Truly laying the graphical/power question to rest. The full truth.

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU: PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and bigger.

Avatar image for Xeonz
Xeonz

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Xeonz
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU:PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and gigger.

mohammad112388
It wouldn't display PS3 for the CPU because it knows your in denial so instead it's a smiley face with a tongue sticking out.

The GPU is one of the most important for a gaming system anyways, which Sony should have spend more time on than Blu-Ray or Cell.
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU:PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and gigger.

Xeonz
It wouldn't display PS3 for the CPU because it knows your in denial so instead it's a smiley face with a tongue sticking out.

I edited the message, i had a : and a p next to each other which made the system print a smiley.
Avatar image for General14
General14

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 General14
Member since 2003 • 168 Posts
Great job, your proof is from youtube(lol), and even better an artical where the information was gotten from sony and not an independednt source(the artical says so). Congratuations, on the great proof.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts

John Carmack =/= 360 expert...

The rest of your proof is equally valid...

Avatar image for Xeonz
Xeonz

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Xeonz
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts
[QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU:PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and gigger.

mohammad112388
It wouldn't display PS3 for the CPU because it knows your in denial so instead it's a smiley face with a tongue sticking out.

I edited the message, i had a : and a p next to each other which made the system print a smiley.

Yeah, I know, it was supposed to be a joke...
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts
http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm "ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor." This is where you lose credibility. A credible website has grammar check, and certainly wouldn't title an entire article as such.
Avatar image for fedameda
fedameda

2340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 fedameda
Member since 2005 • 2340 Posts

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360.
mohammad112388

And has half the bandwidth of the 360. Give it up. The cell is like all ibm chips. It has a huge amount a processing power but no bandwidth to feed it
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
PC graphics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 360 and PS3 graphics

:|

What are you trying to prove exactly?
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts

Here is the peak performance explained in another website (if you trust this one)

http://dpad.gotfrag.com/portal/story/35372/?spage=4

Avatar image for primetime2121
primetime2121

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 primetime2121
Member since 2004 • 3953 Posts
PC graphics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 360 and PS3 graphics

:|

What are you trying to prove exactly?
foxhound_fox

Gears of War graphically >>>>>> anything on PC right now
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
PC graphics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 360 and PS3 graphics

:|

What are you trying to prove exactly?
foxhound_fox
Relavence to the thread? = squadouche...
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU: PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and bigger.

mohammad112388


LMAO. Ok, child. I'll let you live your fairy tale this time. The others though, they won't be so nice. :)
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts

The areas of graphics

GPU: 360 wins

CPU: PS3

RAM: Equal

Overall Peak performance: PS3

THE LOOK ON 360 FANS' FACES: (PRICLESS)

That is correct you ignorant (meaning lacking knowledge, so dont try to report me.) 360 fans. WIKI, the poster of a post named: Laying the Graphics question to rest. The genius only posted the highlights of the 360. In the end, the PS3 is the dominant console Hardware (and software wise).

John Carmack Himself (a 360 enthusiast) explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8

P.S. the cell is 300% more powerful than an Xbox 360. Here is that link: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/07/ps3s-cell-three-times-more-powerful-as-the-xbox-360-processor.htm

Let us bury this, and never dig up the bones. The rest will be shown through the games. Example

PS3 OBLIVION > 360 OBLIVION

And that list will get bigger and bigger.

mohammad112388
If the Cell could read and think for you, you'd be all set. That last article is talking about how the 360 and ps3 are comparable in power, and how everything else is just Sony spin. Nice one. Besides: Gears of War. /this awful thread.
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts
360 fans, it is ok. The 360 will come out with some decent looking games. But i assure you that the PS3 will have better looking games, more exclusives, and the online (which is getting better everyday) is free. Nothing beats free. And it took microsof 1 whole year to come out with a phenominal looking game that gets boring a week afeter you beat it. And everybody knows what game im talking about.
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts
360 fans, it is ok. The 360 will come out with some decent looking games. But i assure you that the PS3 will have better looking games, more exclusives, and the online (which is getting better everyday) is free. Nothing beats free. And it took microsof 1 whole year to come out with a phenominal looking game that gets boring a week afeter you beat it. And everybody knows what game im talking about.mohammad112388
Highlighted (in order): understatement, speculation, exaggeration, personal opinion.
Avatar image for mwa
mwa

2639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mwa
Member since 2003 • 2639 Posts
Great job, your proof is from youtube(lol), and even better an artical where the information was gotten from sony and not an independednt source(the artical says so). Congratuations, on the great proof.General14

TC OWNED

/thread
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts

GPU= 360 wins (xenos vs RSX)

CPU = PS3 wins (Xenon vs Cell)

RAM= 360 wins (512MB total, BUT 480MB availible per game on 360 VS 416MB availible per game on PS3 +huge 360 bandwidth advantage)

Online = 360 wins

multiplat development = 360 wins

 libary support= 360 wins

 controller = 360 for me, but whatever fits YOUR hand better wins.

Yeah, the PS3 really wins this technical comparison

PS about your links....who wrote that garbage??  SPEs are NOT cores!!! just check how much total memory they can access----256K! Cell>Xenon but 3X better? no way!

Avatar image for FreedomReign
FreedomReign

1178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 FreedomReign
Member since 2006 • 1178 Posts
We all know power means squat. PS2, anyone?
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]PC graphics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 360 and PS3 graphics

:|

What are you trying to prove exactly?
primetime2121

Gears of War graphically >>>>>> anything on PC right now

Not by much  and it is 2 years old.
Avatar image for aceReborn
aceReborn

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 aceReborn
Member since 2004 • 340 Posts
GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
We all know power means squat. PS2, anyone?FreedomReign
PS2 won because it was the platform multiplat games were developed on 1st. Something like 99% of all non-1st or 2nd party games were on PS2 and only "might" have appeared on Xbox1 or Cube. ---Which console this generation is the primary one??? So far, the 360.
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="aceReborn"]GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.

Thram are equal. 360 ramn is in one area, the ps3 is divided between the video memory, and the general purpose memory(which the 360 only has). And there have been extensive theoretical test that show that the PS3 DOES have MORE peak performance. The ultimate draw is that it is up to devloppers to take time and actually use it. In the end all of us are going to have to sit and wait.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="aceReborn"]GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.mohammad112388
Thram are equal. 360 ramn is in one area, the ps3 is divided between the video memory, and the general purpose memory(which the 360 only has). And there have been extensive theoretical test that show that the PS3 DOES have MORE peak performance. The ultimate draw is that it is up to devloppers to take time and actually use it. In the end all of us are going to have to sit and wait.

Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. The 360's memory system is FAR ahead of PS3. not just available RAM but usable bandwidth. It's not "close" at all. Do you know what uses up video bandwidth and how the 360's Xenos chip overcomes this? The memory differences between 360 and PS3 are as great as Gameube vs N64.
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"][QUOTE="aceReborn"]GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.

Thram are equal. 360 ramn is in one area, the ps3 is divided between the video memory, and the general purpose memory(which the 360 only has). And there have been extensive theoretical test that show that the PS3 DOES have MORE peak performance. The ultimate draw is that it is up to devloppers to take time and actually use it. In the end all of us are going to have to sit and wait.

Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. The 360's memory system is FAR ahead of PS3. not just available RAM but usable bandwidth. It's not "close" at all. Do you know what uses up video bandwidth and how the 360's Xenos chip overcomes this? The memory differences between 360 and PS2 are as great as Gameube vs N64.

Why r u comparing 360 to PS2
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"][QUOTE="aceReborn"]GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.

Thram are equal. 360 ramn is in one area, the ps3 is divided between the video memory, and the general purpose memory(which the 360 only has). And there have been extensive theoretical test that show that the PS3 DOES have MORE peak performance. The ultimate draw is that it is up to devloppers to take time and actually use it. In the end all of us are going to have to sit and wait.

Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. The 360's memory system is FAR ahead of PS3. not just available RAM but usable bandwidth. It's not "close" at all. Do you know what uses up video bandwidth and how the 360's Xenos chip overcomes this? The memory differences between 360 and PS2 are as great as Gameube vs N64.

Why r u comparing 360 to PS2

Fixed---look again
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts

also--"peak" performance is nothing, just a marketing word for "if we do nothing but X, then our system's X rate is better than yours"   What matters is sustained performance in a game environment with sound, AI. physics, etc all running at once. Yes, as I've said, Cell>Xenos but GAMES (not weather forecast software) hit GPU and memory walls long before they hit CPU ones.

It's like saying, "system X is better because it has a CPU good at face recognition but system Y only has better 3D acceleration"---which is more useful for a game system???

Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Avatar image for aceReborn
aceReborn

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 aceReborn
Member since 2004 • 340 Posts
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"][QUOTE="aceReborn"]GPU: 360 clearly better, ps3 gpu is dated by comparision. CPU: PS3 cpu better in some areas, 360 cpu better in other areas. Memory: 360 has more usable ram, better ram architecture. Overall winner: 360. Pretty sad considering the 60gb ps3 will retail for twice the price of the 360 premium when it finally gets released over here.

Thram are equal. 360 ramn is in one area, the ps3 is divided between the video memory, and the general purpose memory(which the 360 only has). And there have been extensive theoretical test that show that the PS3 DOES have MORE peak performance. The ultimate draw is that it is up to devloppers to take time and actually use it. In the end all of us are going to have to sit and wait.

Ps3 has higher peak performance while running benchmarks that have no similarity to game code. With typical game code, 360 will have the advantage. While cell is great for certain things, it’s not gaming. Even IDs John Carmack recently said that Sony made a bad choice going with the cell. About the ram: Ps3 OS is bloated compared to the 360 OS, hence 360 has more ram left for games. 360 unified memory architecture is also much more flexible, and using the 10MB of edram frees up even more graphics ram that would otherwise be used as frame buffer. And of course, edram boosts the memory bandwidth significantly.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

mohammad112388

OK--you are owned!!!!!!!!!!!!

 http://www.nordichardware.com/news,1551.html

During an interview with Todd Hollenshead, president at ID Software, US gaming magazine found out what the icon and gamedeveloper John Carmack thought about the two coming game consoles that will power ID Software's latest creation, Quake 4. Carmack's grade for Xbox 360 was "great" but he wasn't convinced by PlayStation 3 where the grade was "pain in my ass". This simply a jugment on how the consoles are to work with when developing games and since Xbox 360 will be launched relatively soon the devkits should be better but at the same we can't say we are surprised the PS3 is hard to master.

Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
Really, 1st you make all these claims of PS3 superiority, then after I blow them all out of the water, you run and hide behind Carmack's back until you realise he has no love for PS3, what's next???? Just face it, the PS3 is a great system, just not AS great as 360.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

mohammad112388

OK--you are owned!!!!!!!!!!!!

 http://www.nordichardware.com/news,1551.html

During an interview with Todd Hollenshead, president at ID Software, US gaming magazine found out what the icon and gamedeveloper John Carmack thought about the two coming game consoles that will power ID Software's latest creation, Quake 4. Carmack's grade for Xbox 360 was "great" but he wasn't convinced by PlayStation 3 where the grade was "pain in my ass". This simply a jugment on how the consoles are to work with when developing games and since Xbox 360 will be launched relatively soon the devkits should be better but at the same we can't say we are surprised the PS3 is hard to master.

Youre a total retard The only thing that shows is it is hard as hell to code for the PS3. Which isis kind of understood, seeing as it is more powerful

I'm a retard Name calling is not the way to prove you point. Try documenting some of the stuff you claim as proof. N64 was FAR more powerful than Saturn--which one was harder to progrm on??? The 360 is more powerful and has FAR better developer support+libraries than PS3--try asking some developers at beyond3d.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

The_Ish


What do you know? Exactly. Have you even finished Junior High?

Why can't this site get some smart non-cherry-picking PS3 fanboys for us to argue with? This is as satisfying as beating up a five year old. Maybe I should become a PS3 fanboy----at least we'll get some good argumants then.
Avatar image for ZeLeam
ZeLeam

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ZeLeam
Member since 2006 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Tony_aaaa


What do you know? Exactly. Have you even finished Junior High?

Why can't this site get some smart non-cherry-picking PS3 fanboys for us to argue with? This is as satisfying as beating up a five year old. Maybe I should become a PS3 fanboy----at least we'll get some good argumants then.

No thanks, stay as a lemming. John Carmack (the same guy that you quote in your post) is who said that the ps3 has higher performance (also that it is much harder to program for). So what's your point? Noone argues that ps3 is harder to develop for, and your own surce says that ps3 has more raw power.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Tony_aaaa


What do you know? Exactly. Have you even finished Junior High?

Why can't this site get some smart non-cherry-picking PS3 fanboys for us to argue with? This is as satisfying as beating up a five year old. Maybe I should become a PS3 fanboy----at least we'll get some good argumants then.



If you made good arguements, you would not be a fanboy.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#40 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

plus you know the ps2 had the better cpu and the xbox gpu dont you!?

Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

ZeLeam


What do you know? Exactly. Have you even finished Junior High?

Why can't this site get some smart non-cherry-picking PS3 fanboys for us to argue with? This is as satisfying as beating up a five year old. Maybe I should become a PS3 fanboy----at least we'll get some good argumants then.

No thanks, stay as a lemming. John Carmack (the same guy that you quote in your post) is who said that the ps3 has higher performance (also that it is much harder to program for). So what's your point? Noone argues that ps3 is harder to develop for, and your own surce says that ps3 has more raw power.

I'm not a lemming, I own everything but a PS3--(yes even the obscure stuff like a Supergrafx and NeoGeo) I don't see anything that refutes anything I posted. The thread starter ran home to mama (Carmack) because he couldn't argue his own points. I Didn't bring him up/change the subject---check the posts. I'd be more that happy to discuss the original topic.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

daveg1


Nah.  The 360 shares 512 MB of GDDR3 for both the GPU and the CPU, while the  PS3 has 256 MB dedicated to the CPU and 256 MB dedicated to the GPU.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts

sigh not another one of these.. These are just fanboy wars..

Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="daveg1"]

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

Teufelhuhn


Nah.  The 360 shares 512 MB of GDDR3 for both the GPU and the CPU, while the  PS3 has 256 MB dedicated to the CPU and 256 MB dedicated to the GPU.

Read the previous posts---360 has 64MB more RAM for games (PS3's OS reservers 96MB; 360's OS reserves 32MB)
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

Tony_aaaa


Nah. The 360 shares 512 MB of GDDR3 for both the GPU and the CPU, while the PS3 has 256 MB dedicated to the CPU and 256 MB dedicated to the GPU.

Read the previous posts---360 has 64MB more RAM for games (PS3's OS reservers 96MB; 360's OS reserves 32MB)



Oh jesus....they have the same amount of RAM for christ's sake. 
Avatar image for ZeLeam
ZeLeam

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ZeLeam
Member since 2006 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="ZeLeam"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Tony_aaaa


What do you know? Exactly. Have you even finished Junior High?

Why can't this site get some smart non-cherry-picking PS3 fanboys for us to argue with? This is as satisfying as beating up a five year old. Maybe I should become a PS3 fanboy----at least we'll get some good argumants then.

No thanks, stay as a lemming. John Carmack (the same guy that you quote in your post) is who said that the ps3 has higher performance (also that it is much harder to program for). So what's your point? Noone argues that ps3 is harder to develop for, and your own surce says that ps3 has more raw power.

I'm not a lemming, I own everything but a PS3--(yes even the obscure stuff like a Supergrafx and NeoGeo) I don't see anything that refutes anything I posted. The thread starter ran home to mama (Carmack) because he couldn't argue his own points. I Didn't bring him up/change the subject---check the posts. I'd be more that happy to discuss the original topic.

Didnt you say this?
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Tony_aaaa

OK--you are owned!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,1551.html

During an interview with Todd Hollenshead, president at ID Software, US gaming magazine found out what the icon and gamedeveloper John Carmack thought about the two coming game consoles that will power ID Software's latest creation, Quake 4. Carmack's grade for Xbox 360 was "great" but he wasn't convinced by PlayStation 3 where the grade was "pain in my ass". This simply a jugment on how the consoles are to work with when developing games and since Xbox 360 will be launched relatively soon the devkits should be better but at the same we can't say we are surprised the PS3 is hard to master.

Well, carmark, in the same interview that that article quotes, said that the ps3 has more performance (and yes, that it's a pain in the ass to develop for).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8  
Avatar image for iwo4life
iwo4life

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 iwo4life
Member since 2004 • 1155 Posts

John Carmack =/= 360 expert...

The rest of your proof is equally valid...

Spartan070
But the guy from valve was some sort of genius hero god when he said that the PS3 was garbage. So I guess that isn't valid either.
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

Teufelhuhn


Nah. The 360 shares 512 MB of GDDR3 for both the GPU and the CPU, while the PS3 has 256 MB dedicated to the CPU and 256 MB dedicated to the GPU.

Read the previous posts---360 has 64MB more RAM for games (PS3's OS reservers 96MB; 360's OS reserves 32MB)



Oh jesus....they have the same amount of RAM for christ's sake. 

The boxes both contain 512MB but the developers aren't allowed to use all of it. Sony's plans to use the PS3 as more than a game system mean that they reserve a much bigger block of memory, compromising the PS3 as a GAME system. 64MB differance may not seem like much to a PC, but to a closed system, only having a total of 224MB availible to your GPU (textures anyone?) is most definetly a disadvantage.
Avatar image for iwo4life
iwo4life

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 iwo4life
Member since 2004 • 1155 Posts
[QUOTE="mohammad112388"]

Why do 360 fans think it has more raw power. Post for Proof.(And not from a biased sight) And Are You Telling Me John Carmack (a very well known,and respected, developer) is lying. Waht do civilians and gamers know. Diddy squat. So prove me(and John) wrong and post.

Tony_aaaa

OK--you are owned!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,1551.html

During an interview with Todd Hollenshead, president at ID Software, US gaming magazine found out what the icon and gamedeveloper John Carmack thought about the two coming game consoles that will power ID Software's latest creation, Quake 4. Carmack's grade for Xbox 360 was "great" but he wasn't convinced by PlayStation 3 where the grade was "pain in my ass". This simply a jugment on how the consoles are to work with when developing games and since Xbox 360 will be launched relatively soon the devkits should be better but at the same we can't say we are surprised the PS3 is hard to master.

If the 360 was so easy to dev for then why did that quake 4 port turn out like total garbage with all kinds of framerate issues. So much for that argument.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#50 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

ram = ???? i thought the 360 had more that the ps3?

Tony_aaaa


Nah.  The 360 shares 512 MB of GDDR3 for both the GPU and the CPU, while the  PS3 has 256 MB dedicated to the CPU and 256 MB dedicated to the GPU.

Read the previous posts---360 has 64MB more RAM for games (PS3's OS reservers 96MB; 360's OS reserves 32MB)

sorry guys im not a tech wizard but it was my understanding that the ps3 was limited in areas of memory for things like textures leading to games looking  bland compared to 360 games with that limited memory.also things in oblivion have been cut like horse armour due to limited memory.again sorry for my lack of wizardry in these areas, unless  its different types of memory you guys are talking about? p.s..i know what R.A.M.  means:)