What sort of consequences will the next gen consoles have on PC hardware?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for flashn00b
flashn00b

3961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 flashn00b
Member since 2006 • 3961 Posts

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#2 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts
I see pre-built PCs becoming more popular if they can hit the price point of next-gen consoles.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

probably just continue on like it does now

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

flashn00b

 

PC hardware prices are based on costs of production, with the allowance of a profit margin necessary for any business to stay afloat. They're not gonna get cheaper just because some console with low to mid range components from 2011 comes along. :roll:

Avatar image for biggles2120
biggles2120

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 biggles2120
Member since 2005 • 44 Posts

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

flashn00b
All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.
Avatar image for Alpha_S_
Alpha_S_

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Alpha_S_
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts

Like any new console generation it provides an incentive to upgrade now that games coming out will take advantage of the better hardware since consoles tend to play the role of lowest common denominator.  Aside from that there's not going to be any huge changes - you'll continue to see hardware manufacturers off a range of products at various prices and as usual you get what you pay for. 

It doesn't take much to be able to put together a machine now that can equal or beat the next gen consoles...and in two years from now when you have much better GPUs, new Intel processors and DDR4 ram it will once again far exceed the consoles.

Avatar image for Guy_Brohski
Guy_Brohski

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Guy_Brohski
Member since 2013 • 2221 Posts

Well when graphics continue to evolve at a snail's pace, the hermits will all blame next gen consoles for it like always. They won't be happier playing a couple settings above next gen consoles, they want photo realism "right nao".

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
I bet we will see an influx of these mini APU systems.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

probably just continue on like it does now

lostrib

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

I think we'll get more of the same.

PCs have improved to the point where high end is superior to nextgen consoles, before they even lauch, this time.

If Moore's law keeps up, the gap will be even wider this gen.

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts
[QUOTE="flashn00b"]

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

biggles2120
All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.

Lmao no
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="biggles2120"][QUOTE="flashn00b"]

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

m3Boarder32
All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.

Lmao no

Oi you TV boy. Best quality TV for £400. I don't care about type, it just has to be good.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="biggles2120"][QUOTE="flashn00b"]

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

m3Boarder32

All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.

Lmao no

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="biggles2120"] All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.Kinthalis

Lmao no

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

where do you install the games on the 7850?

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Lmao nolostrib

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

where do you install the games on the 7850?

 

Strawman. He refuted Giovela validly. 

 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

Jankarcop

where do you install the games on the 7850?

 

Strawman. He refuted Giovela validly. 

 

No he didn't. simply having a 7850 won't beat the PS4, nor is it even proven that it will

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

where do you install the games on the 7850?

lostrib

 

Strawman. He refuted Giovela validly. 

 

No he didn't. simply having a 7850 won't beat the PS4, nor is it even proven that it will

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
CrownKingArthur

5262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 CrownKingArthur
Member since 2013 • 5262 Posts

[QUOTE="flashn00b"]

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

biggles2120

All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.

biggles is right. check my sig. 

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

 

Strawman. He refuted Giovela validly. 

 

Mazoch

No he didn't. simply having a 7850 won't beat the PS4, nor is it even proven that it will

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

No he didn't. simply having a 7850 won't beat the PS4, nor is it even proven that it will

princeofshapeir

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

Kinthalis

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

Yet the sales of prebuilt desktops continue to drop while laptops are increasingly becoming the norm. Therefore I have no reason to believe that the majority of people own a prebuilt desktop that is capable of running PS4-quality games if only they had an adequate graphics card.
Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

No he didn't. simply having a 7850 won't beat the PS4, nor is it even proven that it will

princeofshapeir

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

princeofshapeir

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

Yet the sales of prebuilt desktops continue to drop while laptops are increasingly becoming the norm. Therefore I have no reason to believe that the majority of people own a prebuilt desktop that is capable of running PS4-quality games if only they had an adequate graphics card.

 

Yeah, they continute to fall (the overal global market that is - not the PC gmaing makret. PC gmaing hardware continues to GROW).  Do you know by how much? And do you know how many desktops STILL get moved ina  single quarter?

 

In case you odn't fele like googling it: It's more in 1 quarter than ALL SALES OF ANY CONSOLE COMBINED FOR THE PAST ENTIRE GENERATION.

 

So yeah, MOST people in the world do indeed own a desktop.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="biggles2120"] All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.Kinthalis

Lmao no

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

 

Or they could just spend $60 more and get a 7950, which destroys the PS4/XB1. Hell, you could even get a 7970--it's still cheaper than buying a PS4 or XB1, and so long as you have a remotely decent CPU, you should be good for the next 3 years at least. 

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

Mazoch

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.

Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4?
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#26 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

Kinthalis

Yet the sales of prebuilt desktops continue to drop while laptops are increasingly becoming the norm. Therefore I have no reason to believe that the majority of people own a prebuilt desktop that is capable of running PS4-quality games if only they had an adequate graphics card.

 

Yeah, they continute to fall (the overal global market that is - not the PC gmaing makret. PC gmaing hardware continues to GROW).  Do you know by how much? And do you know how many desktops STILL get moved ina  single quarter?

 

In case you odn't fele like googling it: It's more in 1 quarter than ALL SALES OF ANY CONSOLE COMBINED FOR THE PAST ENTIRE GENERATION.

 

So yeah, MOST people in the world do indeed own a desktop.

We'd still need to know what the average specs are for prebuilts that consumers buy. Ignoring the GPU I don't think they're superior to a PS4
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

princeofshapeir

I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.

Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4?

 

The Core 2 Duo will perform better than the PS4 CPU, yes. The RAM is a bit lacking. But RAM is cheap. You can easily upgrade it with pocket change.

Assuming Ubisoft does it's job well, then I would estimate similar performance to a PS4.

The main win would really be that on PC you ahve options and on console, you do not.

On the Ps4, you CANNOT play BF4 at 1080p. No matter how much you might want to. But maybe you care more about 1080p than 60 FPS. Maybe you cna live with 50 FPS? Or maybe oyu can live wiht lightly less realistic shadows? IT's entirely up to you. On the PC you COULD have a 1080p/60 FPS experience with that hardware at slightly lower graphical settings, or heck, you might entirley the other way, and play at 30 FPS 1080p, with better grpahics settings. Again, entirely up to YOUR preference.

 

Ultimatley that is the strength of PC gaming. The options. You have the option to buy cheap and enjoy thousands of top scoring games from years ago up to indies of today. You cna go high end and play games at resolutions and graphics levels that console gamers NEVER get to see. You can balance those two extremes. You cna buy digital or you cna buy retail, you can use a mouse and keyboard or an xbox 360 gamepad, or a wheel, or a Ps3/PS4 gamepad, or a wii-mote, or a kinect! You can play a game at a specific resoltuion and performance, or at a particular graphics level. You can play a deep strategy game with complex mechanics that reward you only after extensive trial and error, or a simple 2D platformer. 

Options are what make PC gaming great.

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Yet the sales of prebuilt desktops continue to drop while laptops are increasingly becoming the norm. Therefore I have no reason to believe that the majority of people own a prebuilt desktop that is capable of running PS4-quality games if only they had an adequate graphics card. princeofshapeir

 

Yeah, they continute to fall (the overal global market that is - not the PC gmaing makret. PC gmaing hardware continues to GROW).  Do you know by how much? And do you know how many desktops STILL get moved ina  single quarter?

 

In case you odn't fele like googling it: It's more in 1 quarter than ALL SALES OF ANY CONSOLE COMBINED FOR THE PAST ENTIRE GENERATION.

 

So yeah, MOST people in the world do indeed own a desktop.

We'd still need to know what the average specs are for prebuilts that consumers buy. Ignoring the GPU I don't think they're superior to a PS4

 

The PS4 CPU is tablet grade. not garbage for heavily multi-threaded applicaitons - but there are FEW such applicaitons in gaming today, AND it IS garbage for single-threaded applicaitons/workloads.

Any PC CPU form the past 5years will match or beat it.

Avatar image for iHarlequin
iHarlequin

1928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 iHarlequin
Member since 2011 • 1928 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

The meaning was clear. Faulting him for not explicitly stating that a video card on its own wont play a game is just as foolish as faulting someone to talk about the capacity of the PS4 without explicitly stating that you need a TV or a monitor to be able to play games on it.

Kinthalis

You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

 

I HIGHLY doubt even a third of the planet's population has desktops. :lol:

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

princeofshapeir

I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.

Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4?

You'd have to ask the person posting the claim in the first place. My point was simply that the menaing of the post was clear. Wether the claim made in the post is accurate is another matter. I dont have a PS4 or a 7850 or a copy of Watchdogs so I dont know how it'll run :P

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

iHarlequin

MOST people on the planet already have desktops. MOST people on the planet DO NOT have a PS4. Therefore, for MOST PEOPLE on the planet, a sub $200 GPU will do them right.

Also, please let me know the moment my PS4 can run Photoshop, Premier, Visual Studio 2013, can be used to record my various isntruments, run excel and power point, play my new favorite browser game - CardHunter (seriously, check it out, it's awesome!) and can rip my blu-rays too. I assume it will be able to do that for $399 as well, right?

 

I HIGHLY doubt even a third of the planet's population has desktops. :lol:

 

Yeah, you're right, I'm msotly talking about the devloped world. But that doesn't change the ratio of like a billion to 1 in terms of dekstops out there vs consoles out there.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

 

Yeah, they continute to fall (the overal global market that is - not the PC gmaing makret. PC gmaing hardware continues to GROW).  Do you know by how much? And do you know how many desktops STILL get moved ina  single quarter?

 

In case you odn't fele like googling it: It's more in 1 quarter than ALL SALES OF ANY CONSOLE COMBINED FOR THE PAST ENTIRE GENERATION.

 

So yeah, MOST people in the world do indeed own a desktop.

Kinthalis

We'd still need to know what the average specs are for prebuilts that consumers buy. Ignoring the GPU I don't think they're superior to a PS4

 

The PS4 CPU is tablet grade. not garbage for heavily multi-threaded applicaitons - but there are FEW such applicaitons in gaming today, AND it IS garbage for single-threaded applicaitons/workloads.

Any PC CPU form the past 5years will match or beat it.

 

Even with heavily threaded games, single core performance is still very important as the main thread will still do a considerable amount of the work, while more extraneous elements will be delegated to the other threads. 

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Well, I think PC hardware will change, but not because of consoles specifically. 

 

The general consumer wants more features for less money, and in smaller packages too.

 

If the consoles didn't exist AMD would still be making APUs, and I think that's where the future is headed even for gaming PCs. Soon we'll get mini-PCs that are gaming-ready for just a few hundred dollars.

 

Personally would love to see pocket-sized micro-PCs that can "dock" into different monitors, and such. Would love to see a Micro PC that I could dock into the back of a laptop-like device for portablePCing, and when I come home I can remove it and dock it into a big-screen TV for some mediaPCing, and then remove it and dock it into my monitor for some gamingPCing.

 

Sounds glorious 3545895097.gif

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts
[QUOTE="Mazoch"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You are missing the point. You can't tell me that a GPU alone will do what a $399 PS4 can. When you equate a graphics card alone to a PS4 that's what you're saying: that a graphics card, a raw graphics card with nothing else attached, will deliver the experience of a packaged console.

Just to get a working configuration to play PC games you'd need a motherboard, RAM, CPU, hard drive, PSU, and then a video card.

princeofshapeir
I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.

Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4?

Except PS4 exclusive games will have performance similar to PC hardware that is twice as strong as PS4. Due to focus on single spec according to Carmack
Avatar image for TheFadeForever
TheFadeForever

2655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 TheFadeForever
Member since 2013 • 2655 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Mazoch"] I'm not missing the point at all. You also cant tell me that a PS4 would outperform a PS3 without a TV, yet the meaning is clear if people talks about the PS4 having better graphics than the PS3. Given the post and the context of the thread the meaning was clear. Just to get a working PS4 you need a working wall socket, an HDMI cable, speakers, a TV, a power cable for the TV and working eyes in your head. So talking about playing games on the PS4 would misleading without also mentioning all the other required pieces needed to use a PS4 In other words, his meaning was clear: A PC using a 7850 GPU can out perform a PS4.m3Boarder32
Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4?

Except PS4 exclusive games will have performance similar to PC hardware that is twice as strong as PS4. Due to focus on single spec according to Carmack

 

I guess you missed the part when he said similar spec PC never did he say pc twice as strong as the ps4

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="flashn00b"]

Should I expect the next gen consoles to give PC hardware manufacturers inventive to see if they can't make better hardware while keeping a competitive price in mind?

biggles2120

All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.

Theorically it's the 7870 the one that is supposedly stronger than the PS4, the 7850 is only supposedly stonger than the X1.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
Cyberdot

3928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Cyberdot
Member since 2013 • 3928 Posts

Probably nothing.

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Can I take that to mean any PC using a 7850 can outperform a PS4? So if I have a Core 2 Duo, 2GB of RAM, and a 7850, Watch Dogs will be running better for me than it would have been on a PS4? TheFadeForever

Except PS4 exclusive games will have performance similar to PC hardware that is twice as strong as PS4. Due to focus on single spec according to Carmack

 

I guess you missed the part when he said similar spec PC never did he say pc twice as strong as the ps4

He said double performance with equal hardware Which is the same as equal performance with double hardware...
Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#39 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="biggles2120"] All it takes is a $160.00 video card to surpass what PS4 and X1 can do.Kinthalis

Lmao no

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

The PS4 has a modified 7870.  Modified meaning some downgrades in pure performance, but it's still stronger than the 7850 and is a compute monster thanks to modifications.

Then you factor in the APU setup and console optimization, it's not even close.

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Lmao noChozofication

 

The 7850 is $160 now, so yeah, he's right.

 

The PS4 has a modified 7870.  Modified meaning some downgrades in pure performance, but it's still stronger than the 7850 and is a compute monster thanks to modifications.

Then you factor in the APU setup and console optimization, it's not even close.

Yep and it will be obvious with exclusive games