I can't even begin to describe these. Just take a look. (all in-game)
Creative Assembly does not release bullshots.
This is the most impressive looking game from a technical standpoint I've ever seen in my life.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Define me the "technical standpoint" you go by. Blabadon
If you're getting at the fact that those aren't the best looking textures or character models you've ever seen, then yes, that's true. But they are ridiculously detailed for the fact that there's that many of them. Strategy games are usually pretty technical in that way, and it's why I get better framerates on my laptop running crysis maxed out than I do running starcraft 2 at a little less than max.
And yeah. Holy freaking t!ts Looks awesome. Me wantee. NOW!
[QUOTE="Blabadon"]Define me the "technical standpoint" you go by. the_bi99man
If you're getting at the fact that those aren't the best looking textures or character models you've ever seen, then yes, that's true. But they are ridiculously detailed for the fact that there's that many of them. Strategy games are usually pretty technical in that way, and it's why I get better framerates on my laptop running crysis maxed out than I do running starcraft 2 at a little less than max.
And yeah. Holy freaking t!ts Looks awesome. Me wantee. NOW!
Look at the detail behind the shield in the last picture...
Why?
Why the hell not.
Wow, that looks very good indeed, it will probably be more than 30 gb of data considering the size of other total war games! :o
[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]
[QUOTE="Blabadon"]Define me the "technical standpoint" you go by. Wasdie
If you're getting at the fact that those aren't the best looking textures or character models you've ever seen, then yes, that's true. But they are ridiculously detailed for the fact that there's that many of them. Strategy games are usually pretty technical in that way, and it's why I get better framerates on my laptop running crysis maxed out than I do running starcraft 2 at a little less than max.
And yeah. Holy freaking t!ts Looks awesome. Me wantee. NOW!
Look at the detail behind the shield in the last picture...
Why?
Why the hell not.
Beats vanilla Skyrim, lol.
[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]
[QUOTE="Blabadon"]Define me the "technical standpoint" you go by. Wasdie
If you're getting at the fact that those aren't the best looking textures or character models you've ever seen, then yes, that's true. But they are ridiculously detailed for the fact that there's that many of them. Strategy games are usually pretty technical in that way, and it's why I get better framerates on my laptop running crysis maxed out than I do running starcraft 2 at a little less than max.
And yeah. Holy freaking t!ts Looks awesome. Me wantee. NOW!
Look at the detail behind the shield in the last picture...
Why?
Why the hell not.
Haha. Exactly. There's some crazy sh!t goin on there. Definitely the most detailed character models I've ever seen in a strategy game. And there will be hundreds, if not thousands of them, running separate AI and killing each other. Glorious.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Look at the detail behind the shield in the last picture...
Why?
Why the hell not.
Riadon2
Beats vanilla Skyrim, lol.
:lol: Indeed it does.
Maybe it's just me. But, I prefer the lack of color filtering like those on previous Total War games. Otherwise, the Rome: Total War II screenshots look great.
I have AA in my Shogun 2 shots. My Shogun 2 shots also look better than the official "bullshots", after all I somehow (probably magic) managed to increase the render resolution to 2560x1440. I can safely conclude that I am a wizard, or a dragon, or maybe a dragon wizard!Creative Assmebly are notorious for bullshots. :? Look at the Shogun 2 screens released by them, then look at the final game. It didn't even have AA.
Peredith
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment