Tired of the disappointed Crysis 2 graphics threads...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts

Did anyone think that maybe, just maybe, Crytek were better at rendering a tropical setting?

Where was Farcry set? In a tropical paradise. Ditto with Crysis. Maybe the developer just had more talent working under that setting.

I realize all the technical complaints (no DX11, less customization with graphics on PC) - but I think the biggest difference is the environments. The character models and guns and everything still looks on par with the original. If they did another tropical island based FPS, people would just complain that they rehashed the series. Good on them for changing things up, let the haters hate.

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

Crysis 2 still takes place in a jungle... an urban jungle, but a jungle nevertheless... no?

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts

Crysis 2 still takes place in a jungle... an urban jungle, but a jungle nevertheless... no?

67gt500
Wasn't tropical though. I think Crytek really excel at that atmosphere (palm trees, bushes, beaches, etc.). I think it's a huge reason why people are a bit disappointed in Crysis 2's graphics.
Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

I think people are just angry they didn't get everything htey wanted

Avatar image for DreamCryotank
DreamCryotank

1829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DreamCryotank
Member since 2011 • 1829 Posts

This

Was more interesting than this:

In my opinion. Crysis 1 looks better, but the enviroment got boring half way through, while Crysis 2 has tons of variety.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

The disappointment is the lack of improvements in a sequel that has come out nearly four years later. You act like by being on par with a game that came out in 2007, people should be satisfied.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts

I can take a dip in graphics or eye candy but you know what. Crysis 1 looks better and runs better on my system. Crysis 2 is such a poor game on a technical level its not even funny. It doesn't support crossfire it doesn't let you adjust graphic options to optimize performance without downloading a FAN MADE program. The game suffers from ghosting and tons of graphical glitches. The game can outright bug out and buttons will stop working forcing you to exit the game to get it to work again. It plays ok but the amount of problems I have had playing this game just make it worthy of scorn. It is lazy unfinished product not because its consolized but because it suffers from bugs and glitches has basic features that every other PC game has removed. Awful.

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Mozelleple112
You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2).
Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Trinexxx
You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2).

The game doesn't even have DX10. Not that I care too much but you can tell how much the game feels like a hatchet job when they have to patch in BASIC features after release.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
I'm tired of the damn graphics threads in general about it. This game is so much more than graphics. The campaign is one of the best experiences I have had in a FPS in a long time. Crysis 2 >>>>> Crysis/Warhead in everything but graphics.
Avatar image for jethrovegas
jethrovegas

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jethrovegas
Member since 2007 • 5103 Posts
I agree. Graphics are the least of Crysis 2's problems.
Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Trinexxx
You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2).

Its the same gap on pc. Unless you're admitting that the console generation is what held it back. Far Cry - 2004 --> Crysis- 2007 --> Crysis 2 -2011
Avatar image for zaibutzu
zaibutzu

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#14 zaibutzu
Member since 2004 • 1277 Posts
Even in real life, we prefer to look at a natural green jungle, than a urban jungle.
Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
There is a reason why. Crysis was a benchmark, Crytek talked up their game so much about graphics. It delivered for the most part. However, Crysis 2 did the exact opposite of what Crytek said.
Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinexxx"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

blues35301
You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2).

Its the same gap on pc. Unless you're admitting that the console generation is what held it back. Far Cry - 2004 --> Crysis- 2007 --> Crysis 2 -2011

I always thought there was an increase in the saturation of graphics cards when new consoles launched. If not, then you could also argue that graphical improvements have decreased over the years. 2004 - 2007 had a more drastic increase (in general, with all games) compared to 2007 - present time.
Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinexxx"][QUOTE="blues35301"][QUOTE="Trinexxx"] You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2).

Its the same gap on pc. Unless you're admitting that the console generation is what held it back. Far Cry - 2004 --> Crysis- 2007 --> Crysis 2 -2011

I always thought there was an increase in the saturation of graphics cards when new consoles launched. If not, then you could also argue that graphical improvements have decreased over the years. 2004 - 2007 had a more drastic increase (in general, with all games) compared to 2007 - present time.

Yeah there has been a decline. Its because the game was multiplat so it had to fit with this console generation. If it were pc exclusive we'd have seen the leap in technology.
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

man, crysis 2 looks outstanding but the performance is pretty bad. it's the fps equivalent of castlevania lords of shadow where framerate is concerned :P and the pop ins...

Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts

I can take a dip in graphics or eye candy but you know what. Crysis 1 looks better and runs better on my system. Crysis 2 is such a poor game on a technical level its not even funny. It doesn't support crossfire it doesn't let you adjust graphic options to optimize performance without downloading a FAN MADE program. The game suffers from ghosting and tons of graphical glitches. The game can outright bug out and buttons will stop working forcing you to exit the game to get it to work again. It plays ok but the amount of problems I have had playing this game just make it worthy of scorn. It is lazy unfinished product not because its consolized but because it suffers from bugs and glitches has basic features that every other PC game has removed. Awful.

6matt6
Never experienced any of that. Buttons don't stop working...you need to HOLD THEM.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts

In my opinion. Crysis 1 looks better, but the enviroment got boring half way through, while Crysis 2 has tons of variety.

DreamCryotank

What mods are you using for the C1 pics?

Avatar image for John_Read
John_Read

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 John_Read
Member since 2009 • 1214 Posts

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Mozelleple112
really now compared HL vs HL 2 and then HL 2 vs HL episodes jump from HL2 to HL episodes is s*** lazy valve
Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
[QUOTE="6matt6"]

I can take a dip in graphics or eye candy but you know what. Crysis 1 looks better and runs better on my system. Crysis 2 is such a poor game on a technical level its not even funny. It doesn't support crossfire it doesn't let you adjust graphic options to optimize performance without downloading a FAN MADE program. The game suffers from ghosting and tons of graphical glitches. The game can outright bug out and buttons will stop working forcing you to exit the game to get it to work again. It plays ok but the amount of problems I have had playing this game just make it worthy of scorn. It is lazy unfinished product not because its consolized but because it suffers from bugs and glitches has basic features that every other PC game has removed. Awful.

soapandbubbles
Never experienced any of that. Buttons don't stop working...you need to HOLD THEM.

Google it its a problem everyone has had.
Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

[QUOTE="blues35301"][QUOTE="Trinexxx"] You're comparing games with a generational gap (Farcry and Crysis) between games using very similar hardware (Crysis and Crysis 2). Trinexxx
Its the same gap on pc. Unless you're admitting that the console generation is what held it back. Far Cry - 2004 --> Crysis- 2007 --> Crysis 2 -2011

I always thought there was an increase in the saturation of graphics cards when new consoles launched. If not, then you could also argue that graphical improvements have decreased over the years. 2004 - 2007 had a more drastic increase (in general, with all games) compared to 2007 - present time.

Say it as it is. There is no big jump because the game is a multiplat and actually you can say it isn't even a small jump. Why avoid such an obvious fact?

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"][QUOTE="6matt6"]

I can take a dip in graphics or eye candy but you know what. Crysis 1 looks better and runs better on my system. Crysis 2 is such a poor game on a technical level its not even funny. It doesn't support crossfire it doesn't let you adjust graphic options to optimize performance without downloading a FAN MADE program. The game suffers from ghosting and tons of graphical glitches. The game can outright bug out and buttons will stop working forcing you to exit the game to get it to work again. It plays ok but the amount of problems I have had playing this game just make it worthy of scorn. It is lazy unfinished product not because its consolized but because it suffers from bugs and glitches has basic features that every other PC game has removed. Awful.

6matt6
Never experienced any of that. Buttons don't stop working...you need to HOLD THEM.

Google it its a problem everyone has had.

I never had that problem... nor has my friend.
Avatar image for CTR360
CTR360

9217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#26 CTR360
Member since 2007 • 9217 Posts
crysis2 looks gorgeous for a console game
Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

Both Games are maxed. Crysis is set to Very High on all settings, and Crysis 2 is set to Extreme. Both games are played at 1080p (1920x1080) resolution. No tweaks or mods used.

http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/6018/65025168.jpg

http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/444/34635230.jpg

http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/9253/97325964.jpg

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5050/13095343.jpg

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6910/75235288.jpg

http://img862.imageshack.us/img862/7427/14399241.jpg

http://img864.imageshack.us/img864/9752/25310960.jpg

http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7707/75690103.jpg

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3355/79286551.jpg

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5458/26934357.jpg

http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/4140/86983697.jpg

http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/5579/94316475.jpg

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9338/38276149.jpg

http://img858.imageshack.us/img858/9723/72462513.jpg

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/5162/60572334.jpg

http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/4089/172ft.jpg

http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/665/192f.jpg

http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/629/91760049.jpg

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/2461/33259525.jpg

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/7549/32835494.jpg

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/8417/44595193.jpg

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8874/86295991.jpg

http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/3074/14719673.jpg

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7130/30676825.jpg

http://img848.imageshack.us/img848/8970/80625362.jpg

http://img857.imageshack.us/img857/4394/51623011.jpg

http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/7708/70815484.jpg

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/649/14089457.jpg

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8038/29010360.jpg

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/9325/59611580.jpg

http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/1448/48988724.jpg

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#28 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
No, it doesn't look on par. It's completely inferior to it's predecessor which came out four years ago. Crytek....A SHAMEFUL DISPLAY
Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

Vanilla Crysis:

Crysis 2:

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Mozelleple112
DX10 isn't real. They just did that so people upgrade their OS. http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6182140/index.html DX9 and DX10 with Crysis are identical.
Avatar image for Blistrax
Blistrax

1071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Blistrax
Member since 2008 • 1071 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Far Cry 1 : DX9

Crysis: Dx10

Crysis 2: Dx1... Oh wait :lol:

Look at Far Cry then look at Crysis 1.

If the jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was as big as Far Cry 1 to Crysis 1.........................

........... Crysis 2 would be Pixar CGI quality :cry:

Grey_Eyed_Elf
DX10 isn't real. They just did that so people upgrade their OS. http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6182140/index.html DX9 and DX10 with Crysis are identical.

Nope. You get the spectral glints, God fingers, better water, better shadows, more.
Avatar image for KillerWabbit23
KillerWabbit23

3466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 KillerWabbit23
Member since 2009 • 3466 Posts

I know, right?

Jeez, it looks beautiful no matter how you slice it. Maybe it's just because of my "inferior console mentality" or whatnot, but most of these games look the same- amazing.

Plus, not getting a game because the graphics are only a little better than the first in the series? That's just stupid.

Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

I know, right?

Jeez, it looks beautiful no matter how you slice it. Maybe it's just because of my "inferior console mentality" or whatnot, but most of these games look the same- amazing.

Plus, not getting a game because the graphics are only a little better than the first in the series? That's just stupid.

KillerWabbit23

What if the graphics are actually worse while also being inconsistant as feck When the game is full of glitches, does'nt have real PC menus, is littered in what looks like placerholder textures, has'nt received dx11 yet, needed a patch to not actually have a console menu in the first place, had and still has bad online servers and login issues, is rather untweakable and generally a technical downgrade in all aspects but lighting?

Crytek has by no means been modest about their little project during it's development so why is it so half assed and why are they keeping their community completely in the dark? That dx11 patch better do something amazing if it's ever actually released.