treyarch making another COD game!

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MobilechicaneX
MobilechicaneX

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 MobilechicaneX
Member since 2009 • 2863 Posts

Treyach are pretty bad compared to IW so i hope they can do something original instead of copying IW.

Zombies should come back!

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49122 Posts

Then why are you playing MW2? Anyway COD WAW was a great game, so i trust treyarch will make another solid COD game.Racer850


I really enjoyed the singleplayer campaign of World at War. The multiplayer part however was just Modern Warfare with WW2 weapons and setting. Anyway didn't Treyarch say they were done with WW2 ? I sure hope they don't do modern warfare now as well, something like a Vietnam setting would be great though.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"] Don't you think your over exaggeratinga little bit??? While you could definitly argue that WaW was a glorified expansion pack... Don't you feel your being overly harsh to Treyarch??? You said it yourself while IW is Acti's poster board, Trey would be the abused red headed stepchild forced to live in the attic... Lets give Trey some credit here pal!!! At least they could give us campaign co-op with up to four people and not have to recycle lvls and call them specialops missions with only two players... Also Didn't Trey introduce the most popular new feature to any CoD in years??? Yup Zombie survival!!! If you look at the packages side by side WaW is the better deal with more options... I'm sure Treyarch would love to go off and make something new but unfortunately Acti wont allow it... One last thing unlike IW who can take their sweet time on CoD, Trey is forced to make various ports or new games in the same time frame...

2beers_in_hand

they also had another game mode, this is particularly why i feel mw2 is a step back, all they really did was rearange the perks and add kill streaks so you could mass slaughter your opponents.

Seriously!!! I mean come on they are using the same engine slightly updateded... They spent more time on emblems and call signs then anything else...

Treyarch didn't create any new perks for WaW.....it was virtually an identical game from the game mechanics to the gameplay balance and the weapons.

Oh yeah, let's not forget, it used the SAME game engine as Call of Duty 4. Is Treyarch abused? Yes. Is Treyarch a terrible developer? Yes. Could Treyarch make it on their own? HELL no. Activision is doing them a favor by giving them a prebuilt game engine and prebuilt gameplay mechanics/concepts. I'm sure Treyarch is more profitable just making games under the Call of Duty brand than they would ever be on their own, which is precisely why they're working for Acti. Frankly, I'm astonished you would buy any Treyarch games, let alone defend them. They are terrible and a waste of money, same with nearly ever game in the Call of Duty franchise.

It's not meant to be a quality franchise, it's meant to be a hackjob. Treyarch are hacks and I will never respect a hack.

Avatar image for TheRedStrike
TheRedStrike

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 TheRedStrike
Member since 2007 • 603 Posts

So does Treyarch make the older war games and Infinity Ward make the modern warfares? Also, I heard the next game was about the Cold War.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

So does Treyarch make the older war games and Infinity Ward make the modern warfares? Also, I heard the next game was about the Cold War.

TheRedStrike
Uh, problem there: the Cold War wasn't a real war. Case in point, there were no battles in the Cold War, none. There were only proxy wars, which are in and of themselves separate and distinct wars, i.e. Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan.
Avatar image for TheRedStrike
TheRedStrike

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 TheRedStrike
Member since 2007 • 603 Posts
[QUOTE="TheRedStrike"]

So does Treyarch make the older war games and Infinity Ward make the modern warfares? Also, I heard the next game was about the Cold War.

Brownesque
Uh, problem there: the Cold War wasn't a real war. Case in point, there were no battles in the Cold War, none. There were only proxy wars, which are in and of themselves separate and distinct wars, i.e. Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan.

LOL oops. I meant Vietnam, and Cuba. source: http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2009/05/01/call-of-duty-7-in-vietnam-cuba/
Avatar image for uyiop0t
uyiop0t

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 uyiop0t
Member since 2009 • 615 Posts
MW2 sold like hot cakes, so I can see them making another one.
Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts

They should use the CoD 3. What engine did that use? Because it looks different from all the others and had rag doll. I need ragdoll in my games. If Cod 7 is different like CoD 3 and has ragdoll I will buy it.

Avatar image for BigBoss154
BigBoss154

2956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 BigBoss154
Member since 2009 • 2956 Posts

They should use the CoD 3. What engine did that use? Because it looks different from all the others and had rag doll. I need ragdoll in my games. If Cod 7 is different like CoD 3 and has ragdoll I will buy it.

akbar13

I thought MW and MW2 had ragdoll physics? Well, on the PC version anyway...I'm not sure if the console version had them.