what are the most ridiculous arguments on system wars?

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

prodiqy32

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Crysis having better graphics than Fable 2!

Crysis is 3 1/2 gens ago.

Ps3 has no games, only blu-ray movies, and If it's not AAA on GS, it's not a great game.

"no achievements? so youre playing for nothing..."killerfist

There are people that actually say that ? Lol

Ps3 has no games, only blu-ray movies, and If it's not AAA on GS, it's not a great game.

[QUOTE="killerfist"]"no achievements? so youre playing for nothing..."Tykain

There are people that actually say that ? Lol

Yup. There's a famous quote from some dude talking about Warhawk.

[QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

majadamus

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Prospective is 99% of what makes one truer then the other. ;)

[QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

majadamus

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Well, while gfx isn't the most important thing, to most people it is important to some point.

[QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

SecretPolice

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Prospective is 99% of what makes one truer then the other. ;)

So you're saying $1 billion worth of problems isn't a big deal?

[QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

SecretPolice

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Prospective is 99% of what makes one truer then the other. ;)

RROD is a big deal, no matter how you look at it. PS3 has an ok exclusives library imo, just not great but people are always overexagerating about it, and that will change this year anyways.

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"][QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

Chutebox

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Prospective is 99% of what makes one truer then the other. ;)

So you're saying 1 billion worth of problems isn't a big deal?

Prospective it is then. ;)

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"][QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

SecretPolice

I don't see any problems with 5 or 6. If you were a graphics whore or your someone who feels like braggin about your accomplishments when it comes to video games, then those arguments might seem silly to you.

The most ridiculous argument here at System Wars would have to be: The PS3 has no games. RROD is not a big deal.

Prospective is 99% of what makes one truer then the other. ;)

So you're saying 1 billion worth of problems isn't a big deal?

Prospective it is then. ;)

Prospective? No, that's called making things up. They have a goal to reach 11.5 million units by april or march, I don't remember. And they are basically right at that number, 10.9 million being the last we know of.

i find it hilarious when someone can talk about the flaws of a system and get 100 fanboys defending it.

example:

wiis games look not much better than gamecube, in some cases it looks identical like mario galaxy

wiis controls work like crap other than with nintendos first party games.

wiis geared towards young kids, just like the gamecube.

nintendos online strategy is so abysmal, im suprised they didnt go with 56k.

ps3 is an overpriced game system thats used mainly for hd dvds atm.

ps3 is an underpriced hd dvd player that can play videogames (even though none are out worth having except maybe 1 or 2 titles that ARE NOT multiplatform)

ps3 network is almost as bad as nintendos compaired to the 360

xbox please fix me (360) all xboxes will fail eventually with the RROD

xbox 360 lost the hd dvd format war so therefore it will lose the system war.

microsoft is the evil devil that wants to eat your children

if one system outsells another for ONLY ONE MONTH that system has got to be clearly winning the system war because who cares its the first month its outsold the other system in the past 2 and a half years.

yep these statements all may be true, but i bet many fanboys will flock to defend them.

crap i forgot to include the pc fanboys, my mistake.

crysis isnt as advanced as many let on, the ai really sucks in some parts, and no matter how you wheel and deal, its still going to cost more than 2k to have a system that will play the game the way its meant to be played (if you dont already have a rig)

pc games are mostly MMOs, FPS and RTS. and in the past 8 years consoles have had twice as many 4 star and above games compared to the p.c. (research it, its true)

you hermits need to update your systems (they became obsolete 5 minutes after you last updated them)

crap i forgot to include the pc fanboys, my mistake.

crysis isnt as advanced as many let on, the ai really sucks in some parts, and no matter how you wheel and deal, its still going to cost more than 2k to have a system that will play the game the way its meant to be played (if you dont already have a rig)

pc games are mostly MMOs, FPS and RTS. and in the past 8 years consoles have had twice as many 4 star and above games compared to the p.c. (research it, its true)

you hermits need to update your systems (they became obsolete 5 minutes after you last updated them)

gearsofhalogeek

4 star game?

1. Wii has (X)-many AAA's while system (XX) has less. Like Wii's AAA's equal other system's.

2. PS3 has no games

3. 360 is dead.

[QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

crap i forgot to include the pc fanboys, my mistake.

crysis isnt as advanced as many let on, the ai really sucks in some parts, and no matter how you wheel and deal, its still going to cost more than 2k to have a system that will play the game the way its meant to be played (if you dont already have a rig)

pc games are mostly MMOs, FPS and RTS. and in the past 8 years consoles have had twice as many 4 star and above games compared to the p.c. (research it, its true)

you hermits need to update your systems (they became obsolete 5 minutes after you last updated them)

CaseyWegner

4 star game?

games that were rated 75 percent or above out of 100

or 4 out of 5 stars or above

or 7.5 out of 10 or above

Wiiware will be better than XBLA and PSN even though no games have been actually played by anybody.

Only PSN has dedicated servers

PSN has no lag

The RROD isn't a problem

Just wait (this applies to people waiting for a good 360 chipset and for the PS3 to get their library up to snuff)

A massive library of shovelware is ok just as long as you have a GOTY

The Wii control isn't a gimmick even though it's best games don't even use it all that much or to great effect.

PSN is better because it's free

XBL is better because you have to pay

JRPGs are better than WRPGs

WRPGs are better than JRPGs

Japan is the center of the universe

NA is the center of the universe

Rumble doesn't matter

Paying 40 bucks for a beta is ok, but spending 60 bucks for a full game and a beta is milking.

The 360 is just like the Dreamcast

Jeez. I could do this all day. The amount of ridiculous arguments in System Wars is mindnumbingly vast...And sad.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

crap i forgot to include the pc fanboys, my mistake.

crysis isnt as advanced as many let on, the ai really sucks in some parts, and no matter how you wheel and deal, its still going to cost more than 2k to have a system that will play the game the way its meant to be played (if you dont already have a rig)

pc games are mostly MMOs, FPS and RTS. and in the past 8 years consoles have had twice as many 4 star and above games compared to the p.c. (research it, its true)

you hermits need to update your systems (they became obsolete 5 minutes after you last updated them)

gearsofhalogeek

4 star game?

games that were rated 75 percent or above out of 100

or 4 out of 5 stars or above

or 7.5 out of 10 or above

4 out of 5 is 80% and are you comparing the pc to all consoles combined? why?

[QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

crap i forgot to include the pc fanboys, my mistake.

crysis isnt as advanced as many let on, the ai really sucks in some parts, and no matter how you wheel and deal, its still going to cost more than 2k to have a system that will play the game the way its meant to be played (if you dont already have a rig)

pc games are mostly MMOs, FPS and RTS. and in the past 8 years consoles have had twice as many 4 star and above games compared to the p.c. (research it, its true)

you hermits need to update your systems (they became obsolete 5 minutes after you last updated them)

CaseyWegner

4 star game?

games that were rated 75 percent or above out of 100

or 4 out of 5 stars or above

or 7.5 out of 10 or above

4 out of 5 is 80% and are you comparing the pc to all consoles combined? why?

3.5 out of 5 then i guess (whatever 75 percent is with that rating system)

p.c.s are all different there is no standard for a p.c. because they are so upgradeable. (some games may be able to be played on a walmart 300 dollar p.c. and some need a gaming rig) basically p.c.s cannot be considered 1 platform many of the games listed on websites with high scores go as far back as the original warcraft. the only fair way to compare p.c. games to console games would be to combine all console games over a set number of years and then a comparison can be made. (also if you dont have a gaming rig and decide to build one you will pay minimum 2k,) and with consoles you can buy a wii, 360 and ps3 and only be out 1500 dollars at the most. if you want to further disect this, 2k will get you every console thats came out in the past 8 years right now.

3.5 out of 5 then i guess (whatever 75 percent is with that rating system)

p.c.s are all different there is no standard for a p.c. because they are so upgradeable. (some games may be able to be played on a walmart 300 dollar p.c. and some need a gaming rig) basically p.c.s cannot be considered 1 platform many of the games listed on websites with high scores go as far back as the original warcraft. the only fair way to compare p.c. games to console games would be to combine all console games over a set number of years and then a comparison can be made. (also if you dont have a gaming rig and decide to build one you will pay minimum 2k,) and with consoles you can buy a wii, 360 and ps3 and only be out 1500 dollars at the most. if you want to further disect this, 2k will get you every console thats came out in the past 8 years right now.

gearsofhalogeek

or you could do what we do here and compare pc games released since the start of each new console generation. that way it's completely fair and isn't pc vs. everything else.

[QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

3.5 out of 5 then i guess (whatever 75 percent is with that rating system)

p.c.s are all different there is no standard for a p.c. because they are so upgradeable. (some games may be able to be played on a walmart 300 dollar p.c. and some need a gaming rig) basically p.c.s cannot be considered 1 platform many of the games listed on websites with high scores go as far back as the original warcraft. the only fair way to compare p.c. games to console games would be to combine all console games over a set number of years and then a comparison can be made. (also if you dont have a gaming rig and decide to build one you will pay minimum 2k,) and with consoles you can buy a wii, 360 and ps3 and only be out 1500 dollars at the most. if you want to further disect this, 2k will get you every console thats came out in the past 8 years right now.

CaseyWegner

or you could do what we do here and compare pc games released since the start of each new console generation. that way it's completely fair and isn't pc vs. everything else.

good point, i was having a flashback of a p.c. fanboy saying the p.c. had more triple A titles than the consoles. so i went to metacritic and researched how many total titles the p.c. had (which went back 10 years) so i compensated for the consoles for 10 years and subtracted like 500 for multiplatforms and came up with a number, i forget the exact numbers but i had a number damit

Crysis having better graphics than Fable 2!

Crysis is 3 1/2 gens ago.

Chutebox

The stupidest thing about this place is: you defend a Sony game or console you're a cow, you defend a Nintendo game or console you're a sheep, you defend a Microsoft game or console you're a lemming. Also tons of haters bash things they have not played or completed. Stupidity in spades.Ghost_Dub

sheep cows lemmings and hermits.

gamespots one big barnyard of uberness.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

3.5 out of 5 then i guess (whatever 75 percent is with that rating system)

p.c.s are all different there is no standard for a p.c. because they are so upgradeable. (some games may be able to be played on a walmart 300 dollar p.c. and some need a gaming rig) basically p.c.s cannot be considered 1 platform many of the games listed on websites with high scores go as far back as the original warcraft. the only fair way to compare p.c. games to console games would be to combine all console games over a set number of years and then a comparison can be made. (also if you dont have a gaming rig and decide to build one you will pay minimum 2k,) and with consoles you can buy a wii, 360 and ps3 and only be out 1500 dollars at the most. if you want to further disect this, 2k will get you every console thats came out in the past 8 years right now.

gearsofhalogeek

or you could do what we do here and compare pc games released since the start of each new console generation. that way it's completely fair and isn't pc vs. everything else.

good point, i was having a flashback of a p.c. fanboy saying the p.c. had more triple A titles than the consoles. so i went to metacritic and researched how many total titles the p.c. had (which went back 10 years) so i compensated for the consoles for 10 years and subtracted like 500 for multiplatforms and came up with a number, i forget the exact numbers but i had a number damit

the pc wins pretty much every year when it comes to games.

People need to stop crying about the RRoD. Your getting a free replacement for christs sake, what more do you want?
Apparently we aren't allowed to talk about the PS2s problems here anymore either, how convenient. Burnsmiesta

I agree that RRoD is used to commonly as a brainless response. Usually thrown in where it makes no sense just to spite a 360 user. I totally agree.

Buuuuut, until we see a sure fix for the issue, the issue reamins. And, yes, great that MS stepped up to the plate to replace bad units. But the issue is so bad that even replecements have gone bad. When there's a fix, I think 360 owners will have more of a leg to stand on. Until then, the issue remains.

The base argument that cause everything else to sound silly. "Scores matter"

This lead to:
PS3 had no good games
Wii is shovelware city
Xbox360 has the best library
PS3 needs a system seller
Game "X" is overrated

The base argument that cause everything else to sound silly. "Scores matter"

This lead to:
PS3 had no good games I disagree, the ps3 has one or two good games
Wii is shovelware city I agree
Xbox360 has the best library I agree
PS3 needs a system seller I agree
Game "X" is overrated I agree

Cute_Red_Panda

nah scores dont cause that, thats just the truth in most cases

[QUOTE="Burnsmiesta"]People need to stop crying about the RRoD. Your getting a free replacement for christs sake, what more do you want?
Apparently we aren't allowed to talk about the PS2s problems here anymore either, how convenient. The_Dan_K

I agree that RRoD is used to commonly as a brainless response. Usually thrown in where it makes no sense just to spite a 360 user. I totally agree.

Buuuuut, until we see a sure fix for the issue, the issue reamins. And, yes, great that MS stepped up to the plate to replace bad units. But the issue is so bad that even replecements have gone bad. When there's a fix, I think 360 owners will have more of a leg to stand on. Until then, the issue remains.

[QUOTE="The_Dan_K"]

[QUOTE="Burnsmiesta"]People need to stop crying about the RRoD. Your getting a free replacement for christs sake, what more do you want?
Apparently we aren't allowed to talk about the PS2s problems here anymore either, how convenient. Ghost_Dub

I agree that RRoD is used to commonly as a brainless response. Usually thrown in where it makes no sense just to spite a 360 user. I totally agree.

Buuuuut, until we see a sure fix for the issue, the issue reamins. And, yes, great that MS stepped up to the plate to replace bad units. But the issue is so bad that even replecements have gone bad. When there's a fix, I think 360 owners will have more of a leg to stand on. Until then, the issue remains.

Of course, there are people with 360's that are contrary to the norm. And I am glad for you not to have had to deal with the issues that have plagued many. That doesn't mean that there isn't an issue.

Pretty much 95% of arguements built against PC gaming are just utterly embarrassing.

Do we need to hear the same hate of the Wii over and over and over. Hell I still see Wii is a fad arguements lets move on to something new. I would think more people would talk about WFC but seeing as how most Wii bashers never played a Wii I guess they can't talk about it.

Smash Brothers Brawl isn't a fighter its a party brawler. I mean because we can all just make up genre's when we want too right.

Smash fans that say that Smash is the best fighter. This one really kills me as most Smash fans don't even like other fighters yet try them.

"Twilight Princess is wii exclusive because the gamecube version is very rare and difficult to find in stores"- Blackisle_ripJPOBS

I saw this and was like wtf lol

The reason why people say that PS3 has no good games is because cows were the ones to originally claim it just like the "Just Wait" phrase. Because PS3 sales were close to 360 sales and the phrase, "They're close now imagine what will happen when it gets games." or "Man that's good sales for a system with no games when we get games its over." lastly "For a $600 console with no games its selling good, once we get a few exclusives its over"Blackbond

Why choose to accept those arguments and not arguments from PS3 users who says it has good games?

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]The reason why people say that PS3 has no good games is because cows were the ones to originally claim it just like the "Just Wait" phrase. Because PS3 sales were close to 360 sales and the phrase, "They're close now imagine what will happen when it gets games." or "Man that's good sales for a system with no games when we get games its over." lastly "For a $600 console with no games its selling good, once we get a few exclusives its over"Cute_Red_Panda

Why choose to accept those arguments and not arguments from PS3 users who says it has good games?

The PS3 obviously has good games. The cows were only using the no games arguement as a result of the sales war. Now they got stock with it and the other factions kept it running wild.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

3.5 out of 5 then i guess (whatever 75 percent is with that rating system)

p.c.s are all different there is no standard for a p.c. because they are so upgradeable. (some games may be able to be played on a walmart 300 dollar p.c. and some need a gaming rig) basically p.c.s cannot be considered 1 platform many of the games listed on websites with high scores go as far back as the original warcraft. the only fair way to compare p.c. games to console games would be to combine all console games over a set number of years and then a comparison can be made. (also if you dont have a gaming rig and decide to build one you will pay minimum 2k,) and with consoles you can buy a wii, 360 and ps3 and only be out 1500 dollars at the most. if you want to further disect this, 2k will get you every console thats came out in the past 8 years right now.

gearsofhalogeek

or you could do what we do here and compare pc games released since the start of each new console generation. that way it's completely fair and isn't pc vs. everything else.

good point, i was having a flashback of a p.c. fanboy saying the p.c. had more triple A titles than the consoles. so i went to metacritic and researched how many total titles the p.c. had (which went back 10 years) so i compensated for the consoles for 10 years and subtracted like 500 for multiplatforms and came up with a number, i forget the exact numbers but i had a number damit

:lol: :lol: :lol: wtf are you talking about? If you goto gamerankings (pretty much same thing only a billion times easier to do searches on)

You will see the PC completely crushes the consoels every year as far as exclusives go :lol: :lol: :lol:

If your counting non exclusives then I think I should point out that 1 non exclusives really don't matter and 2 you would have counted a multiplat on 3 platforms that scored well 3 different times :lol: making your findings a joke.

Just look at last year 2007 the PC had more AAA/AA exclusives then all the consoles combined times 2 :lol:

Going back before really 1999 is really a waste of time on Gamerankings or Metacritic because they just don't have that much data back then, seriously the originaly CNC game has like 3 reviews listed and that game sold millions upon millions of copies, but I've did the math on exclusives since 2000 before and the PC completely dominates.

i find it hilarious when someone can talk about the flaws of a system and get 100 fanboys defending it.

example:

wiis games look not much better than gamecube, in some cases it looks identical like mario galaxy

wiis controls work like crap other than with nintendos first party games.

wiis geared towards young kids, just like the gamecube.

nintendos online strategy is so abysmal, im suprised they didnt go with 56k.

ps3 is an overpriced game system thats used mainly for hd dvds atm.

ps3 is an underpriced hd dvd player that can play videogames (even though none are out worth having except maybe 1 or 2 titles that ARE NOT multiplatform)

ps3 network is almost as bad as nintendos compaired to the 360

xbox please fix me (360) all xboxes will fail eventually with the RROD

xbox 360 lost the hd dvd format war so therefore it will lose the system war.

microsoft is the evil devil that wants to eat your children

if one system outsells another for ONLY ONE MONTH that system has got to be clearly winning the system war because who cares its the first month its outsold the other system in the past 2 and a half years.

yep these statements all may be true, but i bet many fanboys will flock to defend them.

gearsofhalogeek

I could mostly agree but you got a typo with the PS3 plays HDDVDs(bluray anyway). No shortage of defenders.

Blue-ray will get you girls

final fanatsy13 will be the greastest rpg ever

lost oddyssy flopped big time

fable looks better than crysis

all games need to innovate

"no achievements? so youre playing for nothing..."killerfist

This one wins by far.

PS3's can get you girls. Ive seen that one so many times.

I saw this one earlier today "Almost everyone in Japan has a PS3"

I mean if he meant the ds, then he might actually have a case there but the PS3? :lol:

Teh Cell

Just Wait

Gears maxed out the 360

Uncharted maxed out the PS3

PS3 has no game

Most people buy the PS3 as a blu-ray player

and my favorite ...teh Fable 2 is betta than Crysis the trees have so many leaves!!!!

1-you dont like a game so you are a fanboy.

2-you dont like a game so youve never played it.

3-a AA game is a flop

4-the PS3 has no good exclusives

5-graphics dont matter

6-acheivments are over-rated

7-only gamespot scores matter

8-sales make the system the best

9-claiming greatness and hyping a game youve never played

10-multiplatform games do no matter.

thoughts? opinions? wanna add something? shoot!

prodiqy32

You forgot Casual vs Hardcore. I cant afford to play games 24/7 so that makes me a casual? I dont really FPS's so I'm a casual? I play Madden so I'm a casual? The Casual Vs Hardcore is BS!!!!

anyone along these lines -

face it (lemmings, cows, sheep, or in fanboy case, "sheeps"), the PS3/360/Wii will be doomed in 2007/2008/2009/2010.

some guy kept saying the 360 was last gen, i mean thats just retarded.

anyone else see that?

i hate ppl who go on about how the ps3 could run crysis. and that it has all this untaped well of power

oh 'blue ray makes games look better and helps AI' i actualy heard that!!!