This topic is locked from further discussion.
Dead Rising and Rockstar: Table Tennis. Dead Rising is one of the coolest concepts in a game and is a must have for all 360 owners, and Table Tennis is one of the best sports games I've ever played (and I've played most of them). Can't wait for the Wii version of TT, and hopefully a Wii version of Dead Rising.
probably Resident Evil: Deadly Silence, a great remake that only got 7.9, I think it deserved more of a mid-AA score
I think I would also say Dead Rising if the game didn't crash every time I went to do the second mission :evil:
I would have to say Dead Rising or Saints Row.lucas_kelly
i agree with saints row, i wathced my sister play it the whole time, it was better than san andreas to me.
[QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
ElToRo_14
More like a 8.5. There is no excuse for bullet lag in a game. Oh and Enchanted arms and saints row are underated for me.
finally someone said enchanted arms.
Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
GameWiz1000
I think GeOW was OVER rated. Take away the amazing graphics, and you just have a solid shooter with a forgettable story, average campaign length, and fairly linear gameplay. The co-op really shines though, and again, the presentation and graphics are top notch. However, the multiplayer is CRIPPLED due to the P2P nature of XBOX LIVE, and host advantage is way too prevalent.
I think GeOW should be rated at least an 8.0, but not quite a 9.
[QUOTE="smooothe"][QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
-Tretiak
However, the multiplayer is CRIPPLED due to the P2P nature of XBOX LIVE.
So why can Perfect Dark Zero support 40 player matches without lag?
I'm talking about GeOW. It's near impossible to play competitively in that game simply because the host always has such an advantage. Damn man, your coming back at me like I'm attacking your lovely XBOX or something, i was just stating an opinion based on facts. I own an XBOX and GeOW, and the P2P host advantage sucks all of the fun out of the multiplayer for me.
[QUOTE="-Tretiak"][QUOTE="smooothe"][QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
smooothe
However, the multiplayer is CRIPPLED due to the P2P nature of XBOX LIVE.
So why can Perfect Dark Zero support 40 player matches without lag?
I'm talking about GeOW. It's near impossible to play competitively in that game simply because the host always has such an advantage. Damn man, your coming back at me like I'm attacking your lovely XBOX or something, i was just stating an opinion based on facts. I own an XBOX and GeOW, and the P2P host advantage sucks all of the fun out of the multiplayer for me.
In that case it is a problem with Gears of War not being programmed properly, not a problem with Xbox Live.
Well, regardless if the problem is problem with GeOW programming the lack of dedicated servers, the host has such a huge advantage that it makes the game unfair and less fun. Therefore, there is no way in hell that game deserves a 10. I hate looking like I'm bashing Gears (beacuse it is a quality and fun game), but it's not worthy of the accolades it gets from a gameplay perspective. Minus the amazing presentation, it's just a solid shooter with excellent co-op. (More than worthy of an 8.5 IMO). The online, as I said, is broken because of host advantage (unless you like just running around and getting shotgun kills by chance). If it wasn't for the host advantage, I'd enjoy the game so much more.
Thus, I guess we can agree GeOW is overrated.
Just because I love racing games, I say Motorstorm. The core of the game is spot on. It just needed more.
Edit: What the heck? Why are you people saying Bioshock? It was hyped AAA. It scored AAA. What do you want?
Oh god. :|Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
GameWiz1000
GeoW doesn't deserve anywhere near a 10. :|
Seriously once you take out the graphics its an ordinary FPS with nothing special. Are you saying that because of the graphics it will automatically boost the gameplay and everything to a 10. :lmao: Seriously GeoW is so overrated, its flashy at first and gives off a wow appeal but when you look passed that, less than 10 hours of gameplay? no need to use cover? seriously 9.0 yes not 10
[QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Oh god. :|Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
D1c3_GaM3
GeoW doesn't deserve anywhere near a 10. :|
Seriously once you take out the graphics its an ordinary FPS with nothing special.
then obviously you've never played it because GeoW is a third person shooter :|
[QUOTE="D1c3_GaM3"][QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Oh god. :|Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
mwa
GeoW doesn't deserve anywhere near a 10. :|
Seriously once you take out the graphics its an ordinary FPS with nothing special.
then obviously you've never played it because GeoW is a third person shooter :|
Sorry mistake, TPS. :/Deither way you can't deny what i said.
[QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Oh god. :|Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
D1c3_GaM3
GeoW doesn't deserve anywhere near a 10. :|
Seriously once you take out the graphics its an ordinary FPS with nothing special. Are you saying that because of the graphics it will automatically boost the gameplay and everything to a 10. :lmao: Seriously GeoW is so overrated, its flashy at first and gives off a wow appeal but when you look passed that, less than 10 hours of gameplay? no need to use cover? seriously 9.0 yes not 10
I was just kidding. :P It is overrated.
[QUOTE="D1c3_GaM3"][QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Oh god. :|Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
GameWiz1000
GeoW doesn't deserve anywhere near a 10. :|
Seriously once you take out the graphics its an ordinary FPS with nothing special. Are you saying that because of the graphics it will automatically boost the gameplay and everything to a 10. :lmao: Seriously GeoW is so overrated, its flashy at first and gives off a wow appeal but when you look passed that, less than 10 hours of gameplay? no need to use cover? seriously 9.0 yes not 10
I was just kidding. :P It is overrated.
Good, i was going to say. :lol:[QUOTE="GameWiz1000"]Gears of War. It deserved atleast a 10.
smooothe
I think GeOW was OVER rated. Take away the amazing graphics, and you just have a solid shooter with a forgettable story, average campaign length, and fairly linear gameplay. The co-op really shines though, and again, the presentation and graphics are top notch. However, the multiplayer is CRIPPLED due to the P2P nature of XBOX LIVE, and host advantage is way too prevalent.
I think GeOW should be rated at least an 8.0, but not quite a 9.
100% agreed. I'd personally rate it 8.5.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment