What does Killzone 3 do multiplayer wise that other shooters haven't?

From the video I watchedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw0szy_EPEw

It looks like Call of Duty with awesome graphics.

I know this is the alpha version, but what does it offer that is new.

From the video I watchedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw0szy_EPEw

It looks like Call of Duty with awesome graphics.

I know this is the alpha version, but what does it offer that is new.

From the video I watchedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw0szy_EPEw

It looks like Call of Duty with awesome graphics.

I know this is the alpha version, but what does it offer that is new.

StarFire571

'the Warzone' is original in itself

all game modes interchange seamlessly without loads screens or stoppage of play.

it really creates the feeling of WAR with a moving battle across the map.

Also the feel of the guns...really makes the game stand out. You don't feel like your gun is a cardboard cutout like on COD. It has real kick back. The recoil is vastly different from any fps game I've played.

Your movement also isn't like you are on skates...KZ3 seems a little faster but it still seems to have that weighty feel with movement. Your character feels like he is actually on the ground with gravity.

its just different. I suggest you wait to try KZ3 to judge..its only 4 months away.

I think the Melee's are unique too. No other FPS game I know has context sensitive Melee's in FP view. (I could be wrong on that one though)

What new does Call of Duty offer? Yet it's still fun. Crazy how this world works.UCF_Knight

Not saying it wont be fun, it looks fun, but nothing revolutinary.

Cod is kind of the "new thing" which is why so many devs copy off it.

''Warzone plays out through dynamic matches where multiple game types are played in a single round''

operation a story based objective mode

first person cover

recoil

being cool/badass

in a killzone 2 its different story wise because you are the aggressor

weighted controls

motion support

rico:P

a shooter is a shooter is a shooter..nothing new just looks good and probably fun as any other shooter. Hope it sells well. Looks good.

''Warzone plays out through dynamic matches where multiple game types are played in a single round''

operation a story based objective mode

first person cover

recoil

being cool/badass

in a killzone 2 its different story wise because you are the aggressor

Vader993

[QUOTE="Vader993"]

''Warzone plays out through dynamic matches where multiple game types are played in a single round''

operation a story based objective mode

first person cover

recoil

being cool/badass

in a killzone 2 its different story wise because you are the aggressor

Impress3

in killzone 3 its being retweak,and you can run to cover

I like the Warzone, though I think MAG does it better with the multiple objectives happening at the same time. I guess the larger scale requires it though.

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]What new does Call of Duty offer? Yet it's still fun. Crazy how this world works.StarFire571

Not saying it wont be fun, it looks fun, but nothing revolutinary.

Cod is kind of the "new thing" which is why so many devs copy off it.

The key to making a good FPS isn't doing new things, it's doing things well.

The key to making a good FPS isn't doing new things, it's doing things well.

kussese

This is exactly right. It does classes pretty well and that is something a lot of games can't get right.

Going by 2, since have not played 3...

Warzone. Other shooters may have had switching objective games, but Kz2 mad it the main thing and actually made it run smoothly.

Having victory after a hard fought 1 hour + game is euphoric.

[QUOTE="kussese"]

The key to making a good FPS isn't doing new things, it's doing things well.

15strong

This is exactly right. It does classes pretty well and that is something a lot of games can't get right.

I felt Killzone 2 could have used better class uniqueness, but I guess that's why they lowered the number to 5 in KZ3. It just seemed to lack the whole "different experience" for every class like games such as TF2 and BC have done, although the last 3 classes felt pretty unique. Otherwise Engineer, Medic, Tech and the like just felt like a soldier with perks and less weapons to me. It probably wasn't the best choice to have a class with most of the weapons(Soldier), because it took away from the others.

Helghast... I'm pretty sure no other game has them.

Do I win something now??

Helghast... I'm pretty sure no other game has them.

Do I win something now??

GreenGoblin2099

No sir, you get nothing.

[QUOTE="kussese"]

The key to making a good FPS isn't doing new things, it's doing things well.

15strong

This is exactly right. It does classes pretty well and that is something a lot of games can't get right.

well, abilities (not perks) Warzone (changes 'game modes/objectives' on the fly) Mechs jetpacks (Vertical Combat type maps) (reach does this too i think?) Classes an actual Clan System unlike how cod does it (put tag on...ur in a clag.. TADA!!)campzor

I was just about to mention the clan system. The clan wagering was cool too.

well, abilities (not perks) Warzone (changes 'game modes/objectives' on the fly) Mechs jetpacks (Vertical Combat type maps) (reach does this too i think?) Classes an actual Clan System unlike how cod does it (put tag on...ur in a clag.. TADA!!)campzor

He said other shooters, not just CoD.