Uncharted to be only 10-12h long?

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="Mizuke"]That's why a rental is justified.Mandingo101

^^^^^The PS3's new slogan^^^^^^

:lol: So I guess lemmins magically forgot that Gears was 6hrs...Evil-Zero86

Why everytime the gears time subject pops up, cows deplete it by 2 hrs.....next thing i heard that gears takes only 5 mins to beat...

and what it wit u guys a long ass games....I cant p[lay a game taht's more than 12 hrs unless it's an rpg, because then i get bored ( that's why it took me 4 months to beat halo 2)

Name all the action game this gen longer tham 12h............it's not many.ragrdoll21

The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. What do I win?

And for all of you comparing Uncharted to Gears, Gears has co-op and online multiplayer, which serve to extend the gameplay expierience. Uncharted... not so much. Also Gears is not an action adventure game, its a third person shooter, and it gets its replayablilty from its multiplayer, and last time I checked most adventures last more than 10 hours. A good action adventure game should last around 15 - 25 hours, or it should have things that make it fun / a challenge to replay, like the challenge of the gods in GoW and the increasing difficulty levels in DMC3.

Games are just about always shorter than the dev says, If they say 10-12, most people who have been gaming for a long time will probably knock it over in 7-9.

Its catching all this flack because the developers said they had to use Blu-ray so everyone expected it to be a long game and then it turns out to be average length with no announced online component. JiveT

 Welcome to next gen gaming. Brought tp you by Sony. Better keep those demos short...

To MegaPigeon

Thank you! Well that's at least comforting to hear cause I'm tired of spending $60 for only 10-12 hour games.peaceful_anger

You could always edit the post that messed up you know ;)

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mass-Effect-A-50-Hour-Main-Quest-47040.shtml 

Best article I could find. Mainly because it's midnight and I'm tired :cry:.You might want to Google it, most articles say around 30-50 hours.

[QUOTE="Mandingo101"][QUOTE="MegaPigeon"]

[QUOTE="Mandingo101"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Mandingo101"]lemmings are really grasping for ownage, last time i checked gears, teh 360s best games is like 8 hours long, this game is reported 50% longer by IGN and lems use this for ownage ? i love SW logicMegaPigeon

Try playing it on anything but casual mode.

Well, it's more the question of will you actually want to play this through a second time. GeOW was buckets of fun, had well spread out achievement points across both single and multiplayer, and had awesome online deathmatch and co-op. The PS3 doesn't really have an achievement point system like the 360 (I think some would agree that a simple little bleep added to an easily accesable profile and score is better than getting a trophie in your online avatar's trophie cabinet),  this doesn't have either multiplayer, and it REALLY doesn't look fun.

That, and the fact that cows have been long infected with a new-strand of BSE that's made them brag about how Blu-Ray will create amazingly long games and that DVD9 holds the 360 back. 

Who the hell sits down and plays a game for 10 hours straight?miss_kitt3n

Me :oops:

[QUOTE="miss_kitt3n"]Who the hell sits down and plays a game for 10 hours straight?E_x_i_l_e

Me :oops:

what about water or potty breaks?

remembers the article i read about a guy who died after playing CS for like 2-3 days straight without taking any breaks.:? 

[QUOTE="E_x_i_l_e"]

[QUOTE="miss_kitt3n"]Who the hell sits down and plays a game for 10 hours straight?istreakforfood

Me :oops:

what about water or potty breaks?

remembers the article i read about a guy who died after playing CS for like 2-3 days straight without taking any breaks.:? 

 If you were a true hardcore, you'd have a small fridge and a bedpan close by...

[QUOTE="E_x_i_l_e"]

[QUOTE="miss_kitt3n"]Who the hell sits down and plays a game for 10 hours straight?istreakforfood

Me :oops:

what about water or potty breaks?

remembers the article i read about a guy who died after playing CS for like 2-3 days straight without taking any breaks.:?

How about the Guy who died after playing WoW for more than 72 hours? 

GOW and RE4 were sequels to amazing games. Also one is horror and both are heavy on gore. huge difference there.DoctorBunny

That's not what people are crapping their pants about. Lemmings are claiming ownage for a game's lenght of up to 12 hours. Not the game itself and what it represents. I stand by my statement. RE4, God of War's were 12 hour games. And they were extremely good. So again, who needs multiplayer?

So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? hotdaisy18

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? DXGreat1_HGL

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? hotdaisy18

Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

DMC = Proven Series

Mass Effect is from one of the most reliable and greatest dev's in recent history

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? hotdaisy18

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

 If DMC4 is only 10 - 12 hours long then, yes it is a rip off. This is a major stretch to tell a person to spend $60 for such a short length of time. Man, I have 20 year old games with simple control and crap graphics that are cheaper and better then that. I guess Sony marketing hype has hypnotized people to think it's teh awesomeness.

 Cows should stop bashing 360 games that are 12 hours long so they won't be self-owned over and over. So now length doesn't determine quality anymore. Yes, Gears Of War is still the best next-gen console game released so far. themyth01

 It's always been the trend on planet Bovine 'as soon as you start losing with your own defined rules, try to change them.'

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? DXGreat1_HGL

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

 If DMC4 is only 10 - 12 hours long then, yes it is a rip off. This is a major stretch to tell a person to spend $60 for such a short length of time. Man, I have 20 year old games with simple control and crap graphics that are cheaper and better then that. I guess Sony marketing hype has hypnotized people to think it's teh awesomeness.

Sucks for you. Nobody thinks like you. People have different tastes for different gaming they enjoy. Again your logic makes zero sense. And we're not talking about an established name franchise. Why do you Lemmings keep changing the subject. You're just as bad as Cows.

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="hotdaisy18"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? hotdaisy18

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

 If DMC4 is only 10 - 12 hours long then, yes it is a rip off. This is a major stretch to tell a person to spend $60 for such a short length of time. Man, I have 20 year old games with simple control and crap graphics that are cheaper and better then that. I guess Sony marketing hype has hypnotized people to think it's teh awesomeness.

Sucks for you. Nobody thinks like you. People have different tastes for different gaming they enjoy. Again your logic makes zero sense. And we're not talking about an established name franchise. Why do you Lemmings keep changing the subject. You're just as bad as Cows.

 I realize that you can't grasp logic. You ask why the game is bashed? Too short, if you can't accept it deal with it. If Sony is expecting people to shell out big money for short games then I hope they enjoy third place...

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="hotdaisy18"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? DXGreat1_HGL

 Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

 If DMC4 is only 10 - 12 hours long then, yes it is a rip off. This is a major stretch to tell a person to spend $60 for such a short length of time. Man, I have 20 year old games with simple control and crap graphics that are cheaper and better then that. I guess Sony marketing hype has hypnotized people to think it's teh awesomeness.

Sucks for you. Nobody thinks like you. People have different tastes for different gaming they enjoy. Again your logic makes zero sense. And we're not talking about an established name franchise. Why do you Lemmings keep changing the subject. You're just as bad as Cows.

 I realize that you can't grasp logic. You ask why the game is bashed? Too short, if you can't accept it deal with it. If Sony is expecting people to shell out big money for short games then I hope they enjoy third place...

If you say so Lemming. Your logic ceases to amaze me. Give yourself some credit. At least you're not Greg Splicer. I'm pretty shocked you haven't started with graphics next. And if I can't accept it? What am I accepting? That your logic is flawed? Okay. I acn accept that. I accept many things about games that you continue to bash.

So... Blu Ray is needed for 12 hour experiences? Wow, PS3 is amazing...

 

/PS2

ssbfalco

:lol: 

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? DXGreat1_HGL

Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Besides the fact that GoW and RE4 are regarded as some of the absolute best games of last gen...

And yes, it is acceptable that 10-hour games with no multi-player exist on the PS3.  You know why?   For one thing, the majority of PS3 owners AND 360 owners don't have online, so single-player is all they get.  Imagine how dissapointed they'll be when they find out that GEoW only lasts them 6-8 hours with a s*** story and little to no replayability... whereas Uncharted was desinged solely as a single-player experience.  This means more time put into the story and into the replayability.

So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? hotdaisy18

Wait, wait, wait.  This is a distortion so obvious I'm stunned that nobody has pointed it out.  Resident Evil 4 isn't a 12-hour game unless you do a speed run, and most people will take at least 18-20 hours to finish it the first time; and God of War 2 is almost twice as long as God of War 1... you know, the same God of War which everybody complained was far too short.  So we have two games that aren't anywhere near so short as 12 hours, and God of War, whose major faults included its meager length.  The post above is entirely without merit.

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? WeeWeeJumbo

Wait, wait, wait. This is a distortion so obvious I'm stunned that nobody has pointed it out. Resident Evil 4 isn't a 12-hour game unless you do a speed run, and most people will take at least 18-20 hours to finish it the first time; and God of War 2 is almost twice as long as God of War 1... you know, the same God of War which everybody complained was far too short. So we have two games that aren't anywhere near so short as 12 hours, and God of War, whose major faults included its meager length. The post above is entirely without merit.

The point is that people are complaining about short games while using absolutely no perspective.  Hell, look at the current games on the 360.  GRAW 2's campaign was even shorter than the estimated completion time for Uncharted. 

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? WeeWeeJumbo

Wait, wait, wait.  This is a distortion so obvious I'm stunned that nobody has pointed it out.  Resident Evil 4 isn't a 12-hour game unless you do a speed run, and most people will take at least 18-20 hours to finish it the first time; and God of War 2 is almost twice as long as God of War 1... you know, the same God of War which everybody complained was far too short.  So we have two games that aren't anywhere near so short as 12 hours, and God of War, whose major faults included its meager length.  The post above is entirely without merit.

Not everyone has the same pace of how they play a game. So you're a slow gamer, big deal. Some people take the time to enjoy the game's envorinments, etc etc. I usually do that after I've beat the game. Sorry if I have a keen skill of playing games so fast. Like I said. Everyone has their own pace to playing games.

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? DoctorBunny

Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Okay...what did you just say? "Teh only next gen"? So next gen games have to be multiplayer now? What kind of logic is that? Look at DMC4. It's hyped. Muliplayer? Nope. Certain games are designed for certain gaming needs. If a game is 12 hours long, then there's obvious reasons for it in the replay value of the game itself. I don't know what your issue is you but a game's length, but in my eyes, it has never been an issue of how great the game will be. I could turn around and say "Oh, Mass Effect is going to flop because it's too long of a game. And it has no multiplayer". This is a rediculous claim for something so far fetched. Why don't you just go make another thread and cry about Lair vs Kameo graphics. That seems to be the trend here these days. :roll:

DMC = Proven Series

Mass Effect is from one of the most reliable and greatest dev's in recent history

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? a_ratchet_fan

Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Besides the fact that GoW and RE4 are regarded as some of the absolute best games of last gen...

And yes, it is acceptable that 10-hour games with no multi-player exist on the PS3.  You know why?   For one thing, the majority of PS3 owners AND 360 owners don't have online, so single-player is all they get.  Imagine how dissapointed they'll be when they find out that GEoW only lasts them 6-8 hours with a s*** story and little to no replayability... whereas Uncharted was desinged solely as a single-player experience.  This means more time put into the story and into the replayability.

 You probably haven't even played GeOW, have you? It's about 10-12 hours of gameplay and has more replayibility than any PS3 game out there and probably much more than Uncharted, not to mention that it obviously has online which over 50% of xbox360 owners have. Uncharted is only single-player and it's only 10 hours, now that's bs.

That's OK, as long as the game is great.

I mean, both GOW and GOW2 are extremely short (takes about 8 hours) and GOW is one of my favourite series now.

EDIT: RE4/MGS series are very short too. Pokemon too. 

[QUOTE="WeeWeeJumbo"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? a_ratchet_fan

Wait, wait, wait. This is a distortion so obvious I'm stunned that nobody has pointed it out. Resident Evil 4 isn't a 12-hour game unless you do a speed run, and most people will take at least 18-20 hours to finish it the first time; and God of War 2 is almost twice as long as God of War 1... you know, the same God of War which everybody complained was far too short. So we have two games that aren't anywhere near so short as 12 hours, and God of War, whose major faults included its meager length. The post above is entirely without merit.

The point is that people are complaining about short games while using absolutely no perspective.  Hell, look at the current games on the 360.  GRAW 2's campaign was even shorter than the estimated completion time for Uncharted. 

Exactly. GRAW 2 was more built for muliplayer. So of course it's going to be a short ended game. To where you can turn around and play online most of the time. Why can't people see this?

That's better than most big Xbox games, save Oblivion.

Kameo wasn't any longer than 20 hours, most lemmings love that.

[QUOTE="ssbfalco"]

So... Blu Ray is needed for 12 hour experiences?  Wow, PS3 is amazing...

 

/PS2 

R-Dot-Yung

And you my good sir, obviously know SOOO much about developing, whats wrong with 10-12 hours, cuz a bunch of crazy cows bashed GeOW now Lems have to do the same, whats the point in that

Honestly you are just.....wow, troll troll troll, Blu Ray is needed for 3000 Animations, Streaming Cache Data, tons of other goodies and reasons that your too narrow minded to understand obviously

Blu Ray is why MGS4, Lair, Uncharted, FFXIII, and a tons more games wont go to the 360, cuz they are over 9GB

I still don't understand xbox 360 fanboys insist that these games are too short. The xbox 360 had only 4 games longer then uncharted during its whole lifetime right now, OBlivion, dead rising, saints row, and Final fantasy 11. It isn't like 12 hours is a short game. It is actually a fairly long game if you think about it. Bigger then almost every other game. But anything is getting bashed nowadays that is on the ps3? The stupider they are the more amused I am getting.

[QUOTE="a_ratchet_fan"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="hotdaisy18"]So Resident Evil 4's 13 hour game stopped it from being great? It's just a renter right? Oh, and God of War 1 and 2. 15 hours max, right? Geez. Those 12 hour games sure do act like renters. Multiplayer doesn't make a game as a whole, great. What's wrong with people today? Lemmings in particular. Something you drank? Ate? Pissed off about something? Logic failing? Monday? What's up Lemmings? themyth01

Oh ok, so now cows are going back to flip floping concerning last gen and this gen. Sorry but a 12 hour game with no multiplayer on a machine that's hyped as 'teh only next gen' machine out is unacceptable. I guess we can see why some devs have to now throw a movie on, to smokescreen short gameplay. Seriously $600 + $60 a game is acceptable for 10 hours of gameplay? Welcome to planet Bovine...

Besides the fact that GoW and RE4 are regarded as some of the absolute best games of last gen...

And yes, it is acceptable that 10-hour games with no multi-player exist on the PS3.  You know why?   For one thing, the majority of PS3 owners AND 360 owners don't have online, so single-player is all they get.  Imagine how dissapointed they'll be when they find out that GEoW only lasts them 6-8 hours with a s*** story and little to no replayability... whereas Uncharted was desinged solely as a single-player experience.  This means more time put into the story and into the replayability.

 You probably haven't even played GeOW, have you? It's about 10-12 hours of gameplay and has more replayibility than any PS3 game out there and probably much more than Uncharted, not to mention that it obviously has online which over 50% of xbox360 owners have. Uncharted is only single-player and it's only 10 hours, now that's bs.

Lemmings hiding behind GeoW. :lol: This thread has lost its logic. Oh...have you played Uncharted? I want to see screenshots! Where's your link? And....50% of Xbox360 owners? -dies- The majority of 360 owners don't even have Xbox Live. Where are you pulling numbers from? Your imaginary MS Representivie that lives next door?