This topic is locked from further discussion.
multiplayer didn't feel right, its was good, but it was too, idk, the guns just ddidn't feel right and the atmosphere was qeird with just 24 ppl facing off at each other, so it seemed like on side of the levels were nothing while the other half was full. it was just really the mulitplayer wasn't the greatest even tho it was cool at first.
i like the SP tho, i beat it twice thro.
who cares what they did then, we should care what they are doing now, and thats bringing it back to ww2 which sucks balls big timeriver_rat3117
The normandy landings are getting booooooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiinggggggggggggggggg. why can't they just let WW2 die already??
It wasn't so bad. In my opinion it had better multiplayer than CoD2.
CoD2's single player is far superior because CoD3's campaign is ridiculous, doesn't have any variety and is too over the top in trying to be cinematic.
But in terms of the multiplayer. Vehicles and 24 players made me happy. Which is why it seemed odd to me that CoD4 took a step back from that.
when you play cod2 there no need to play cod3 not enough inovation and i think i would prefer more realistic gameplay seriously i must have kill 10000 german soldier !!!!legol1In multi player there were many new features added... single player not really
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment