There IS the possibilty of of Crysis on PS3-and it's very high

im not going to lie

that would be awsome and id get it

Oh for fuk sake, not again...

I'm actually starting to beg Crytek to confirm Crysis for consoles just to stop these darned threads and console fanboys to stop having orgasms over every possible hint that there could be Crysis for consoles.

It's EA. They'll sell their own souls just to earn some cash, so, yeah, there will be Crysis for consoles for sure. If not the straight port, then it'll be a spinoff made by some other company which is not Crytek.

But, hey. Does it really have to be Crysis? I mean, Crytek hires PS3 programmers to work on CryEngine 2. Who knows? Maybe they'll pull something off even better than Crysis.

SEE? MAYBE EVEN BETTER THAN CRYSIS!!!1 So I have an idea for all you console fanboys. Why don't you start digging about that mistery PS3 game powered by teh allmigthy CryEngine 2, and leave the word "Crysis" for a time after the game actually gets released.

Even if it was the game would have to be downgraded due to RAM issues.CJL13

Yeah, thats what I would figure. If they could make a PS3 version comparable to the PC version (even without a DX10 card in the mix) it would be great, but if its just a crappy cash-in port, I'd rather they didn't even bother. 

They would be crazy not to. It could only go on the PS3 though, since it is the only next generation console. The other 2 are embarassments.Twisted_Hawk

:lol:

Fanboys will be fanboys. 

[QUOTE="Twisted_Hawk"]They would be crazy not to. It could only go on the PS3 though, since it is the only next generation console. The other 2 are embarassments.XL83

Ken Kutagari said that, and no one console has proven him wrong yet. How can I be a fanboy when I list what the officials are saying abourt the next war?

:lol:

Fanboys will be fanboys. 

Ken Kutagair said it, making it law. How is that fanboyism?