When will the next battlefield 2 come out?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Logan832
Logan832

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Logan832
Member since 2006 • 2168 Posts

In terms of its online greatness?

For a console? Reason I say console because I don't have like $3,000 to dish out for a new computer to play crysis lol...

Im definently not saying that every other online gamewas alot worse or anything. I played and loved these online multiplayer games... Halo 2, Resistance: Fall of Man, Motorstorm,and Warhawk since my Battlefield 2 craze. But Battlefield 2 seemed to have that amazing online multiplayer feel to it, (probably the whole sandbox design and the ability to use jets/heli's n all that good stuff). Warhawk is similar to that style but not as involved.

Id figure id ask in system wars because I would get answers from all three of the major console auidences.

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
there is a battle field 3 comming out.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

there is a battle field 3 comming out.jack_russel

he ment an actual battlefield 3....no a standard shooter with the BF name tacked on.

Avatar image for Logan832
Logan832

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Logan832
Member since 2006 • 2168 Posts
Ya, I know bad company is coming out. But I hear the maps are dramatically reduced in size meaning no need forjets or boats.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

Ya, I know bad company is coming out. But I hear the maps are dramatically reduced in size meaning no need forjets or boats.Logan832

Thats a disgrace ... Bring on Battlefield 3 (PC) please :D

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
basiclly...not until console games can actually 64 player online well....and by that I mean dedicaded servers.
Avatar image for TkLive
TkLive

730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TkLive
Member since 2007 • 730 Posts
Battlefield is a console IP now. Expect to see the real Battlefield 3 on consoles.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

Battlefield is a console IP now. Expect to see the real Battlefield 3 on consoles. TkLive

What BF3?

I dont see any large maps or 64 player online....I see tiny 24 player maps...a standard shooter with the BF name attached....

Im sure the next BF game will be on the PC.

Avatar image for Logan832
Logan832

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Logan832
Member since 2006 • 2168 Posts

A Battlefield 3 with at least 32 player multiplayer support would completely satisfy me for a good 2 years. =p

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
You don't need to shell out 3k for a PC to play Crysis. I got mine for about 1.8k and it can handle WiC in medium settings. But, us telling you would be pretty useless I think. Sure we can give you ideas but all the biases are going to show. Xbox guys will kill you if you don't play Halo 2/3, Sony Fanboys will kill you if you don't say Killzone or Resistance. Browse around a Blockbuster or something.
Avatar image for jt8b2z
jt8b2z

7189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 jt8b2z
Member since 2005 • 7189 Posts

Battlefield is a console IP now. Expect to see the real Battlefield 3 on consoles. TkLive

Lol, yeh, battlefield:bad company.

We're talking about a true battlefield game, i.e. the pc versions where you have more than 24 players and you have HUGE maps with jets, boats e.t.c.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
Ya, I know bad company is coming out. But I hear the maps are dramatically reduced in size meaning no need forjets or boats.Logan832
Actually I heard the maps are huge.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Forgotten Hope 2 comes out later this year... the only thing that made me keep my copy of BF2.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

[QUOTE="Logan832"]Ya, I know bad company is coming out. But I hear the maps are dramatically reduced in size meaning no need forjets or boats.turgore
Actually I heard the maps are huge.

maybe by console standards.....by 24 players simply isnt enough for a BF game.

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

Forgotten Hope 2 comes out later this year... the only thing that made me keep my copy of BF2.foxhound_fox

have you tried Project reality yet?

its like BF but much more realistic and Everybody uses Teamwork.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts

A Battlefield 3 with at least 32 player multiplayer support would completely satisfy me for a good 2 years. =p

Logan832

There is NO battlefield 3 comign out.

Games that seem to have a battlefieldish gameplay to it : BF :Cad Bompany , Wuake Qars , Frontlines : Wuels of Far. MS has a new technology called DonnyBrooks that will allow a huge number of players to play at once (in FPSs) so soon you will see 64 player games pretty often.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
have you tried Project reality yet?

its like BF but much more realistic and Everybody uses Teamwork.

cobrax75


I think I tried it out a while back, I haven't really got into any MP BF2 mods... just SP stuff. FH2 is going to rock my socks, one of the only WWII games worth playing and its free.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
[QUOTE="Logan832"]

A Battlefield 3 with at least 32 player multiplayer support would completely satisfy me for a good 2 years. =p

turgore

There is NO battlefield 3 comign out.

Games that seem to have a battlefieldish gameplay to it : BF :Cad Bompany , Wuake Qars , Frontlines : Wuels of Far. MS has a new technology called DonnyBrooks that will allow a huge number of players to play at once (in FPSs) so soon you will see 64 player games pretty often.

link? somehow is seems like you are making this up.....and Quake wars is 16 players on the Consoles, Bad Company is 24, frontlines is 32 (but clearly made for the 64 players on the PC) so clearly he is looking for something else.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts

[QUOTE="turgore"][QUOTE="Logan832"]Ya, I know bad company is coming out. But I hear the maps are dramatically reduced in size meaning no need forjets or boats.cobrax75

Actually I heard the maps are huge.

maybe by console standards.....by 24 players simply isnt enough for a BF game.

I said maps ...not number of players. But that can mean just in SP.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
[QUOTE="turgore"][QUOTE="Logan832"]

A Battlefield 3 with at least 32 player multiplayer support would completely satisfy me for a good 2 years. =p

cobrax75

There is NO battlefield 3 comign out.

Games that seem to have a battlefieldish gameplay to it : BF :Cad Bompany , Wuake Qars , Frontlines : Wuels of Far. MS has a new technology called DonnyBrooks that will allow a huge number of players to play at once (in FPSs) so soon you will see 64 player games pretty often.

link? somehow is seems like you are making this up.....and Quake wars is 16 players on the Consoles, Bad Company is 24, frontlines is 32 (but clearly made for the 64 players on the PC) so clearly he is looking for something else.

I never said they will use that technology for those games. Sorry for the confusion. Anyway if you wanted a link for a battlefield 3 not coming out ...buddy , you have to give me a link that IT IS comign out. Anyway http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZrMzxOmQtJg that's an interview of the technology.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

you dont need a 3000$ pc for crysis, 4year old pc's will be able to run the game, and i havent played it yet but it seems like it will remember BF2 a bit.

and dont worry EA will probly release a BF3 but they got bashed a lot for releasing bf2142 instead of prorply patching BF2 so i guess they are taking their time to make a solid game this time around, it should be announced next year(i doubt they are droping the PC fan base)

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="turgore"][QUOTE="Logan832"]

A Battlefield 3 with at least 32 player multiplayer support would completely satisfy me for a good 2 years. =p

turgore

There is NO battlefield 3 comign out.

Games that seem to have a battlefieldish gameplay to it : BF :Cad Bompany , Wuake Qars , Frontlines : Wuels of Far. MS has a new technology called DonnyBrooks that will allow a huge number of players to play at once (in FPSs) so soon you will see 64 player games pretty often.

link? somehow is seems like you are making this up.....and Quake wars is 16 players on the Consoles, Bad Company is 24, frontlines is 32 (but clearly made for the 64 players on the PC) so clearly he is looking for something else.

I never said they will use that technology for those games. Sorry for the confusion. Anyway if you wanted a link for a battlefield 3 not coming out ...buddy , you have to give me a link that IT IS comign out. Anyway http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZrMzxOmQtJg that's an interview of the technology.

you mean an MMOFPS? those have exsisted for a while now......

and yes quite certainly BF3 will come....they have made a BF game almost every year now....and I highly doubt that they will stop creating more when its one of the most popular online games out there....the fact that Bad Company is not coming to the PC is most likely a good indictation that they are doing something more-battlefield-esc for the PC.

Avatar image for leejohnson7
leejohnson7

2909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 leejohnson7
Member since 2007 • 2909 Posts
Comparing the PC and console versions of battlefield; one is an unforgetable war simulator that is awesome, and one is like being castrated. Thats if you compare, otherwise battlefield MC is a good game, but... BF2 is something else.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

Battlefield is a console IP now. Expect to see the real Battlefield 3 on consoles. TkLive

lol....owned.