Pretty much the topic, im just wondering because i would love to play BC2 in a PS3 Vs. 360 player game, i think it would be fun. Im not very up to date on what these systems can do but just wondering if this could happen in the future.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
that'd be pretty epic if they had a massive multiplayer game where you had to capture territory for your platform
It won't work.
PC has the home advantage when it comes to shooters. If the crossplatform online multiplayer thing was to be used, it should be used in a situation where the 360 and PC lack any sort of advantage. Perhaps it might work for danmaku shoot-em-ups, platformers, and 2d fighting games.
it would just have to be a game that is free to play like shadowrun on the 360.no.. a person playing on PSN will never get to play with someone on XBL.
Wouldn't be that fair also. Someone playing on PSN can play with the same community of people as someone that pays for XBL. But who know, anything can happen in business.
ichiban30
[QUOTE="Omzzz"]It'll never happendonalbaneAs you can tell from the numerous Shadowrun comments, it already has. both platforms are microsoft owned so the servers are relative...
We already had. Quake 3 Arena, dreamcast players could play against PC gamers... needless to say, the dreamcast players were always brutally owned so they removed that featureGTR2addictThat's one hell of an exaggeration. The feature wasn't "removed" - Sega simply didn't bother to continue patching the game to stay in sync with id's patches on PC.
[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]We already had. Quake 3 Arena, dreamcast players could play against PC gamers... needless to say, the dreamcast players were always brutally owned so they removed that featurelowe0That's one hell of an exaggeration. The feature wasn't "removed" - Sega simply didn't bother to continue patching the game to stay in sync with id's patches on PC. But in whatever way, the dreamcast players were always brutally slaughtered, they just didn't have the speed and precision needed
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="GTR2addict"]We already had. Quake 3 Arena, dreamcast players could play against PC gamers... needless to say, the dreamcast players were always brutally owned so they removed that featureGTR2addictThat's one hell of an exaggeration. The feature wasn't "removed" - Sega simply didn't bother to continue patching the game to stay in sync with id's patches on PC. But in whatever way, the dreamcast players were always brutally slaughtered, they just didn't have the speed and precision needed What about those had KB/M :P
Not likely. It's not in Microsoft's nor Sony's playbooks to allow cross-platform play since it would discourage defections.Pretty much the topic, im just wondering because i would love to play BC2 in a PS3 Vs. 360 player game, i think it would be fun. Im not very up to date on what these systems can do but just wondering if this could happen in the future.
walbeb
They should so do that with.....whatever the next big multiplat FPS is. Unless it's CoD. Activision can go **** themselves.
[QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="Omzzz"]It'll never happenslvrraven9As you can tell from the numerous Shadowrun comments, it already has. both platforms are microsoft owned so the servers are relative... So does this logic also extend to PC / 360 games being counted as exclusive? Since you want to give no credit to cross-system with PC/360 stating they're both "microsoft owned." Watch the backpedaling happen everyone. . .This is one of the main reasons I've argued for console exclusive term.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment