WiiForAll
WiiForAll

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 WiiForAll
Member since 2007 • 234 Posts
If you wanted people to agree with you on your anti-VC stance, you should have posted that the VC was a great reason to buy the Wii instead. The only way to ensure one kind of response is to representing the opposing viewpoint. The threads people post in most around here are the ones they disagree with.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#24 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
I'm 22 and am loving the VC. Many of the titles on it cannot be easily found anymore, if at all. I'll gladly drop $5 for old classics that I played as a young kid.OceanLeet
Exactly the ones YOU played as a young kid. What about people who have never played those old classics? Would they hold the same value?
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#25 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

The Wii's VC is rather pointless for gamers who did'nt grow up on those old games. They have no value to younger gamers, the audience that Nintendo is targeting.

I personally don't find many of the VC games fun because the game-play and graphics are way outdated and the games hold know sentimental value to me. How about people younger than me (im 19)? These games don't mean anything to these younger gamers.

Even though Super Mario Bros. is an amazing game, when compared to the 3d platformers of today, it is totally outdated and rather boring. Though Super Mario Bros. has one advantage, it is timeless and even now holds its greatness, but what about the other games? The ones that only gamers who owned those games back on the NES or SNES actually remember? Those games have no appeal to the younger audience today because they hold no sentimental value.

The VC is really pointless when it comes to today's younger crowd. Also who is going to spend $250 just to play way outdated games? Seriously, the VC is not a major selling point for gamers who have not ever played those old games.

I personally am not interested in it at all. Who wants to pay money for these really old games? Also what if you already own these games? You need to pay for it again just to play them on your console now? What is the point!

Tristam22
Oh really? Why are some people still playing their SNES, their Saturn, their Turbo Duo, or their N64? Is it because those games aren't valuable anymore? Are games inherently "better" now?

Im saying that its for people who have never played those games. Its pointless. Who wants to play those games that are way inferior to games of today if they have no value to them?
Avatar image for Jagazaar
Jagazaar

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Jagazaar
Member since 2007 • 1023 Posts

I wish the VC had a LOT more of the older games up for download, but there are already some damn great games available for it, far from pointless, whether the user is a newer gamer who's never played the classics, or somebody who once played them and wants to relive the memories.

And I'm in favour of anything that gets Gunstar Heroes the recognition it deserves. ;)

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#27 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
If you wanted people to agree with you on your anti-VC stance, you should have posted that the VC was a great reason to buy the Wii instead. The only way to ensure one kind of response is to representing the opposing viewpoint. The threads people post in most around here are the ones they disagree with.WiiForAll
I have been here for several years, I know how to post arguments. My arugment is simple, the VC is pointless to people who have never played those games before. Nothing more. I see the VC as a pointless waste of money. Im not trying to push my views on everybody and make them think my way, I want them to do what they are doing, disagreeing and backing their own arguments. So far I don't see any pointless flaming, so I would say the thread is a success.
Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#28 DSgamer64
Member since 2007 • 4449 Posts

Right :roll:

Thats why people still actually play them. I would rather pay to play old great games then craptastic arcade games and old Atari flops and rehashes on XBLA. There are probably about 1000 great games worth downloading that will be available on the Virtual Console, I mean who wouldnt want to play Super Mario Bros 3, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Turtles in Time, Super Mario RPG, Donkey Kong Country 1-3, DK64, Blast Corps, Duke Nukem 64, Streets of Rage and other amazing titles like that. So you think people might not be interested in trying some of these old classic games, a lot of which hold up well over time? Man you must be living under a bloody rock. Go play your crappy XBLA arcade remakes and poor Atari flops.

Avatar image for Tristam22
Tristam22

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Tristam22
Member since 2006 • 1598 Posts
[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

The Wii's VC is rather pointless for gamers who did'nt grow up on those old games. They have no value to younger gamers, the audience that Nintendo is targeting.

I personally don't find many of the VC games fun because the game-play and graphics are way outdated and the games hold know sentimental value to me. How about people younger than me (im 19)? These games don't mean anything to these younger gamers.

Even though Super Mario Bros. is an amazing game, when compared to the 3d platformers of today, it is totally outdated and rather boring. Though Super Mario Bros. has one advantage, it is timeless and even now holds its greatness, but what about the other games? The ones that only gamers who owned those games back on the NES or SNES actually remember? Those games have no appeal to the younger audience today because they hold no sentimental value.

The VC is really pointless when it comes to today's younger crowd. Also who is going to spend $250 just to play way outdated games? Seriously, the VC is not a major selling point for gamers who have not ever played those old games.

I personally am not interested in it at all. Who wants to pay money for these really old games? Also what if you already own these games? You need to pay for it again just to play them on your console now? What is the point!

Wasdie
Oh really? Why are some people still playing their SNES, their Saturn, their Turbo Duo, or their N64? Is it because those games aren't valuable anymore? Are games inherently "better" now?

Im saying that its for people who have never played those games. Its pointless. Who wants to play those games that are way inferior to games of today if they have no value to them?

Ah, so games ARE inherently more valuable today, I see. That's tantamount to saying that a 3D game is inherently better than a 2D game (because the saturation point for graphics in 2D games was reached a long time ago). How about side-scrollers? Shmups? 2D fighters? Are all those games worthless now?
Avatar image for jfkunrendered
jfkunrendered

8298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 jfkunrendered
Member since 2005 • 8298 Posts
I got a few VC games and I owned a NES, SNES, and N64...but sadly I traded these systems in. I have sworn never to do this again though....stupid!!!!! stupid!!!!! stupid!!!!
Avatar image for Pangster007
Pangster007

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#31 Pangster007
Member since 2004 • 4426 Posts
Well, i'm pretty sure there are people who played the newer games and felt that they would try the games that preceded it. For example, someone who started playing Zelda on the GC, heard about 'a link to the past' from friends, and would like to try it out.
Avatar image for akupokonoshow
akupokonoshow

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 akupokonoshow
Member since 2006 • 107 Posts
 
Are you kidding? With the VC it gives people the oppurtunity to relive old games and for the younger generation of gamers to experience. Im 14 and i loved paper mario for the n64 and the paper mario for the gamecube, they are probablly my 2 favorite games of all time. And a couple of weeks ago i found out about super mario rpg. And ever since i found out about this i've been wanting to play it, and it's my most anticipated game for the wii. Check the sig lol, so to keep it you're statement doesn't apply for me and probablly a lot of other people out there.
Avatar image for hydrophoboe
hydrophoboe

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 hydrophoboe
Member since 2004 • 444 Posts
VC is pointless? I hope those save batteries in your SNES cartridges are working out for you.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Man
Nintendo_Man

19733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 Nintendo_Man
Member since 2003 • 19733 Posts
I am 21 and have played all the consoles since the NES and Atari, though i wish Nintendo would give some VC games for free.
Avatar image for solidsnakeEx3
solidsnakeEx3

26413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#35 solidsnakeEx3
Member since 2004 • 26413 Posts

First of all: Nobody's forcing you to buy the game :|

Secondly, VC games have been selling like hotcakes.  I don't know if that's from gamers buying games again, for the first time because they missed it, or just trying new things out. :o 

By your logic younger people aren't going to buy games on XBLA, games that may have lower production values, are 2D, etc.  Yes I know the VC games are old.  But so what?  Kids aren't going to just reject something outright because it's old.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#36 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

First of all: Nobody's forcing you to buy the game :|

Secondly, VC games have been selling like hotcakes. I don't know if that's from gamers buying games again, for the first time because they missed it, or just trying new things out. :o

By your logic younger people aren't going to buy games on XBLA, games that may have lower production values, are 2D, etc. Yes I know the VC games are old. But so what? Kids aren't going to just reject something outright because it's old.

solidsnakeEx3
XBLA offers more than just old games.
Avatar image for mestizoman
mestizoman

4172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 mestizoman
Member since 2006 • 4172 Posts
lol, the wii vc is useless for us hermits, lol