ummm why all the hate on GTAIV?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for snakeofsolid
snakeofsolid

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 snakeofsolid
Member since 2005 • 2140 Posts

im simply amazed by the bad air about this game. i just dont get it, let me break it down.

 

Graphics:

the graphics look pretty decent, you have to realize this game is a large sandbox game, and i dunno if you remember, but in the trailer, i saw quite a few pedestrians, and game informer reported that each pedestrian would be doing various things, like reading, talking, sitting, ie.. the citys going to be  a living breathing location, so why the hell would you reasonably expect some super high DOAesque quality models?? Sure its a 360/PS3 game but damn some of you guys have ridiculous demands that lack sense.

 

city size:

so its smaller than san andreas, so what? 1/3 of san andreas was barren land. Plus its probably going to be twice as big as los santos, with amazing amounts of more detail, so youd rather have rockstar throw in some unecessary land over a higly detailed city?

 

Its in Liberty City..again!:

okay i doubt its going to be the same liberty city you saw in GTA3 and LCS, reworked, redone, and redrawn is what im thinking, thus practically a new city. 

Avatar image for coreygames
coreygames

5027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 coreygames
Member since 2005 • 5027 Posts
I don't like GTA in general, I don't think they are great games at all... good maybe.
Avatar image for snakeofsolid
snakeofsolid

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 snakeofsolid
Member since 2005 • 2140 Posts

I don't like GTA in general, I don't think they are great games at all... good maybe.coreygames

 

thats a fair criticism, you just dont like the series, but theres a boatload of people who just bash on for really menial and nonsensical reasons. 

Avatar image for tegovoltio
tegovoltio

9280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 tegovoltio
Member since 2004 • 9280 Posts

Well I'm positive towards GTA IV but my main issues are your last point, might be something like GTA III all over but we aren't sure of that.

And also lack of planes, now out of nowhere ppl are comming up saying planes sucked and that they were unnecesary or a pin etc....

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts
Genuinely the plane parts frustrated me. Having to learn how to fly was one of the biggest chores in the whole game. Flying through the red rings AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN...errghh...no thanks.
Avatar image for XenoNinja
XenoNinja

5382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 XenoNinja
Member since 2003 • 5382 Posts

im simply amazed by the bad air about this game. i just dont get it, let me break it down.

 

Graphics:

the graphics look pretty decent, you have to realize this game is a large sandbox game, and i dunno if you remember, but in the trailer, i saw quite a few pedestrians, and game informer reported that each pedestrian would be doing various things, like reading, talking, sitting, ie.. the citys going to be  a living breathing location, so why the hell would you reasonably expect some super high DOAesque quality models?? Sure its a 360/PS3 game but damn some of you guys have ridiculous demands that lack sense.

 

city size:

so its smaller than san andreas, so what? 1/3 of san andreas was barren land. Plus its probably going to be twice as big as los santos, with amazing amounts of more detail, so youd rather have rockstar throw in some unecessary land over a higly detailed city?

 

Its in Liberty City..again!:

okay i doubt its going to be the same liberty city you saw in GTA3 and LCS, reworked, redone, and redrawn is what im thinking, thus practically a new city. 

snakeofsolid

I agree, I think alot of people are jumping to conclusions. the city may be smaller but it might actually have alot more areas to explore than san andreas. like you said that game was 80% countrysides and deserts and most of the buildings couldn't be entered...plus the graphics in this game looks miles better than the rest.     

Avatar image for tegovoltio
tegovoltio

9280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tegovoltio
Member since 2004 • 9280 Posts

Genuinely the plane parts frustrated me. Having to learn how to fly was one of the biggest chores in the whole game. Flying through the red rings AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN...errghh...no thanks.dommeus

Ater CJ gets enough experiense and you get the controlls right flying around SA is quite fun, specially the planes that make it easy like the Hydra and shamall, not that you will always be using the crappy small one they give for practice. 

Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#9 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16579 Posts
Because it's popular. :roll: I guess people think it makes them cool by insulting games that sell well or something. 
Avatar image for Idonomeus
Idonomeus

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Idonomeus
Member since 2006 • 2273 Posts
There has always been a lot of hate towards GTA because it's one of the best rated and best selling games. Nintendo fans in particular hate it because it has yet to appear on a Nintendo console.
Avatar image for htotheo
htotheo

2759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 htotheo
Member since 2005 • 2759 Posts
i see this being a positive step in the development of the GTA series. the graphics look really good, dont see y people are complaining about them.
Avatar image for Twisted14
Twisted14

3497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Twisted14
Member since 2007 • 3497 Posts
I'm really looking forward to this game. I think the graphics look pretty nice actually. There will be more detail in the city and I'm not too fussed by the planes anyway. (btw I haven't played SA anyway so I don't know what the big deal is)
Avatar image for Illumination
Illumination

2109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Illumination
Member since 2005 • 2109 Posts
It's not japanease and its not a playstation exclusive. As soon as GTA wetn multi-platform they defected to the enemy which means no hard core gamer is allowed to say they like it, part of the rules. No hardcore gamer is allowed to enjoy anything that DOESN'T have a sony playstation exclusive logo on it.
Avatar image for johngmills
johngmills

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 johngmills
Member since 2005 • 4349 Posts
I think people have gotten over the fact that it's in Liberty City.  The biggest complaint I'm hearing how is that it won't have airplanes in it.  Which to me is fine.....I prefer the Helicopters.
Avatar image for PelekotansDream
PelekotansDream

7602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#15 PelekotansDream
Member since 2005 • 7602 Posts
I just get a feeling we will have no country side, thats the only thing to bother me. I will still enjoy this game, but not as much as SA.
Avatar image for SonnyF
SonnyF

1645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 SonnyF
Member since 2005 • 1645 Posts
because people are just being idiots, "oh look, its set in a city with the same name, even though i looks completely different. i dont want to go to the same, completely different city. "
Avatar image for jsnepo
jsnepo

1593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jsnepo
Member since 2003 • 1593 Posts
I for one is excited about the new GTA. Even though it doesn't have planes and the map is smaller, as long as it has more details not only visually but the interaction is bigger, then I will be a satisfied customer.
Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts

because people are just being idiots, "oh look, its set in a city with the same name, even though i looks completely different. i dont want to go to the same, completely different city. "SonnyF

It's not even that, it's the fact that a New York themed city is so drab and predictable. People liked VC and San andreas because they were colorful and bright and had varied environments. Look at how many games have New York as a setting, then think about all the movies, books and comics are set in NY. I want something new, NY is a tired setting for a game, no matter how lively they make it.

I for one is excited about the new GTA. Even though it doesn't have planes and the map is smaller, as long as it has more details not only visually but the interaction is bigger, then I will be a satisfied customer.jsnepo

What turns me off about the game is the fact that you can't fly planes. I would rather have GTAIV be 2X bigger than look 5X better. They say because it's one city, you don't need planes. It's all bull crap because people still cry about 911, that's why there's no planes in GTAIV.