There is virtuallly 0 difference between 720p and 1080p.

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts

720p vs 1080p threads show up all the time. Honestly who cares? I have played 1080p and 720p games and they look virtually identical and I've got a 42" Plasma TV. If someone were to put a game running 1080p next to a game running 720p I bet 99% of the people on this site could not even tell which one is running1080p.

Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

This is so true. I couldn't help but laugh at the cows who even took it a step further and said there was a noticeable difference between 1080p through componant and 1080p in HDMI.

As Frankie of Bungie fame once said, "to claim you can notice a difference based on the cable being used is to announce to the world that you dont know what you're talking about."

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

720p vs 1080p threads show up all the time. Honestly who cares? I have played 1080p and 720p games and they look virtually identical and I've got a 42" Plasma TV. If someone were to put a game running 1080p next to a game running 720p I bet 99% of the people on this site could not even tell which one is running1080p.

Firelore29
depends on the size of the tv and where you are sitting.\thread
Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15058 Posts
the difference becomes noticeable on bigger tv's like 52'' and bigger
Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
1080p i sonly good for big TVs .
Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

depends on the size of the tv and where you are sitting.\threadmmirza23

Pretty much. 1080p is very noticeable on a 57" Tv, for example. You're getting over twice the amount of detail.

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#7 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts

This is so true. I couldn't help but laugh at the cows who even took it a step further and said there was a noticeable difference between 1080p through componant and 1080p in HDMI.

As Frankie of Bungie fame once said, "to claim you can notice a difference based on the cable being used is to announce to the world that you dont know what you're talking about."

Ninja-Vox

if you cant see the difference you are fing blind. i have played my 360 on my 46inch 1080p capable tv with component, vga and now hdmi and i can see the difference in each one. the colors and picture sharpness are different with each cable.

as for 720p and 1080p you can tell the difference but you really really have to look for it.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

This is so true. I couldn't help but laugh at the cows who even took it a step further and said there was a noticeable difference between 1080p through componant and 1080p in HDMI.

As Frankie of Bungie fame once said, "to claim you can notice a difference based on the cable being used is to announce to the world that you dont know what you're talking about."

Ninja-Vox
you're right there is virtually no difference between 1080p component and 1080p hdmi as long as their both native signals, hdmi is better because its onecable and it can give you uncompressed sound, the picture quality difference is almost negligible.
Avatar image for lilboy561
lilboy561

156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 lilboy561
Member since 2003 • 156 Posts

thats a yes and no question yes there's hardly any diffence if you watching a 720p or 1080p picture on a small display like 42-48 inch

but no if watching a 720p or 1080p picture on a large display like a 55-80 inch or a projector

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Virtually no difference between 1080p and 720p? I guess that would be true... if there weren't more than twice as many pixels on-screen when images are rendered in 1080p over 720p...

1280x720 = 921.600 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1650 = 4,224,000 pixels


Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

tomarlyn


Much greater difference. http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/Naming_Proposal.htm

1080i "should" be referred to as 540i.
Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts

Virtually no difference between 1080p and 720p? I guess that would be true... if there weren't more than twice as many pixels on-screen when images are rendered in 1080p over 720p...

1280x720 = 921.600 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1650 = 4,224,000 pixels


foxhound_fox

Everyone keeps saying this but the simple fact is that it's darn near impossible to tell the difference for the human eye. If you have a huge TV 50+ inches yes it would probably be noticeable but most people don't have a TV that big.

Avatar image for Forza_2
Forza_2

3083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Forza_2
Member since 2007 • 3083 Posts

This is so true. I couldn't help but laugh at the cows who even took it a step further and said there was a noticeable difference between 1080p through componant and 1080p in HDMI.

As Frankie of Bungie fame once said, "to claim you can notice a difference based on the cable being used is to announce to the world that you dont know what you're talking about."

Ninja-Vox

That's another topic, though. He's talking about resolutions, not the cables.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

Virtually no difference between 1080p and 720p? I guess that would be true... if there weren't more than twice as many pixels on-screen when images are rendered in 1080p over 720p...

1280x720 = 921.600 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1650 = 4,224,000 pixels


foxhound_fox

I don't think he means there's no tangible difference, but it's probably like the difference between 60 fps and 120 fps. That's a pretty significant difference in FPS, but not one your eye is ever likely to catch. Not that I'm saying it's to that extent.

Avatar image for lilboy561
lilboy561

156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 lilboy561
Member since 2003 • 156 Posts
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

foxhound_fox



Much greater difference. http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/Naming_Proposal.htm

1080i "should" be referred to as 540i.

finally some who really know's what there talking about when it come's to high defintion

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Everyone keeps saying this but the simple fact is that it's darn near impossible to tell the difference for the human eye. If you have a huge TV 50+ inches yes it would probably be noticeable but most people don't have a TV that big.Firelore29


If you can, set your monitor to 1600x1200 and then turn it down to 1024x768 or 800x600 and tell me you can't see the difference.
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="Firelore29"]Everyone keeps saying this but the simple fact is that it's darn near impossible to tell the difference for the human eye. If you have a huge TV 50+ inches yes it would probably be noticeable but most people don't have a TV that big.foxhound_fox


If you can, set your monitor to 1600x1200 and then turn it down to 800x600 and tell me you can't see the difference.

on monitors, you are sitting literally inches from the screen so ofcourse you can see the difference, now try to do that on a 30+ inch tv and see what happens to your eyes.
Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

lilboy561



Much greater difference. http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/Naming_Proposal.htm

1080i "should" be referred to as 540i.

finally some who really know's what there talking about when it come's to high defintion

? Totally different subject then the one at hand.

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts

Virtually no difference between 1080p and 720p? I guess that would be true... if there weren't more than twice as many pixels on-screen when images are rendered in 1080p over 720p...

1280x720 = 921.600 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1650 = 4,224,000 pixels


foxhound_fox

The smaller the difference in pixel size, the smaller the difference in picture quality. The difference in size between a pixel on a 1080p TV and a 720p TV is tiny compared to the difference in size between a pixel on a 720p TV and a 480p TV.

Avatar image for snorlaxmaster
snorlaxmaster

1490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 snorlaxmaster
Member since 2005 • 1490 Posts
1080p is only good for very large televisions, which is why they are normally only available in those retarded sizes. ;)
Avatar image for donnygorgas
donnygorgas

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 donnygorgas
Member since 2005 • 2531 Posts
The difference is quite obvious to me on my 47' Vizio. Both my 360 and my PS3 look better in 1080p through HDMI. There might be 0 difference to some of you but to me it's quite obvious.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

lilboy561



Much greater difference. http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/Naming_Proposal.htm

1080i "should" be referred to as 540i.

finally some who really know's what there talking about when it come's to high defintion

foxhound_fox is wrong. 1080i is only a signal for delivery of a video picture. When the signal is reassembled on any modern TV, the picture quality will be nearly indistinguishable (if properly encoded) from a 1080p signal at 30fps. The only advantage of 1080p is that it can go up to 60fps, but movies are filmed in 24fps, TV shows are filmed in 30fps, and video games will almost never be rendered at 1080p/60fps.

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Virtually no difference between 1080p and 720p? I guess that would be true... if there weren't more than twice as many pixels on-screen when images are rendered in 1080p over 720p...

1280x720 = 921.600 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1650 = 4,224,000 pixels


Zeliard9

I don't think he means there's no tangible difference, but it's probably like the difference between 60 fps and 120 fps. That's a pretty significant difference in FPS, but not one your eye is ever likely to catch. Not that I'm saying it's to that extent.

Actually, I did some tests on my CRT monitor, and in Counter-Strike: Source, I was able to notice a difference between 60 Hz and 75 Hz. 75 Hz felt smoother and more fluid. I've also noticed the difference between 1280x720 and 1920x1080.

Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts

[QUOTE="Firelore29"]Everyone keeps saying this but the simple fact is that it's darn near impossible to tell the difference for the human eye. If you have a huge TV 50+ inches yes it would probably be noticeable but most people don't have a TV that big.foxhound_fox


If you can, set your monitor to 1600x1200 and then turn it down to 1024x768 or 800x600 and tell me you can't see the difference.

Completely different. First off it would be going from 1600x1200 to 1280x1024 I have know idea how 1024x768 or 800x600 come into play?!?

Second the only difference you would see would be the screen resolution in windows because things are smaller. However when your actually playing a game you would see virtually 0 difference. Again I've played a number of games at 1280x1024 and I've played a game at 1600x1200 once and you simply can't tell the difference.

Avatar image for tramp
tramp

2110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 tramp
Member since 2003 • 2110 Posts

^^Aliasing is less noticable with higher res.

Avatar image for ChrisMun
ChrisMun

1100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ChrisMun
Member since 2003 • 1100 Posts

720p vs 1080p threads show up all the time. Honestly who cares? I have played 1080p and 720p games and they look virtually identical and I've got a 42" Plasma TV. If someone were to put a game running 1080p next to a game running 720p I bet 99% of the people on this site could not even tell which one is running1080p.

Firelore29

You have two problems with your claims. Firstly is your tv size.You need something larger than a 50' HDTV to make any real notices between the resolutions. And second, you're making a bet to the people. So shouldn't you be making a bet on the official bets boards? Either way, you're just speculation because you have no proof that you could compare both resolution to come up with a solid opinion. Sounds just like a lot of hot air you've blowing.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
foxhound_fox is wrong. 1080i is only a signal for delivery of a video picture. When the signal is reassembled on any modern TV, the picture quality will be nearly indistinguishable (if properly encoded) from a 1080p signal at 30fps. The only advantage of 1080p is that it can go up to 60fps, but movies are filmed in 24fps, TV shows are filmed in 30fps, and video games will almost never be rendered at 1080p/60fps. mjarantilla


That's all true, except for the video games part. Many PC games can easily be rendered at 1080p at 60fps if you have the hardware, and would look absolutely fantastic on that 56" 1080p HDTV... especially if they are running at even higher framerates. When it comes to games, framerate is everything. Only if it is running at a steady 60 or higher does it look the best it possibly can.

We are talking about video games here, and even though most games on the 360 and PS3 are rendered best at 720p, that still doesn't mean that there isn't a huge difference between 720p and 1080p.

If you guys want to save some money, buy a 24-27" LCD monitor with a 1680x1050 resolution and a good pair of headphones. Not only do you save money, but tons of room as well, you don't have to rearrange your living space to accommodate a giant TV. What's the point in sitting 20 feet away from the TV when you could sit 6 feet away and get the same experience?
Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
you need glasses.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Completely different. First off it would be going from 1600x1200 to 1280x1024 I have know idea how 1024x768 or 800x600 come into play?!?

Second the only difference you would see would be the screen resolution in windows because things are smaller. However when your actually playing a game you would see virtually 0 difference. Again I've played a number of games at 1280x1024 and I've played a game at 1600x1200 once and you simply can't tell the difference.

Firelore29


If you've played any game at 1600x1200 you would notice that MSAA is pretty much not needed for the most part. The pixels are so small the edges smooth themselves out and trick your eyes into thinking they are when they are obviously not.

There are massive differences bettween resolutions like 480p, 720p, 1080p and 1650p. Massive.
Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#34 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts

I know for blind ppl, the difference is 0

and they also notice 0 difference between 480p and 720p

Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#35 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts

720p vs 1080p threads show up all the time. Honestly who cares? I have played 1080p and 720p games and they look virtually identical and I've got a 42" Plasma TV. If someone were to put a game running 1080p next to a game running 720p I bet 99% of the people on this site could not even tell which one is running1080p.

Firelore29
maybe cus your plasma cant do 1920x1080 natively lol
Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#36 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

What about 720p v 1080i?

I'll probably buy a HDTV in about a year.

foxhound_fox


Much greater difference. http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/Naming_Proposal.htm

1080i "should" be referred to as 540i.

its 540p and 1080 i is still 1920x1080 but its at half the frames cus u need to frames to make a hole picture with interlace
Avatar image for EmilioDigsIt
EmilioDigsIt

4391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 EmilioDigsIt
Member since 2005 • 4391 Posts
The only thing people should be talking about is Component/HDMI vs Composite. You can only tell the difference on 720/1080 if you have a big enough TV AND it has native 1080p, and chances are... you don't.
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts



If you guys want to save some money, buy a 24-27" LCD monitor with a 1680x1050 resolution and a good pair of headphones. Not only do you save money, but tons of room as well, you don't have to rearrange your living space to accommodate a giant TV. What's the point in sitting 20 feet away from the TV when you could sit 6 feet away and get the same experience?
foxhound_fox

I have a 23" LCD that maxes out at 1680x1050. I was told a while after buying it though that it may have been a mistake, since monitors that go up to that resolution aren't actually "full" 1080p. Is that significant, or even true?

Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts
[QUOTE="Firelore29"]

720p vs 1080p threads show up all the time. Honestly who cares? I have played 1080p and 720p games and they look virtually identical and I've got a 42" Plasma TV. If someone were to put a game running 1080p next to a game running 720p I bet 99% of the people on this site could not even tell which one is running1080p.

ChrisMun

You have two problems with your claims. Firstly is your tv size.You need something larger than a 50' HDTV to make any real notices between the resolutions. And second, you're making a bet to the people. So shouldn't you be making a bet on the official bets boards? Either way, you're just speculation because you have no proof that you could compare both resolution to come up with a solid opinion. Sounds just like a lot of hot air you've blowing.

Listen I'm not saying that there isn't any difference. There is. But for most people there is not any difference.

Avatar image for Spartan8907
Spartan8907

3731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Spartan8907
Member since 2006 • 3731 Posts
1080p is really only neccessary for larger TVs than 42". 42" and below, you really only need 720p. Its those 50"s and 60"s and beyond that you need 1080p.
Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts
[QUOTE="Firelore29"]Completely different. First off it would be going from 1600x1200 to 1280x1024 I have know idea how 1024x768 or 800x600 come into play?!?

Second the only difference you would see would be the screen resolution in windows because things are smaller. However when your actually playing a game you would see virtually 0 difference. Again I've played a number of games at 1280x1024 and I've played a game at 1600x1200 once and you simply can't tell the difference.

foxhound_fox



If you've played any game at 1600x1200 you would notice that MSAA is pretty much not needed for the most part. The pixels are so small the edges smooth themselves out and trick your eyes into thinking they are when they are obviously not.

There are massive differences bettween resolutions like 480p, 720p, 1080p and 1650p. Massive.

No. Simply no. Your wrong. Everyone can say that there is MASSIVE difference all day long and quote numbers and such but when push comes to shove and your actually sitting down to play a game unless you have a HUGE Tv you are not going to notice the difference.

Avatar image for DarthMar
DarthMar

270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DarthMar
Member since 2007 • 270 Posts

[QUOTE="mmirza23"] depends on the size of the tv and where you are sitting.\threadGrive

Pretty much. 1080p is very noticeable on a 57" Tv, for example. You're getting over twice the amount of detail.

Hmm... I have a 52" and I don't see a big difference...

Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

The smaller the difference in pixel size, the smaller the difference in picture quality. The difference in size between a pixel on a 1080p TV and a 720p TV is tiny compared to the difference in size between a pixel on a 720p TV and a 480p TV.

mjarantilla

Um, the difference between 480p and 720p is exactly the same difference as the one between 720p and 1080p.

Avatar image for Firelore29
Firelore29

4158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Firelore29
Member since 2007 • 4158 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

The smaller the difference in pixel size, the smaller the difference in picture quality. The difference in size between a pixel on a 1080p TV and a 720p TV is tiny compared to the difference in size between a pixel on a 720p TV and a 480p TV.

Grive

Um, the difference between 480p and 720p is exactly the same difference as the one between 720p and 1080p.

The differeence in picture quality is but the difference to the human eye is much different.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

Well could it just be because PC games are made to be able to output to those kinds of crazy resolutions, and console games generally aren't? Because foxhound is right, at least on a monitor, there is DEFINITELY a very noticeable difference between a resolution like 1024x768 and 1680x1050 in games.

But I also agree with some of the others that even on a huge TV, the difference between 720p and 1080p doesn't seem that big, at least not nearly to the extent it is on a monitor. I haven't tried PC games on a large HDTV, though, just console.

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts

Depends ons

Source Materiel

Screen Size

How far you are from the screen

Avatar image for Bill_McBlumpkin
Bill_McBlumpkin

1001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Bill_McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 1001 Posts

On TV's under 50", it's nearly impossible to tell the difference. This is true.

For larger front projection setups this ceases to be true, though.

Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#49 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts
I wouldn't go as far to say that the difference is unnoticable, but it is certainly very minimal. And for the price, 720p takes the cake.
Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

The differeence in picture quality is but the difference to the human eye is much different.

Firelore29

To gauge that, you'd need to compare the jumps with an analogous jump in TV size. If we sit at the same distance from all three TVs, a 20" 480p TV will have the same quality to the human eye as a 30" 720p which will have the same quality as a 45" 1080p.