what'be like if microsoft leave the video game industry?

theres one thing no Online/Multiplayer pressure. LOL

I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSni6htmare01

I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSni6htmare01

I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSni6htmare01

same here  

No Halo.
Sloppy online(Nintendo:roll:)
Less competition.

I dont know, I never really have thought about it. 

[QUOTE="ni6htmare01"]I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSAfterShafter

We can both play the fanboy game... ;)

Videogame heaven?
lilrush

'Hell' is more like it. 

[QUOTE="AfterShafter"][QUOTE="ni6htmare01"]I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSmakingmusic476

We can both play the fanboy game... ;)

Ok...no online, no blu-rayu, no push Hd, no sony or nintendo tryin to be innovative...happy now? 

If Microsoft left I forsee the Apples "Iconsole" taking off with completely pure digital downloadable games to a 500gig hdd.

"Madame Tofu must rest now" 

[QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

[QUOTE="AfterShafter"][QUOTE="ni6htmare01"]I will LOVE to see Sega rather than MSkillaj2786

We can both play the fanboy game... ;)

Ok...no online, no blu-rayu, no push Hd, no sony or nintendo tryin to be innovative...happy now? 

If Microsoft left I forsee the Apples "Iconsole" taking off with completely pure digital downloadable games to a 500gig hdd.

"Madame Tofu must rest now"

JackBurton28

For the low low price of $1,200. 

no halo

that it;

I own a 360 btw..

no halo

that it;

I own a 360 btw..

palaric8

no halo

that it;

I own a 360 btw..

palaric8

Wouldn't like that, at all.

They're providing excellent competition, especially this gen. 

Then there will be no Microsoft fanboys anymore oscar530

And thus the end of the trifecta wars leading to the unraveling of the universe as we know it. 

We wouldnt have to put up with rehashes of a generic shooter and floppage RPG's like Blue Dragon thats for sure. Plus people wouldnt be getting milked of their money for maps for their online games and fees to play the games wouldnt exist.

We wouldnt have to put up with rehashes of a generic shooter and floppage RPG's like Blue Dragon thats for sure. Plus people wouldnt be getting milked of their money for maps for their online games and fees to play the games wouldnt exist.

DSgamer64

To be serious, the opposite would be true. Ask a person that PC games....Which OS is easier to play games on out of the box Mac or Windows?  

Less features the PS3 can copy?ReverseCycology

Like the 360 is so original...:roll:

hypocrite.

[QUOTE="DSgamer64"]

We wouldnt have to put up with rehashes of a generic shooter and floppage RPG's like Blue Dragon thats for sure. Plus people wouldnt be getting milked of their money for maps for their online games and fees to play the games wouldnt exist.

JackBurton28

To be serious, the opposite would be true. Ask a person that PC games....Which OS is easier to play games on out of the box Mac or Windows?  

I really wouldnt care whether games were on Mac OS or Windows, Windows is easier to learn and more convinent but its riddled with problems including poor reliability, suseptible to viruses and hackers, plus Windows as a whole is a resource hog compared to Mac OS. I am not saying Mac OS is perfect but its a far better alternative. If Apple really wanted to start becoming a gaming computer company, then they would be getting Nvidia and ATI to start making more video cards for their platform that are cheaper, plus making their motherboards more compatible with other hardware and having a wider selection of upgrade options on a dekstop instead of being so limited to what hardware can be used. Yes I believe that there should be proprietary hardware which will allow for better performance, however a wider variety of parts should be available to choose from.

[QUOTE="JackBurton28"][QUOTE="DSgamer64"]

We wouldnt have to put up with rehashes of a generic shooter and floppage RPG's like Blue Dragon thats for sure. Plus people wouldnt be getting milked of their money for maps for their online games and fees to play the games wouldnt exist.

DSgamer64

To be serious, the opposite would be true. Ask a person that PC games....Which OS is easier to play games on out of the box Mac or Windows?  

I really wouldnt care whether games were on Mac OS or Windows, Windows is easier to learn and more convinent but its riddled with problems including poor reliability, suseptible to viruses and hackers, plus Windows as a whole is a resource hog compared to Mac OS. I am not saying Mac OS is perfect but its a far better alternative. If Apple really wanted to start becoming a gaming computer company, then they would be getting Nvidia and ATI to start making more video cards for their platform that are cheaper, plus making their motherboards more compatible with other hardware and having a wider selection of upgrade options on a dekstop instead of being so limited to what hardware can be used. Yes I believe that there should be proprietary hardware which will allow for better performance, however a wider variety of parts should be available to choose from.

The ONLY reason i still use Windows is because i'm an avid pc gamer with an addiction for RTS.  I stupidly upgraded to Vista, which is now eating up 512 mb of ram when only idling, so now SupCom lags like hell even on the smaller levels, because i only have 2gb of pc3200 ram.  It's sad when the older version of an OS are multiple times better for gaming then the latest version.