This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="platniumgamer"]
to be halo 4.
DISSESHOWEDO
Hi loosing/forzagear !!!
you really think i'm loosing/forzagears/etc? thanks, i guess.There's a GTA FPS mod.
Though of course, then it wouldn't be a 10,just 9 because PC has higher standards.
Perfect Dark almost had it
BPoole96
A quote from that review...
It's hard for Perfect Dark to appear as impressive today as GoldenEye 007 did when it first came out several years back, because GoldenEye 007 had looked like it would be just another first-person shooter for the console systems, which had seen mainly lackluster ports of PC shooters. However, the game was groundbreaking enough to influence nearly every shooter - console and PC - that succeeded it. Perfect Dark isn't a game that wows you immediately like its predecessor did - its improvements on that title are subtle, at least at first.
Gamespot
Oh how the times have changed :(
There was a time where the consoles got lackluster ports and it took a great, groundbreaking game like Goldeneye, to actually influence the PC. Now anything that sells well despite the quality influences everything. Even Halo is falling to what the higher selling shooters do. It's really sad.
Though also take the header from that review...
As a single-player or multiplayer FPS experience Perfect Dark is unparalleled on the console systems.Gamespot
See how they had to add in "on the console systems." That tells you everything you need to know about gaming standards.
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]Goldeneye was also close it had 9.8 on Gamespot. god damn do I miss Rare... :( Every Goldeneye released after Goldeney64 is better than Goldeneye 64, it was overhyped the game was not that good and I am talking when it came out, and the N64 controller didn't help. PD was better but both should have gotten lower scores. Didn't give to spits about console FPS until the PS2 and Xbox.[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
Perfect Dark almost had it
BPoole96
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
Perfect Dark almost had it
Wasdie
A quote from that review...
It's hard for Perfect Dark to appear as impressive today as GoldenEye 007 did when it first came out several years back, because GoldenEye 007 had looked like it would be just another first-person shooter for the console systems, which had seen mainly lackluster ports of PC shooters. However, the game was groundbreaking enough to influence nearly every shooter - console and PC - that succeeded it. Perfect Dark isn't a game that wows you immediately like its predecessor did - its improvements on that title are subtle, at least at first.
Gamespot
Oh how the times have changed :(
There was a time where the consoles got lackluster ports and it took a great, groundbreaking game like Goldeneye, to actually influence the PC. Now anything that sells well despite the quality influences everything. Even Halo is falling to what the higher selling shooters do. It's really sad.
Though also take the header from that review...
As a single-player or multiplayer FPS experience Perfect Dark is unparalleled on the console systems.Gamespot
See how they had to add in "on the console systems." That tells you everything you need to know about gaming standards.
I did notice how GS tagged the "on a cosole" part at the end. GS used to segregate console and PC quite a bit. They even had two different GOTY awards back in the 90s.
It is quite a shame that CoD4 is pretty much undeniably the most "groundbreaking" game this gen since it has influenced not only other FPS games, but several other genres.
[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]Goldeneye was also close it had 9.8 on Gamespot.StatusShufflegod damn do I miss Rare... :( Every Goldeneye released after Goldeney64 is better than Goldeneye 64, it was overhyped the game was not that good and I am talking when it came out, and the N64 controller didn't help. PD was better but both should have gotten lower scores. Didn't give to spits about console FPS until the PS2 and Xbox. I played both GoldenEye 64 and Perfect Dark back when they released and there was nothing like them on Consoles at the time. The only other console FPS that had the impact of those 2 games back then was Halo CE.
I think Goldeneye on the Nintendo 64 would have gotten 10 instead of a 9.8 if it was reviewed today, back then Gamespot rated games by 0.1's out of ten, but now Gamespot rates games by 0.5's out of ten.
STALKER SOC is perfect 10 in my book. STALKER sum up how to make FPS and how all FPS should have been. sadly due to corrupt mainstream media it was overshadow by big overhype game. like COD or bioshock.SNIPER4321luckily we don't go by your book.
[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]
[QUOTE="platniumgamer"]
to be halo 4.
platniumgamer
Hi loosing/forzagear !!!
you really think i'm loosing/forzagears/etc? thanks, i guess.Change your sig please so it says: loosingENDS, Forzagearsface, ProjectNatalfan and platinum gamer :P
you really think i'm loosing/forzagears/etc? thanks, i guess.[QUOTE="platniumgamer"]
[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]
Hi loosing/forzagear !!!
R4gn4r0k
Change your sig please so it says: loosingENDS, Forzagearsface, ProjectNatalfan and platinum gamer :P
I will gladly photoshop you in there, ragnarok :)you really think i'm loosing/forzagears/etc? thanks, i guess.[QUOTE="platniumgamer"]
[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]
Hi loosing/forzagear !!!
R4gn4r0k
Change your sig please so it says: loosingENDS, Forzagearsface, ProjectNatalfan and platinum gamer :P
just ask if you wanna be in the picture.Borderlands was 10/10 as far as I'm concerned, I mean it did everything right including co-op.
I'd also give Half-Life 2 a 10/10 easily.
Rage was about a 9/10
Doom3 about a 9/10
Halo Reach was excellent. I can see an argument for 10/10
Also Killzone 2
To not be a FPS.
GD1551
This, I mean in this day and age it's just not enough to be a first-person shooter, you need RPG elements, some driving, etc.
It's hard to say "All you do is shoot people" and give it a 10/10.
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]I will gladly photoshop you in there, ragnarok :)R4gn4r0k
just ask if you wanna be in the picture.platniumgamer
Sure hehe, what's it mean to be a bacon brother ?
Bacon... bacon never changes.You lost me at Killzone 2.Borderlands was 10/10 as far as I'm concerned, I mean it did everything right including co-op.
I'd also give Half-Life 2 a 10/10 easily.
Rage was about a 9/10
Doom3 about a 9/10
Halo Reach was excellent. I can see an argument for 10/10
Also Killzone 2
ZombieKiller7
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]I will gladly photoshop you in there, ragnarok :)R4gn4r0k
just ask if you wanna be in the picture.platniumgamer
Sure hehe, what's it mean to be a bacon brother ?
loyalty, respect, and love. never disrespect the bacon or your brothers.we gotta get you baptised in bacon grease, and you will be a bacon bro.... forever.
You are now a bacon brother, r4gn4rok, you must obey the bacon (aka no one) and post bacon when necessary (random threads).
Looks a bt unnatural :P
parkurtommo
Haha, it's getting a bit crowdy :P
loyalty, respect, and love. never disrespect the bacon or your brothers.
we gotta get you baptised in bacon grease, and you will be a bacon bro.... forever.
platniumgamer
Sounds dirty
...
I'm in !:D
Not really the bacon fad wear off after one page and then you go and take over someone elses.Sorry TC, this thread now belongs to us, resistance is useless.
parkurtommo
[QUOTE="GD1551"]
To not be a FPS.
ZombieKiller7
This, I mean in this day and age it's just not enough to be a first-person shooter, you need RPG elements, some driving, etc.
It's hard to say "All you do is shoot people" and give it a 10/10.
You forgot all about those 9.0's ACTI paid GS to post. If they just paid them a bit more.[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]Not really the bacon fad wear off after one page and then you go and take over someone elses. That sounds fair.Sorry TC, this thread now belongs to us, resistance is useless.
StatusShuffle
another thread derailed by parkurt and thread turn into another bacon spam thread. we cant discuss about FPS now...SNIPER4321let's be honest... all you were going to do was praise stalker and metro or any PC game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment