What exactly is it and whats so special about it? I always hear people talking about it.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Me neither. Why doesnt everyone just use a 386 processor. It'd be a lot cheaper.I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Canindian_Boy
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Canindian_Boy
It's irregular and is capable of doing insane calculations. Which means that it's A) Worthless for gaming... or B) has this legendary untapped potential.
It has 7 parallel processors and a controlling unit. They're clocked really high and they're very fast. The Xbox 360 by comparison has 3 general purpose processor cores and the Wii has 1.I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Canindian_Boy
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Canindian_Boy
Here you go.
[QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
organic_machine
It's irregular and is capable of doing insane calculations. Which means that it's A) Worthless for gaming... or B) has this legendary untapped potential.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/helicopter-gameplay-uncharted-2/57340
Orly.....
False dichotomy. I choose answer C) it melts faces when in capable developers' hands.
False dichotomy. I choose answer C) it melts faces when in capable developers' hands.
Brownesque
On paper. The reality is that most graphics engines are heavily GPU-centric. So, in reality, Sony would have been much better off either investing all that money into a insane GPU or at least into giving the console a crapload of more ram.
[QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
MetroidPrimePwn
Here you go.
Dude that that was cool but it still doesn't explain whats so special about it. I mean if you look at PS3 and 360 in terms of graphics and physics, the ps3 is honestly not much better.. Killzone, MGS4, Uncharted are really the only games I see that have a noticeable difference.
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]
False dichotomy. I choose answer C) it melts faces when in capable developers' hands.
organic_machine
On paper. The reality is that most graphics engines are heavily GPU-centric. So, in reality, Sony would have been much better off either investing all that money into a insane GPU or at least into giving the console a crapload of more ram.
No, in reality, you get Uncharted 2. Go figure. Looks like you should go back to the drawing board, bro.A movie directed by Tarsem Singh starring Jennifer Lopez, Vincent D'Onofrio and Vince Vaughn.
"Catharine Deane is a psychotherapist who is part of a revolutionary new treatment which allows her mind to literally enter the mind of her patients. Her experience in this method takes an unexpected turn when an FBI agent comes to ask for a desperate favour. They had just tracked down a notorious serial killer, Carl Stargher, whose MO is to abduct women one at a time and place them in a secret area where they are kept for about 40 hours until they are slowly drowned. Unfortunately, the killer has fallen into an irreversible coma which means he cannot confess where he has taken his latest victim before she dies. Now, Catherine Deane must race against time to explore the twisted mind of the killer to get the information she needs, but Stargher's damaged personality poses dangers that threaten to overwhelm her"
Thanks!
No, in reality, you get Uncharted 2. Go figure. Looks like you should go back to the drawing board, bro.Brownesque
How big are the levels in Uncharted 2? Not very. Especially in comparison to some PC games like Stalker or Crysis. The Cell mught be great, but with almost no ram and a mediocre GPU, the only way to accomplish U2 level graphics is to make the worlds small and static.
[QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]
[QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Canindian_Boy
Here you go.
Dude that that was cool but it still doesn't explain whats so special about it. I mean if you look at PS3 and 360 in terms of graphics and physics, the ps3 is honestly not much better.. Killzone, MGS4, Uncharted are really the only games I see that have a noticeable difference.
Oh, I see. Your problem is not that you don't understand what the Cell processor is, your problem is that you've been fed a lot of propaganda on it and you can't square that with reality. Most games don't utilize most of the processor cores in the Cell processor (of which there are 7 versus 3 in the 360 and 1 in the Wii). You may have a game using one processor core or another game using only a couple, 2-3 if you're lucky. The problem is that only some developers know how to get all the processors to work efficiently and thus you get a lot of crappy games that don't run as well as other systems despite the system itself having more processing power.Dude that that was cool but it still doesn't explain whats so special about it. I mean if you look at PS3 and 360 in terms of graphics and physics, the ps3 is honestly not much better.. Killzone, MGS4, Uncharted are really the only games I see that have a noticeable difference.
Canindian_Boy
It's apparently really good at handling floating point calculations.
I have no idea what that means at all, but it sounds really badass.
(as far as computer stuff goes)
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]No, in reality, you get Uncharted 2. Go figure. Looks like you should go back to the drawing board, bro.organic_machine
How big are the levels in Uncharted 2? Not very. Especially in comparison to some PC games like Stalker or Crysis. The Cell mught be great, but with almost no ram and a mediocre GPU, the only way to accomplish U2 level graphics is to make the worlds small and static.
Show me a single game on any other system with the same draw distances and geometry complexity of the footage I just linked you to of Uncharted 2. Oh and stop blowing smoke up my ass.[QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]It has 7 parallel processors and a controlling unit. They're clocked really high and they're very fast. The Xbox 360 by comparison has 3 general purpose processor cores and the Wii has 1.I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
Brownesque
You do know that each core in the xbox processor also is dual threaded, right?
Also on a side note, the seven spes in the cell processor are more like gimped cores, they are not real cores. The clocking is the same for both processors.
In theory the cell would give a slight advantage in CPU heavy calculations.
It has 7 parallel processors and a controlling unit. They're clocked really high and they're very fast. The Xbox 360 by comparison has 3 general purpose processor cores and the Wii has 1.[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
fireballonfire
You do know that each core in the xbox processor also is dual threaded, right?
Also on a side note, the seven spes in the cell processor are more like gimped cores, they are not real cores. The clocking is the same for both processors.
In theory the cell would give a slight advantage in CPU heavy calculations.
Does that mean that Xenon is 19.2GHz while Cell is 22.4GHz?
No one can be told what the Cell is. You have to see it for yourself.Cherokee_Jack
Hold on I'm gonna get my hammer...
It has 7 parallel processors and a controlling unit. They're clocked really high and they're very fast. The Xbox 360 by comparison has 3 general purpose processor cores and the Wii has 1.[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"]
I do and I understand its a processor but I'm not so sure whats so special about it.
fireballonfire
You do know that each core in the xbox processor also is dual threaded, right?
Also on a side note, the seven spes in the cell processor are more like gimped cores. The clocking is the same for both processors.
In theory the cell would give a slight advantage in CPU heavy calculations.
All dual-threading means is that they can perform two simultaneous operations if I understand it properly. It doesn't make it faster, it just makes it more efficient. If you have a processor idling or not utilizing all of its resources it can dedicate another thread to another application. "The clocking is the same for both processors." For each individual core, yes. And the Cell processor has 7 of those cores whereas the Xenon has 3 of those cores. But somehow dual threading makes Xbox 360's CPU superior? "In theory the cell would give a slight advantage in CPU heavy calculations." No, in theory the Cell processor carries substantially more processing power and this isn't just entirely theoretical this is demonstrable. The issue is getting the code fed to all those processor cores to get them working simultaneously. As far as any efficiency issues with the CPU itself....I'm not sure what those are but I'm sure they exist, but I don't think they'd be to the point where you could tell me the Cell processor is gimped. "Also on a side note, the seven spes in the cell processor are more like gimped cores. " Huh? No....they're just not general purpose processing cores like the Xbox 360's Xenon. You might as well say a GPU is gimped because it's not general purpose. In reality, a GPU is fast as ***k but it isn't as utilitarian as a GPU due to its inability to chew on general purpose code. The Cell processor is the same way.Show me a single game on any other system with the same draw distances and geometry complexity of the footage I just linked you to of Uncharted 2. Oh and stop blowing smoke up my ass.Brownesque
What are you talking about? The attention to detail in Uncharted 2's enviornments are pretty much unsurpassed, but from a technical standpoint Uncharted 2 is not impressive. This should be common knowledge. And for the record, I am sure the cell is capable of great things. But few developers take advantage of it. And, frankly, I don't give a **** about how nice the graphics are and the attention to detail in worlds. How about some believable AI? How about some good physics? Those things should be much more common with a processor like the cell.
[QUOTE="fireballonfire"]
[QUOTE="Brownesque"] It has 7 parallel processors and a controlling unit. They're clocked really high and they're very fast. The Xbox 360 by comparison has 3 general purpose processor cores and the Wii has 1.Frank2368
You do know that each core in the xbox processor also is dual threaded, right?
Also on a side note, the seven spes in the cell processor are more like gimped cores, they are not real cores. The clocking is the same for both processors.
In theory the cell would give a slight advantage in CPU heavy calculations.
Does that mean that Xenon is 19.2GHz while Cell is 22.4GHz?
LoL, no, the processor speed of each core basically determines how many processing cycles the core will have per second. Dual threading allows each processing core to process two different things simultaneously. It doesn't affect the processor speed, it simply allows it to increase its efficiency.What exactly is it and whats so special about it? I always hear people talking about it.
Canindian_Boy
using google doesnt hurt.
anyway Cell is:
Cell is the ultimate creation of Doctor Gero. He is an artificial life form created using the cells of several characters from the series, including Goku, Piccolo and Frieza. As a result, Cell is able to perform techniques such as the Kamehameha, a powerful energy blast which he gains from the cells of Goku.[7] In creating the character of Cell, Toriyama tried many different designs before finally settling on the one used in the series. Cell evolves several times throughout his appearances. He originally evolves from a cocoon-like form into his first "Imperfect Form", which is insect-like in appearance. Both his first form and his second "Semi-Perfect Form" have a long tail that ends in a stinger-like appendage and allows it to absorb other organisms.[8] The tail recedes under his wings in his final "Perfect Form", and he can use it to spawn Cell Jr. (セルジュニア Seru Junia?)s, minuscule child-like versions of himself.
What are you talking about? The attention to detail in Uncharted 2's enviornments are pretty much unsurpassed, but from a technical standpoint Uncharted 2 is not impressive.
organic_machine
You forgot to tell me why its not impressive.
This should be common knowledge.
organic_machine
I can tell you why it's not common knowledge, beginning with why you haven't supported a single one of your assertions. I'd like to see a single game with the draw distance and geometry complexity of Uncharted 2 on another platform, if you would be so kind. Also, draw distance and geometry complexity does not refer to detail, it refers to draw distance and geometry complexity. I think you're thinking of textures. Yes, Uncharted 2 has very detailed textures, I'm glad you've admitted that and I'll add it to the list of things Uncharted 2 does very well along with geometry complexity and draw distances.
Do you have a game with the level of detail of Uncharted 2 and the draw distances and geometry complexity? If so, show me. If not, stop blowing smoke up my ass.
And for the record, I am sure the cell is capable of great things. But few developers take advantage of it. And, frankly, I don't give a **** about how nice the graphics are and the attention to detail in worlds. How about some believable AI? How about some good physics? Those things should be much more common with a processor like the cell.
organic_machine
That's an issue with the developers and the things they're seeking to maximize. Why don't you take that up with them? I can't go grab them by the throat and say "organic machine on system wars says you should maximize the processor load allocation with AI and physics in your game engines."
...Seriously? Yeah, thats why my Xbox is still working...PS3s' 7 core processor running at 3.2GHZ opposed to X360s' less-powerful-but-still-better-than-Wii's-CPU 3 core running at 3.2GHz
X360s' CPU works more easily than PS3s' though
Frank2368
...Seriously? Yeah, thats why my Xbox is still working... Your Xbox 360 not working has more to do with heat generation and distribution than processing power. I.E. your Xbox 360, while thinking really hard, got really hot and your Xbox 360 circulated the air somewhat but it just ended up melting your components.[QUOTE="Frank2368"]
PS3s' 7 core processor running at 3.2GHZ opposed to X360s' less-powerful-but-still-better-than-Wii's-CPU 3 core running at 3.2GHz
X360s' CPU works more easily than PS3s' though
ZackerThe3rd
[QUOTE="Canindian_Boy"][QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]
Here you go.
Brownesque
Dude that that was cool but it still doesn't explain whats so special about it. I mean if you look at PS3 and 360 in terms of graphics and physics, the ps3 is honestly not much better.. Killzone, MGS4, Uncharted are really the only games I see that have a noticeable difference.
Oh, I see. Your problem is not that you don't understand what the Cell processor is, your problem is that you've been fed a lot of propaganda on it and you can't square that with reality. Most games don't utilize most of the processor cores in the Cell processor (of which there are 7 versus 3 in the 360 and 1 in the Wii). You may have a game using one processor core or another game using only a couple, 2-3 if you're lucky. The problem is that only some developers know how to get all the processors to work efficiently and thus you get a lot of crappy games that don't run as well as other systems despite the system itself having more processing power.Ohh I see, thanks.
Uncharted 2 ABUSES any other console game in terms of Graphics. But you don't want to take my word for it so play if for yourself and you'll see. Nothing compares except maybe a handfull of PC games.BrutalAdonisOr, you know, a LOT of PC games.
[QUOTE="BrutalAdonis"]Uncharted 2 ABUSES any other console game in terms of Graphics. But you don't want to take my word for it so play if for yourself and you'll see. Nothing compares except maybe a handfull of PC games.Cherokee_JackOr, you know, a LOT of PC games. Yeah like Crysis, and um er... Fact is just comparing teh cell to infinitely upgradable PC specs is a compliment to teh cell and not the PC.
Do you have a game with the level of detail of Uncharted 2 and the draw distances and geometry complexity? If so, show me. If not, stop blowing smoke up my ass.
Brownesque
Well, Uncharted 2 does have great draw distances and complex geometry. No question. But this is not a discussion on Uncharted 2, but the cell. How much of that geometry is physically manipulatable? Is any of it? For that kind of quality, sacrifices need to be made. The PS3 desperately needs more RAM and a better GPU. And no matter how nice the cell is, with more RAM and a better GPU I really think you'd have not only graphically better games, but more interactive enviornments as well. Uncharted 2's enviornemtns aren't very interactive. And you ask for that game, and I give you Crysis. Now before you troll, let me say that it renders hudreds of trees on screen at once, and each tree (minus a few big ones) and all physcial objects can be interacted with, whether up close or from the farthest point on the map. That may be possible to do with the cell, but it most certainly impossible to do with even 516 mb of RAM.
That's an issue with the developers and the things they're seeking to maximize. Why don't you take that up with them? I can't go grab them by the throat and say "organic machine on system wars says you should maximize the processor load allocation with AI and physics in your game engines."
Brownesque
Christ, dude. What's your problem? My whole point is that the cell is a watse of investment because developers usually WON'T take advantage of a good CPU. And guess what? They don't. Sure, we've got the gorgeous, cramped, and static Uncharted 2. Whooptie-****ing-do. That's one game. What about the multiplats? No. A majority of the exclusives? Well, they've got some great looking ones, but again, no huge leap in terms of technical prowess than other games.
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="BrutalAdonis"]Uncharted 2 ABUSES any other console game in terms of Graphics. But you don't want to take my word for it so play if for yourself and you'll see. Nothing compares except maybe a handfull of PC games.BrutalAdonisOr, you know, a LOT of PC games. Yeah like Crysis, and um er... I'll help you out: Stalker, Stalker: Clear Sky, ARMA 2, Empire: Total War, World in Conflict, Cryostasis, numerous multiplats, etc. etc.
[QUOTE="BrutalAdonis"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] Or, you know, a LOT of PC games.Cherokee_JackYeah like Crysis, and um er... I'll help you out: Stalker, Stalker: Clear Sky, ARMA 2, Empire: Total War, World in Conflict, Cryostasis, numerous multiplats, etc. etc.
Out of those ones only WiC and ETW are better... and maybe CoH because they're RTS
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment