Time to bring objectivity to System Wars.

1. XBL is better than PSN.

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

1. XBL is better than PSN.

For 300$ 2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

Objectivity? in SW? at this time of the year (right before E3)? yeah, good luck.

I guess I can agree with about 7 of those.cloudff7tm

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

spacesheikh

In sales?

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

in what sucking?

charlesdarwin55

No silly, in winning ;D

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

edidili

In sales?

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

In sales?

[QUOTE="edidili"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

spacesheikh

In sales?

That may be good for Nintendo but I couldn't care less. I'd rather go with the quality + quantity of games these platforms deliver. After all I am a gamer and that's what I care the most and WII is way below the others.

1. Silly, cute, consoles and their online services.
2. True
3. And better internal components, mini-usb, lithium-ion 'n such, all wireless and rechargeable.
4. Sorta, they suck at cooling it, and I hear the drive is bad as well, the components in the console are actually extremely good, for when they were released.
5. Never had a problem with it...
6. Dunno, not played many..
7. Yes.
8. I dunno, I feel like one, since I only have had it on for maybe 150 hours tops, but that's 'cause I have a pc...
9. duh
10. (1) MS, (2) Sony, (3) Nintendo, MS and Sony manufacture more than just silly consoles.

~5/10! that's almost close!

[QUOTE="cloudff7tm"]I guess I can agree with about 7 of those.spacesheikh

lol. That's actually not too shabby.Stevo_the_gamer

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.spacesheikh

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.ShadowriverUB

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.ShadowriverUB

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.Stevo_the_gamer

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.Stevo_the_gamer

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

Yea, but those was best PS3 you can get... thru i heard first sixaxis sacked

1. Well yeah, although it does have a monthly fee.
2. Agreed again.
3. True
4. I guess so, with all the RRoDs and all
5. I dont know
6. According to GS scores ammount of quality exclusives goes like this PC>>>Wii>PS3>360.
7. They are evil indeed, but there are worse game companies out there... like Zynga.
8. Well, a sucker if it wasnt worth the money for them. But if the purchase back then was worth it yeah.
9. True
10. In terms of sales, yeah. Quality? Nintendo>Sony>MS

I mostly agree, soo I will vote yes.

Yea, but those was best PS3 you can get... thru i heard first sixaxis sacked

ShadowriverUB

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]Yea, but those was best PS3 you can get... thru i heard first sixaxis sacked

Inconsistancy

Yea sry im not native english :p and first SixAxis, those with half transparent black color

Games and your perception of them are completely subjective so no.

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"][QUOTE="cloudff7tm"]I guess I can agree with about 7 of those.cloudff7tm

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="cloudff7tm"] Five, Seven, and Eight.spacesheikh

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"] I guess that means you bought a PS3 in 2007 for activision games.. :Pgaming25

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.spacesheikh

So you telling PS2 BC sucks? :p

Well if you are going to put it that way then if you pay for XBL at anytime for $50 a year you were a bigger sucker because it's free on every other avalible platform and if you pay $60 for XBL now still using PvP servers and all other platforms still offer it free you deserve to be laughed at, Agree?

if not then what you wrote about people who bought PS3 in 06 and 07 is complete bull because unlike XBL a playstation 3 with blu-ray player, hdmi, wifi and blue tooth compatability, it a tangible investment. If they bought a PS3 then and didn't pay a cent more :shock: they would still have their PS3 now with all those features I mentioned and...free online.

1. XBL is better than PSN but you have to pay fpr it.

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

spacesheikh

After that, you pretty much win.

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

1. XBL is better than PSN but you have to pay fpr it.

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

Solquid_Snake

After that, you pretty much win.

:| but then that kills his argument for #8 and shows a bit of bias in his post.

lol how can you hype XBL (and ignore the cost) and then try to dis PS3 in 06-07 because of the price (the hardware and tech was still valid value). if you bought a xbox in 06 for $400...you'd have paid $650 for it by now in 2011 because of XBL fees, and guess what, xbox360 will never have the tech and hardware PS3 does.

1. XBL is better than PSN.

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

spacesheikh

1. Subjective and I disagree.

2. Subjective and I disagree about the comfort. Objectively correct on the triggers.

3. Agree.

4. Agree.

5. Agree.

6. Subjective, but I agree.

7. Subjective and I dont care.

8. Subjective and I disagree.

9. Agree (since I assume you mean technical aspects)

10. Agree.

Hmmm... 4.5 out of 10 correct. 5.5 if you mean what I think you mean with PC graphics. If you are going to make such a topic you should probably try to make sure all of your points are actually objectively correct.

Better luck next time.

6, 7, and 8 are completely subjective. Other than that, yeah. Those are pretty much facts.

1. XBL is better than PSN. not fact

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3. not fact

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad. not fact

4. MS sucks at hardware. not fact

5. Sony sucks at operating systems. not fact

6. PS3 has better exclusives. not fact

7. Activision is evil. not fact, but true anyway. :P

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker. Probably

9. PC has better graphics. Undeniable

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place. In sales, at least. Every other parameter is not fact.

spacesheikh

So yeah.

Agreed, but there should be two further points that point out:

1. PC is not as expensive as people say.

2. PC has the most exclusives so other fanboys can run and tell that!

you forgot, not only does microsoft fail at exclusives, but it fails even harder at original IP's. enjoy gears x and forza y lems :)PSTreyExpo2012

Agree with all except #6. I'd say they are both even.

I agree with all of those points.

EDIT: Activision may not be evil... money hungry, milking, dev devouring white collars... but not evil.

Those are all opinions.foxhound_fox

Captain obvious to the rescue

Those are all opinions.foxhound_fox

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.spacesheikh

Um.....thanks for sharing your opinion, but what are we suppose to discuss here?

Every single one of those is subjective...

1. XBL is better than PSN.

2. The 360 controller is more comfortable and has better triggers than the Dual Shock 3.

3. Dual Shock 3 has a better D-pad.

4. MS sucks at hardware.

5. Sony sucks at operating systems.

6. PS3 has better exclusives.

7. Activision is evil.

8. If you bought PS3 in 2006/2007, you're a sucker.

9. PC has better graphics.

10. Nintendo is in 1st place. MS is in 2nd place. Sony is in 3rd place.

spacesheikh

1. I prefer PSN, because it DOES NOT HAVE cross game chat. Am I seriously the only one that doesn't like it? Next to nobody communicates within the game they are playing anymore.

2. The 360 pad is great, but the dual shock is OVERALL better because it does EVERYTHING, thanks to not having a crappy dpad.