The DREAMCAST
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9406E0DC1230F932A3575AC0A9669C8B63
Poor PS3 it dropped after only7 months. Sony is so desprate.
The Dreamcast price lasted at least a year.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The DREAMCAST
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9406E0DC1230F932A3575AC0A9669C8B63
Poor PS3 it dropped after only7 months. Sony is so desprate.
The Dreamcast price lasted at least a year.
To be fair, your also looking at $199 vs $599 so Sony had more reason to PD. Also Xbox price Dropped it's first year, but then Xbox wasn't in to win it, but mearly grab the attention of gamers.
Sony had to price drop because it had to, the problem is $500 is still out of Mass Market reach, and the Xbox can price drop whenever it decided to. With the 65nm Xenon/Xenos chips coming out...even further reason to.
Holiday 07 is going to help paint the picture to what the rest of this gens console wars will look like.
You forgot that the Xbox and gamecube both had earlier price drops.nygiantsfan1
Of course they did after Sony dropped the price of the PS2 first, It's called competition.
http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/15/1416203
The same way I expect to see a 360 price drop soon.
[QUOTE="munu9"]You're pretty good at spin. You should go into politics :|BigDizzAww dont go into denial
:lol: First people say that the ps3 needs a price cut and now they start with this crap? But teh dreamcast had teh price cut too!!! It so much like the ps3! Just like how the ps3 had many great games in it's first year! Just like how the ps3 was very cheap. Just like how the ps3 had a failed consoles of the same brand before it! Just like how the ps3 has a disc format that holds less space than the other consoles. No wait... What the TC said seems to be the only similiarity at all between the ps3 and dreamcast. Yet you guys are using it to make it seem like the ps3 price cut is negative thing. As if just because a console 7 years ago that had a price cut in a year failed, means the ps3 should do the same. Hmmm... what do you call that? Retarded logic? No, a better word for it is SPIN!! And the only one in denial is you and the TC :|
[QUOTE="munu9"]Nintendo is the only one making money off their console at the moment...BuryMea company doing what they're supposed to do makes them greedy?
uh no. A company that could have done better (in the graphics department) but instead decided to make their console 100% casual and very cheap to make is what I would call greedy. They got good gameplay but bad graphics. The 360 has good gameplay and good graphics and seems be making very less money because it strived for both :|
a company doing what they're supposed to do makes them greedy?[QUOTE="BuryMe"][QUOTE="munu9"]Nintendo is the only one making money off their console at the moment...munu9
uh no. A company that could have done better (in the graphics department) but instead decided to make their console 100% casual and very cheap to make is what I would call greedy. They got good gameplay but bad graphics. The 360 has good gameplay and good graphics and seems be making very less money because it strived for both :|
ide say its taking a hit because of the amount of brake downs, bad cust service from microsoft and the cost to get equipment to go online and then pay to play online. To me paying for online is stupid.
[QUOTE="munu9"]a company doing what they're supposed to do makes them greedy?[QUOTE="BuryMe"][QUOTE="munu9"]Nintendo is the only one making money off their console at the moment...DragonZ3
uh no. A company that could have done better (in the graphics department) but instead decided to make their console 100% casual and very cheap to make is what I would call greedy. They got good gameplay but bad graphics. The 360 has good gameplay and good graphics and seems be making very less money because it strived for both :|
ide say its taking a hit because of the amount of brake downs, bad cust service from microsoft and the cost to get equipment to go online and then pay to play online. To me paying for online is stupid.
Yes, but even ignoring all that. The 360 was sold for less than it cost to make at launch...
[QUOTE="DragonZ3"][QUOTE="munu9"]a company doing what they're supposed to do makes them greedy?[QUOTE="BuryMe"][QUOTE="munu9"]Nintendo is the only one making money off their console at the moment...munu9
uh no. A company that could have done better (in the graphics department) but instead decided to make their console 100% casual and very cheap to make is what I would call greedy. They got good gameplay but bad graphics. The 360 has good gameplay and good graphics and seems be making very less money because it strived for both :|
ide say its taking a hit because of the amount of brake downs, bad cust service from microsoft and the cost to get equipment to go online and then pay to play online. To me paying for online is stupid.
Yes, but even ignoring all that. The 360 was sold for less than it cost to make at launch...
But would microsoft not make the money back quickly with the equipment sold and the online subscriptions? several million people paying 40 odd pounds a year must stack up.
[QUOTE="nygiantsfan1"]You forgot that the Xbox and gamecube both had earlier price drops.-Super-Fly-
Of course they did after Sony dropped the price of the PS2 first, It's called competition.
http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/15/1416203
The same way I expect to see a 360 price drop soon.
I get it. When Sony does a price drop early it is because it's failing but when MS and Nintendo do the same thing it's considered competing. Besides, having an early price drop is probably better than having to extend your warranty and refund money for faulty hardware.
Didn't the DS get one before a year too?tegovoltioThe DS and PS3 are nothing alike. Comparing them is useless. And to answer your question, I think the DS got it's price cut before the DSL launch which was about 1 year and 8 months after the initial launch. So about a year and a half?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment