What did you think of Uncharted 3? (Contains Spoilers)!

  • 72 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#1 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

As the thread title says, if you don't want the story ruined then DON'T ENTER THE THREAD! If you do I'm not feeling sorry for you.

Now with that out of the way, I beat Uncharted 3 recently and I have to say that the game is seriously epic! But some things didn't make sense to me (more on that in a bit), I enjoyed the puzzles alot more as they were much more challenging than Uncharted 2 and 1 puzzles. Also the hand to hand combat is hands down amazing, and each chapter I felt was defiantely awesome. IMO it is the best in the series, and the online ahs become my favorite multiplayer game, even better than Killzone and RDR and COD. People that are talking about how there was no charecter development can kiss my ass, the story has much more serious drama than the last two games and the relationship between Drake and Sully really improves.

Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so. And I didn't understand in Chauetu (spelling? ) when you find one of the enemies and their body is strange looking and Drake comments about it and says they can't decompose that fast. This is never explained and they just dropped it from the storyline.

Overall Uncharted 3 is probably my second favorite game this gen now right behind Skyrim.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

Loved the beginning of the story. Felt different from the others. The ending fell into the same ol', same ol' (collapsing city... Again?)

All around fun game... However, I played none of the MP.

Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

I think it sucks.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#4 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

Loved the beginning of the story. Felt different from the others. The ending fell into the same ol', same ol' (collapsing city... Again?)

All around fun game... However, I played none of the MP.

lundy86_4

I agree that the collapsing city was a little cliche', but it was still pretty cool IMO. I was dissapointed with the fight with Marlon though, she just dies in quick sand, I was expecting this crazy supernatural thing to happen to her. But the second chapter and the third COMPLETELY surprised me, I didn't expect it at all. It was a nice touch.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

I agree that the collapsing city was a little cliche', but it was still pretty cool IMO. I was dissapointed with the fight with Marlon though, she just dies in quick sand, I was expecting this crazy supernatural thing to happen to her. But the second chapter and the third COMPLETELY surprised me, I didn't expect it at all. It was a nice touch.

ShadowMoses900

TBH i'm glad that Marlow wasn't anything special. After Lazarovich in UC2, I wasn't really interested in a ridiculous supernatural ending. I did like the dive back into Drake's childhood, though more fleshing out would not have hurt.

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

yay more uncharted 3 threads

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
The ending just wrapped up way to fast for my liking. I feel like they should have milked the city of brass a bit more. I see how the collapsing city is cliche but come on, if you created a super secret city/location, you think you wouldn't put a self destruct/easily destroyed mechanism in it ? although I would have preferred the city just get pulled into a massive sandtrap/quicksand kinda thing.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

It feels like an adventure this time instead of just a tps. :o

TheGuardian03

I definitely got that vibe. The Pub was a pretty nice touch, even though is was mostly cutscene :P

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

I thought Uncharted 2 was better. I liked Cutter though.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#11 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

The ending just wrapped up way to fast for my liking. I feel like they should have milked the city of brass a bit more. I see how the collapsing city is cliche but come on, if you created a super secret city/location, you think you wouldn't put a self destruct/easily destroyed mechanism in it ? although I would have preferred the city just get pulled into a massive sandtrap/quicksand kinda thing. Nonstop-Madness

Ya that would have been awesome, I would have liked to explored the city a little more but it was good for what it was. And I though that they kept trying to convince you that they were going to kill off charecters but then they don't. It happens like 2 or 3 times, and Chloe and Elena don't have much of a role in the story, but that's ok because it was really about Drake and Sully and their freindship.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#12 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

I entered without reading, but I wanted to say that so far, I love it. Its not as awesome as Uncharted 2 started, but still damn good.

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#13 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
The story is pretty much the same formula every UC game follows but the characters' relationships are much more fleshed out in this game, I love the bond between Sully and Drake. Also, despite being the same treasure hunting story, Drakes motive is questioned, whether it's all really worth it which is interesting too. The rest of the characters are great too, they play off of each other really well, dialogue during times when Drake, Sully, Chloe and Charlie are together is particularly funny. The games story is by no means great but is an improvement over previous games and I do look forward to what they do with the next one.
Avatar image for SteamedBennet
SteamedBennet

534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SteamedBennet
Member since 2011 • 534 Posts

I enjoyed Uncharted 1 & 2 a lot when I played them (enough to platinum 2). I bought Uncharted 3 and stopped playing on Chapter 8 and haven't been back yet (though I plan to at some point). Not sure why really, just wasn't feeling it at the time. From what I played it was good, I guess I'm just a bit burned out on the series at the moment.

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

Uncharted 3 is a better game overall if you like multiplayer. U3's MP is creative and plays like nothing else that I've played. It also has a bunch of damn content that will probably be overlooked by those who care only for the single player portion. I enjoyed Uncharted 2's campaign more, mostly because it came first. Uncharted 3 has better puzzles, combat, the writing is about the same, but the story events are better to me. Drake as a character is detailed very nicely.

They added some new mechanics to the game that break things up SPOILER (riding a horse with firing and jumping on/off, new platforming, waving off spiders with fire, melee combat with multiple targets, throwing grenades back, and disarming enemies to take their weapon if you have none). I think the lost city part was predictable, it was the same formula as Uncharted 2. Wish the campaign was longer. I feel the game rushed you into the lost city in the sands in the final chapters.

It looks like people are only talking about the single player only. People can look at the series this way: if you compare Uncharted 2 to games with both MP and SP components, you would probably say to yourelf "how the f*ck did they pull this off". I think Ucnharted 3's single player is better than all of these games single player portions: Killzone, Crysis, Gears, Halo, MW3, Battlefield and Resistance. I'm not saying these are the only types of games people should compare it to, but this is the type of game it is (having resources and manpower divided into different modes of play). On top of that there's a content rich MP that contends with top games in terms of features and creativity. ND put some real effort here. Its really awesome. I think there's much room for improvement though.

Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

It's not better than UC2, but it's still an awesome game.

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#17 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

i loved the game, not much complaints besides the fact I didn't kill marlowe

diving into how drake and sully met was a nice touch imo

Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts

Equal in quality with Uncharted 2, though the story maybe a bit weaker.
Oh and I believe the story behind the body is that the spiders got to him. Given where you find the body I think they relied on people to assume this. It was kind of like a warning for things to come.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#19 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

The story is pretty much the same formula every UC game follows but the characters' relationships are much more fleshed out in this game, I love the bond between Sully and Drake. Also, despite being the same treasure hunting story, Drakes motive is questioned, whether it's all really worth it which is interesting too. The rest of the characters are great too, they play off of each other really well, dialogue during times when Drake, Sully, Chloe and Charlie are together is particularly funny. The games story is by no means great but is an improvement over previous games and I do look forward to what they do with the next one.fabz_95

It really did have a more serious tone to it this time around IMO, like you mentioned about Drake's motives being qustioned ect... Like the part where he is talking to Elena and she says that Sully is someone he should be worried about and she implies that he is responsible for any danger that might happen to him since Sully loveslike a son and will follow him anywhere.

And then there is the part where Marlon talks about Drake's past and you learn a little about his parents and home life, the part about his mother commiting suicide and how Drake might not be a realitive of Francis Drake, I thought that was a good part in the storyline.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14559 Posts

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
btw, Charlie Cutter was cut short in the story because Graham Mctavish had to go film The Hobbit. That probably made Amy cut out Chloe for most of the story as well. I think Elena was in the story just enough. Your suppose to get the sense that Nate and Elena are separated but love each other enough to not get each other into danger. Uncharted 3 was about Nate and Sully and I think ND did a great job with that.
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

Basinboy

I agree with everything you said. Spot on brudda. Rushed near the end, left me wanting more (in Ubar and the actual Rub al Khali). But the reason they didnt do a final boss fight is because people complained about the Lazarevic fight. Don't know why...

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts

[QUOTE="fabz_95"]The story is pretty much the same formula every UC game follows but the characters' relationships are much more fleshed out in this game, I love the bond between Sully and Drake. Also, despite being the same treasure hunting story, Drakes motive is questioned, whether it's all really worth it which is interesting too. The rest of the characters are great too, they play off of each other really well, dialogue during times when Drake, Sully, Chloe and Charlie are together is particularly funny. The games story is by no means great but is an improvement over previous games and I do look forward to what they do with the next one.ShadowMoses900

It really did have a more serious tone to it this time around IMO, like you mentioned about Drake's motives being qustioned ect... Like the part where he is talking to Elena and she says that Sully is someone he should be worried about and she implies that he is responsible for any danger that might happen to him since Sully loveslike a son and will follow him anywhere.

And then there is the part where Marlon talks about Drake's past and you learn a little about his parents and home life, the part about his mother commiting suicide and how Drake might not be a realitive of Francis Drake, I thought that was a good part in the storyline.

Thats one thing people seem to overlook in Uncharted 3. You learn way more about Drake and Sully in Uncharted 3 than in Uncharted 1 and 2 combined. Uncharted 3 really grounded those characters.
Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

[QUOTE="Basinboy"]

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

TREAL_Since

I agree with everything you said. Spot on brudda. Rushed near the end, left me wanting more (in Ubar and the actual Rub al Khali). But the reason they didnt do a final boss fight is because people complained about the Lazarevic fight. Don't know why...

Blame Sony for the rushness at the end. Any extra time that was requested was negated automaticallyby them . And also a part of the team left to work on Last of Us.

The ending , I feel, was perfect, if UC2 hadn't done it already.

Avatar image for jamejame
jamejame

10634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 jamejame
Member since 2005 • 10634 Posts

I thought the story was lazy but the game great overall.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14559 Posts

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

[QUOTE="Basinboy"]

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

TrapJak

I agree with everything you said. Spot on brudda. Rushed near the end, left me wanting more (in Ubar and the actual Rub al Khali). But the reason they didnt do a final boss fight is because people complained about the Lazarevic fight. Don't know why...

Blame Sony for the rushness at the end. Any extra time that was requested was negated automaticallyby them . And also a part of the team left to work on Last of Us.

The ending , I feel, was perfect, if UC2 hadn't done it already.

And I do. I get that Sony needed to catch up fiscally with their Playstation line and get as many games to market while they've still got a window, but UC3 had a whole lot of potential that went down the tube. Shame.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

[QUOTE="Basinboy"]

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

TrapJak

I agree with everything you said. Spot on brudda. Rushed near the end, left me wanting more (in Ubar and the actual Rub al Khali). But the reason they didnt do a final boss fight is because people complained about the Lazarevic fight. Don't know why...

Blame Sony for the rushness at the end. Any extra time that was requested was negated automaticallyby them . And also a part of the team left to work on Last of Us.

The ending , I feel, was perfect, if UC2 hadn't done it already.

I really don't blame Sony. A game has to have a solid release date. Uncharted deserves to be released in the holiday window and it would cost Sony way too much money to keep the game in development until the next holiday window. The main issue was that ND tried to pull off way to much stuff. Tech wise, they pulled off some crazy stuff with the fire, water, and sand all in real time. Not to mention they had to pull off a much larger multiplayer and 3D ... which probably is Sony's fault. AND on top of that with a slightly smaller team due to The Last of Us. The development wasn't as focused as Uncharted 2.
Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts
Pretty great game, story was kinda meh. But great gameplay and gameplay experiences. Online is also fun and addictive, but that sprint button was not necessary
Avatar image for zeroking420_666
zeroking420_666

1009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 zeroking420_666
Member since 2004 • 1009 Posts

The Game SUCKS

Avatar image for xXShortroundXx
xXShortroundXx

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 xXShortroundXx
Member since 2011 • 1807 Posts

I thought it was awsome. It's not like the other two had good storys either and this one was no different, but I just liked the setting and the characters in Part 3 the most.

It also had teh set peicez....

Nah, but I would give it 4 stars.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

The Game SUCKS

zeroking420_666

Whoa... Really?

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

"Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so."

Yeah? Well thats one of odd moments of terrible writing and eluded plot points which are never answered. I felt the same way, and it turns out that he doesn't have any sort of powers at all. He simply has a bullet proof vest which allows him to survive bullets and escape wire(?) for him to make quick escapes. At least...that's what the developers said what happended. None of this is actually explained in the game sadly...

"And I didn't understand in Chauetu (spelling? ) when you find one of the enemies and their body is strange looking and Drake comments about it and says they can't decompose that fast. This is never explained and they just dropped it from the storyline."

Also another part of the game that bothered me. The decomposing body was supposed to elude to the spiders that you face underground. Now, how is a decomposing body supposed to elude to...spiders? Beats me.

This game built up a lot of suspense for some good story beats, but the pay off is terrible.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so. And I didn't understand in Chauetu (spelling? ) when you find one of the enemies and their body is strange looking and Drake comments about it and says they can't decompose that fast. This is never explained and they just dropped it from the storyline.ShadowMoses900

"They control through deception and fear..." - Basically nothing supernatural, they're illusionists employing various tricks to fool their enemies.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts

Agree fully with the GS review score, multiplayer shines but singleplayer lacked the same outbreaking flare that UC2 possessed.

My biggest complaints: story wrapped-up too quickly, never felt like they took full advantage of either Marlowe or Talbot's character, did not spend enough time in Ubar (and why no closing boss fight like in UC2? The fact that they just let the genie lamp drop back into the cavern's spring was a major letdown).

Basinboy

the single player as in gameplay was pretty good, lots of action and lots of different location. BUT yeah the story was meh, cuz they didnt really explain things, Charlie was basically killed off never to be seen again, Chole was only ther for 5 mins and wasnt important at all, Elena was took way too long to show up, but when she did it was confusing wat was going on between her and Drake. I never understod who was Marlowe and Talbot and what they wanted. Drake and Talbot seemed to know each other. The fact that you end up in a ancient forbbiden city again was kinda a let down, wanted something different. The final boss fight was lame as hell too.

Why was Drake after............... whatever ever it was they were after? Why did Charlie and Chloe just dissapear? Why did the city just crumple just becus Drake shot the crain? You would need a hge explosin to get a city like that to shake ar break down just from shock waves.

Theonly thing that REALY disappointed me was the fact that you get NOTHING for beating the story. U1 and U2 have cool unlockables and cheats for when you beat the story. U3 had nothing, not even a "You Win", "Thanks for Playing"

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

"Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so."

Yeah? Well thats one of odd moments of terrible writing and eluded plot points which are never answered. I felt the same way, and it turns out that he doesn't have any sort of powers at all. He simply has a bullet proof vest which allows him to survive bullets and escape wire(?) for him to make quick escapes. At least...that's what the developers said what happended. None of this is actually explained in the game sadly...

JangoWuzHere

I didn't feel it really needed to be explained. Personally I felt it to be kind of obvious. I know when I see someone get shot like that and then get back up with no apparent wound "kevlar vest" is the first thing that pops in my mind.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Why did Charlie and Chloe just dissapear?Nengo_Flow

I see a lot of people bring this up and I seriously have to wonder if people are skipping the cutscenes. Did you miss the part where Charlie breaks his leg and Chloe decides that whatever Drake's going after isn't worth risking their lives?

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

"Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so."

Yeah? Well thats one of odd moments of terrible writing and eluded plot points which are never answered. I felt the same way, and it turns out that he doesn't have any sort of powers at all. He simply has a bullet proof vest which allows him to survive bullets and escape wire(?) for him to make quick escapes. At least...that's what the developers said what happended. None of this is actually explained in the game sadly...

worlock77

I didn't feel it really needed to be explained. Personally I felt it to be kind of obvious. I know when I see someone get shot like that and then get back up with no apparent wound "kevlar vest" is the first thing that pops in my mind.

This is Uncharted, so nothing is ever super obvious. Cutter seemed pretty freaked out that Talbot survived a bullet to the chest, so that gave me the impression that there might be something really weird going on with Talbot.,The fact that they never explain in the game that it was a bullet proof vest is why this part of the story still pisses me off to this day.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts

"And I didn't understand in Chauetu (spelling? ) when you find one of the enemies and their body is strange looking and Drake comments about it and says they can't decompose that fast. This is never explained and they just dropped it from the storyline."

Also another part of the game that bothered me. The decomposing body was supposed to elude to the spiders that you face underground. Now, how is a decomposing body supposed to elude to...spiders? Beats me.

This game built up a lot of suspense for some good story beats, but the pay off is terrible.

JangoWuzHere

Yeah I was waiting for an explaination about that dead guy.

I was expecting something more, but no, its just the spiders.

BUT then it brings out another question, who was that guy?what thef*ck is up with them spiders? What are they, what do the want, why are they there? why do they want to kill people? Why are those Spiders in the Chaetu (France) and in Syria?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

"Now some things didn't make sense to me: For one thing I cannot unerstand if Talbot had supernatural powers or not, there are times where he shows up out of nowhere and it seems impossible for him to do so."

Yeah? Well thats one of odd moments of terrible writing and eluded plot points which are never answered. I felt the same way, and it turns out that he doesn't have any sort of powers at all. He simply has a bullet proof vest which allows him to survive bullets and escape wire(?) for him to make quick escapes. At least...that's what the developers said what happended. None of this is actually explained in the game sadly...

JangoWuzHere

I didn't feel it really needed to be explained. Personally I felt it to be kind of obvious. I know when I see someone get shot like that and then get back up with no apparent wound "kevlar vest" is the first thing that pops in my mind.

This is Uncharted, so nothing is ever super obvious. Cutter seemed pretty freaked out that Talbot survived a bullet to the chest, so that gave me the impression that there might be something really weird going on with Talbot.,The fact that they never explain in the game that it was a bullet proof vest is why this part of the story still pisses me off to this day.

Charlie was also coming down from having his mind f*cked by hallucinogenic drugs.

Avatar image for NJGIANTSNY
NJGIANTSNY

291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 NJGIANTSNY
Member since 2011 • 291 Posts
I thought uncharted 3 was a excellent scripted story that was a excellent movie in the end. Was not a very good video game in that it left the player watching n quick timing events instead of letting the gamer/player care for themselves in the world that uncharted is. I think naughtydog isn't the great video game dev people run out n say they are. they are just call of duty-ing there games. while the scripted games are great it just loses itself by becoming a watch a thon then a play a thon.
Avatar image for johnlennon28
johnlennon28

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 johnlennon28
Member since 2008 • 2158 Posts
I must be the only one who liked it better than uncharted2
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

I didn't feel it really needed to be explained. Personally I felt it to be kind of obvious. I know when I see someone get shot like that and then get back up with no apparent wound "kevlar vest" is the first thing that pops in my mind.

worlock77

This is Uncharted, so nothing is ever super obvious. Cutter seemed pretty freaked out that Talbot survived a bullet to the chest, so that gave me the impression that there might be something really weird going on with Talbot.,The fact that they never explain in the game that it was a bullet proof vest is why this part of the story still pisses me off to this day.

Charlie was also coming down from having his mind f*cked by hallucinogenic drugs.

He was already off that stuff a long time ago before that scene...

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#43 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Yeah it was good, definitely a 9.0+ from me just a shame U2 spoiled us too much that we didn't see much improvement... Oh well maybe next time we'll see some insane things happen.
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#44 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

I liked it. I thought the campaign was a lot of fun and I really liked that it had actual character development this time.

My only issue with UC3 is that it just doesn't have a lot of customization options. It's too bad they removed all the bonuses for the singleplayer campaign that were in the first 2 games. I was looking forward to playing through the game dressed as suited drake using a silenced pistol, but oh well. The MP also severely lacks customization. There aren't that many modes or editing options. Co-op being the most disappoiting here. Instead of having separate modes for all seige, survival or gold rush, they crammed them all together. Me and my friends were looking forward to playing through nothing but survival, but oh well.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]Why did Charlie and Chloe just dissapear?worlock77

I see a lot of people bring this up and I seriously have to wonder if people are skipping the cutscenes. Did you miss the part where Charlie breaks his leg and Chloe decides that whatever Drake's going after isn't worth risking their lives?

the fact that he breaks his leg and then we never see him again at all is stupid. why did Chloe felt cool with the plan at first then did want to go trhough with it? She was only there for fan service. At least they could of shown up again at the end somewhere, in the last cutscene so that we would know that they were still part of the game. they make you get all attached to Cutter for nothing.

If they were going to kill them off the story, they might as well actually kill them so that we would know what happened to them and maybe if they were dead, we might understand why Drake was doing all of this. If both Cutter and Chloe were killed by Talbot and his men, then the story would of made more sense.

Better than "I broke me leg", "I dont want to do this anymore". "Ok bye"

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts
Yeah it was good, definitely a 9.0+ from me just a shame U2 spoiled us too much that we didn't see much improvement... Oh well maybe next time we'll see some insane things happen.JohnF111
well ND kinda rushed it, if they had more time it would of been better thought through. It felt like they didnt get to do wat they wanted, but they still wanted to put in a Cruise ship and a plane no matter what
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#47 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
[QUOTE="JohnF111"]Yeah it was good, definitely a 9.0+ from me just a shame U2 spoiled us too much that we didn't see much improvement... Oh well maybe next time we'll see some insane things happen.Nengo_Flow
well ND kinda rushed it, if they had more time it would of been better thought through. It felt like they didnt get to do wat they wanted, but they still wanted to put in a Cruise ship and a plane no matter what

Yeah pretty much but PS3 is getting tired, devs are only getting small incremental improvements now.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#48 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]Why did Charlie and Chloe just dissapear?Nengo_Flow

I see a lot of people bring this up and I seriously have to wonder if people are skipping the cutscenes. Did you miss the part where Charlie breaks his leg and Chloe decides that whatever Drake's going after isn't worth risking their lives?

the fact that he breaks his leg and then we never see him again at all is stupid. why did Chloe felt cool with the plan at first then did want to go trhough with it? She was only there for fan service. At least they could of shown up again at the end somewhere, in the last cutscene so that we would know that they were still part of the game. they make you get all attached to Cutter for nothing.

If they were going to kill them off the story, they might as well actually kill them so that we would know what happened to them and maybe if they were dead, we might understand why Drake was doing all of this. If both Cutter and Chloe were killed by Talbot and his men, then the story would of made more sense.

Better than "I broke me leg", "I dont want to do this anymore". "Ok bye"

Cutter gets tossed out of the story because the voice actor couldn't finish the game because he had to finish The Hobbit. Amy Hemming did come up with kinda of a stupid solution though.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#49 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
For me UC3 was a bit of a mixed bag... the bit near the end where Drake was hallucinating was utterly annoying and the ending was lame... it just didn't seem to have the level of over-all polish that UC2 had... I can see why Gears 3 is universally lauded for being more polished from both a SP and MP perspective... UC3 isn't a bad game, by any means... it's just not as great as it was hyped up to be...
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]Why did Charlie and Chloe just dissapear?Nengo_Flow

I see a lot of people bring this up and I seriously have to wonder if people are skipping the cutscenes. Did you miss the part where Charlie breaks his leg and Chloe decides that whatever Drake's going after isn't worth risking their lives?

the fact that he breaks his leg and then we never see him again at all is stupid. why did Chloe felt cool with the plan at first then did want to go trhough with it? She was only there for fan service. At least they could of shown up again at the end somewhere, in the last cutscene so that we would know that they were still part of the game. they make you get all attached to Cutter for nothing.

If they were going to kill them off the story, they might as well actually kill them so that we would know what happened to them and maybe if they were dead, we might understand why Drake was doing all of this. If both Cutter and Chloe were killed by Talbot and his men, then the story would of made more sense.

Better than "I broke me leg", "I dont want to do this anymore". "Ok bye"

To be fair to Naughty Dog they can't really control the fact that the actor playing Cutter, Graham McTavish, had to go to New Zealand to play a dwarf for a couple of years. And why do the characters need to be in the story for longer than they were anyway? It's Drake and Sully's story. Anyone else is kinda ancillary to that. And why kill them off and ruin any chance of using them again in the future?