What would MGSVPP have scored if Konami and Kojima didn't pay off reviewers?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for urimashkai
Urimashkai

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Urimashkai
Member since 2016 • 12 Posts

Lets be honest, we already know that Konami manipulated reviewers into giving this turd a 10/10 and that there's A LOT of Kojima fanboyism in the industry even though he's by far the most overrated developer on the planet

MGSV Phantom Poo was at the end of the day a life less and boring game which had a lot of content, very little of it actually good.

If it wasn't for Kojima and Konami, this game would of undoubtedly scored in 70'-80's

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

Unless you have proof of kojima and konami paying off reviewers to review MGS PP positively this thread will be locked.Now enjoy the new year and I hope you stop creating new accounts to bandodge.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

Probably the same score range as Mad Max. Never before had I seen a 10-rated game which caused so much vocal disappointment and continues to do so even now. On top of that, the criticism it gets very often comes from long-time fans.