I am far from a Halo fanboy, but Halo should be mentioned in there. Halo has phenomenal physics. I'm not saying they are realistic, but the most incredibly random things can happen because of how consistent their physics engine is.
I am far from a Halo fanboy, but Halo should be mentioned in there. Halo has phenomenal physics. I'm not saying they are realistic, but the most incredibly random things can happen because of how consistent their physics engine is.Hahadouken
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]I am far from a Halo fanboy, but Halo should be mentioned in there. Halo has phenomenal physics. I'm not saying they are realistic, but the most incredibly random things can happen because of how consistent their physics engine is.siddhu33
Ok, then Havok gets my vote because of all the other games I've played that used it and impressed me as well (MotorStorm, Half Life, Oblivion, among others). Still, the way Bungie uses the Havok engine is among the best implementations out there. I should have been more clear, or just read the poll more carefully.
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]I am far from a Halo fanboy, but Halo should be mentioned in there. Halo has phenomenal physics. I'm not saying they are realistic, but the most incredibly random things can happen because of how consistent their physics engine is.Hahadouken
Ok, then Havok gets my vote because of all the other games I've played that used it and impressed me as well (MotorStorm, Half Life, Oblivion, among others). Still, the way Bungie uses the Havok engine is among the best implementations out there. I should have been more clear, or just read the poll more carefully. i think half life 2 implemented it much better. but halo was OK i guess.
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]I am far from a Halo fanboy, but Halo should be mentioned in there. Halo has phenomenal physics. I'm not saying they are realistic, but the most incredibly random things can happen because of how consistent their physics engine is.Hahadouken
Ok, then Havok gets my vote because of all the other games I've played that used it and impressed me as well (MotorStorm, Half Life, Oblivion, among others). Still, the way Bungie uses the Havok engine is among the best implementations out there. I should have been more clear, or just read the poll more carefully.
I didn't vote. I'd say Crysis, but it's VERY buggy and very flawed imo. The objects physics are pretty good, but the physics on people is atrocious and Havoks physic engine seems a ton better and I think that's a massive flaw. So I'd sort of be forced to go with Euphoria since it does the human body very well in comparison to any other engine right now. Plus the physics on objects are also pretty good. They may not be as great as Crytek, but they are decent. If GTA4 had destructible environments it would be the Crytek engine very easily imo.
Euphoria is awesome, but Crysis has some pretty great physics too, the animation on euphoria is what makes it so great, the way characters move between being animated and the physics kicking in is brilliant to watch.
Anyone who says otherwise is wrong. It was delivering fully destructible environments back in 2007. No other engine comes close to the capabilities and performance ofCryEngine 2.
I like the Havoc, especially in Halo 3. When playing the custom game type Halo, were the sniper is shooting at you while your in a mongoose, and the gmae takes into consideration shot lead and everything, and then the impact of the bullet on your mongoose, and adds swerve and sometimes makes you flip is something i think is great.
there is only one answer to this....boom blox bash party :P. to its credit it is quite impressive considering the hardware its running on. im going to have to go with crysis though. a little glitchy but very kewl.
Log in to comment