http://ps3.ign.com/articles/781/781888p1.html
Wow... thats sad and this isn't comming from a PS3 hater. What do you guys think?
Discuss
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Actually, I think Bomberman: Act Zero scored lower (2.3 on GS, I believe). I'll go take a look...
EDIT: Nope, not a 2.3, but it scored the same as Super Rub-a-Dub (2.9). At least Super Rub-a-Dub costs less, I suppose.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.html?q=Bomberman:%20Act%20Zero&tag=result;title;0
Â
Actually, I think Bomberman: Act Zero scored lower (2.3 on GS, I believe). I'll go take a look...
EDIT: Nope, not a 2.3, but it scored the same as Super Rub-a-Dub (2.9). At least Super Rub-a-Dub costs less, I suppose.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.html?q=Bomberman:%20Act%20Zero&tag=result;title;0
Â
Basinboy
That game (Bomberman) really sucked. It doesn't deserve to exist. I remember just a few days ago IGN was saying that Super Rub a Dub was fun. I found it weird to see it score so low especially considering it was apart of the Sony E3 06 press conference.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/781/781888p1.html
Wow... thats sad and this isn't comming from a PS3 hater. What do you guys think?
DiscussÂ
d_eM_s
Yeah, Super- Rub-A Dub is crap. This should have be a FREE download game for people who register for Sony's online gaming network. I hope people don't waste their money of this crap.
[QUOTE="Basinboy"]Actually, I think Bomberman: Act Zero scored lower (2.3 on GS, I believe). I'll go take a look...
EDIT: Nope, not a 2.3, but it scored the same as Super Rub-a-Dub (2.9). At least Super Rub-a-Dub costs less, I suppose.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.html?q=Bomberman:%20Act%20Zero&tag=result;title;0
Â
d_eM_s
That game (Bomberman) really sucked. It doesn't deserve to exist. I remember just a few days ago IGN was saying that Super Rub a Dub was fun. I found it weird to see it score so low especially considering it was apart of the Sony E3 06 press conference.
Well, Super Rub-a-Dub didn't officially exist at the E306 conference; it was merely a technical demonstration for the Cell processor. So, seeing as it was just a tech demo I'm shocked that they even tried to make into a game. What a wreck...
[QUOTE="d_eM_s"][QUOTE="Basinboy"]Actually, I think Bomberman: Act Zero scored lower (2.3 on GS, I believe). I'll go take a look...
EDIT: Nope, not a 2.3, but it scored the same as Super Rub-a-Dub (2.9). At least Super Rub-a-Dub costs less, I suppose.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.html?q=Bomberman:%20Act%20Zero&tag=result;title;0
Â
Basinboy
That game (Bomberman) really sucked. It doesn't deserve to exist. I remember just a few days ago IGN was saying that Super Rub a Dub was fun. I found it weird to see it score so low especially considering it was apart of the Sony E3 06 press conference.
Well, Super Rub-a-Dub didn't officially exist at the E306 conference; it was merely a technical demonstration for the Cell processor. So, seeing as it was just a tech demo I'm shocked that they even tried to make into a game. What a wreck...
I remember the graphics being WAY better way back when. It seems so horrible looking now. This game isn't meant for consoles maybe this kind of game would've worked better on handhelds. Â
Sorry the winner has already been crowned.
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/doubledungeonstg16/index.html
"But once you do reach the point where a labyrinth is taking longer to finish, it isn't because of clever puzzle design -- it's because the Sixaxis responses absolutely suck."
Â
BUT SIXAXIS IS TEH FUTURE OF GAMIGN!Â
Sorry the winner has already been crowned.
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/doubledungeonstg16/index.html
Bansheesdie
WOW.
But can you really count it considering its just a port of a game that came out more than a decade ago? I think not! But wow that really sucks.Â
[QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]Sorry the winner has already been crowned.
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/doubledungeonstg16/index.html
d_eM_s
WOW.
But can you really count it considering its just a port of a game that came out more than a decade ago? I think not! But wow that really sucks.
Â
WOW.
But can you really count it considering its just a port of a game that came out more than a decade ago? I think not! But wow that really sucks. d_eM_s
The Wii has dozens of sub 3.0 games, but they are almost all VC titles.
[QUOTE="d_eM_s"][QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]Sorry the winner has already been crowned.
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/doubledungeonstg16/index.html
Nike_Air
WOW.
But can you really count it considering its just a port of a game that came out more than a decade ago? I think not! But wow that really sucks.
Â
I do admit I'm wrong just saying can you really count a game that has always suck but was just re-released to bring its suckage to the next generation?Â
[QUOTE="d_eM_s"]http://ps3.ign.com/articles/781/781888p1.html
Wow... thats sad and this isn't comming from a PS3 hater. What do you guys think?
DiscussÂ
blackace
Yeah, Super- Rub-A Dub is crap. This should have be a FREE download game for people who register for Sony's online gaming network. I hope people don't waste their money of this crap.
POOR PS3. And Cows were hyping this game a few months ago. "this game is worth it for the next-gen physics alone" - Bobby_Kitles
[QUOTE="d_eM_s"]WOW.
But can you really count it considering its just a port of a game that came out more than a decade ago? I think not! But wow that really sucks. Bansheesdie
The Wii has dozens of sub 3.0 games, but they are almost all VC titles.
Well, its a good thing we dont have to buy games we dont want . On a slightly related note(but not related to the quote), why are systems bashed for having bad games? its not like you're forced to buy these bad games.Â
"But once you do reach the point where a labyrinth is taking longer to finish, it isn't because of clever puzzle design -- it's because the Sixaxis responses absolutely suck."
Â
BUT SIXAXIS IS TEH FUTURE OF GAMIGN!
ryan_mirow
Â
OMG are you an idiot or what? That's the excact thing everybody says about the wii-mote too, that it isn't responsive enough or way to responsive. It's the developers fault that the sixaxis didn't work properly, and the same goes with the wii-games. You do remmeber what everybody complained about in Red Steel, right?Â
[QUOTE="Basinboy"]Actually, I think Bomberman: Act Zero scored lower (2.3 on GS, I believe). I'll go take a look...
EDIT: Nope, not a 2.3, but it scored the same as Super Rub-a-Dub (2.9). At least Super Rub-a-Dub costs less, I suppose.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.html?q=Bomberman:%20Act%20Zero&tag=result;title;0
Â
d_eM_s
That game (Bomberman) really sucked. It doesn't deserve to exist. I remember just a few days ago IGN was saying that Super Rub a Dub was fun. I found it weird to see it score so low especially considering it was apart of the Sony E3 06 press conference.
Oh really? IGN UK gave it a 3.0 a month ago... nice try.Â
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/781/781888p1.html
Wow... thats sad and this isn't comming from a PS3 hater. What do you guys think?
Discuss
d_eM_s
How is it a "next gen game"? Is MK2 next gen because its available for download too? It was reviewed right here. And yeah, I was looking at the Bomberman review earlier, so if you really consider Rub a Dub a "next gen game" its still neck and neck with Bomberman.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment