This is how Assassin's Creed would look on the Wii

So how would Assassin's Creed look on the Wii? Well,Prince of Persia: Rival Swords is on the Wii and Assassin's Creed looks like a sharper, prettier version of it. I've posted the pics below of Rival Swords, I'd expect it would look like those pics. The Wii is more powerful then these pics suggest (Rival Swords was a quick port) however I think that extra power would be used to compensate for the draw distance and high number of character models that come with a free roaming environments. Perhaps the textures would be a little sharper as that seems to be the biggest difference between Galaxy & Metroid Prime 3 and their Gamecube Predesesccors.

[QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my WiiHeil68

or spore? :o

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my Wiihyperboy152000

or spore? :o

I'm pretty sure that counts as a multiplat.

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my Wiihyperboy152000

or spore? :o

Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.Zenfoldor

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.kevy619

Because graphics matter. Look at L.A.I.R. Such a revolutionary graphical title.

The game could be done 1000x better on the Wii, if it was developed better. Now, it is just a mediocre title with decent graphics and repetitive gameplay.

That was probably a straight PS2 to Wii port, so I'm guessing it would look way better than that.sexy_chimp

Probably not.

That was probably a straight PS2 to Wii port, so I'm guessing it would look way better than that.sexy_chimp

It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.kevy619

[QUOTE="kevy619"]It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.Zenfoldor

Because graphics matter. Look at L.A.I.R. Such a revolutionary graphical title.

The game could be done 1000x better on the Wii, if it was developed better. Now, it is just a mediocre title with decent graphics and repetitive gameplay.

You arent even reading what Im saying. The wii cant compete with the 360 or ps3 in terms of AI, level size and physics. Lair was a bad game yes, the wii also has plenty of crappy games.

[QUOTE="sexy_chimp"]That was probably a straight PS2 to Wii port, so I'm guessing it would look way better than that.Zerostatic0

It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.kevy619

Still not going to happen, the wii doesnt have the capabilty to run assasins creed. You cant just downgrade the graphics.

k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my Wiidlind70

wow...

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.kevy619

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

Also, you own a PS3 and a PSP. Your obviously a graphics whore and a fanboy, to the point of ruining the gaming experience for yourself because of your biased against Nintendo, which I guarntee existed during the Gamecube days when the GCN had equal graphics to the Xbox, and no load times.

Terrible that you would even dare to comment on Nintendo's console when you have no idea what your talking about, and spew your unjustified, generalized, and false rhetoric all over these forums.

By not owning a Wii, YOU are the one missing out. By not owning a DS, YOU are the one missing out.

If you were a "hardcore" gamer, and not a fanboy, you know what you would believe?

See, when a game, like SMG is hailed as the "greatest game of all time" then a real hardcore gamer wants to see what all the fuss is about. That gamer would go through the ends of the earth to play this game and determine for himself if it is the best.

A fanboy, like yourself, will post negative things about the Wii, and play the game for only his system, and degrade the Wii, just because he feels buyers remores for purchasing the competition.

I'm sure you are upset by your peception that "Nintendo is ruining the gaming industry with casuals." I got news for you. Casual's flame SMG because they are too new to gaming, or too fanboyish for the systems they bought, to respect the developers and the critical reviews. Nothin can penetrate their closed minded view of what a "next gen" console is supposed to be.

So, they buy a crappy handheld, and 2 systems that basically play the same multiplats and not much else, and don't buy a Wii, and never play SMG, and THEY are the people ruining the gaming industry, not Nintendo. Nintendo is revitalizing it.

You're pathetic.

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.Zenfoldor

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

Also, you own a PS3 and a PSP. Your obviously a graphics whore and a fanboy, to the point of ruining the gaming experience for yourself because of your biased against Nintendo, which I guarntee existed during the Gamecube days when the GCN had equal graphics to the Xbox, and no load times.

Disguesting that you would even dare to comment on Nintendo's console when you have no idea what your talking about, and spew your unjustified, generalized, and false rhetoric all over these forums.

By now owning a Wii, YOU are the one missing out. By not owning a DS, YOU are the one missing out.

If you were a "hardcore" gamer, and not a fanboy, you know what you would believe?

See, when a game, like SMG is hailed as the "greatest game of all time" then a real hardcore gamer wants to see what all the fuss is about. That gamer would go through the ends of the earth to play this game and determine for himself if it is the best.

A fanboy, like yourself, will post negative things about the Wii, and play the game for only his system, and degrade the Wii, just because he feels buyers remores for purchasing the competition.

I'm sure you are upset by your peception that "Nintendo is ruining the gaming industry with casuals." I got news for you. Casual's flame SMG because they are too new to gaming, or too fanboyish for the systems they bought, to respect the developers and the critical reviews. Nothin can penetrate their closed minded view of what a "next gen" console is supposed to be.

So, they buy a crappy handheld, and 2 systems that basically play the same multiplats and not much else, and don't buy a Wii, and never play SMG, and THEY are the people ruining the gaming industry, not Nintendo. Nintendo is revitalizing it.

You're pathetic.

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.Zenfoldor

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

Also, you own a PS3 and a PSP. Your obviously a graphics whore and a fanboy, to the point of ruining the gaming experience for yourself because of your biased against Nintendo, which I guarntee existed during the Gamecube days when the GCN had equal graphics to the Xbox, and no load times.

Terrible that you would even dare to comment on Nintendo's console when you have no idea what your talking about, and spew your unjustified, generalized, and false rhetoric all over these forums.

By now owning a Wii, YOU are the one missing out. By not owning a DS, YOU are the one missing out.

If you were a "hardcore" gamer, and not a fanboy, you know what you would believe?

See, when a game, like SMG is hailed as the "greatest game of all time" then a real hardcore gamer wants to see what all the fuss is about. That gamer would go through the ends of the earth to play this game and determine for himself if it is the best.

A fanboy, like yourself, will post negative things about the Wii, and play the game for only his system, and degrade the Wii, just because he feels buyers remores for purchasing the competition.

I'm sure you are upset by your peception that "Nintendo is ruining the gaming industry with casuals." I got news for you. Casual's flame SMG because they are too new to gaming, or too fanboyish for the systems they bought, to respect the developers and the critical reviews. Nothin can penetrate their closed minded view of what a "next gen" console is supposed to be.

So, they buy a crappy handheld, and 2 systems that basically play the same multiplats and not much else, and don't buy a Wii, and never play SMG, and THEY are the people ruining the gaming industry, not Nintendo. Nintendo is revitalizing it.

You're pathetic.

ok then. SMG is a great game. and so is zelda and metroid. Heck my favorite game of all time is Chrono Trigger. Do you think think the snes can play N64 games with downgraded graphics? Last gen I did have a gamecube, loved Metroid, RE4, Zelda(except the sea part), Star Fox Adventures and Eternal Darkness. This gen so far, all nintendo has is another Metroid Prime rehash, a Zelda gamecube game, and the Mario game that should of come out last gen. I also did own a ds, and then sold it since most of its games sucked IMO. Or should I own a ds for another mario kart rehash, Mario 64, or maybe Final Fantasy remakes.

[QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my WiiJPOBS

wow...

not if they suck. I would rather play them on m 360.

@JPOBS

Prove him wrong about what, nub? All he stated was a generalized opinion about the "huge difference in prossing power and how most people don't know what processing power is."

I didn't need to prove him wrong, I only needed to point out the facts about him being obviously biased against the Wii in his statements, which he couldn't prove.

I'm not dumb enough to spend 2 hours going into technical specs to prove someone right or wrong, for a post that an already biased fanboy like yourself will look at for 2 seconds, when he's already made his mind up. If he wants to prove his point with some specs, he can be my guest, but they won't prove that this particular game uses any more processing power in terms of draw distances or on screen sprites than the Wii is capable of, because it has more to do with the developer useing the hardware to it's maximum efficiency.

...I would have your silence in this matter, from now on, it'll be better for you in the end, I have no doubt.

@JPOBS

Prove him wrong about what, nub? All he stated was a generalized opinion about the "huge difference in prossing power and how most people don't know what processing power is."

I didn't need to prove him wrong, I only needed to point out the facts about him being obviously biased against the Wii in his statements, which he couldn't prove.

I'm not dumb enough to spend 2 hours going into technical specs to prove someone right or wrong, for a post that an already biased fanboy like yourself will look at for 2 seconds, when he's already made his mind up. If he wants to prove his point with some specs, he can be my guest, but they won't prove that this particular game uses any more processing power in terms of draw distances or on screen sprites than the Wii is capable of, because it has more to do with the developer useing the hardware to it's maximum efficiency.

...I would have your silence in this matter, from now on, it'll be better for you in the end, I have no doubt.

Zenfoldor

Correction, you dont know what you are talking about. Go play SMG again, its not like another good wii game is coming out anytime soon. Then you can come back and tell me that brawl isnt a rehash because of the wiimote.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]

[QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my Wiilaughingman42

wow...

not if they suck. I would rather play them on m 360.

@JPOBS

Prove him wrong about what, nub? All he stated was a generalized opinion about the "huge difference in prossing power and how most people don't know what processing power is."

I didn't need to prove him wrong, I only needed to point out the facts about him being obviously biased against the Wii in his statements, which he couldn't prove.

I'm not dumb enough to spend 2 hours going into technical specs to prove someone right or wrong, for a post that an already biased fanboy like yourself will look at for 2 seconds, when he's already made his mind up. If he wants to prove his point with some specs, he can be my guest, but they won't prove that this particular game uses any more processing power in terms of draw distances or on screen sprites than the Wii is capable of, because it has more to do with the developer useing the hardware to it's maximum efficiency.

...I would have your silence in this matter, from now on, it'll be better for you in the end, I have no doubt.

Zenfoldor

You seem to think bias is a one way street. how sadly mistaken you are.

ok then. SMG is a great game. and so is zelda and metroid. Heck my favorite game of all time is Chrono Trigger. Do you think think the snes can play N64 games with downgraded graphics? Last gen I did have a gamecube, loved Metroid, RE4, Zelda(except the sea part), Star Fox Adventures and Eternal Darkness. This gen so far, all nintendo has is another Metroid Prime rehash, a Zelda gamecube game, and the Mario game that should of come out last gen. I also did own a ds, and then sold it since most of its games sucked IMO. Or should I own a ds for another mario kart rehash, Mario 64, or maybe Final Fantasy remakes.

kevy619

Thanks for admitting SMG is a great game. Chrono Trigger is also my favorite game.

The Wii vs the PS3 has a much smaller difference in graphics and processing power than does the N64, and the Super NES. Every gen, the power and processing has increased less and less, since Atari vs Famicom. You know this, don't use exaggerated examples.

The Wii is already more sucessful, with a better game than the Gamecube had.

SMG could not have been done last gen. It runs at 60fps with no slowdown, the Wii has significant processing upgrades and a better video card than the cube did. It also makes ample use of the Wii controller to increase the experience of the game. Not possible on the gamecube by a longshot. The game is also larger than that of a game that would fit on a Gamecube disc, thanks to the increadible audio.

I own a DS and a PSP. The sheer number of excellent titles availabe on the DS blow the PSP's library out of the water. The most notable game for the DS imo, is Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, or Castlevania: Portrait of Ruin. However, the PSP is a good system, and I'm sorry that I flamed you for owning it.

Using the term "rehash" for most of the new Nintendo games is very cliche' and fanboyish, but still valid in some cases. However, make very sure you apply them to the right games. Applying Rehash to Mario Kart DS or SMG is the same as applying Rehash to RE4, and saying it's the same as RE1-3, inaccurate and incorrect. Play the games before you lable them.

That said, you didn't flame back, which is admirable. We can end this now, if you want, and I won't type another word. I respect your opinions.

[QUOTE="laughingman42"][QUOTE="JPOBS"]

[QUOTE="dlind70"]k I don't know about you, but I don't want ports on my WiiNintendo_Ownes7

wow...

not if they suck. I would rather play them on m 360.

Good thinking. Who doesnt buy a wii for nintendo games?

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]

@JPOBS

Prove him wrong about what, nub? All he stated was a generalized opinion about the "huge difference in prossing power and how most people don't know what processing power is."

I didn't need to prove him wrong, I only needed to point out the facts about him being obviously biased against the Wii in his statements, which he couldn't prove.

I'm not dumb enough to spend 2 hours going into technical specs to prove someone right or wrong, for a post that an already biased fanboy like yourself will look at for 2 seconds, when he's already made his mind up. If he wants to prove his point with some specs, he can be my guest, but they won't prove that this particular game uses any more processing power in terms of draw distances or on screen sprites than the Wii is capable of, because it has more to do with the developer useing the hardware to it's maximum efficiency.

...I would have your silence in this matter, from now on, it'll be better for you in the end, I have no doubt.

JPOBS

You seem to think bias is a one way street. how sadly mistaken you are.

If only all my flames could fit on a T-shirt.

Again, you seem to have missed the point, singled out one word, and used it against me. Oh my, I'm so owned.

Look, smart guy, the point is, even though I might be a sheep, I do own other consoles. I don't troll the other topics waiting for my opportunity to flame the other systems with single word trolls because I'm not that much of a fanboy, and I don't feel the need to necessarily demean other systems with no proof, unprovoked.

You don't belong in this conversation.

If only all my flames could fit on a T-shirt.

Again, you seem to have missed the point, singled out one word, and used it against me. Oh my, I'm so owned.

Look, smart guy, the point is, even though I might be a sheep, I do own other consoles. I don't troll the other topics waiting for my opportunity to flame the other systems with single word trolls because I'm not that much of a fanboy, and I don't feel the need to necessarily demean other systems with no proof, unprovoked.

You don't belong in this conversation.

Zenfoldor

Then you can come back and tell me that brawl isnt a rehash because of the wiimote.

kevy619

Then you can come back and tell me that Halo 3 isnt a rehash because of better graphics.

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]

If only all my flames could fit on a T-shirt.

Again, you seem to have missed the point, singled out one word, and used it against me. Oh my, I'm so owned.

Look, smart guy, the point is, even though I might be a sheep, I do own other consoles. I don't troll the other topics waiting for my opportunity to flame the other systems with single word trolls because I'm not that much of a fanboy, and I don't feel the need to necessarily demean other systems with no proof, unprovoked.

You don't belong in this conversation.

JPOBS

That's not what your mother said, last night.

Yeh, that's basically how it would look only AC on the Wii would be much more polished.

EDIT: The textures would get an upgrade and I imagine that the fires would definitely look much better using the Wii's power.

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

Then you can come back and tell me that brawl isnt a rehash because of the wiimote.

laughingman42

Then you can come back and tell me that Halo 3 isnt a rehash because of better graphics.

Read a couple of reviews. They already clearly state whats new in Halo 3.

PoP has a pretty linear level design compared to AC.....Vandalvideo

Yeah, Assassins Creed is like Gran Theft Auto 1500 BC and the amount of NPCs are insane.

[QUOTE="laughingman42"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

Then you can come back and tell me that brawl isnt a rehash because of the wiimote.

kevy619

Then you can come back and tell me that Halo 3 isnt a rehash because of better graphics.

Read a couple of reviews. They already clearly state whats new in Halo 3.

No crap, I was just showing you what you said is wrong. Smash Bros Dojo

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.kevy619

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

But there's one little problem with your arguement; YOU aren't the one in charge of porting it! If Ubisoft decides to port it to the Wii, they'd hire a developer with a high-level understanding of the Wii hardware, NOT YOU.

NO OWNAGE FOR YOU!

NEXT!

[QUOTE="kevy619"]

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.metroidprimegmr

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

But there's one little problem with your arguement; YOU aren't the one in charge of porting it! If Ubisoft decides to port it to the Wii, they'd hire a developer with a high-level understanding of the Wii hardware, NOT YOU.

Lol, you must not be familiar with Ubisoft's track record when it comes to ports.... especially Wii ports.

[QUOTE="laughingman42"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

Then you can come back and tell me that brawl isnt a rehash because of the wiimote.

kevy619

Then you can come back and tell me that Halo 3 isnt a rehash because of better graphics.

Read a couple of reviews. They already clearly state whats new in Halo 3.

Yeah, man, but the point is, Brawl isn't even released yet. You can't possibly know it is a rehash, and if you consider Brawl a rehash and Halo 3 not a rehash, simply because the reviews state what is new in the game, your not really boulstering your point very much.

IMO, if you consider any game from Nintendo a rehash, then you have to consider FFX, Halo 2, and Especially Halo 3, Ratchet and Clank, and quite a few other great, high profile games, rehashes as well. You can't have it both ways. If that is gonna be one of your main arguing points, rehashes, then admit that a lot of the games you play and love are rehashes as well.

Personally, I think Rehash is a buzzword for fanboys, and in reality only applies to a very few games. These games tend to reuse the same animation, graphics, and sound effects from previous games, and recycle multiple elements of the previous game.

Games that only share the THEME of the previous game, and are built on new engines aren't rehashes, they are simply sequels that are purposefully trying not to stray too far from the tree, because the tree is good, people love the tree, if they wanted to rock on the other side of the fence they would have bought it instead.

[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"]

[QUOTE="sexy_chimp"]That was probably a straight PS2 to Wii port, so I'm guessing it would look way better than that.kevy619

It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.kevy619

Still not going to happen, the wii doesnt have the capabilty to run assasins creed. You cant just downgrade the graphics.

Uh yes it can. You seem to be very blind to the fact that yes, AC could happen on the Wii, graphics or not. AC has nothing to do with some different graphics engine. If it did, then your straight out telling PoP doesnt exist. The DS has an AC version for god's sake, why couldn't the Wii have it?

It wouldnt even run on the wii. Theres more to "next gen" games then just graphics. Wii owners cant seem to comprehend that more power gives us more than just better graphics.kevy619

What else are they putting that processing power to use on? And please I suggest you don't say A.I or physics.

PoP has a pretty linear level design compared to AC.....Vandalvideo

Exactly. And i dont know how the AI would hold up seeing as even the PS3 and 360 dont do that great a job.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]

If only all my flames could fit on a T-shirt.

Again, you seem to have missed the point, singled out one word, and used it against me. Oh my, I'm so owned.

Look, smart guy, the point is, even though I might be a sheep, I do own other consoles. I don't troll the other topics waiting for my opportunity to flame the other systems with single word trolls because I'm not that much of a fanboy, and I don't feel the need to necessarily demean other systems with no proof, unprovoked.

You don't belong in this conversation.

Zenfoldor

That's not what your mother said, last night.

wow thats real mature

ffs all he said is this game prob isnt possible on the wii, wtf is wrong with u ppl

the truth is, it probably isnt, have u even played assassins creed?

it has big open enviroments where u can pretty much explore anywhere with little to no load times

just cause u downgrade the graphics doesnt mean everything else will run as it should.

to have assassins creed on the wii it would have to take a big hit and prob end up being a different game all together, i dont know why thats so hard to understand

everytime someone comments on the wii u sheep go into defcon 4 and defend it like its your life. wtf is wrong with u

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]PoP has a pretty linear level design compared to AC.....Ninja-Vox

Exactly. And i dont know how the AI would hold up seeing as even the PS3 and 360 dont do that great a job.

Not this A.I thing again....sigh. It shows you are just grasping for straws when you mention it up. You're questioning how the A.I will hold up because the PS3 and 360s isn't to good either. Maybe because A.I isn't advanced and demanding like you think? I haven't seen a advance in A.I since HL2 and Fear. And even those two are very flawed, its like this: A.I will never take the place of man. Its sufficent enough if the A.I does its job and be challenging. In short there has been no advancement in A.I since last generation.

[QUOTE="metroidprimegmr"][QUOTE="kevy619"]

[QUOTE="Zenfoldor"]Yeah, it would still be funner and less repetitve than the other versions of the game, though.tbone29

lol, it wouldnt even be possible on the wii. Even if they downgraded the visuals, the wii version would be completely broken.

But there's one little problem with your arguement; YOU aren't the one in charge of porting it! If Ubisoft decides to port it to the Wii, they'd hire a developer with a high-level understanding of the Wii hardware, NOT YOU.

Lol, you must not be familiar with Ubisoft's track record when it comes to ports.... especially Wii ports.