GI magazine gave it a 9.75, but their scores are usually higher than GS's. I'd still say 9.5 here, but you don't know just how a review is going to turn out here.
GI magazine gave it a 9.75, but their scores are usually higher than GS's. I'd still say 9.5 here, but you don't know just how a review is going to turn out here.Mordred19
You must be speaking about Mass Effect, dude. Too Human hadn't been reviewed yet since it is out next year.
I say AAA even possibly a 9.5 on Gamespot. I have great faith in Silicon Knights. On Gamerankings it will be around 9,2 when most sites have said their piece..
[QUOTE="Mordred19"]GI magazine gave it a 9.75, but their scores are usually higher than GS's. I'd still say 9.5 here, but you don't know just how a review is going to turn out here.A_zombie
You must be speaking about Mass Effect, dude. Too Human hadn't been reviewed yet since it is out next year.
I'll have to say 7.5
"blinks" oh, it does say too human on the title. My mistake. For some reason I always confuse the names at first glance. :P
I have come to expect one certainty from Gamespot:
No matter how good a game looks, it does not guarantee AAA status. That said, a game could not be that graphically impressive here and still score high marks. Case in point, Halo 3.
I don't know what to expect from Too Human. It went through lots of development problems. But Silicon Knights is a decent developer, so.....we'll see. I'm not expecting much though.
8.0, but its a little early i mean the entire game hasn't been shown and certain things havent been spelled out(like how exactly does the co-op work, online-offline, how are character creation going to be worked out, how long is the game?, etc... ) i could see it getting a 9.0 if it answers some of those questions in a good way.
3-d diablo-like online co-op? i'm definitely picking this game up. i'm guessing 8-8.5 if silicon knights can get through the muck they've been wading through lately with too human and this epic games lawsuit.
Log in to comment