domo, suwatte kudasai.
I'm curious, over in the PC Hardware section, there are a few trolls who go on about Alienware being great.
If you do the maths, you can usually build something on-par/slightly better for about 80-90% of the cost of an Alienware (including Windows in the custom build). Obviously, you miss out on a few things by building yourself, like telephone support, and return-to-bench warranty repairs. Though if one can build a PC themselves, what do they need such support for?
But I'd suspect that Alienware get discounts on parts beyond what a consumer would when building it themselves. Therefore, perhaps Alienware could sell the machines cheaper, perhaps they could match the price of homebuilt? Perhaps they choose not to, as they like money.
I suspect this Steambox is unlikely to run Windows out of the box, this could save on costs. Also, I suspect that Valve are well aware that many Steam users are not clueless when it comes to building/maintaining PCs. Therefore, there needs to be something particularly attractive about this Steambox system to differentiate it, to add value to it, compared to it's competitors.
The discussion questions:
Is it possible that when Valve's Steambox releases, they use a combination of cheaper operating software, and economies of scale to push the price of their unit to lower than the price of an equivalent homebuilt pc?
Who do you suspect the Steambox's primary competition will be? Consoles? PCs? Apple TV? The Commodore 64? (jokes obviously, the Commodore 64 is peerless)
Do you suspect Valve would make Half-Life 3 either a full exclusive to the Steambox (eg, would not run on Steam in Windows, or just not available to buy)? Or perhaps a timed exclusive?
Could Windows be an option for the Steambox like how Windows is an option for Intel macs with Bootcamp? I guess it would if it's x86-64 based
Log in to comment