Twisted logic on system wars

How is it, when resistance 2 gets a 9.5 from ign its like the second coming.

but when Fable 2 gets 8.5 its a flop, and completely outcasted.

Although it has recieved 10 on other sites??

I know its just prefrence, but im going to rent resistance 2 first.

They would have to completely change the core gameplay before I consider buying it.

Im not sure if any of you would agree , but the first one was as bland as you could possibly get. The only ONE thing i could pick from the game was the creative weapons.

What do you think?

And could somebody explain to me what made resistance Fall of man so good?

How is it, when resistance 2 gets a 9.5 from ign its like the second coming.

but when Fable 2 gets 8.5 its a flop, and completely outcasted.

Although it has recieved 10 on other sites??

I know its just prefrence, but im going to rent resistance 2 first.

They would have to completely change the core gameplay before I consider buying it.

Im not sure if any of you would agree , but the first one was as bland as you could possibly get. The only ONE thing i could pick from the game was the creative weapons.

What do you think?

And could somebody explain to me what made resistance Fall of man so good?

scottiescott238

Resistance 2 is the kind of game gamers should buy.

Stuff like this happens on SW all the time.

There's no such thing as logic here...

Stuff like this happens on SW all the time.

There's no such thing as logic here...

SSJ_Nega

ya really dont know why i come here lol

Twisted SW logic 101:

1. All games less than 9.0 are garbage

2. Sales CAN be played (especially if you can't rely on scores)

3. ANYTHING can be called damage control

4. Blogs are one-hundred percent credible

5. If a game on your system flops, then that means it was never hyped to begin with.

6. The most reliable review site on the net is the one that gives a game the score you most desire (as of yet).

6. I am always right! :P

[QUOTE="SSJ_Nega"]

Stuff like this happens on SW all the time.

There's no such thing as logic here...

jeezers

ya really dont know why i come here lol

Probably just because the PS3's better. Hahaha.

How is it, when resistance 2 gets a 9.5 from ign its like the second coming.

but when Fable 2 gets 8.5 its a flop, and completely outcasted.

Although it has recieved 10 on other sites??

I know its just prefrence, but im going to rent resistance 2 first.

They would have to completely change the core gameplay before I consider buying it.

Im not sure if any of you would agree , but the first one was as bland as you could possibly get. The only ONE thing i could pick from the game was the creative weapons.

What do you think?

And could somebody explain to me what made resistance Fall of man so good?

scottiescott238

Resistance 2 is obviously way better the RFoM as ign says. What do you want us to say? "Resistance 2 got 9.5 on IGN, that means absolutely nothing to us". is that it ?

Well IGN are very similar to Gamespot, so they give out similar scores. As such is usually acts as a good estimate. Not allways mind. This mean R2 has a very high chance of being AAA on Gamespot.WasntAvailable

Wait, IGN has three scores. Why do we go by the main one?

Can we not go by the UK one? I dont really care for what Yanks have to say on the game, as im not an American.

How is it, when resistance 2 gets a 9.5 from ign its like the second coming.

but when Fable 2 gets 8.5 its a flop, and completely outcasted.

Although it has recieved 10 on other sites??

I know its just prefrence, but im going to rent resistance 2 first.

They would have to completely change the core gameplay before I consider buying it.

Im not sure if any of you would agree , but the first one was as bland as you could possibly get. The only ONE thing i could pick from the game was the creative weapons.

What do you think?

And could somebody explain to me what made resistance Fall of man so good?

scottiescott238

At the time when it was released, it was the only functional shooter on the ps3. It wasn't really anything special, but it wasn't bad and the guns were good. But R2 just seems much more improved then the original in every single way. Guns look and will probably play as great as always, enemies looks more badass, bosses are epic, 2 campaigns, and 60 player multiplayer (and no lag), which is incredible and enough for me to get this game. Also, Jeff Hayes is a very harsh critic. A 9.5 is amazing coming from him.