visually speaking.....Well?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i thinkYet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone
skrat_01
Wait wait, if the PS3 is so powerful, why wasn't there an MGS4 on release day?XaosIIThat's just stupid, devs DO still need time to actually DEVELOP the game you know? I know the TC's point is pretty stupid, but that doesn't mean you have to play along with it.
[QUOTE="XaosII"]Wait wait, if the PS3 is so powerful, why wasn't there an MGS4 on release day?Exeed_OrbitThat's just stupid, devs DO still need time to actually DEVELOP the game you know? I know the TC's point is pretty stupid, but that doesn't mean you have to play along with it.
LIES!!!
Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i thinkYet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone
Exeed_Orbit
THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
AS for my point, how was it silly? Hermits go on and on how the GPU in the PC are so advanced blah blah blah...its a valid point which you approved.
farcry loks just as good and it came out early 2004 so almost 4 years ago now, also hl2 looks great and doom 3's textrues are still some of the bestimprezawrx500Farcry Still Looks as good as WHAT exactly, I hope you're not talking about Uncharted?
That's just stupid, devs DO still need time to actually DEVELOP the game you know? I know the TC's point is pretty stupid, but that doesn't mean you have to play along with it.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="XaosII"]Wait wait, if the PS3 is so powerful, why wasn't there an MGS4 on release day?XaosII
LIES!!!
Gheheheh, that made me LOL[QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i thinkYet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it aloneBecause developers dont need to scrounge around with their current hardware.
Exeed_Orbit
Look at UT3 on PS3 and on a 7900GS. Identical - yes I have seen in person.
There are plenty of games that deliver fantastic visuals on lower end video cards, and others that push the boundries of what is technically possible with the latest hardware.
And $813 for my system upgrade - DVDrw, case, 160gb hdd not included. You get what you pay for
edit*
Impreza also made a good point with COD4
I am stating facts.THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
cool_guy2000
Your consoles arent as technically capable as you dream them to be
That's just stupid, devs DO still need time to actually DEVELOP the game you know? I know the TC's point is pretty stupid, but that doesn't mean you have to play along with it.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="XaosII"]Wait wait, if the PS3 is so powerful, why wasn't there an MGS4 on release day?XaosII
LIES!!!
lol the way i see it he asked a stupid question, got a stupid answer, or in this case a stupid question to mock him><
Wait wait, if the PS3 is so powerful, why wasn't there an MGS4 on release day?XaosII
and why can my over 2 year old 7800gt run cod for in 720p maxed out while ps3 can't?
Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i think
cool_guy2000
THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
What's your point again? Are you trying to to lead us to believe is ps3 is more powerful than a pc?
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i thinkYet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone
Exeed_Orbit
I never knew ps3 has 7300gt. the gf 7600 or better does just as good as ps3
Did you even bother to read my post? Here, let me show you something.What's your point again? Are you trying to to lead us to believe is ps3 is more powerful than a pc?
jangojay
Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it aloneExeed_OrbitThere, I'm glad we cleared that up
Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i think
cool_guy2000
THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
AS for my point, how was it silly? Hermits go on and on how the GPU in the PC are so advanced blah blah blah...its a valid point which you approved.
No he wrong and so are you, its not because the consoles are better at optimizing, its far from the truth, PC development is gradual,ebcause it has to appeal to a range of systems yes, but teh consoels are not more efficient, quite the opposite, a game sole developed for the PCs 7950 , a Duo Core and what 2GB RAM (specific ) would of slaughtered the consoles 3 years ago.
But then ... there wouldnt be alot of sales now would there?
Haws nothing to do with console power ... this "Console graphics get better in years due to optimization" BS needs to stop, they know the limits form day 1, development time & Budget however is what influences it, it gets more expensive each generation, the 1st lot of games are not due to un-optmizatized games, its because of the lack of foresight into higher development costs with new technology.
[QUOTE="cool_guy2000"]Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i think
jangojay
THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
What's your point again? Are you trying to to lead us to believe is ps3 is more powerful than a pc?
Not at all...just the simple fact that PC at the time with about the same card (2 years ago) as the PS3 couldn't make or didn't visuals like uncharted..yet Hermits scream there lungs out about how the GPU is light years beyond the consoles, etc etc.
if so, why didn't we see these visuals ages ago on the PC?
doesn't that just prove gaming is much more better on consoles?
[QUOTE="jangojay"]Did you even bother to read my post? Here, let me show you something.What's your point again? Are you trying to to lead us to believe is ps3 is more powerful than a pc?
Exeed_Orbit
Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it aloneExeed_OrbitThere, I'm glad we cleared that up
Huh I wasn't directing anything at you.. at coolguy though.
[QUOTE="jangojay"][QUOTE="cool_guy2000"]Yet you don't see PCs cranking out the level of visuals that the ps3 seems to be doing with that video card. The thing is this, consoles seem to be more efficient with their given hardware compared to the computer. But all in all, computers are still capable of more, given the right amount of money. And no, I'm not saying you have to spend $26000 (Yes, thousand, that's not a typo) dollars to have a decent PC, so leave it alone[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]The PS3 has a 7900GS equivilant, which is about 2 years old - hell a little older i think
cool_guy2000
THANK YOU, and Hermits have the guts to downplay the consoles? LMFAO! plz
What's your point again? Are you trying to to lead us to believe is ps3 is more powerful than a pc?
Not at all...just the simple fact that PC at the time with about the same card (2 years ago) as the PS3 couldn't make or didn't visuals like uncharted..yet Hermits scream there lungs out about how the GPU is light years beyond the consoles, etc etc.
if so, why didn't we see these visuals ages ago on the PC?
doesn't that just prove gaming is much more better on consoles?
No it just proves that devs didn't want to make a game which only the best card could run.
have you seen crysis on a 7900GS? It looks better than any console game out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4PzBdJDDEo
See for yourself. As I said before ...... no dev wanted to release a game crysis level graphics at that time
Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Gamersince81
I blame the 360. Joint development of so many 360/PC games has held PC game development back.
Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Gamersince81I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.
[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Exeed_OrbitI'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.
Name a PC game available now besides Crysis that BLOWS Uncharted away.. Shoot, im waiting!!
I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Gamersince81
Name a PC game available now besides Crysis that BLOWS Uncharted away.. Shoot, im waiting!!
Uncharted? you mean that games thats only slightly better than Gears of War? How about eveyr PC multiplat for these kind of games :D
[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Meu2k7
Name a PC game available now besides Crysis that BLOWS Uncharted away.. Shoot, im waiting!!
Uncharted? you mean that games thats only slightly better than Gears of War? How about eveyr PC multiplat for these kind of games :D
Like i said the PC only have one clear cut game superior graphically over Uncharted and thats Crysis.. I beaten GEOW on the 360 and that game doesnt blow, let alone look better than Uncharted in the least. My point is if the PC is so great i should see 30 games that look about or as good as Crysis. Just having one game dominating consoles inst that impressive. When i see 30 or more PC games that are Crysis level than ill understand what all the fuss about the PC is.
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?Gamersince81
Name a PC game available now besides Crysis that BLOWS Uncharted away.. Shoot, im waiting!!
Uncharted? you mean that games thats only slightly better than Gears of War? How about eveyr PC multiplat for these kind of games :D
Like i said the PC only have one clear cut game superior graphically over Uncharted and thats Crysis.. I beaten GEOW on the 360 and that game doesnt blow, let alone look better than Uncharted in the least. My point is if the PC is so great i should see 30 games that look about or as good as Crysis. Just having one game dominating consoles inst that impressive. When i see 30 or more PC games that are Crysis level than ill understand what all the fuss about the PC is.
Gears for pc looks better than 360
All multiplats look better on pc
And I'll say it again. Just because devs don't want to push crysis like graphics, that doesn't mean the PC isn't capable of them. Before uncharted what did you cows have? Nothing.. that's right..
Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
Meu2k7
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
Cranler
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
Are you silly?
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
Cranler
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
CoD2 is completely physics-free and the animations are damn bad by comparison. HL2 by comparison has more environmental interactivity and superb character animations.
[QUOTE="Gamersince81"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to have to disagree with you on that.[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"][QUOTE="Gamersince81"]Only ONE game out now that PC has blows Uncharted away and thats Crysis!! If you think about it, what else does the PC has graphically that can blow Unchated away thats available right now?jangojay
Name a PC game available now besides Crysis that BLOWS Uncharted away.. Shoot, im waiting!!
Uncharted? you mean that games thats only slightly better than Gears of War? How about eveyr PC multiplat for these kind of games :D
Like i said the PC only have one clear cut game superior graphically over Uncharted and thats Crysis.. I beaten GEOW on the 360 and that game doesnt blow, let alone look better than Uncharted in the least. My point is if the PC is so great i should see 30 games that look about or as good as Crysis. Just having one game dominating consoles inst that impressive. When i see 30 or more PC games that are Crysis level than ill understand what all the fuss about the PC is.
Gears for pc looks better than 360
All multiplats look better on pc
And I'll say it again. Just because devs don't want to push crysis like graphics, that doesn't mean the PC isn't capable of them. Before uncharted what did you cows have? Nothing.. that's right..
Im not a cow im a gamer.. I bought a PS3 for MGS4, GT5 and FF13.. I bought it for teh games like i always have for all consoles. Everyone knows the PC is the most powerful medium in gaming. Im just saying i would expect the PC to have more maxed out hardware games like Crysis available every other month.
[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
aliblabla2007
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
CoD2 is completely physics-free and the animations are damn bad by comparison. HL2 by comparison has more environmental interactivity and superb character animations.
LOL don't even add all that. Just look @ Gs's cod 3 Screens for x360 compared to HL2 for the pc. You will have a good laugh
[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
aliblabla2007
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
CoD2 is completely physics-free and the animations are damn bad by comparison. HL2 by comparison has more environmental interactivity and superb character animations.
He was talking about graphics not physics. HL2 might have better faces but thats it. Just like COD 4 graphics are better than EP2.
[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Besides,
Half-Life 2 was better looking than anything in the Xbox360's first year pretty much, thats a 2 year gap.
Now we have Crysis, and by the time Xbox720/PS4 is release ... Crysis 2... nothing will match Crysis on the consoles in thier lifetimes let alone Crysis 2.
The gap is still there, anyone saying its closed that much is in denial, Crysis on the consoles would be a repeat of Doom3/Half-Life2/Chrinicles of Riddick/Far Cry on the Xbox1 ... GARBAGE.
Cranler
COD 2 has better graphics than HL2. Oblivion came out a few months after the 360 launch.
CoD2 is completely physics-free and the animations are damn bad by comparison. HL2 by comparison has more environmental interactivity and superb character animations.
He was talking about graphics not physics. HL2 might have better faces but thats it. Just like COD 4 graphics are better than EP2.
HL2 looks better than Cod 3, yes not only Cod 2 but also COD 3 which is on the X360. Look @ Gs screens if you want.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment