This topic is locked from further discussion.
Run, either die by machine gun fire or make it to a trench and start stabbing people with a bayonet. Repeat for serverl hours, game done.
you're missing grenades, mustard gas, flamethrower, barbed wire, bolt action rifles, and fighting in the middle. there was fighting inbetween the trenches. also, you forget that there were planes in WWIRun, either die by machine gun fire or make it to a trench and start stabbing people with a bayonet. Repeat for serverl hours, game done.
October_Tide
shameful episode in humanity.PannicAtackUhm? WW2 was shameful aswell but it's been flogged to death.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]shameful episode in humanity.ThatsSimtasticUhm? WW2 was shameful aswell but it's been flogged to death. At least WWII had a point. WWI was completely pointless.
What are we going to do today? We're going to sit in this trench.
The causes of WW1 seem much more interesting than WW1 itself. Or did i miss something?
you kinda missed alot... WWI was the first "big" war to use automatic weapons, airplanes, zepplins, bolt action rifles, and mustard gas. nice try thoughWhat are we going to do today? We're going to sit in this trench.
KungfuKitten
The causes of WW1 seem much more interesting than WW1 itself. Or did i miss something?
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]you kinda missed alot... WWI was the first "big" war to use automatic weapons, airplanes, zepplins, bolt action rifles, and mustard gas. nice try though Meh i thought it was 90% trenches and meatgrinding.What are we going to do today? We're going to sit in this trench.
The causes of WW1 seem much more interesting than WW1 itself. Or did i miss something?mutantleaguex
you kinda missed alot... WWI was the first "big" war to use automatic weapons, airplanes, zepplins, bolt action rifles, and mustard gas. nice try though Meh i thought it was 90% trenches and meatgrinding. haven't you heard of the red baron? or the river somme? or the city verdun?[QUOTE="mutantleaguex"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]
What are we going to do today? We're going to sit in this trench.
The causes of WW1 seem much more interesting than WW1 itself. Or did i miss something?KungfuKitten
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]Meh i thought it was 90% trenches and meatgrinding. haven't you heard of the red baron? or the river somme? or the city verdun? No not really. Well i have probably. I only know the red baron but it's kind of hard to build an FPS around it i think. But hey You know way more about WW1 than i do and if You say it's totally doable, then sure.[QUOTE="mutantleaguex"] you kinda missed alot... WWI was the first "big" war to use automatic weapons, airplanes, zepplins, bolt action rifles, and mustard gas. nice try thoughmutantleaguex
To accurately portray WW1 the game would be pretty blunt and horrific, infact WW1 and what went on in what was basically a poinless war is one of the few things that moves me to tears, especially considering members of my own family fought and were injured in the war. Truth is, a pointless salughter of young men on both sides for no real perceivable gain and on very thin grounds would not make a good game.
Nobody wants to do a WWI game because WWI was a shameful episode in humanity. There are games based off of WWII because it was a clear victory against an unambiguously bad enemy.PannicAtack
so killing germans and japanese is ok?
To accurately portray WW1 the game would be pretty blunt and horrific, infact WW1 and what went on in what was basically a poinless war is one of the few things that moves me to tears, especially considering members of my own family fought and were injured in the war. Truth is, a pointless salughter of young men on both sides for no real perceivable gain and on very thin grounds would not make a good game.
BoloTheGreat
So how you think feel germans to kill all the time their grandfathers?
a game like that would need something to defend it from the murderous CoD blow, It needs something to stand out of the crowd.... Its art style could be grayscale with film grain and what not. that would make it a whole lot cooler, as long as they get the lighting down so thats not a chore to spot enemies. That and they would need incredble music that amps up the pressure and makes it feel like you're don'ing something when you are prowling throught the trenches. There would have to be an incridble plot and possibly great charaterswith great voice actingto grab people away from the CoD crowd. and along with the art style the graphics would have to be top notch with loads of vaierty. Adding to this it would have to be very graphic because WWI was. and with very solid game play and great online it would be amazing. I would get it.
a bad game? what if it was in the honor of the people that fought and it was a way of showing the horror and to never forget the people that participated in it? The game would be great.To accurately portray WW1 the game would be pretty blunt and horrific, infact WW1 and what went on in what was basically a poinless war is one of the few things that moves me to tears, especially considering members of my own family fought and were injured in the war. Truth is, a pointless salughter of young men on both sides for no real perceivable gain and on very thin grounds would not make a good game.
BoloTheGreat
A FP action/adventure game along the lines of Penumbra set in various battles across Europe (especially Verdun) would kick some serious ass. Let's say you play a spy. You could accomplish tasks like delivering messages, repairing things, maybe even planning attacks in a command room, fly a plane, some Zeppelin levels, some operations behind the frontlines... A carefully staged atmosphere and many "things" happening around you, like in COD, would make the game awesome.
Or something like The Saboteur set in London, including the night attacks, would be really cool.
Or something like Thief:P
Creating a FPS based on WWI would be a very difficult task. Yes, there are plenty of skirmishes and battles that could be covered in the game (First and Second, and Third Battles of Ypres, Somme, Verdun, Meuse-Argonne), but the gameplay, more or less, would be repetitive (i.e. Trench Warfare). The game would need to include some variety. For example, it would have to include submarine warfare and/or air combat. The games land combat would need to be broken down into both the Eastern and Western Fronts, possibly utilizing two separate protagonists for each front.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Nobody wants to do a WWI game because WWI was a shameful episode in humanity. There are games based off of WWII because it was a clear victory against an unambiguously bad enemy.HFkami
so killing germans and japanese is ok?
To accurately portray WW1 the game would be pretty blunt and horrific, infact WW1 and what went on in what was basically a poinless war is one of the few things that moves me to tears, especially considering members of my own family fought and were injured in the war. Truth is, a pointless salughter of young men on both sides for no real perceivable gain and on very thin grounds would not make a good game.
BoloTheGreat
So how you think feel germans to kill all the time their grandfathers?
You do not understand, it seems. The motives and goals, no matter how you look at it, of the German and Imperial Japanese forces in WWII were evil. WWI was a pointless, insane affair where no side was actively seeking to exterminate a race/nation.[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Trenches?................snoozefestmutantleaguexfool, you have no idea. the reason post-traumatic stress is even a medical term is because of WWI. fool And that had absolutely nothing to do with his comment. :|
Either way, doesn't matter. U r teh banned. Better luck next time.
[QUOTE="HFkami"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]
so killing germans and japanese is ok?
[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]
To accurately portray WW1 the game would be pretty blunt and horrific, infact WW1 and what went on in what was basically a poinless war is one of the few things that moves me to tears, especially considering members of my own family fought and were injured in the war. Truth is, a pointless salughter of young men on both sides for no real perceivable gain and on very thin grounds would not make a good game.
Verge_6
So how you think feel germans to kill all the time their grandfathers?
You do not understand, it seems. The motives and goals, no matter how you look at it, of the German and Imperial Japanese forces in WWII were evil. WWI was a pointless, insane affair where no side was actively seeking to exterminate a race/nation.every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
You do not understand, it seems. The motives and goals, no matter how you look at it, of the German and Imperial Japanese forces in WWII were evil. WWI was a pointless, insane affair where no side was actively seeking to exterminate a race/nation.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="HFkami"]
So how you think feel germans to kill all the time their grandfathers?
HFkami
every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
Saying every war is pointless is to be ignorant of major political, social, and economic aspects. WWII was fought to prevent a hostile Japanese takeover of the entire Pacific and to ensure that Hitler did not become the leader of all of the civilized Eastern hemisphere. WWI was fought because the royalty basically said to. Are you seriously going to tell me WWII was as pointless as WWI? The former has been called one of the very few justifiable wars, even. And I use the word Imperial Japanese because, well...that's what they were. They called themselves that. :?[QUOTE="HFkami"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] You do not understand, it seems. The motives and goals, no matter how you look at it, of the German and Imperial Japanese forces in WWII were evil. WWI was a pointless, insane affair where no side was actively seeking to exterminate a race/nation.Verge_6
every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
Saying every war is pointless is to be ignorant of major political, social, and economic aspects. WWII was fought to prevent a hostile Japanese takeover of the entire Pacific and to ensure that Hitler did not become the leader of all of the civilized Eastern hemisphere. WWI was fought because the royalty basically said to. Are you seriously going to tell me WWII was as pointless as WWI? The former has been called one of the very few justifiable wars, even. And I use the word Imperial Japanese because, well...that's what they were. They called themselves that. :?but you call the germans just german instead nazi germans or something like that,
i dont want argue with you anymore. Your knowledge end here anyways. I bet you think irakwar and hiroshima was necessary too. Or that your two fraction system real democracy is.
Saying every war is pointless is to be ignorant of major political, social, and economic aspects. WWII was fought to prevent a hostile Japanese takeover of the entire Pacific and to ensure that Hitler did not become the leader of all of the civilized Eastern hemisphere. WWI was fought because the royalty basically said to. Are you seriously going to tell me WWII was as pointless as WWI? The former has been called one of the very few justifiable wars, even. And I use the word Imperial Japanese because, well...that's what they were. They called themselves that. :?[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="HFkami"]
every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
HFkami
but you call the germans just german instead nazi germans or something like that,
i dont want argue with you anymore. Your knowledge end here anyways. I bet you think irakwar and hiroshima was necessary too. Or that your two fraction system real democracy is.
Your posts are almost unreadable and your logic is unfathomable.Saying every war is pointless is to be ignorant of major political, social, and economic aspects. WWII was fought to prevent a hostile Japanese takeover of the entire Pacific and to ensure that Hitler did not become the leader of all of the civilized Eastern hemisphere. WWI was fought because the royalty basically said to. Are you seriously going to tell me WWII was as pointless as WWI? The former has been called one of the very few justifiable wars, even. And I use the word Imperial Japanese because, well...that's what they were. They called themselves that. :?[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="HFkami"]
every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
HFkami
but you call the germans just german instead nazi germans or something like that,
i dont want argue with you anymore. Your knowledge end here anyways. I bet you think irakwar and hiroshima was necessary too. Or that your two fraction system real democracy is.
...I am seriously at a loss for words at this. And believe me, it's hard for me to be at a loss for words. Bravo.Seriously, do NOT argue with me on this particular subject. I have spent the better part of a decade obssessing over it. I have more books on the Second World War than you probably have in general.
Saying every war is pointless is to be ignorant of major political, social, and economic aspects. WWII was fought to prevent a hostile Japanese takeover of the entire Pacific and to ensure that Hitler did not become the leader of all of the civilized Eastern hemisphere. WWI was fought because the royalty basically said to. Are you seriously going to tell me WWII was as pointless as WWI? The former has been called one of the very few justifiable wars, even. And I use the word Imperial Japanese because, well...that's what they were. They called themselves that. :?[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="HFkami"]
every war is pointless, the britain empire slaved the world with their colonialism and what was with black people in america at that time. Humans had to weak up, it was obviously that some one had to go too far.
And why you say germans but for japanese, the word imperial in front.
HFkami
but you call the germans just german instead nazi germans or something like that,
i dont want argue with you anymore. Your knowledge end here anyways. I bet you think irakwar and hiroshima was necessary too. Or that your two fraction system real democracy is.
actually: WWII was very much necessary to keep the entire world from falling under fascist controland is infact the only justified war we have ever been in. Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a but extreme but we did warn them, we said to them 'surrender or well nuke you' but they said 'lol no' so we did, and then we said 'surrender or well do it again' but they still said 'lol no' so we did. and then they know we were serious. it was either that or send in the army and have, probably 10x more people die in the fighting to take the island. now my question to you is : what is irakwar?if you remember from history class how ww1 was fought it wont be that fun. everyone sat in a trench and fought terere and neer realy gained any ground. Also tanks went realy slow, and i mean realy slow. They moved as fast as you can walk. EmperorZerueli believe it was slower than that in some cases
[QUOTE="EmperorZeruel"]if you remember from history class how ww1 was fought it wont be that fun. everyone sat in a trench and fought terere and neer realy gained any ground. Also tanks went realy slow, and i mean realy slow. They moved as fast as you can walk. shadow_hosii believe it was slower than that in some cases If they moved at all. It was not uncommon for a MkIV tank to stall after only going a few hundred meters, effectively making it a useless metal bunker in the middle of no man's land. Guess how much tanks crews looked forward to making a sprint to the friendly trenches when that happened.
[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"][QUOTE="EmperorZeruel"]if you remember from history class how ww1 was fought it wont be that fun. everyone sat in a trench and fought terere and neer realy gained any ground. Also tanks went realy slow, and i mean realy slow. They moved as fast as you can walk. Verge_6i believe it was slower than that in some cases If they moved at all. It was not uncommon for a MkIV tank to stall after only going a few hundred meters, effectively making it a useless metal bunker in the middle of no man's land. Guess how much tanks crews looked forward to making a sprint to the friendly trenches when that happened. big metal bunker with bug guns! pew pew pew
[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"][QUOTE="EmperorZeruel"]if you remember from history class how ww1 was fought it wont be that fun. everyone sat in a trench and fought terere and neer realy gained any ground. Also tanks went realy slow, and i mean realy slow. They moved as fast as you can walk. Verge_6i believe it was slower than that in some cases If they moved at all. It was not uncommon for a MkIV tank to stall after only going a few hundred meters, effectively making it a useless metal bunker in the middle of no man's land. Guess how much tanks crews looked forward to making a sprint to the friendly trenches when that happened. Problem is tanks were only used on a handful of occasions and were more often than not deathtraps for their crews.
Nobody wants to do a WWI game because WWI was a shameful episode in humanity. There are games based off of WWII because it was a clear victory against an unambiguously bad enemy.PannicAtackUmm, yeah, what he said.
[QUOTE="October_Tide"]you're missing grenades, mustard gas, flamethrower, barbed wire, bolt action rifles, and fighting in the middle. there was fighting inbetween the trenches. also, you forget that there were planes in WWIRun, either die by machine gun fire or make it to a trench and start stabbing people with a bayonet. Repeat for serverl hours, game done.
mutantleaguex
Or dying from several kinds of flu and other fun diseases, of course, you could take off in a plane, fly around for 2 minutes then come crashing down because you ran out of fuel
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment